Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Procurement Revision V
Public Procurement Revision V
01. Question
1.1the way of evaluating a bidder in a substantial competitive market for goods procurement
Evaluate a bidder
bidder trustworthiness – substantial responsibility of the bidder /should be very honest and
reliable bidder/to get continues supply
2.documents
1.2 What are the recommendation to increase the fit for purpose under the competitive selection/what
are the methods that can be used to reduced the risk in obtaining fit for purpose under the competitive
selection
02. Question
Selection of a contractor
Contract document
Procurement objectives
03 Question
Under ICB huge cost involving and documentary preparation also very complex and very lengthy
process. So here we should consider cost savings and the level of quality in selecting the method.
If there is no any option or insufficient local market or local market is imperfect, ICB is only option that
can be used for as the method.
Incotrems/transporation/legal issues
2. VFM – any single cents that we spent on purchasing should have a value.without value we should not
spent. Basically we should focussed achieving the objectives and its depend on couple of important
things which are quality and price. Compliance also important.
What are the problems that may arise under ICB under the current crisis?
04 Questions
What are the kind of resistance in our economy to stop the emerging small holder market.
05 Q
06 Q
Consultancy procurement
Terms of references
How to make a good TOR to reduce the risk of not obtaining expected consultant or smotimes your
consultant is not match with your
07 Q
Answers
01
1.1
The most common approach to bidding is to provide the same plans and specs to two
or more contractors (typically three or four on a large project) and ask them for a fixed-
price bid. Each then submits a price and proposal and you select the winner. In most
cases, the owner selects the low bidder, but in some instances you would be wise to
choose another bidder. You might choose one of the middle bids if you believe you will
get better quality, a better schedule and completion date, or perhaps a better overall
experience based on what you learn from talking with references and your gut instincts.
You goal should be to find the lowest bidder that you trust will do the job to your
standards. Remember, the bid price is really just a starting point and the actual cost of
the project will almost always be higher. So saving 1 or 2 percent at the outset by going
with the low bidder can sometimes be false economy. The money is important, but
should not be your sole criteria.
In most things in life, we are willing to pay a little more for a better product or service.
On a big project, you will be working closely with the contractor over a period of months
to turn your vision into a real building. There are no guarantees here, but the promise a
smooth, stress-free project that comes out the way you want it may be work paying a
modest premium for.
As a procuring entity or official, very often we come across such a situation where some of the
bidders do not fully comply to the ‘technical specifications and other requirements’ given in the
bid document. In such a situation, we tend to reject such a bid. Is this right? If the answer is
‘Yes’, then the following viewpoint might be of your interest.
By putting ‘technical specifications’ of equipment and goods (let’s call it ‘product’) in the bid
document, we normally come forward with purchaser’s ‘minimum technical specification’
requirement, which the product should ‘substantially’ meet. We don’t expect bidders to quote
such a product, which ‘meet line-by-line’ to the ‘minimum technical specifications’. There could
be deviation as well which, if accepted may not compromise the normal functioning / usage of
the product.
It is the responsibility of the person evaluating bids to carefully examine/evaluate all the bids
against the technical specifications and other requirements / criteria given in the bid document
and determine bids responsiveness in ‘three categories’ as above. Here comes the fine judgement
by the evaluating officer as to which deviation is to be treated as 'minor / acceptable' and which
is to be treated as 'major / non-acceptable'.
I have come across many cases, where evaluators of bid become so rigid that they overlook the
concept of ‘substantial responsiveness’ of bids. They either declare a bid as Responsive /
Qualified or Non-Responsive / Disqualified. Imagine such a scenario when we look forward to
such a bidder/product, which ‘fully’ meet the requirement. It could be the possibility, in the
wildest assumption, that the ‘specifications and other requirements’ as given in the bid
document, have been ‘tailored’ to suit a particular bidder.
Hope this post shall improve the ‘quality of evaluation of bids’ by practicing procurement
officials and thereby giving fair treatment to all bidders and enhancing competition.
03
International Competitive Bidding: This is one of the most appropriate methods of competitive bidding in
public procurement. The process entails the procurement entity to internationally advertise their requirement
of goods and services. In an internationally acceptable language. The contract is then awarded to the bidder
with the best bids and contract terms.
The procurement entity in such kind of arrangements enjoys a certain amount of freedom in selecting winning
bids for its projects. ICB procedures are normally employed for contracts with estimated values that exceed
thresholds set at the time of procurement plan preparation
It promotes competition between suppliers, resulting in best “value for money” for purchasers and users
It offers a kind of transparency and help avoid corruption and favouritism
It gives all suppliers the opportunity to win the business that is advertised
International Competitive Bidding enables effective competition and gives equal opportunities for businesses to
participate and win in government procurement activities.
This entry was posted in International competitive Bidding and tagged Government Tenders, ICB procedures,
Crisis
Sri Lanka is facing an unprecedented crisis due to economic mismanagement, corruption and an agricultural crisis.
For starters a series of policy miscalculations such as imposing tax cuts took a heavy toll on government revenues. This was
part of a populist agenda that was used to win the 2019 presidential election and the subsequent 2020 parliamentary
elections.
The cuts in taxes led to budget deficits soaring from 5% in 2020 to 15% in 2022. The bad monetary policies has led to
soaring inflation that has triggered unrest and protests as ordinary Sri Lankans are unable to bear the high cost of living.
What’s more the country is on the verge of bankruptcy, as the remaining foreign reserves of US$ 2.3 billion (As of March
2022) is not enough to pay its debts. The national inflation rate increased to 17.5% in February 2022.
Sri Lanka depends heavily on imports to meet its various needs such as petroleum, food, paper, sugar, lentils, medicines,
and transportation equipment, among other essential items.
A lack of foreign currency means the country does not have the money to buy (import) these commodities.
The economic crisis is accompanied by a severe food shortage. There was a rise in food prices that was caused by
depreciation in currency. It forced the government on August 31, 2022 to impose an economic emergency. It gave the
authorities the following powers:
The army was deployed to help better manage food rationing following a series of protests by the local populace.
What were the factors that triggered the Sri Lankan Economic Crisis
Some of the the factors that triggered the economic crisis in Sri Lanka were:
The Covid-19 Pandemic that put the tourism industry on hold. It accounted for 10% of Sri Lanka’s GDP
This led to a dip in the forex reserve (from $7.5 billion in 2019 to $2.8 billion in July 2021).
Dip in other sources of revenue led to high cost in importing of essential items, including food.
A depreciated currency, high dependence on imports and hoarding led to a steep rise in food prices in Sri Lanka.
The Hambantota port was another white elephant project by the present government to shorten its economic woes.
Instead it only further increased the debt problem that Sri Lanka faced as it had taken $1 billion from China.
The ongoing Russo-Ukrainian Conflict also is a factor which is affecting the already precarious economic condition
of Sri Lanka.
The reason is that the both the Sri Lankan tourism relies on arrivals from Russia and Ukraine
Russia is also the second biggest market to Sri Lanka when it comes to tea exports.
Thus, the war in the Ukraine put a serious dent in the path of economic recovery of Sri lanka.
Now how does a food shortage figure into this economic crisis? For that a single agricultural policy is responsible, the detail
of that will be discussed belows:
Marginalization
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in economies in terms of their contribution to
national output,employment and share of firms operating in countries.
In Sri Lanka, they form the backbone of the economy and can be found in all sectors of the economy.The SME
sector in Sri Lanka accounts for 52 percent of the GDP, and 45 percent of the total employment,whilst making
up more than 75 percent of the total number of enterprises in the country.
Question 05