Unit 1 Overview: The World in 1750

By Trevor Getz

To find meaning in the massive political, economic and social

transformations that occurred between 1750 and 1914, we must
understand their starting point: The world in 1750.

1180L
Unit One Overview: The World in 1750
Trevor Getz

In this course, we study change and continuity over time, from about 1750 to today. It’s a shorter period of time
than it sounds. There are sharks alive today that were born before 1750. Our planet is 4.5 billion years old, and our
species is 250,000 years old. The earliest written sources we have for human history are more than 5,000 years
old. So, 270-ish years is a drop in the bucket.

But studying the recent past can be especially useful for understanding change and continuity in a way that makes
it meaningful and usable. By studying patterns – looking at the things that change, for whom they change, and how
they change – we find meaning within the evidence. In this course, we give you lots of evidence about continuity
and change between 1750 and now. We hope you can subject this evidence to your own interpretations, and that
what you find will help you understand the world you live in today and make decisions for the future.

To make this kind of meaning of the past, and to understand continuity and change over the last 27 decades or so,
you have to know where you’re starting. How can you tell what has changed if you don’t have a picture of what
things were like before? So unit one is all about the period in which the course begins, the years around 1750.

We can begin our story of the year 1750 by looking at a narrative – a story about continuity and change – that for a
long time was believed by most historians. The thing about world history is that there are narratives that try to give
us a single, simplified story about the shared past of everyone, everywhere.

In this case of 1750, the narrative most historians believed for a long time was the “Rise of the West”. It was
developed mostly by historians from countries in Europe and North America, also known as the “West”. So, it’s not
surprising that the narrative focuses on the rise of these regions of the world. The story begins by suggesting that
up until about 1750, wealth and power were pretty evenly distributed in several parts of the world, including China,
Europe, and elsewhere. But soon afterward, the story goes, Europe and its overseas colonies in North America
began to dominate the world. This change sped up in the twentieth century, so that the “West” still occupies a
dominant position in world affairs today.

Or does it? This narrative has been around for a while, partly because it has some evidence behind it and partly
because powerful people want to believe it. But it also needs to be tested using evidence. Is this narrative really an
accurate explanation of what has happened over the years since 1750? Or is it the product of a group of Western
historians looking at the past from one perspective, and missing the broader patterns?

A map of the so-called Western World. Careful observers will notice some problems with
calling these places “the West”. By Concus Cretus, CC BY-SA 4.0.
2
Unit One Overview: The World in 1750
Trevor Getz

As you learned in the first lesson, two scholars, Bob Bain and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, have suggested
strategies for us to understand the problems of a narrative like this one.

But it’s just as important for you to actually look at the evidence used in this course. Armed with evidence, you will
be able to support, extend, or critique this narrative by viewing the world in the year 1750 through three frames.
Each of these frames is like a filter through which we can look at the evidence from a unique perspective.

Communities: A world of states and identities

Through a series of articles focused on different regions of the world, we will explore the diversity of human
communities in 1750. We will encounter states, from small chieftaincies to larger kingdoms, confederations, and
sultanates to vast empires. Some people lived in empires that had existed for centuries – the Ottoman Empire in
North Africa and around the Mediterranean and Red Sea, the Mughal Sultanate in South Asia, and the Habsburg
Empire in Europe were particularly old. In China, the Qing Dynasty was relatively new, but it ruled a vast and
ancient state. Meanwhile, the rulers of Russia were fast becoming conquerors of a vast landmass. In the Atlantic,
small European states were busily building large, oceanic empires.

We will see how people in states of all sizes identified as members of religious communities. Large, widespread
religions like Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism spanned many countries, sometimes closely tied to
governments, sometimes not. In some cases, these religious communities appeared in little pockets across many
states. This was particularly true of Judaism. Other people had identities as members of smaller, more local
religious communities. We all have layers of identity that shape how we understand the world and our place in it,
and so did the people of 1750. This course will bring those layers of identity into clearer view.

Production and distribution: Doing business globally

People’s lives were also shaped through their participation in systems of production and distribution in these years.
In 1750, the word economics had not even been invented, but it is the modern theory of economics that gives us
terms like production and distribution. People everywhere had already been making or growing things, processing
them, trading or selling them, and consuming them for some time. We will see how most of what was made or
grown was still produced by families or small groups of people and consumed by them or their neighbors. But there
was also unprecedented trade and commerce. In fact, by this period, there were companies whose reach, for the
first time, spanned the world. These massive companies, like the Dutch East India Company, the British East India
Company, and others, were in many ways the models for the modern multi-national corporation. They made their
investors and directors as wealthy as kings by trading for goods in Asia and Africa and extracting raw materials
from colonies in the Americas. Based in Europe, they are evidence we can use in understanding the so-called “Rise
of the West” in economic terms.

And yet, there is plenty of evidence that, in terms of production and distribution, the “West” was not in the driver’s
seat at this time. Indeed, these companies existed largely because Europeans wanted access to the wealth of Asia.
India was the world’s largest producer of cloth, which was in particularly high demand. Even more desirable were
the fine goods produced by the Qing state of China, the world’s largest economy in 1750. European merchants were
desperate to break into Chinese markets, but the Chinese leadership was not impressed enough by European goods
to start trading.

3
Unit One Overview: The World in 1750
Trevor Getz

Portrait of an East India Company official, likely William Fullerton of Rosemount, who joined the East India
Company’sservice in 1744. He became mayor of Calcutta in 1757. By Dip Chand, circa 1764, Public Domain.

Networks: Connections across and around the world

You will assemble a picture of production and distribution in 1750 by looking at the economies of different regions
of the world as well as some evidence of global patterns. Thinking about patterns gets even more interesting,
because that is what leads us to the vital consideration of networks. The more you look into them, these economic
patterns will start to mirror the networks of ideas, culture, and language that connected people across regions.

Those networks were key to bringing together many different concepts, innovations, and cultural ideas in some
regions at this time. Cities became centers where people and worldviews met and mixed. For example, the creole
cities of the Americas were inhabited by a potent mix of indigenous American, African, and European cultures.
This kind of fusion also occurred wherever there was large-scale migration, in places like Manila in the Philippine
Islands and Cape Town in Africa.

In western Europe, knowledge brought back by merchants and other travelers from many parts of the world created
the conditions for intellectual leaps and political changes – and we’ll jump into that in the next unit. This build-up
again points to a “Rise of the West” narrative, but it is important to remember what some historians of the past left
out of the story: much of the knowledge and many of the ideas came from other parts of the world.

The next three units will all focus on massive transformations – political, economic, and social – that occurred
between 1750 and 1914, and helped shape the modern world. But to evaluate and find meaning in these changes, we
must understand their starting point, in 1750. That starting point is the purpose of this unit.

4
Unit One Overview: The World in 1750
Trevor Getz

Trevor Getz
Trevor Getz is Professor of African and World History at San Francisco State University. He has written or edited eleven
books, including the award-winning graphic history Abina and the Important Men, and co-produced several prize-winning
documentaries. He is also the author of A Primer for Teaching African History, which explores questions about how we should
teach the history of Africa in high school and university classes.

Image credits
Cover: A Senior Merchant of the Dutch East India Company, Ê Jacob Mathieusen and his Wife. Behind them, a Slave Holds a
Pajong. The Dutch East India Company ships ready to sail home, in the background is the City of Batavia., Aelbert Cuyp, c. 1640
- c. 1660. © Sepia Times/Universal Images Group via Getty Images.
A map of the so-called Western World. Careful observers will notice some problems with calling these places “the West”. By Concus
Cretus, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_world_Samuel_P_Huntington.svg
Portrait of an East India Company official, likely William Fullerton of Rosemount, who joined the East India Company’s service in 1744.
He became mayor of Calcutta in 1757. By Dip Chand, circa 1764, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrait_of_
East_India_Company_official.jpg

The Lexile® Framework for Reading

Articles leveled by Newsela have been adjusted along several
dimensions of text complexity including sentence structure,
vocabulary and organization. The number followed by L indicates
the Lexile measure of the article. For more information on Lexile
measures and how they correspond to grade levels: www.lexile.
com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
To learn more about Newsela, visit www.newsela.com/about.
The Lexile® Framework for Reading evaluates reading ability and
text complexity on the same developmental scale. Unlike other
measurement systems, the Lexile Framework determines reading
ability based on actual assessments, rather than generalized
age or grade levels. Recognized as the standard for matching
readers with texts, tens of millions of students worldwide receive
a Lexile measure that helps them find targeted readings from
the more than 100 million articles, books and websites that have
been measured. Lexile measures connect learners of all ages
with resources at the right level of challenge and monitors their
progress toward state and national proficiency standards. More
information about the Lexile® Framework can be found at
www.Lexile.com.