Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 2022
Rezoning case no. RZ22-13: Bryan Independent School District
CASE DESCRIPTION: a request to amend the development standards of a previously-approved

Planned Development – Mixed Use District (PD-M), specifically to allow
for the construction of a Bryan Independent School District-operated
maintenance and transportation facility
LOCATION DESCRIPTION: 95.29 acres of land out of the Zeno Phillips League, A-45, adjoining the
west side of North Harvey Mitchell Parkway between Leonard and West
Villa Maria Roads
EXISTING LAND USE: vacant acreage
APPLICANT(S): Bryan Independent School District
STAFF CONTACT: Katie Williams, AICP, Project Planner
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the proposed rezoning.
Page 1 of 18
AERIAL IMAGERY, 2021:
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Bryan Independent School District (BISD), proposes to amend the existing planned
development land uses and development standards of this 95.29-acre subject tract in order to construct the
new Ruby Haliburton Maintenance and Transportation Facility. The existing transportation facility, located
at southeast corner of Wilkes Street and North Earl Rudder Frontage Road, is scheduled for demolition in
order to allow for the ultimate construction of the new Sadberry Intermediate School.
Over the past three years, BISD has explored a number of sites that could potentially house the new
maintenance and transportation facility. On June 9, 2022, BISD purchased the subject property from the
previous owners, Blinn College District.
A previous proposal was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission during their regular meeting
on August 4, 2022. This proposal was recommended for denial by a vote of six (6) to one (1), with
Commissioners stating that the location of the maintenance and transportation facility did not meet the
Page 2 of 18
intent of the Future Land Use Plan and that there should be a retail component reserved and incorporated
into the proposal. The minutes from this meeting are attached to this report.
Since the August 4, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, City staff has met with BISD
representatives to discuss possible revisions to the development plan that could provide flexibility for use
by the school district or private development in the future. On Tuesday, August 23, staff authored a revised
development regulations document, which incorporated the P&Z recommendations and suggestions that
staff had made to the applicants as far back as October 2021.
On Thursday, August 25, BISD responded to staff with a development exhibit that reflected the four land
use areas, but significantly altered language in the plan. BISD then offered further revisions, which were
received by staff on Friday, August 26. Staff found the plan language inappropriate for several reasons and
determined it unusable for the purposes of a development plan that could ultimately serve as part of the
Bryan Code of Ordinances. As such, staff was unable to support the proposal in its submitted form, which
is the subject of the previous staff report to the Commission dated September 1.
Until late in the day on Thursday, September 1, planning staff worked with BISD to address and revise the
concerns within the submitted development regulations. By 4 p.m. the same day, the development
regulations had been revised to remove impermissible contract language and other concerns regarding
physical development criteria. City staff felt that these regulations could be recommended for approval, and
distributed hard copies to Commissioners during the workshop meeting, which began at 5 p.m. Due to the
timing; staff was not able to provide a full analysis and report regarding the most recent development
regulations, which is the purpose and subject of this subject staff report.
During the September 1 P&Z meeting, following a public hearing where both public testimony and a
presentation by the applicant was heard, the Commission voted to postpone the vote to make a
recommendation on these development regulations until the next regular meeting.
These most recent development regulations substantially reflect the BISD layout and resulting development
plan text from August 23. These regulations expand the original BISD development into four land use areas,
each with a unique list of permitted and conditional uses. The land use areas are summarized as follows:
 Land Use Area I - located at the highly visible corner of North Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM
2818) and Leonard Road (FM 1688), and intended for a variety of uses ranging from high-density
residential to retail.
 Land Use Area II, formally referred to as the Transportation and Logistics District, is intended
primarily for the uses directly associated with housing and maintaining the school district’s fleet of
school buses and other vehicles. This land use area has been relocated away from the property
frontage along North Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818).
 Land Use Area III, previously referred to as the General Office District, is located on the southern
half of the subject property, and similar to Land Use Area I, contains a variety of permitted uses
primarily oriented towards office and auxiliary educational support uses.
 Land Use Area IV contains over 15 acres of conservation area, and is virtually unchanged from the
previous proposal. This conservation area will be maintained in order to provide a natural buffer
and wildlife habitat, and consequently, the permitted uses within this land use area are heavily
restricted. The permitted uses for this area include parks and/or multi-modal trails and outdoor
educational facilities.
Page 3 of 18
Please note that the proposed regulations have yet to be approved by BISD’s Board. While the item
was scheduled for consideration at the Board’s September 6 workshop meeting, no action was taken.
The existing zoning of the subject property is Planned Development – Mixed Use District (PD-M), which
was approved in 2015 in response to Blinn College’s proposed new campus. Prior to any construction,
Blinn and TAMU System leadership determined that RELLIS campus would be the preferred option for
housing new Blinn College programs, thus the subject property has remained vacant.
Property to the north and west is unimproved acreage and is zoned Agricultural – Open District (A-O).
Property to the east, across North Harvey Mitchell Parkway, is zoned a combination of Commercial District
(C-3) and Multiple-Family District (MF) and improved with new construction apartment buildings and a
convenience store. To the south, property is zoned a combination of Industrial District (I) and Residential
– Neighborhood Conservation District (R-NC). Due the location of floodplain, this adjacent property has
remained undeveloped, and nearly 13 acres is owned and maintained by the City of Bryan as part of the
Turkey Creek walking trail.
RELATION TO BLUEPRINT 2040:
The City of Bryan’s Comprehensive Plan, BluePrint 2040, includes policy recommendations related to
the various physical development aspects of the community. The Comprehensive Plan states that it is a
goal of the City to achieve a balance of land uses within the City by achieving a sustainable mix of land
use types in suitable locations, densities and patterns. The subject property is envisioned as being used
for mixed-use development. Areas with this land use designation are intended for an appropriately
planned mixture of non-residential and residential uses. Mixed-use areas are intended to provide
flexibility for the City and the development community in order to encourage innovative, unique, and
sustainable developments. The following are policies to guide mixed-use areas:
 A well thought-out, master planned approach is needed to make certain these development types
are coordinated with surrounding developments.
 Buildings should be placed near the front property line and should be oriented towards the street.
 Mixed-use development should be located at high points of visibility, such as along arterials and
collectors.
 They should serve as a buffer and transition between higher intensity uses and lower density
residential areas.
Staff believes that the proposed PD-M zoning is appropriate on the subject property. Preserving space
for retail and commercial uses immediately adjacent to the roadway while relocating the light industrial
maintenance and transportation use to the interior of the property will create a transition from higher to
lower intensity uses at a point of high visibility.
Page 4 of 18
ANALYSIS:
In making its recommendation regarding a proposed zoning change, the Planning and Zoning Commission
shall consider the following factors.
1. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be appropriate in the immediate area
concerned; relationship to general area and the City as a whole.
Staff believes that the proposed mix of permitted land uses are appropriate uses within the
immediate area concerned and is comfortable with the proposed range of permitted land uses
and development standards at this location. Per BluePrint 2040, mixed-use development should
Page 5 of 18
be located at points of high-visibility and create a buffer or transition between higher and lower
intensity uses.
The proposed development plan accomplishes these goals by locating the most intense uses to the
interior of the subject property and reserving space for retail and commercial buildings that are
oriented towards the street and adjacent to the existing transportation corridors. Therefore, staff
believes that the proposal is appropriate for the subject property according to the land use
policies adopted by the Future Land Use Plan.
2. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing public
schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers, and other utilities to the area and shall note the findings.
Staff finds that there is adequate capacity in the area for extension of public water and sewer
utilities. In accordance with the City’s thoroughfare plan, 80 feet of right-of-way for the Viva
Road extension, a major collector designated roadway, will be dedicated for public use and
connection to North Harvey Mitchell Parkway as part of the platting process.
3. The amount of vacant land currently classified for similar development in the vicinity and elsewhere in
the City, and any special circumstances, which may make a substantial part of such vacant land
unavailable for development.
The current PD-M district zoning on the subject property is functionally obsolete as the proposed
Blinn College Campus development it was created for is no longer moving forward at this
location. Given that the requested arrangement of land uses is somewhat unique, staff believes
that this zone change request, if approved, will not make land classified for similar development
in the vicinity and elsewhere in the City unavailable for development.
4. The recent rate at which land is being developed in the same zoning classification as the request,
particularly in the vicinity of the proposed change.
Staff contends that light industrial and commercial developments are developing at a moderate
pace in this general vicinity and within the various industrial parks located within the City.
Staff observes that within the past few years there has been a general increase in interest for
residential and retail development in the vicinity of the Leonard Road (FM 1688) and North
Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) intersection. Of note is the fact that since 2015, over 1000
lots intended for residential development have been platted within a mile west of the subject tract.
Staff contends that reasonable stewardship of available land that could provide retail service
opportunities for those living in the area is an important function of the planning process.
5. How other areas designated for similar development will be, or are unlikely to be affected if the
proposed amendment is approved, and whether such designation for other areas should be modified
also.
If the proposed PD-M District were approved, staff believes there to be no need to modify the
zoning designation for other areas designated for similar developments.
6. Any other factors affecting health, safety, morals, or general welfare.
Staff is unable to discern factors related to this request that will adversely affect health, safety,
morals, or general welfare. Staff contends that this revised development proposal will allow for a
useful and orderly urban development of this property.
Page 6 of 18
In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall not approve a planned development if it finds that
the proposed planned development does not conform to applicable regulations and standards established by
Section 130-125 of the Zoning Ordinance:
1. Is not compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites, in terms of use, building height, bulk
and scale, setbacks and open spaces, landscaping, drainage, or access and circulation features, within
the standards established by this section.
Staff believes that any proposed amendments involving this 95.29-acre portion of this mixed-use
master-planned development will be compatible with existing and anticipated uses surrounding
this property due to the integrated conservation area and no-development buffers, which are
designed to mitigate against any potential impacts when land uses of different intensities are
adjacent to one another.
2. Potentially creates unfavorable effects or impacts on other existing or permitted uses on abutting sites
that cannot be mitigated by the provisions of this section.
Staff is unable to identify any potentially adverse effects or impacts on other existing or permitted
uses on abutting sites that cannot be mitigated by the provisions of the proposed PD-M District.
3. Adversely affects the safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian circulation in the vicinity,
including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably
anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
Staff contends that the proposed development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience
of vehicular and pedestrian circulation in the vicinity. While new development at this location
will increase the flow of traffic, it is important to note that the subject property is located along
a road designed to accommodate significant amounts of traffic. North Harvey Mitchell Parkway,
a super arterial road on Bryan’s Thoroughfare Plan, and Leonard Road, a minor arterial, can
reasonably be expected to be capable of accommodating traffic loads typically associated with
commercial and light industrial developments. Leonard Road and North Harvey Mitchell
Parkway, which is a signalized intersection, will be the route for buses that need to head north,
and the extension of Viva Road, which will form a right-in right-out intersection with North
Harvey Mitchell Parkway, will serve buses whose routes take them south of the subject property.
4. Adversely affects traffic control or adjacent properties by inappropriate location, lighting, or types of
signs.
The proposed signage for this PD-M District is intended to safely guide drivers throughout and
around the development. The signage will consist of two freestanding signs, wall signage, and
internal directional signage. Staff contends that the proposed development will not adversely
affect traffic control or adjacent properties by inappropriate location, lighting, or types of signs.
5. Fails to reasonably protect persons and property from erosion, flood or water damage, fire, noise, glare,
and similar hazards or impacts.
Based on the required compliance with the proposed development regulations, including the
substantial no-development buffer areas, staff contends that future development on the subject
tract will reasonably protect persons and property from erosion, flood or water damage, fire,
noise, glare, and similar hazards or impacts, in conformance with applicable city ordinances.
Page 7 of 18
6. Will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity, for reasons specifically articulated by the commission.
Staff believes that the proposed master-planned development at this location will neither
adversely affect health, safety, morals, or general welfare nor be materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approving this request to amend a previously-approved Planned Development District.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Excerpt of minutes from the August 4, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting;
2. Excerpt of minutes from the September 1, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting;
3. Proposed Planned Development – Mixed-Use District (PD-M) development regulations;
4. PD-B zoning exhibit;
5. Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by BISD on June 15, 2022 and approved by City of Bryan
engineers on August 9, 2022;
6. Topography map of subject property; and
7. Floodplain map of subject property.
Page 8 of 18
EXCERPT OF MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 4, 2022 PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING:
3. Request for Approval of Zoning Changes - A Public Hearing will be held for each item
(Commission makes recommendation; City Council has final approval).
d. Rezoning RZ22-13: Bryan Independent School District
A request to amend the development standards of a previously-approved Planned Development –
Mixed Use District (PD-M), specifically to allow for the construction of a Bryan Independent
School District-operated maintenance and transportation facility, being 95.29 acres of land out
of the Zeno Phillips League, A-45, adjoining the west side of North Harvey Mitchell Parkway
between Leonard and West Villa Maria Roads in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. (K. Williams)
Ms. Williams presented the staff report (on file in the Development Services Department). Staff
recommends approval of the request.
In response to a question, Ms. Williams stated a traffic impact analysis had been completed and
submitted for review.
The public hearing was opened.
Manny Torres, Architect of Applicant, described the development of the site including the layout
of the site plan, the number of buses that will be housed here, and there will be a berm around the
north and west side of the site.
In response to a question, Warren Lanphier, Agent of the Applicant, stated traffic would not be
impeded and a traffic signal will be installed.
Tyler Green, Engineer of the Applicant, stated there are no current plans for development of the
southeast side of the property.
The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Salvato moved to recommend approval of RZ22-13 to the Bryan City

Council, as requested, and to adopt the written staff report and analysis, as the report,
findings and evaluation of this Commission. Commissioner Bush seconded the motion.
Commissioners discussed that they do not believe this is the best use of land and that the use is
not supported within the Blueprint Plan.
The motion failed with a vote of 6 to 1, with Commissioner Salvato casting the vote of
approval.
Commissioner Boriskie moved to recommend denial of RZ22-13 to the Bryan City Council.
Commissioner Beckendorf seconded the motion.
The motion passed with a vote of 6 to 1, with Commissioner Salvato casting the vote of
opposition.
Page 9 of 18
EXCERPT OF MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 1, 2022 P&Z MEETING:
7. Request for Approval of Zoning Changes - A Public Hearing will be held for each item
(Commission makes recommendation; City Council has final approval).
b. Rezoning RZ22-13: Bryan Independent School District

A request to amend the development standards of a previously-approved Planned Development –
Mixed Use District (PD-M), specifically to allow for the construction of a Bryan Independent
School District-operated maintenance and transportation facility, being 95.29 acres of land out
of the Zeno Phillips League, A-45, adjoining the west side of North Harvey Mitchell Parkway
between Leonard and West Villa Maria Roads in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. (K. Williams)
Mr. Haynes presented the staff report (on file in the Development Services Department). Staff
recommends approval of the request.
The public hearing was opened.
Jason Seymour, 4101 Leonard Road, states the property is a good home for retail opportunities
and concerns for traffic impacts. Mr. Seymour also suggested Bryan Independent School District
to utilize their property located on Mumford Road to home the maintenance and transportation
facility.
Paul Buckner, Bryan Independent School District; Manny Torres and Ron Bailey, Architects of
Applicant; and Tyler Green, Engineer of the Applicant, described that previous feedback had
been studied and alterations have been made to the proposed site. Discussion included that the
traffic impact analysis has been approved by the City of Bryan and accepted by TxDOT, that
developing the southern portion of the property is not viable due to a transmission line running
through the property, floodplain decreasing buildable area, and the approximate 9 million dollars
in additional cost from additional construction and utility extensions costs.
In response to a question, Ron Clary, Bryan Independent School District, stated the traffic impact
analysis highlights two entrances, vehicular circulation around site, staff arrival/departure at
differing times, the varying percentages of the directions the buses leave from the site, and that
there is no adverse effect to the area.
In response to a question, the applicants representatives stated the property on Mumford Road is
not the best property to home a transportation and maintenance facility, Mumford Road is not
constructed to withstand the load from the buses, is narrow, and the flashing yellow light would
be a serious danger to all drivers.
The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Bush moved to postpone taking action on Rezoning RZ22-13 to the Bryan
City Council until September 15, 2022. Commissioner Gonzalez seconded the motion.
Discussion included the proposed industrial use in a high-value corridor, traffic concerns and the
impact on neighboring properties. Commissioners stated they would like to review the
information submitted after the initial staff report was delivered to include the most recent
development plan text, the traffic impact analysis, flood and topographical maps before taking
action.
Page 10 of 18
The motion passed with a vote of 7 to 1, with Commissioner Beckendorf casting the vote of
opposition.
PD-M DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PRESENTED TO P&Z DURING 9/1 WORKSHOP

MEETING:
Exhibit “B”:
Proposed Planned Development – Mixed Use District (PD-M)
Section 1: General Purpose and Description

The intent of this development plan is to guide planning of land use and physical development on the subject
property. This PD-M District development plan shall direct the design, implementation, and growth of a
sustainable auxiliary educational campus environment that meets the needs of the Bryan Independent
School District and the City of Bryan, and allows for orderly and cohesive development within the District.
This development plan is also intended to set forth guidelines, which will promote aesthetic objectives such
as protection of natural features and visual resources, and the use of quality materials to create and maintain
harmony throughout the District and the North Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) corridor.
Section 2: Definitions
When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future; and words used
in the plural number include the singular. Definitions not expressly prescribed herein are to be determined
according to definitions found in the Zoning Ordinance, and failing that, customary usage based on the
latest edition of Merriam-Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.
In this specific context, the term Auxiliary Educational Campus (referred to as Campus herein) shall refer
to the grounds and the buildings situated thereon, which are intended to house facilities that provide support
to students, faculty or staff of a public school district.
Conservation District shall be an identified area which remains undisturbed and in its natural state to
provide a wildlife habitat, open space and to preserve the ecosystem of Turkey Creek and the surrounding
riparian area as well as existing ponds outside of the Turkey Creek system. Walking Trails can be
incorporated into conservation areas where feasible with minimal disturbance. The Conservation District is
further depicted in attached Exhibit A.
Section 3: Land Uses
This District provides for four different planning areas depicted in “Exhibit A”, designed to provide for
an orderly transition of land uses and development standards. Uses permitted in each of these areas are
listed below, any use not identified by these Development Regulations shall be assumed to be prohibited.
Land Use Area I - The land depicted on Exhibit “A” as Land Use Area I is intended to provide a
complementary and context-appropriate combination of residential and commercial opportunities.
The following land uses shall be permitted by right in Land Use Area I:
 Accessory or incidental uses to the main use;

 Accessory structures;
Page 11 of 18
 Branch banks, savings and loans. or credit union offices;
 Child care, Class B and C;
 Essential municipal uses;
 Farmer’s Market;
 Fitness, recreational sports, gym, or athletic club;
 Food Service Uses such as full-service restaurants, cafeterias, and snack bars, including café
seating within a public or private sidewalk area with no obstruction of pedestrian circulation
 Food services and/or restaurants, not including drive-through establishments;
 Hotels;
 Laboratories;
 Medical facilities or clinics;
 Multi- family dwelling unit and / or condominiums;
 Offices for business, professional, and technical uses such as accountants, architects, lawyers,
doctors, public administration etc;
 Parking, structured;
 Retail Sales or Service including personal service shop or custom personal services including
but not limited to: studio or photography studio, laundromats, plant nursery, package liquor
stores, and all incidental uses. Excluded from this category are retail sales and services
establishments intended for the automobile, including motor fuel sales;
 School, public, not including maintenance and transportation facilities;
 Temporary structures for uses incidental to construction work on the premise;
 Theaters— indoor;
 Upper floor residential uses; and
 Veterinary clinic (no outdoor facilities for overnight storage of animals).
Land Use Area II - The land depicted on Exhibit “A” as Land Use Area II is intended to provide
space for development of support facilities for the use of the Bryan Independent School District.
The following land uses shall be permitted by right in Land Use Area II:

 District operations and maintenance, including shops, service vehicles, and associated storage;
 Food preparation and distribution;
 Fueling point (nonpaid for noncommercial use);
 General office use;
 Lawn and Landscape Maintenance (Grounds Building);
 Parking lot (nonpaid for nonresidential use);
 Private recycling center of commercial and light industrial waste including tires, batteries and
motor oil;
 Public Schools;
 School District Transit Garage (Bus Barn);
 Storm water management systems;
 Technology and network operation support;
 Temporary structures for uses incidental to construction work on the premises;
Page 12 of 18
 Vehicle repair and maintenance; and
 Warehouse and storage.
Land Use Area III - The land depicted on Exhibit “A” as Land Use Area III is intended to
provide for a variety of complementary and context-appropriate residential and commercial
opportunities.
The following land uses shall be permitted by right in Land Use Area III:

 Common open space, community center, recreational building, and other facilities or
amenities, provided they are intended for use by the public;
 Farmer’s Market;
 Fitness, recreational sports, gym, or athletic club;
 Food Service Uses such as full-service restaurants, cafeterias, and snack bars, including café
seating within a public or private sidewalk area with no obstruction of pedestrian circulation
 Food services and/or restaurants, not including drive-through establishments;
 Government (federal or state) owned structures, facilities, and uses;
 Health, sports. and athletic training facilities;
 Lawn and Landscape Maintenance (Grounds Building);
 Multifamily dwelling (apartment building, triplex, four-plex), greater than two dwelling units
per structure;
 Offices for business, professional, and technical uses such as accountants, architects, lawyers,
doctors, public administration etc;
 Place of worship;
 School, public;
 Retail Sales or Service including personal service shop or custom personal services including
but not limited to: studio or photography studio, laundromats, plant nursery, package liquor
stores, and all incidental uses;
 School District Transit Garage (Bus Barn);
 Storm water management systems;
 Temporary structures for uses incidental to construction work on the premises; and
The following land uses shall be potentially permitted upon prior approval of a conditional use
permit by the Planning and Zoning Commission in Land Use Area III:
 Detached dwelling units with no more than 4 unrelated persons;

 Live-work unit
 Patio home zero lot line dwelling
 Single family detached dwelling
 Townhouse
Page 13 of 18
Land Use Area IV - The land depicted on Exhibit “A” as Land Use Area IV is a conservation
area intended to remain undisturbed and in its natural state to provide wildlife habitat, open space
and to preserve the ecosystem of Turkey Creek and the surrounding riparian area as well as
existing ponds outside of the Turkey Creek system.
The following land use(s) shall be permitted by right in Land Use Area IV:
 Private or public parks walking paths multimodal trails

 Outdoor educational facilities no greater than 1000 square feet
Section 4: Physical Development

The following standards are intended to guide site and building design in this District in order to create
and maintain a human-scale environment, preserve existing water systems and promote placemaking
through the use of design and construction methods.
This District provides for four different planning areas, depicted in “Exhibit A”, designed to provide for
an orderly transition of land uses and development standards. Development standards for these areas are
further described below:
1. Physical development of office projects in this District shall comply with the development
standards and limitation of the City of Bryan Code of Ordinances that generally apply to properties
zoned Office District (C-1), subject to any modifications specified herein.
2. The following additional physical development standards shall also apply:
a) On all non-residential lots created by means of a subdivision plat in accordance with

Chapter 110 of the Bryan Code of Ordinances, no minimum building setbacks shall be
required from interior lot lines; however, separation requirements mandated by the
applicable building and fire code will still apply.
b) All facades facing and located within 200 feet of the right-of-way or within 100 feet of a
residential zoning district shall be constructed with at least 50 percent of each facade
covered by masonry/brick construction or architectural metal paneling. This regulation
does not include temporary structures for uses incidental to construction work on the
premises, which said buildings shall be removed upon the completion or abandonment of
construction work.
c) Approved Exterior Material List (Limitations subject to paragraphs 2b and 2d)

i. Masonry, including brick, natural stone, cast stone, and concrete masonry units
(CMU).
ii. Corrugated pre-engineered metal building wall and roof panels.
iii. Architectural metal wall and soffit panels.
iv. Black vinyl-coated metal chain-link fencing, with or without slats (screening
required when adjacent to Leonard Road (FM 1688) or North Harvey Mitchell
Parkway (FM 2818)).
v. Black ornamental metal fencing.
Page 14 of 18
d) Screening. Vehicle bays and rolling doors, as well as all materials, products, or equipment
which are stored outside of a fully-enclosed building must be entirely screened from public
view. This includes but is not limited to, outdoor storage, service and equipment areas,
solid waste dumpsters, above-ground fuel storage tanks, campus-use electric vehicles (golf
carts), heating or cooling equipment (located on rooftops or at grade), equipment
loading/unloading areas and bus parking. Such areas shall be completely screened from
parking and pedestrian areas and adjacent properties by a solid visual barrier not less than
six feet in height. Loading and unloading areas for people are not required to be screened,
nor are rooftop exhaust stacks that exceed the six-foot visual barrier requirement. All
required screening, including that provided by landscape materials shall be 100% effective
at the time of installation. Permitted screening methods shall consist of:
i. Approved brick or brick-clad concrete masonry unit (CMU) fence with cast stone
or painted aluminum caps;
ii. Approved evergreen trees, berms or other landscaping, planted such that the items
intended to be screened remain so throughout the year;
iii. Architectural treatments which are compatible with the surrounding building
architecture. The screening of rooftop equipment may include the use of parapet
walls and the encasement of partition screens.
iv. Chain-link fencing with wood, metal, or plastic slats shall not be considered as an
acceptable means of creating a visual barrier. Such materials shall be allowed when
not visible from the Leonard Road (FM 1688), Viva Road or North Harvey
Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) right-of-way.
e) Prior to the recordation of a final plat for this District, 80-feet of right-of-way for the
extension of Viva Road, a major collector, will be dedicated to the City of Bryan in
accordance with the Thoroughfare Plan.
i. At the time of development, and as agreed upon by the City Engineer, only
the pavement width required for the current scale of development shall be
constructed. However, the pavement shall be constructed to City standards and
accepted by the City of Bryan.
f) Internal drives shall be provided and constructed to meet International Fire Code
requirements and constructed of concrete and asphaltic pavement sufficient to
accommodate sanitation services.
g) Installation of public sidewalks shall not be required along Leonard Road (FM 1688) or
North Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818).
h) Detached dwelling units in this district shall conform to standards as specified in the RD-
5 district.
i) Patio home and townhouse dwellings are subject to the supplemental regulations of section
62-167 and section 62-168, respectively.
Page 15 of 18
j) Signage within this District shall be, at a minimum, as listed below. All other sign
regulations of the Bryan Code of Ordinances for properties zoned C-2 District shall apply
unless specifically modified by the following:
i. Freestanding signage:
1. Due to the dimensions of the subject property, two off-premises signs
will be permitted. This is to allow structures and uses to install signage
adjacent to rights-of-way, which will assist with the smooth circulation
of traffic.
2. One freestanding sign at the intersection of North Harvey Mitchell
Parkway (FM 2818) and Leonard Road (FM 1688) with a maximum height
of 25 feet and a maximum area of 200 square feet;
3. One freestanding sign at the Campus entrance on Leonard Road (FM
1688) with a maximum height of eight (8) feet and a maximum area of 80
square feet.
4. Directional signs to be a maximum area of 20 square feet.
ii. Electronic message board:
1. One of the aforementioned signs may incorporate an electronic message
board with a maximum sign area of 80 square feet.
iii. Building/wall signage:
1. Building/wall signage shall be allowed on the exterior walls of each
building, provided the cumulative sign area of all signs on a building shall
not exceed 30 percent of the building façade with the main entrance to that
building.
k) Landscaping shall be provided in order to create and maintain a healthy environment,

provide visual interest, reduce the impact between light industrial, office, and residential
uses on site, obscure the view of parking and storage and provide protection from soil
erosion.
i. Existing trees located within the District at least eight-inches in diameter
measured at DBH (diameter breast height), in good health and not of an invasive
species, shall be assigned a value of 100 square feet per caliper inch, or 800 square
feet, whichever is greater.
1. Any existing trees claimed for landscape credit must be barricaded in
accordance with City standards prior to any construction or earthwork
occurring on site.
l) No physical development shall be permitted within Land Use Area IV except as specified
in Section 3, Land Uses. Existing trees within these Conservation Areas and located
within 50-feet of a public right-of-way may be claimed for landscape credit.
m) Buffers. When any non-residential structure or land-use abuts a residential area, the non-
residential land-use along a mutual side or rear property line or where separated only by
an alley, setbacks shall be greater than the minimum requirements previously set forth in
this District. The purpose of the additional setback is to establish a buffer area to help
mitigate noise, lighting, and other possible adverse impacts. No development shall be
authorized within the buffer area except for required or permitted landscaping and
Page 16 of 18
screening, stormwater detention facilities, and pedestrian walkways. The increased
setbacks, which are measured from the property line, shall be required on the property in
the higher intensity zoning district, and shall be observed at the time of construction.
These buffer requirements are in addition to the screening standards set forth in Section
4.D of this District. No reductions in the buffer area will be allowed.
i. The depth of the side and rear buffer setbacks shall be in accordance with the
following:
1. Fifty feet (50’) when a non-residential land-use abuts any residential land
use.
2. Twenty-five feet (25’) when any multi-family dwelling lot abuts a
detached dwelling unit lot.
Page 17 of 18
PD-M ZONING EXHIBIT:
Page 18 of 18
150 Venture Drive, Suite 100
College Station, Texas 77845
Tel: 979.721.8000
Fax: 979.846.2893
www.quiddity.com
REVIEWED & FILED

July 22, 2022 August 09 2022
Rachel E. Gaddis, EIT
Rachel Gaddis, EIT CITY OF BRYAN
City of Bryan, TX ENGINEERING SERVICES
Re: BISD Transportation & Maintenance RZ22-13

Brazos County, Texas
This is in response to a comment letter dated June 28, 2022 regarding Quiddity Engineering’s (QE)
submittal for BISD M&T Facility Traffic Impact. Comments by City shown below in Black. Review
Comment Responses by Engineer shown below in Blue.
1. Pg 2- Include Right of Way width for each classification of roadway.

a. Addressed- ROW and roadway widths added to the report
2. Pg 2- What is the proposed roadway width?
a. Addressed- ROW and roadway widths added to the report
3. Pg 4- Withincreased subdivision development to the west on Leonard Road, is it safe to assume
that an average of the previous growth rates is an accurate representation of actual growth? Were
the MPO growth rates consulted for this calculation?
a. Coordinated with the MPO to confirm the growth rate was reasonable
4. Bus fleet should utilize Driveway 1 or 2 in order to safely turn left onto FM 2818 instead of utilizing
Driveway 3 and Viva Road. If buses are to head southbound on FM 2818 driveway 3 would b e
acceptable. Any buses turning to go northbound on FM 2818 should utilize the traffic signal at FM
2818 and Leonard Road
a. Trip distribution revised so buses use Driveway 1 and 2 to head north on FM 2818 and
Driveway 3 (viva Road) for southbound
We look forward to your approval of our report. Should you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact me at cwright@quiddity.com or 713-777-5337.
Sincerely,
Colby Wright, PE, PTOE, RSP1
CW/SEK
"K:\01599\01599-0047-00 BISD - New Transportation & Maintenance\Project Management\Deliverables\City Submittals\2022-
07\1.0 - Response Letter 7-15-22.docx"
Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-23290 | Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying Registration No. 10046100
BISD M&T Facility
Traffic Impact Analysis

July 2022
Prepared for:
PBK Architects, Inc.
Prepared by:
Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-23290

6330 West Loop South, Suite 150 Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 777-5337
BISD M&T Facility
Traffic Impact Analysis

July 2022
7/18/2022
Prepared for:
PBK Architects, Inc.
Prepared by:
Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-23290

6330 West Loop South, Suite 150 Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 777-5337
Executive Summary
Quiddity Engineering conducted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed BISD M&T Facility in the
City of Bryan, Texas. Traffic impacts were analyzed for 2021 and 2023 and considered AM and PM peak
period traffic operations.
Site Location and Analysis Area

The BISD M&T Facility is proposed on the southwest corner of FM 2818 and FM 1688 (Leonard Road) in
the City of Bryan, Texas. The proposed development will include the BISD Maintenance and
Transportation Facility and is assumed to be completed in 2023. The purpose of this study is to
determine the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding roadways and
intersections.
Development Description
Transportation Facility and is assumed to be completed in 2023.
Access to the proposed site will be provided by two full access driveways, Driveway 1 and Driveway 2,
on FM 1688 and one full access driveway, Driveway 3, on Viva Road that connects to FM 2818.
Transportation staff and Other Staff are expected to utilize Driveway 1 and Driveway 2. Buses and White
Fleet Vehicles are expected utilize Driveway 2 and Driveway 3. Maintenance Staff is expected to utilize
Driveway 2 and Driveway 3.
Capacity Analysis
Three scenarios were analyzed for AM and PM peak hours as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis: 2021
Existing Conditions, 2023 Background Conditions, and 2023 Projected Conditions.
Access Management
A right turn lane analysis was performed in accordance with Table 2-3 of the Texas Department of
Transportation’s Access Management Manual on FM 1688 at Driveway 1, FM 1688 at Driveway 2, and
FM 2818 at Viva Road. No right turn lanes are warranted or recommended.
A left turn analysis was performed in accordance with Table 3-11: Guide for Left-Turn Lanes on Two-Lane
Highways, in the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual on FM 1688 at Driveway 1 and Driveway 2. Left turn
lanes are warranted and recommended on FM 1688 at Driveway 1.
Traffic impacts to the surrounding roadway are minimal and approval is recommended with the
following recommendations:
1. Install a westbound left turn lane on FM 1688 at Driveway 1 and Driveway 2.
2. Request a variance for minimum driveway spacing for Viva Rd to the existing driveway to
the east on FM 2818.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ i
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Trip Generation and Distribution .................................................................................................................. 4
Capacity Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 6
Access Management ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Summary and Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 10
List of Tables
Table 1 – Trip Generation Volumes .............................................................................................................. 4

Table 2 – TxDOT Traffic Count Database System Growth Rates ................................................................... 4
Table 3 – Level of Service Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions ....................................................... 6
Table 4 – Existing and Background Conditions Capacity Analysis – AM Peak Hour ..................................... 7
Table 5 – Existing and Background Conditions Capacity Analysis – PM Peak Hour...................................... 7
Table 6 – 2023 Projected Conditions Capacity Analysis ............................................................................... 8
Table 7 – 2023 Projected Conditions Right Turn Lane Analysis .................................................................... 9
Table 8 – 2023 Projected Conditions Left Turn Lane Analysis ...................................................................... 9
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Project Location ........................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 2 – Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Introduction
the City of Bryan, Texas, as shown in Figure 1. The proposed development will include the BISD
Maintenance and Transportation Facility and is assumed to be completed in 2023. The purpose of this
study is to determine the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding
roadways and intersections.
Figure 1 – Project Location
Project
Location
1
Existing Conditions
A site visit was conducted to document the existing conditions of the study area roadways and site.
Existing lane assignments and traffic control at the study area intersections can be found in Appendix A.
Roadways
FM 2818 is a is a north-south roadway and is classified as a Super Arterial per the City of Bryan
Thoroughfare Plan. It is an asphalt roadway, 74’ in width, and 320’ of ROW. It has two travel lanes in
each direction, a two-way left turn lane, and a posted speed limit of 55 mph.
FM 1688 (Leonard Road) is an east-west roadway and is classified as a Minor Arterial per the City of
Bryan Thoroughfare Plan. It is an asphalt roadway, 24’ in width and 100’ of ROW. It has one travel lane
in each direction and a posted speed limit of 55 mph.
Viva Road is a proposed roadway to be constructed by BISD. It will be an east-west roadway, 38’ in
width, 80’ of ROW, and is classified as a Major Collector per the City of Bryan Thoroughfare Plan.
Intersections
The intersections included in the study area are:
• FM 2818 at FM 1688
• FM 1688 at (Proposed) Driveway 1
• FM 2818 at (Proposed) Viva Road
• (Proposed) Viva Road at (Proposed) Driveway 3
Site
The existing site is vacant.
Traffic Data
Turning movement counts were taken by CJ Hensch & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, November 30th, 2021.
Data collection included five weekday 13-hour TMC from 6 AM – 7 PM and another 30 min TMC from
5:30-6:00 AM. Two AM and PM Peak Hours of the proposed site were utilized. 5:30-6:30 AM and 8:30-
9:30 AM for the AM Peak Hours and 2:00-3:00 PM and 5:00-6:00 PM for the PM Peak Hours. The AM
and PM Peak Hour Factor (PHF) was determined for each intersection from collected traffic counts. A
PHF of 0.92 was assumed at proposed intersections. Heavy vehicle percentages for each intersection are
determined based on collected traffic data. The heavy vehicle percentage utilized is the percent of
Articulated Trucks, Buses, and Single-Unit Trucks. Heavy vehicle percentages at proposed intersections
were determined by overall heavy vehicle percentage of the adjacent intersection. Due to traffic
patterns returning to normal conditions, no COVID Adjustment Factor was utilized. The existing traffic
volumes can be found in Appendix A and raw traffic count data can be found in Appendix B.
2
Site Characteristics
Transportation Facility and is assumed to be completed in 2023. The proposed site plan is shown in
Figure 2. The full site plan is provided in Appendix F.
Fleet Vehicles are expected utilize Driveway 1, Driveway 2, and Driveway 3. Maintenance Staff is
expected to utilize Driveway 2 and Driveway 3. Future lane assignments and traffic control are shown in
Appendix A.
Figure 2 – Site Plan
3
Trip Generation and Distribution
Table 1 provides a summary of the estimated trips generated for the proposed development provided
by BISD. For the purpose of this study, two sets of AM and PM Peak Hours were analyzed corresponding
with the peak hours of the development. The hourly segments used in this analysis are listed below:
• AM Peak Hours
o 5:30-6:30 AM
o 8:30-9:30 AM
• PM Peak Hours
o 2:00-3:00 PM
o 5:00-6:00 PM
Table 1 – Trip Generation Volumes

24-Hour 5:30-6:30 AM 8:30-9:30 AM 2:00-3:00 PM 5:00-6:00 PM
Trips Size Two-Way
Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Transportation
175 700 150 0 150 0 150 150 150 0 150 0 150 150
Staff
Other staff 15 30 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0
White Fleet
54 216 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0
Vehicles
Maintenance
57 114 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0
Staff
Buses 110 440 0 110 110 110 0 110 0 110 110 110 0 110
Total - 1500 171 125 296 110 150 260 150 146 296 110 150 260
A three percent annual growth rate for background traffic was assumed based on available historical
traffic data and engineering judgment. A summary of available data and annual growth percentage
calculations from TxDOT’s Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) are provided in Table 2. See Appendix
G for MPO Growth Rates coordination.
Table 2 – TxDOT Traffic Count Database System Growth Rates
TxDOT Annual Linear

Location Year
AADT Growth Rate
2016 4,036
2017 4,414 9.4%
FM 1688 West of FM 2818 2018 4,152 -5.9%
2019 4,050 -2.5%
2020 4,575 13.0%
Average 3.5%
Recommended Growth Rate 3.0%
4
Site Access
on FM 1688 and one full access driveway, Driveway 3, on Viva Road. Transportation staff, Maintenance
Staff, and Other Staff are expected to utilize Driveway 1 and Driveway 2. Buses and White Fleet Vehicles
are expected utilize Driveway 1, Driveway 2, and Driveway 3.
The directional distribution of the site generated trips was determined based on existing and expected
travel patterns in the area. Trip origins/destinations for the proposed development are expected to be
30% to/from the north via FM 2818, 30% to/from the south via FM 2818, 30% to/from the east via FM
1688, and 10% to/from the west via FM 1688. Trip Distribution Figures are provided in Appendix A.
Site Generated Volumes and Projected Conditions for 2023 Projected Conditions are provided in
Appendix A.
5
Capacity Analysis
Capacity Analysis was performed using the computer program Synchro 11, which is based on the
procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Capacity Analysis provides information regarding
traffic operations at an intersection and is expressed in terms of the level of service (LOS). The LOS
indicates the average seconds of delay experienced by a motorist at a signalized intersection, at stop
sign controlled approaches and left turn movements at an unsignalized intersection. Intersection LOS
range from A to F, with LOS A representing free flow conditions and LOS F representing highly congested
conditions. An intersection operating at or above LOS D is typically characterized by acceptable delays.
The Level of Service Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions for Signalized and Unsignalized
intersections are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 – Level of Service Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions

Level Unsignalized Signalized
Of Control Delay Per Control Delay Per
Service Description
Vehicle (Sec) Vehicle (Sec)
A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 Good progression and short cycle lengths
Good progression or short cycle lengths, more vehicle
B > 10 and ≤ 15 > 10 and ≤ 20
stops
Fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths, some cycle
C > 15 and ≤ 25 > 20 and ≤ 35
failures
Congestion becomes noticeable, high volume to
D > 25 and ≤ 35 > 35 and ≤ 55
capacity ratio
Limit of acceptable delay, poor progression, long cycles,
E > 35 and ≤ 50 > 55 and ≤ 80
and/or high volume
F > 50 > 80 Unacceptable to drivers, volume greater than capacity
The impact of the proposed development at the study area intersections was analyzed using Capacity
Analysis for the following scenarios and the Synchro 11 capacity analysis reports can be found in
Appendix C-E.
2021 Existing Conditions

• Existing traffic volumes
2023 Background Conditions

• Existing traffic volumes
• 3 percent annual background growth rate for two years
2023 Projected Conditions

• 2023 Background Conditions
• Full build out of the proposed development with site access on FM 1688 and Viva Road with
connection to FM 2818
• Westbound left turn lane on FM 1688 at Driveway 1 and Driveway 2
Tables 4-6 summarize the capacity analysis results for the AM and PM Peak Hours. All signalized
intersections and unsignalized approaches are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS during the
Peak Hours.
6
Table 4 – Existing and Background Conditions Capacity Analysis – AM Peak Hour
5:30-6:30 AM 8:30-9:30 AM
2021 Existing 2023 Background 2021 Existing 2023 Background

Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions
Intersection
Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of

LOS LOS LOS LOS
Delay Delay Delay Delay
FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 13.7 B 14.1 B 15.2 B 15.9

Eas tbound C 29.2 C 30.6 C 25.9 C 26.5
Wes tbound C 29.8 C 30.4 C 32.1 C 32.1
Northbound A 8.8 A 9.1 B 10.5 B 10.8
Southbound A 8.6 A 8.8 B 11.3 B 12.4
*i ndi cates l eft turn LOS
** eva l ua ted as a s i gnal i zed i nters ecti on
Table 5 – Existing and Background Conditions Capacity Analysis – PM Peak Hour

2:00-3:00 PM 5:00-6:00 PM
2021 Existing 2023 Background 2021 Existing 2023 Background

Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions
Intersection

LOS LOS LOS LOS
FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 15.9 B 16.7 C 24.4 C 25.8

Eas tbound C 29.8 C 30.2 C 32.7 C 33.5
Wes tbound C 28.5 C 29.7 D 38.5 D 43.0
Northbound B 12.6 B 13.5 C 23.0 C 24.3
Southbound B 11.8 B 12.4 B 19.2 B 19.8
** eva l ua ted as a s i gnal i zed i nters ecti on
7
Table 6 – 2023 Projected Conditions Capacity Analysis
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
5:30-6:30 AM 8:30-9:30 AM 2:00-3:00 PM 5:00-6:00 PM
Intersection
LOS LOS LOS LOS
FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 18.1 C 20.2 C 21.1 C 31.3

Ea s tbound C 31.7 C 29.6 C 33.9 D 39.9
Wes tbound C 32.2 C 34.8 C 33.6 D 37.9
Northbound B 11.4 B 14.3 B 16.7 C 30.2
Southbound B 13.0 B 15.4 B 16.4 C 27.0
FM 1688 at Driveway 1
Wes tbound A 8.0* A 7.5* A 8.2* A 7.9*
Northbound A 9.3 A 9.9 A 9.8 B 11.5
Wes tbound A 7.5* A 7.7* A 0.0* A 8.1*
Northbound A 9.5 A 11.5 B 10.1 C 15.9
FM 2818 at Viva Road
Ea s tbound A 9.7 A 0.0 B 11.0 A 0.0
Northbound A 8.2* A 9.3* A 0.0* B 12.6*
Viva Road at Driveway 3
Southbound A 8.7 A 0.0 A 8.7 A 0.0
** eva l ua ted a s a s i gnal i zed i nters ecti on
8
Access Management
Right Turn Lane Analysis

Table 2-3 of the Texas Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual provides an
Auxiliary Lane Threshold of 60 vehicles per hour for a right turn lane based on a speed limit less than or
equal to 45 mph and 50 vehicles per hour based on a speed limit greater than 45 mph. Right turn lane
analysis for 2023 Projected Conditions is presented in Table 7.
Table 7 – 2023 Projected Conditions Right Turn Lane Analysis

TxDOT Right-Turn Volume Minimum
Location (Direction) Speed Limit Auxiliary Lane AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume
Threshold 5:30-6:30 8:30-9:30 2:00-3:00 5:00-6:00 Met
55 mph 50 vehicles 8 0 8 0 NO
(Eastbound)
(Eastbound)
FM 2818 at Viva Road
(Southbound)
Left Turn Lane Analysis

Table 3-11: Guide for Left-Turn Lanes on Two-Lane Highways, in the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual
provides recommendations for when left-turn lanes should be considered based on traffic volumes. The
intersections of FM 1688 at Driveway 1 and FM 1688 at Driveway 2 were evaluated in the AM and PM
Peak Hours to determine if a left-turn lane is recommended. Left turn lane analysis for 2023 Projected
Conditions is presented in Table 8.
Table 8 – 2023 Projected Conditions Left Turn Lane Analysis

Projected Projected
Left Turn
Opposing Advancing
Volume % Left Turns
Volume Volume Left Turn
Location (Direction) AM1 (PM1) AM1 (PM1)
AM1 (PM1) AM1 (PM1) Recommended
AM2 (PM2) AM2 (PM2)
AM2 (PM2) AM2 (PM2)
(vehicles)
(vehicles) (vehicles)
FM 1688 at Driveway 1 141 (135) >30 (>30) 180 (244) 208 (289)
YES
(Westbound) 6 (6) <5 (<5) 132 (262) 194 (386)
FM 1688 at Driveway 2 8 (0) <20 (0) 122 (175) 67 (154)
YES
(Westbound) 61 (61) <30 (<20) 143 (273) 196 (388)
Driveway Spacing
Table 2-2 of the TxDOT Access Management Manual provides a minimum State Highway Connection
Spacing (Driveway Spacing) of 425 feet based on speed limits greater than 50 mph. On FM 1688, the
distances between all proposed driveways and from the proposed driveways to the nearest existing
roadways are greater than 425 feet.
On FM 2818, there is an existing driveway approximately 200 feet to the south of Proposed Viva Road.
The existing driveway provides access to the Brazos Club and a variance is recommended since the
driveway spacing is less than 425 feet.
Driveway spacing is shown on the site plan provided in Appendix F.
9
Summary and Recommendations
Capacity Analysis
Three scenarios were analyzed for AM and PM peak hours as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis: 2021
Existing Conditions, 2023 Background Conditions, and 2023 Projected Conditions. All signalized
intersections and unsignalized approaches are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS during the
Peak Hours.
Access Management
A right turn lane analysis was performed in accordance with Table 2-3 of the Texas Department of
10
Appendix
Contents
Appendix A Lane Assignment and Traffic Volumes

Appendix B Traffic Data
Appendix C Capacity Analysis – 2021 Existing Conditions
Appendix D Capacity Analysis – 2023 Background Conditions
Appendix E Capacity Analysis – 2023 Projected Conditions
Appendix F Site Plan
Appendix G Response to Comments
Appendix A
Lane Assignment and Traffic Volumes
BISD MT TIA Existing and Background Lane Assignments
North ^
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
05/27/2022
Quiddity Engineering
BISD MT TIA Future Lane Assignments
North ^
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
D
riv
ew
ay
1
d
oa
Dr
R
ive
va
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
wa
y
2
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA 2021 Existing Conditions
North ^ 5:30-6:30 AM
23 2
4
59
2
26 25 34 9
20 7
13 6
23 8
4
27
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
05/27/2022
North ^ 8:30-9:30 AM
29 4
3
0
10
7
42 42 30 9
59 2
32 4
25 5
4
54
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
05/27/2022
North ^ 2:00-3:00 PM
44 6
5
93
1
43 50 53 19
57 3
44 4
63 7
3
50
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
05/27/2022
North ^ 5:00-6:00 PM
10 3
17 2
5
7
1
81 71 84 80
11 5
89 8 0
95 0
7
82
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
05/27/2022
BISD MT TIA 2023 Background Conditions
North ^ 5:30-6:30 AM
24 5
4
63
3
28 27 36 1
21 8
14 2
24 1
5
29
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
06/01/2022
North ^ 8:30-9:30 AM
31 6
3
6
10
8
45 45 32 4
63 0
34 0
27 8
4
57
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
06/01/2022
North ^ 2:00-3:00 PM
47 9
5
99
1
46 53 56 26
60 5
47 0
67 9
3
53
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
06/01/2022
North ^ 5:00-6:00 PM
10 6
18 8
5
8
1
86 75 89 91
11 6
94 8 7
10 74
87 1
88
16
FM
FM
28
18
88
16
FM
06/01/2022
BISD MT TIA Trip Distribution Percentages of Buses
North ^ Inbound
0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0
30 0
0
0
0
88
16
FM
FM
5 5
5
28
18
0
0
0
0
D
riv 0 0
ew 0 30
0
ay
55
1
d
oa
0
0 Dr
R
0 ive
va
10
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive
0 0
3
3
wa 0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA Trip Distribution Percentages of Buses
North ^ Outbound
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
30 0
3
0
88
16
FM
FM
0
28
0
18
5
0
55
0
D
riv 0 0
ew 0 0
0
ay
0
1
d
oa
5
10 5 Dr
R
0 ive
va
30 0
0 wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
0
wa 30
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA Trip Distribution Percentages of Employees
North ^ Inbound
0
0 0
3 0
0 0
30
30 0
0
0
0
88
16
FM
FM
0
28
90
18
0
0
0
5
D
riv 3
ew 0
0 0 0
0
ay
0
1
d
oa
0
0 Dr
R
5 ive
va
5
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
0
wa
0
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA Trip Distribution Percentages of Employees
North ^ Outbound
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
30 0
3
30
88
16
FM
FM
0
28
0
18
90
5
0
0
D
riv 30 0
ew 0 0
5
ay
0
1
d
oa
0
5 Dr
R
0 ive
va
0
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
0
wa
0
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA Site Generated Volumes
North ^ 5:30-6:30 AM
0
0 2
5 0
0 0
47
52 0
38 8
3
0
88
16
FM
FM
1
8
28
14
18
6
0
69
8
D
riv 4
ew 0
0 5 7
0
ay
8
1
d
oa
6
13 9 Dr
R
8 ive
va
38 0
10 wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
5
wa 38
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 8:30-9:30 AM
0
0 3
3 0
0 0
0
33 0
45 5
4
45
88
16
FM
FM
6 1
6
28
18
13
8 5
0
0
D
riv 45 0
ew 0 33
8
ay
61
1
d
oa
0
8 Dr
R
0 ive
va
11
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive
0 3
3
3
wa 0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 2:00-3:00 PM
0
0 5
4 0
0 0
45
45 0
44 4
4
2
88
16
FM
FM
5
0
28
13
18
12
0
77
8
D
riv 4
ew 0
2 0 5
0
ay
0
1
d
oa
7
14 7 Dr
R
8 ive
va
42 0
8 wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
0
wa 42
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 5:00-6:00 PM
0
0 3
3 0
0 0
0
33 0
45 5
4
45
88
16
FM
FM
6 1
6
28
18
13
8 5
0
0
D
riv 45 0
ew 0 33
8
ay
61
1
d
oa
0
8 Dr
R
0 ive
va
11
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive
0 3
3
3
wa 0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
BISD MT TIA 2023 Projected Conditions
North ^ 5:30-6:30 AM
7 5
4
63 6
3
28 27 36 1
68 8
66 2
62 9
8
29
88
16
FM
FM
14 7
1
6
28
18
6
0
3
17
8
D
riv 37 4
ew 3 5 67
8 9
0
5
ay
1
d
oa
6
13 9 Dr
R
2 ive
va
38 0
11 10 wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
5
wa 38
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 8:30-9:30 AM
6 6
3
10 4
6
8
45 45 32 4
63 0
67 0
93
10 72
2
88
16
FM
FM
6 88
1
28
18
13
8 5
2
13
0
D
riv 65 4
ew 8 33 67
61 35
0
1
ay
1
d
oa
0
8 Dr
R
2 ive
va
13 11
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive
0 3
3
3
wa 0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 2:00-3:00 PM
9 9
5
99 2
1
46 53 56 26
10 5
92 0 5
11 83
55 1
88
16
FM
FM
13 54
5
1
28
18
12
0
6
23
8
D
riv 61 7
ew 4 0 97
0 54
0
1
ay
1
d
oa
7
14 7 Dr
R
7 ive
va
42 0
16 8 wa
Vi
Dr y
ive 3
0
wa 42
0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
North ^ 5:00-6:00 PM
1 6
18 41
5
8
1
8 75 89 91
12 68 11 6
7 7
1 19
13 46
1
2
88
16
FM
FM
6 80
3
28
18
13
8 5
2
26
0
D 11
riv 88 1
ew 33 204
61 27
0
3
ay
1
d
oa
0
8 Dr
R
2 ive
va
26 11
0
wa
Vi
Dr y
ive
0 3
3
3
wa 0
y 0
2
0
0
07/15/2022
Appendix B
Traffic Data
FM 2818 at Leonard Rd - TMC
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Full Length (5:30 AM-6 AM)
All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on
Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates
Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 915994, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
Pasadena, TX, 77503, US
Leg FM 2818 FM 2818 Leonard Rd Leonard Rd
Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int
2021-11-30 5:30AM 6 71 7 0 84 0 3 41 1 0 45 0 13 2 7 0 22 0 10 3 10 0 23 0 174
5:45AM 3 101 6 0 110 0 6 66 2 0 74 0 17 7 6 0 30 1 17 2 12 0 31 0 245
Hourly Total 9 172 13 0 194 0 9 107 3 0 119 0 30 9 13 0 52 1 27 5 22 0 54 0 419
Total 9 172 13 0 194 0 9 107 3 0 119 0 30 9 13 0 52 1 27 5 22 0 54 0 419
% Approach 4.6% 88.7% 6.7% 0% - - 7.6% 89.9% 2.5% 0% - - 57.7% 17.3% 25.0% 0% - - 50.0% 9.3% 40.7% 0% - - -
% Total 2.1% 41.1% 3.1% 0% 46.3% - 2.1% 25.5% 0.7% 0% 28.4% - 7.2% 2.1% 3.1% 0% 12.4% - 6.4% 1.2% 5.3% 0% 12.9% - -
Lights 8 163 13 0 184 - 9 93 3 0 105 - 30 9 13 0 52 - 26 5 22 0 53 - 394
% Lights 88.9% 94.8% 100% 0% 94.8% - 100% 86.9% 100% 0% 88.2% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 96.3% 100% 100% 0% 98.1% - 94.0%
Articulated Trucks 1 4 0 0 5 - 0 8 0 0 8 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 13
% Articulated Trucks 11.1% 2.3% 0% 0% 2.6% - 0% 7.5% 0% 0% 6.7% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 3.1%
Buses and Single-Unit
Trucks 0 5 0 0 5 - 0 6 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1 - 12
% Buses and Single-Unit
Trucks 0% 2.9% 0% 0% 2.6% - 0% 5.6% 0% 0% 5.0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 3.7% 0% 0% 0% 1.9% - 2.9%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0% - - - - - - -
Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 0
% Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - - - - - - -
* Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn
1 of 4
Tue Nov 30, 2021
All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians,
Bicycles on Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 915994, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 343
In: 119 Out: 224
107
3
9
[W] Leonard Rd
[E] Leonard Rd
Out: 17
22
In: 54
5
Total: 69
Total: 85
27
30
In: 52
Out: 31
9
13
1
172
9
13
Out: 147 In: 194

Total: 341
[S] FM 2818
2 of 4
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 915994, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
Leg FM 2818 FM 2818 Leonard Rd Leonard Rd
Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int
2021-11-30 5:30AM 6 71 7 0 84 0 3 41 1 0 45 0 13 2 7 0 22 0 10 3 10 0 23 0 174
5:45AM 3 101 6 0 110 0 6 66 2 0 74 0 17 7 6 0 30 1 17 2 12 0 31 0 245
Total 9 172 13 0 194 0 9 107 3 0 119 0 30 9 13 0 52 1 27 5 22 0 54 0 419
% Approach 4.6% 88.7% 6.7% 0% - - 7.6% 89.9% 2.5% 0% - - 57.7% 17.3% 25.0% 0% - - 50.0% 9.3% 40.7% 0% - - -
% Total 2.1% 41.1% 3.1% 0% 46.3% - 2.1% 25.5% 0.7% 0% 28.4% - 7.2% 2.1% 3.1% 0% 12.4% - 6.4% 1.2% 5.3% 0% 12.9% - -
PHF 0.375 0.426 0.464 - 0.441 - 0.375 0.405 0.375 - 0.402 - 0.441 0.321 0.464 - 0.433 - 0.397 0.417 0.458 - 0.435 - 0.428
Lights 8 163 13 0 184 - 9 93 3 0 105 - 30 9 13 0 52 - 26 5 22 0 53 - 394
% Lights 88.9% 94.8% 100% 0% 94.8% - 100% 86.9% 100% 0% 88.2% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 96.3% 100% 100% 0% 98.1% - 94.0%
% Articulated Trucks 11.1% 2.3% 0% 0% 2.6% - 0% 7.5% 0% 0% 6.7% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 3.1%
Trucks 0 5 0 0 5 - 0 6 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1 - 12
Trucks 0% 2.9% 0% 0% 2.6% - 0% 5.6% 0% 0% 5.0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 3.7% 0% 0% 0% 1.9% - 2.9%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0% - - - - - - -
% Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - - - - - - -
3 of 4
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 915994, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 343
In: 119 Out: 224
107
3
9
[W] Leonard Rd
[E] Leonard Rd
Out: 17
22
In: 54
5
Total: 69
Total: 85
27
30
In: 52
Out: 31
9
13
1
172
9
13
Out: 147 In: 194

Total: 341
[S] FM 2818
4 of 4
FM 2818 at Leonard Road - TMC
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Full Length (6 AM-7 PM)
Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc.
Crosswalk)
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
All Movements
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
Leg FM 2818 Leonard Road FM 2818 Leonard Road
Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int
2021-11-30 6:00AM 2 82 7 0 91 0 9 8 10 0 27 0 9 78 5 0 92 0 5 5 7 0 17 0 227
6:15AM 8 77 9 0 94 0 11 10 22 0 43 0 7 97 6 0 110 0 9 9 11 0 29 0 276
6:30AM 12 158 12 0 182 0 16 13 32 0 61 0 18 159 14 0 191 0 21 17 18 0 56 0 490
6:45AM 10 170 9 0 189 0 31 11 31 0 73 0 18 252 16 0 286 0 25 15 31 0 71 0 619
Hourly Total 32 487 37 0 556 0 67 42 95 0 204 0 52 586 41 0 679 0 60 46 67 0 173 0 1612
7:00AM 17 154 28 0 199 0 19 9 55 0 83 0 23 216 7 0 246 0 28 20 29 0 77 0 605
7:15AM 17 202 29 0 248 0 24 20 59 0 103 0 30 205 11 0 246 0 27 25 33 0 85 0 682
7:30AM 15 245 24 0 284 0 12 18 65 0 95 0 32 180 13 0 225 0 36 22 23 0 81 0 685
7:45AM 18 198 19 0 235 0 17 9 41 0 67 0 36 195 16 0 247 0 26 21 21 0 68 0 617
Hourly Total 67 799 100 0 966 0 72 56 220 0 348 0 121 796 47 0 964 0 117 88 106 0 311 0 2589
8:00AM 12 120 8 0 140 0 18 13 34 0 65 0 36 158 15 0 209 0 13 19 16 0 48 0 462
8:15AM 11 136 12 0 159 0 8 15 29 0 52 0 23 122 13 0 158 0 19 19 17 0 55 0 424
8:30AM 8 115 6 0 129 0 8 5 31 0 44 0 19 85 12 0 116 0 17 5 13 0 35 0 324
8:45AM 9 139 16 0 164 0 9 9 24 0 42 0 23 85 12 0 120 0 10 7 11 0 28 0 354
Hourly Total 40 510 42 0 592 0 43 42 118 0 203 0 101 450 52 0 603 0 59 50 57 0 166 0 1564
9:00AM 5 86 10 0 101 0 9 5 20 0 34 0 14 68 18 0 100 0 19 6 7 0 32 0 267
9:15AM 10 84 10 0 104 0 8 10 25 0 43 0 23 64 17 0 104 0 8 7 14 0 29 0 280
9:30AM 12 95 12 0 119 0 6 11 18 0 35 0 22 86 9 0 117 0 16 13 5 0 34 0 305
9:45AM 6 99 10 0 115 0 7 7 15 0 29 0 16 100 10 0 126 0 17 10 4 0 31 0 301
Hourly Total 33 364 42 0 439 0 30 33 78 0 141 0 75 318 54 0 447 0 60 36 30 0 126 0 1153
10:00AM 5 75 10 0 90 0 7 9 21 0 37 0 23 84 12 0 119 0 12 4 5 0 21 0 267
10:15AM 6 81 3 0 90 0 6 12 14 0 32 0 13 85 14 0 112 0 9 9 8 0 26 0 260
10:30AM 10 101 11 0 122 0 8 11 23 0 42 0 16 93 12 0 121 0 18 14 7 0 39 0 324
10:45AM 16 98 9 0 123 0 11 6 21 0 38 0 25 83 11 0 119 0 12 9 8 0 29 0 309
Hourly Total 37 355 33 0 425 0 32 38 79 0 149 0 77 345 49 0 471 0 51 36 28 0 115 0 1160
11:00AM 10 132 13 0 155 0 8 8 17 0 33 0 19 94 17 0 130 0 20 9 15 0 44 0 362
11:15AM 13 109 13 0 135 0 10 12 27 0 49 0 28 102 16 0 146 0 11 9 9 0 29 0 359
11:30AM 6 108 9 0 123 0 10 8 21 0 39 0 28 131 9 0 168 0 15 21 6 0 42 0 372
11:45AM 13 136 5 0 154 0 8 12 23 0 43 0 25 126 18 0 169 0 17 9 12 0 38 0 404
Hourly Total 42 485 40 0 567 0 36 40 88 0 164 0 100 453 60 0 613 0 63 48 42 0 153 0 1497
12:00PM 10 178 16 0 204 0 15 10 33 0 58 0 24 137 17 0 178 0 11 17 14 0 42 0 482
12:15PM 9 129 7 0 145 0 15 11 29 0 55 0 31 149 14 0 194 0 23 16 3 0 42 0 436
12:30PM 7 122 11 0 140 0 12 15 25 0 52 0 31 122 11 0 164 0 15 9 16 0 40 0 396
12:45PM 12 119 11 0 142 0 6 19 23 0 48 0 29 126 21 0 176 0 15 13 14 0 42 0 408
Hourly Total 38 548 45 0 631 0 48 55 110 0 213 0 115 534 63 0 712 0 64 55 47 0 166 0 1722
1:00PM 18 136 17 0 171 0 4 12 28 0 44 0 29 129 16 0 174 0 10 9 13 0 32 0 421
1:15PM 11 115 12 0 138 0 9 12 28 0 49 0 23 140 15 0 178 0 20 11 6 0 37 0 402
1:30PM 11 110 12 0 133 0 12 13 29 0 54 0 27 137 9 0 173 0 25 10 15 0 50 0 410
1:45PM 10 124 10 0 144 0 11 12 19 0 42 0 24 143 13 0 180 0 14 10 17 0 41 0 407
Hourly Total 50 485 51 0 586 0 36 49 104 0 189 0 103 549 53 0 705 0 69 40 51 0 160 0 1640
2:00PM 13 128 12 0 153 0 10 12 27 0 49 0 22 130 15 0 167 0 7 19 8 0 34 0 403
2:15PM 6 104 10 0 120 0 12 11 19 0 42 0 35 131 16 0 182 0 11 12 9 0 32 0 376
2:30PM 16 108 13 0 137 0 13 13 29 0 55 0 30 121 16 0 167 0 13 11 12 0 36 0 395
2:45PM 9 94 15 0 118 0 21 8 18 0 47 0 32 151 10 0 193 0 19 21 8 0 48 0 406
Hourly Total 44 434 50 0 528 0 56 44 93 0 193 0 119 533 57 0 709 0 50 63 37 0 150 0 1580
3:00PM 11 161 11 0 183 0 9 9 27 0 45 0 28 160 19 0 207 0 20 15 14 0 49 0 484
3:15PM 9 145 11 0 165 0 14 26 25 0 65 0 36 160 19 0 215 0 24 13 16 0 53 0 498
3:30PM 16 158 19 0 193 0 15 19 32 0 66 0 33 189 20 0 242 0 32 15 9 0 56 0 557
3:45PM 13 192 26 0 231 0 15 14 35 0 64 0 44 206 22 0 272 0 17 25 13 0 55 0 622
Hourly Total 49 656 67 0 772 0 53 68 119 0 240 0 141 715 80 0 936 0 93 68 52 0 213 0 2161
4:00PM 22 203 37 0 262 0 7 12 35 0 54 0 30 178 12 0 220 0 24 7 17 0 48 0 584
4:15PM 15 170 15 0 200 0 12 9 37 0 58 0 36 147 26 1 210 0 22 10 11 0 43 0 511
4:30PM 20 199 19 0 238 0 9 12 39 0 60 0 31 186 27 0 244 0 23 8 26 0 57 0 599
4:45PM 23 166 17 0 206 0 11 20 41 0 72 0 57 180 31 0 268 0 22 17 18 0 57 0 603
Hourly Total 80 738 88 0 906 0 39 53 152 0 244 0 154 691 96 1 942 0 91 42 72 0 205 0 2297
5:00PM 28 236 16 0 280 0 18 29 37 0 84 0 49 230 23 0 302 0 18 22 27 0 67 0 733
5:15PM 13 204 25 0 242 0 12 17 54 0 83 0 55 242 31 0 328 0 25 28 14 0 67 0 720
5:30PM 25 198 19 0 242 0 9 29 53 0 91 0 40 190 21 0 251 0 21 27 16 0 64 0 648
1 of 9
5:45PM 23 180 11 0 214 0 14 27 33 0 74 0 36 183 35 0 254 0 18 18 13 0 49 0 591
Hourly Total 89 818 71 0 978 0 53 102 177 0 332 0 180 845 110 0 1135 0 82 95 70 0 247 0 2692
6:00PM 23 152 12 0 187 0 7 19 43 0 69 0 43 149 17 3 212 0 18 20 7 0 45 0 513
6:15PM 15 122 8 0 145 0 6 15 41 0 62 0 43 140 14 0 197 0 9 16 4 0 29 0 433
6:30PM 6 128 10 0 144 0 4 11 27 0 42 0 30 135 15 0 180 0 8 9 8 0 25 0 391
6:45PM 16 126 11 0 153 0 7 11 21 0 39 0 29 108 21 0 158 0 9 11 13 0 33 0 383
Hourly Total 60 528 41 0 629 0 24 56 132 0 212 0 145 532 67 3 747 0 44 56 32 0 132 0 1720
Total 661 7207 707 0 8575 0 589 678 1565 0 2832 0 1483 7347 829 4 9663 0 903 723 691 0 2317 0 23387
% Approach 7.7% 84.0% 8.2% 0% - - 20.8% 23.9% 55.3% 0% - - 15.3% 76.0% 8.6% 0% - - 39.0% 31.2% 29.8% 0% - - -
% Total 2.8% 30.8% 3.0% 0% 36.7% - 2.5% 2.9% 6.7% 0% 12.1% - 6.3% 31.4% 3.5% 0% 41.3% - 3.9% 3.1% 3.0% 0% 9.9% - -
Lights 608 6735 665 0 8008 - 542 652 1521 0 2715 - 1418 6863 801 4 9086 - 873 698 625 0 2196 - 22005
% Lights 92.0% 93.5% 94.1% 0% 93.4% - 92.0% 96.2% 97.2% 0% 95.9% - 95.6% 93.4% 96.6% 100% 94.0% - 96.7% 96.5% 90.4% 0% 94.8% - 94.1%
% Articulated Trucks 2.0% 2.2% 2.1% 0% 2.1% - 2.9% 0.9% 0.5% 0% 1.1% - 0.9% 2.1% 1.1% 0% 1.8% - 0.6% 0.8% 2.0% 0% 1.1% - 1.8%
Trucks 40 317 27 0 384 - 30 20 36 0 86 - 52 332 19 0 403 - 25 19 52 0 96 - 969
Trucks 6.1% 4.4% 3.8% 0% 4.5% - 5.1% 2.9% 2.3% 0% 3.0% - 3.5% 4.5% 2.3% 0% 4.2% - 2.8% 2.6% 7.5% 0% 4.1% - 4.1%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
% Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Full Length (6 AM-7 PM)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 17202
In: 8575 Out: 8627
7207
661
707
[W] Leonard Road
[E] Leonard Road

In: 2317 Out: 2168
589
Out: 2913 In: 2832

678
Total: 4485
Total: 5745
1565
691
723
903
829
7347
1483
4
Out: 9679 In: 9663

Total: 19342
[S] FM 2818
3 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
AM Peak (6:45 AM - 7:45 AM)
Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
2021-11-30 6:45AM 10 170 9 0 189 0 31 11 31 0 73 0 18 252 16 0 286 0 25 15 31 0 71 0 619
7:00AM 17 154 28 0 199 0 19 9 55 0 83 0 23 216 7 0 246 0 28 20 29 0 77 0 605
7:15AM 17 202 29 0 248 0 24 20 59 0 103 0 30 205 11 0 246 0 27 25 33 0 85 0 682
7:30AM 15 245 24 0 284 0 12 18 65 0 95 0 32 180 13 0 225 0 36 22 23 0 81 0 685
Total 59 771 90 0 920 0 86 58 210 0 354 0 103 853 47 0 1003 0 116 82 116 0 314 0 2591
% Approach 6.4% 83.8% 9.8% 0% - - 24.3% 16.4% 59.3% 0% - - 10.3% 85.0% 4.7% 0% - - 36.9% 26.1% 36.9% 0% - - -
% Total 2.3% 29.8% 3.5% 0% 35.5% - 3.3% 2.2% 8.1% 0% 13.7% - 4.0% 32.9% 1.8% 0% 38.7% - 4.5% 3.2% 4.5% 0% 12.1% - -
PHF 0.868 0.787 0.776 - 0.810 - 0.694 0.725 0.808 - 0.859 - 0.805 0.846 0.734 - 0.877 - 0.806 0.820 0.879 - 0.924 - 0.946
Lights 54 718 82 0 854 - 82 51 204 0 337 - 97 808 45 0 950 - 105 79 111 0 295 - 2436
% Lights 91.5% 93.1% 91.1% 0% 92.8% - 95.3% 87.9% 97.1% 0% 95.2% - 94.2% 94.7% 95.7% 0% 94.7% - 90.5% 96.3% 95.7% 0% 93.9% - 94.0%
% Articulated Trucks 1.7% 1.6% 2.2% 0% 1.6% - 0% 3.4% 1.0% 0% 1.1% - 0% 0.9% 2.1% 0% 0.9% - 0.9% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% - 1.1%
Trucks 4 41 6 0 51 - 4 5 4 0 13 - 6 37 1 0 44 - 10 3 5 0 18 - 126
Trucks 6.8% 5.3% 6.7% 0% 5.5% - 4.7% 8.6% 1.9% 0% 3.7% - 5.8% 4.3% 2.1% 0% 4.4% - 8.6% 3.7% 4.3% 0% 5.7% - 4.9%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
AM Peak (6:45 AM - 7:45 AM)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 1975
In: 920 Out: 1055
771
59
90
[W] Leonard Road
[E] Leonard Road

Out: 164
86
In: 354
58
Total: 478
Total: 629
210
116
In: 314
Out: 275
82
116
853
103
47
Out: 1097 In: 1003

Total: 2100
[S] FM 2818
5 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Midday Peak (12 PM - 1 PM)
Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
2021-11-30 12:00PM 10 178 16 0 204 0 15 10 33 0 58 0 24 137 17 0 178 0 11 17 14 0 42 0 482
12:15PM 9 129 7 0 145 0 15 11 29 0 55 0 31 149 14 0 194 0 23 16 3 0 42 0 436
12:30PM 7 122 11 0 140 0 12 15 25 0 52 0 31 122 11 0 164 0 15 9 16 0 40 0 396
12:45PM 12 119 11 0 142 0 6 19 23 0 48 0 29 126 21 0 176 0 15 13 14 0 42 0 408
Total 38 548 45 0 631 0 48 55 110 0 213 0 115 534 63 0 712 0 64 55 47 0 166 0 1722
% Approach 6.0% 86.8% 7.1% 0% - - 22.5% 25.8% 51.6% 0% - - 16.2% 75.0% 8.8% 0% - - 38.6% 33.1% 28.3% 0% - - -
% Total 2.2% 31.8% 2.6% 0% 36.6% - 2.8% 3.2% 6.4% 0% 12.4% - 6.7% 31.0% 3.7% 0% 41.3% - 3.7% 3.2% 2.7% 0% 9.6% - -
PHF 0.792 0.770 0.703 - 0.773 - 0.800 0.724 0.833 - 0.918 - 0.927 0.896 0.750 - 0.918 - 0.696 0.809 0.734 - 0.988 - 0.893
Lights 34 507 43 0 584 - 43 53 107 0 203 - 109 503 63 0 675 - 62 52 40 0 154 - 1616
% Lights 89.5% 92.5% 95.6% 0% 92.6% - 89.6% 96.4% 97.3% 0% 95.3% - 94.8% 94.2% 100% 0% 94.8% - 96.9% 94.5% 85.1% 0% 92.8% - 93.8%
% Articulated Trucks 0% 3.1% 2.2% 0% 2.9% - 0% 1.8% 0.9% 0% 0.9% - 1.7% 1.7% 0% 0% 1.5% - 1.6% 3.6% 4.3% 0% 3.0% - 2.1%
Trucks 4 24 1 0 29 - 5 1 2 0 8 - 4 22 0 0 26 - 1 1 5 0 7 - 70
Trucks 10.5% 4.4% 2.2% 0% 4.6% - 10.4% 1.8% 1.8% 0% 3.8% - 3.5% 4.1% 0% 0% 3.7% - 1.6% 1.8% 10.6% 0% 4.2% - 4.1%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
Midday Peak (12 PM - 1 PM)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 1260
In: 631 Out: 629
548
38
45
[W] Leonard Road
[E] Leonard Road

Out: 156
48
In: 213
55
Total: 322
Total: 428
110
47
In: 166
Out: 215
55
64
534
115
63
Out: 722 In: 712

Total: 1434
[S] FM 2818
7 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour
Crosswalk)
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
2021-11-30 4:45PM 23 166 17 0 206 0 11 20 41 0 72 0 57 180 31 0 268 0 22 17 18 0 57 0 603
5:00PM 28 236 16 0 280 0 18 29 37 0 84 0 49 230 23 0 302 0 18 22 27 0 67 0 733
5:15PM 13 204 25 0 242 0 12 17 54 0 83 0 55 242 31 0 328 0 25 28 14 0 67 0 720
5:30PM 25 198 19 0 242 0 9 29 53 0 91 0 40 190 21 0 251 0 21 27 16 0 64 0 648
Total 89 804 77 0 970 0 50 95 185 0 330 0 201 842 106 0 1149 0 86 94 75 0 255 0 2704
% Approach 9.2% 82.9% 7.9% 0% - - 15.2% 28.8% 56.1% 0% - - 17.5% 73.3% 9.2% 0% - - 33.7% 36.9% 29.4% 0% - - -
% Total 3.3% 29.7% 2.8% 0% 35.9% - 1.8% 3.5% 6.8% 0% 12.2% - 7.4% 31.1% 3.9% 0% 42.5% - 3.2% 3.5% 2.8% 0% 9.4% - -
PHF 0.795 0.852 0.770 - 0.866 - 0.694 0.819 0.856 - 0.907 - 0.882 0.870 0.855 - 0.876 - 0.860 0.839 0.694 - 0.951 - 0.922
Lights 88 786 73 0 947 - 45 94 183 0 322 - 194 809 106 0 1109 - 85 92 70 0 247 - 2625
% Lights 98.9% 97.8% 94.8% 0% 97.6% - 90.0% 98.9% 98.9% 0% 97.6% - 96.5% 96.1% 100% 0% 96.5% - 98.8% 97.9% 93.3% 0% 96.9% - 97.1%
% Articulated Trucks 0% 0.7% 3.9% 0% 0.9% - 2.0% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% - 0% 1.3% 0% 0% 1.0% - 1.2% 0% 0% 0% 0.4% - 0.8%
Trucks 1 12 1 0 14 - 4 1 2 0 7 - 7 22 0 0 29 - 0 2 5 0 7 - 57
Trucks 1.1% 1.5% 1.3% 0% 1.4% - 8.0% 1.1% 1.1% 0% 2.1% - 3.5% 2.6% 0% 0% 2.5% - 0% 2.1% 6.7% 0% 2.7% - 2.1%
Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0
% Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8 of 9
Tue Nov 30, 2021
PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour
Inc.
All Movements
5215 Sycamore Ave.,
ID: 905553, Location: 30.644018, -96.388405
[N] FM 2818
Total: 1937
In: 970 Out: 967
804
89
77
[W] Leonard Road
[E] Leonard Road

Out: 290
50
In: 330
95
Total: 545
Total: 702
185
75
In: 255
Out: 372
94
86
106
842
201
Out: 1075 In: 1149

Total: 2224
[S] FM 2818
9 of 9
Appendix C
Capacity Analysis – 2021 Existing Conditions
1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:30-6:30 AM
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 48 23 27 59 23 42 20 347 29 25 266 13
Future Volume (vph) 48 23 27 59 23 42 20 347 29 25 266 13
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1647 0 1703 1619 0 1703 3365 0 1703 3382 0
Flt Permitted 0.574 0.469
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1647 0 1792 1619 0 1029 3365 0 841 3382 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 44 11 7
Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 52 0 61 68 0 21 391 0 26 291 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Total Split (s) 13.0 25.0 14.0 26.0 11.0 30.0 11.0 30.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 9.1 7.2 8.0 7.2 54.0 54.0 53.3 54.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.68
v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.34 0.37 0.03 0.17 0.04 0.13
Control Delay 34.9 23.7 38.3 22.1 11.1 8.7 10.5 8.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.9 23.7 38.3 22.1 11.1 8.7 10.5 8.5
LOS C C D C B A B A
Approach Delay 29.2 29.8 8.8 8.6
Approach LOS C C A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 11 29 11 3 34 4 25
Internal Link Dist (ft) 395 425 603 462
Turn Bay Length (ft) 270 100 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 222 442 211 467 737 2275 632 2293
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.12 0.29 0.15 0.03 0.17 0.04 0.13
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 80
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.37
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: FM 2818 & FM 1688
06/01/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Quiddity Engineering Page 1
1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 8:30-9:30 AM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1610 0 1703 1647 0 1703 3300 0 1703 3372 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1610 0 1792 1647 0 860 3300 0 812 3372 0
Total Split (s) 11.0 24.0 14.0 27.0 12.0 31.0 11.0 30.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 7.3 10.7 9.8 48.5 48.5 47.6 48.5
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.44 0.28 0.10 0.20 0.08 0.23
Control Delay 33.9 21.3 38.4 21.9 13.3 10.1 12.3 11.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.9 21.3 38.4 21.9 13.3 10.1 12.3 11.2
LOS C C D C B B B B
Approach Delay 25.9 32.1 10.5 11.3
Approach LOS C C B B
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.19 0.41 0.13 0.10 0.20 0.08 0.23
Cycle Length: 80

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 2:00-3:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1674 0 1703 1642 0 1703 3314 0 1703 3358 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1674 0 1792 1642 0 825 3314 0 502 3358 0
Total Split (s) 9.6 23.0 12.0 25.4 10.2 34.0 11.0 34.8
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 9.6 9.3 11.0 10.9 47.7 47.7 46.0 46.9
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.52 0.41 0.39 0.11 0.36 0.14 0.26
Control Delay 32.4 28.9 37.0 20.7 14.1 12.4 12.7 11.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.4 28.9 37.0 20.7 14.1 12.4 12.7 11.7
LOS C C D C B B B B
Approach Delay 29.8 28.5 12.6 11.8
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.40 0.23 0.11 0.36 0.14 0.26
Cycle Length: 80

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:00-6:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1667 0 1703 1701 0 1703 3317 0 1703 3355 0
Flt Permitted 0.678 0.678 0.260 0.132
Satd. Flow (perm) 1215 1667 0 1215 1701 0 466 3317 0 237 3355 0
Total Split (s) 10.4 22.6 13.0 25.2 10.0 34.8 9.6 34.4
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 12.7 12.2 14.4 14.4 36.6 36.6 37.8 37.8
v/c Ratio 0.31 0.65 0.71 0.51 0.40 0.73 0.33 0.62
Control Delay 32.5 32.9 45.9 30.0 25.5 22.7 18.5 19.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.5 32.9 45.9 30.0 25.5 22.7 18.5 19.3
LOS C C D C C C B B
Approach Delay 32.7 38.5 23.0 19.2
Approach LOS C D C B
Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 122 150 116 75 #380 53 294
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.46 0.71 0.37 0.40 0.73 0.33 0.62
Cycle Length: 80
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1% ICU Level of Service C
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Appendix D
Capacity Analysis – 2023 Background Conditions
1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:30-6:30 AM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1645 0 1703 1617 0 1703 3365 0 1703 3382 0
Flt Permitted 0.000 0.000 0.564 0.457
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1645 0 0 1617 0 1011 3365 0 819 3382 0
Total Split (s) 13.0 25.0 14.0 26.0 11.0 30.0 11.0 30.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 7.9 7.3 8.0 7.6 53.5 53.5 52.8 53.7
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.31 0.39 0.37 0.03 0.18 0.05 0.14
Control Delay 37.9 23.5 40.0 21.6 11.3 9.0 10.6 8.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.9 23.5 40.0 21.6 11.3 9.0 10.6 8.6
LOS D C D C B A B A
Approach Delay 30.6 30.4 9.1 8.8
Approach LOS C C A A
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.12 0.33 0.15 0.03 0.18 0.05 0.14
Cycle Length: 80

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 8:30-9:30 AM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1610 0 1703 1647 0 1703 3300 0 1703 3372 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1610 0 1792 1647 0 837 3300 0 776 3372 0
Total Split (s) 10.0 24.0 14.0 28.0 12.0 30.0 12.0 30.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 8.7 7.4 10.8 9.9 48.3 48.3 45.0 45.9
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.43 0.46 0.30 0.11 0.21 0.09 0.26
Control Delay 35.4 21.3 38.8 21.7 13.6 10.4 13.0 12.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.4 21.3 38.8 21.7 13.6 10.4 13.0 12.4
LOS D C D C B B B B
Approach Delay 26.5 32.1 10.8 12.4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.20 0.43 0.14 0.11 0.21 0.09 0.26
Cycle Length: 80

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 2:00-3:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1674 0 1703 1644 0 1703 3314 0 1703 3358 0
Flt Permitted 0.784 0.784 0.446 0.252
Satd. Flow (perm) 1405 1674 0 1405 1644 0 799 3314 0 452 3358 0
Total Split (s) 9.6 23.0 12.0 25.4 10.3 34.0 11.0 34.7
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 9.6 11.2 11.1 44.4 44.4 43.6 43.6
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.54 0.48 0.41 0.13 0.40 0.16 0.30
Control Delay 32.7 29.5 39.3 20.6 14.7 13.4 13.3 12.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.7 29.5 39.3 20.6 14.7 13.4 13.3 12.4
LOS C C D C B B B B
Approach Delay 30.2 29.7 13.5 12.4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.31 0.47 0.24 0.13 0.40 0.16 0.30
Cycle Length: 80

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:00-6:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1667 0 1703 1701 0 1703 3317 0 1703 3355 0
Flt Permitted 0.645 0.580 0.231 0.131
Satd. Flow (perm) 1156 1667 0 1040 1701 0 414 3317 0 235 3355 0
Total Split (s) 10.6 22.6 12.4 24.4 9.8 35.4 9.6 35.2
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 12.8 14.8 14.8 36.8 36.8 38.0 38.0
v/c Ratio 0.33 0.67 0.79 0.53 0.46 0.77 0.35 0.65
Control Delay 32.7 33.8 53.9 30.5 28.1 23.9 18.7 19.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.7 33.8 53.9 30.5 28.1 23.9 18.7 19.9
LOS C C D C C C B B
Approach Delay 33.5 43.0 24.3 19.8
Approach LOS C D C B
Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 131 #178 123 78 #413 55 315
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.49 0.79 0.40 0.46 0.77 0.35 0.65
Cycle Length: 80
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C

Appendix E
Capacity Analysis – 2023 Projected Conditions
1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:30-6:30 AM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1708 0 1703 1692 0 1703 3365 0 1703 3307 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1708 0 1792 1692 0 959 3365 0 780 3307 0
Total Split (s) 13.0 25.0 13.0 25.0 13.0 31.0 11.0 29.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 10.3 10.2 9.8 9.8 48.9 48.9 42.3 43.2
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.39 0.30 0.53 0.11 0.20 0.06 0.20
Control Delay 36.2 27.2 34.2 31.1 13.6 11.1 15.0 12.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 36.2 27.2 34.2 31.1 13.6 11.1 15.0 12.8
LOS D C C C B B B B
Approach Delay 31.7 32.2 11.4 13.0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.21 0.28 0.27 0.11 0.20 0.06 0.20
Cycle Length: 80

2: Driveway 1 & FM 1688 5:30-6:30 AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 173 8 141 67 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 173 8 141 67 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 270 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 6 6 6 6
Mvmt Flow 180 8 147 70 0 6
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1

Conflicting Flow All 0 0 188 0 548 184
Stage 1 - - - - 184 -
Stage 2 - - - - 364 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.46 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1362 - 491 848
Stage 1 - - - - 838 -
Stage 2 - - - - 694 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1362 - 438 848
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 438 -
Stage 1 - - - - 838 -
Stage 2 - - - - 619 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 5.4 9.3
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT

Capacity (veh/h) 848 - - 1362 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.108 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 8 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 -

3: Driveway 2 & FM 1688 5:30-6:30 AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 10 8 59 13 69
Future Vol, veh/h 112 10 8 59 13 69
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 117 10 8 61 14 72

Stage 1 - - - - 122 -
Stage 2 - - - - 77 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1435 - 781 918
Stage 1 - - - - 894 -
Stage 2 - - - - 936 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1435 - 776 918
Stage 1 - - - - 894 -
Stage 2 - - - - 930 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 892 - - 1435 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 - - 0.006 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 7.5 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 -

4: FM 2818 & Viva Road 5:30-6:30 AM
Intersection
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 5 467 373 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
Storage Length 0 160 200 - - -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 40 5 486 389 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2

Conflicting Flow All 642 195 389 0 - 0
Stage 1 389 - - - - -
Stage 2 253 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 7.02 4.22 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.92 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 3.36 2.26 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 398 801 1138 - - -
Stage 1 643 - - - - -
Stage 2 754 - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 396 801 1138 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 494 - - - - -
Stage 1 640 - - - - -
Stage 2 754 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 0.1 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR

Capacity (veh/h) 1138 - - 801 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.049 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 - 0 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 - -

5: Viva Road & Driveway 3 5:30-6:30 AM
Intersection
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 38 0
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 40 0

Conflicting Flow All 5 0 - 0 3 3
Stage 1 - - - - 3 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1590 - - - 1009 1069
Stage 1 - - - - 1010 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1590 - - - 1009 1069
Stage 1 - - - - 1010 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.7
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1

Capacity (veh/h) 1590 - - - 1009
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.039
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.7
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 8:30-9:30 AM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1635 0 1703 1696 0 1703 3300 0 1703 3341 0
Satd. Flow (perm) 1792 1635 0 1792 1696 0 808 3300 0 744 3341 0
Total Split (s) 11.0 24.0 16.0 29.0 11.0 29.0 11.0 29.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 11.6 10.5 9.9 8.8 41.1 41.1 39.7 39.7
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.63 0.50 0.48 0.14 0.25 0.10 0.32
Control Delay 33.9 27.3 40.0 29.3 18.1 13.7 16.2 15.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.9 27.3 40.0 29.3 18.1 13.7 16.2 15.3
LOS C C D C B B B B
Approach Delay 29.6 34.8 14.3 15.4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.19 0.14 0.25 0.10 0.32
Cycle Length: 80

2: Driveway 1 & FM 1688 8:30-9:30 AM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 132 0 6 188 8 135
Future Vol, veh/h 132 0 6 188 8 135
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 138 0 6 196 8 141

Stage 1 - - - - 138 -
Stage 2 - - - - 208 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1421 - 643 900
Stage 1 - - - - 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - 817 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1421 - 640 900
Stage 1 - - - - 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - 814 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 880 - - 1421 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.169 - - 0.004 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 0 -

3: Driveway 2 & FM 1688 8:30-9:30 AM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 132 11 61 135 8 0
Future Vol, veh/h 132 11 61 135 8 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 138 11 64 141 8 0

Stage 1 - - - - 144 -
Stage 2 - - - - 269 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1408 - 588 893
Stage 1 - - - - 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - 767 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1408 - 562 893
Stage 1 - - - - 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - 732 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 562 - - 1408 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - 0.045 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 -

4: FM 2818 & Viva Road 8:30-9:30 AM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 33 467 658 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 34 486 685 0

Stage 1 685 - - - - -
Stage 2 311 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 7.02 4.22 - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 3.36 2.26 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 234 641 878 - - -
Stage 1 451 - - - - -
Stage 2 704 - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 225 641 878 - - -
Stage 1 433 - - - - -
Stage 2 704 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 0
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 878 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - - -

5: Viva Road & Driveway 3 8:30-9:30 AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Lane Configurations
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 34 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - 17 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1552 - - - 991 1050
Stage 1 - - - - 995 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1552 - - - 991 1050
Stage 1 - - - - 995 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 1552 - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 0
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 2:00-3:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1703 0 1703 1687 0 1703 3314 0 1703 3321 0
Flt Permitted 0.976 0.976 0.425 0.226
Satd. Flow (perm) 1749 1703 0 1749 1687 0 762 3314 0 405 3321 0
Total Split (s) 10.8 23.0 14.0 26.2 11.6 32.4 10.6 31.4
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 13.6 12.5 11.5 11.5 40.4 40.4 38.2 38.2
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.62 0.43 0.59 0.25 0.44 0.19 0.37
Control Delay 31.1 35.3 35.5 32.3 19.2 16.3 17.7 16.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 31.1 35.3 35.5 32.3 19.2 16.3 17.7 16.3
LOS C D D C B B B B
Approach Delay 33.9 33.6 16.7 16.4
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.44 0.41 0.34 0.24 0.44 0.19 0.37
Cycle Length: 80

2: Driveway 1 & FM 1688 2:00-3:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 236 8 135 154 0 12
Future Vol, veh/h 236 8 135 154 0 12
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 257 9 147 167 0 13

Stage 1 - - - - 262 -
Stage 2 - - - - 461 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1275 - 387 767
Stage 1 - - - - 773 -
Stage 2 - - - - 627 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1275 - 342 767
Stage 1 - - - - 773 -
Stage 2 - - - - 555 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 767 - - 1275 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.115 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.4 -

3: Driveway 2 & FM 1688 2:00-3:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 167 8 0 154 14 77
Future Vol, veh/h 167 8 0 154 14 77
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 182 9 0 167 15 84

Stage 1 - - - - 187 -
Stage 2 - - - - 167 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1359 - 636 845
Stage 1 - - - - 835 -
Stage 2 - - - - 853 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1359 - 636 845
Stage 1 - - - - 835 -
Stage 2 - - - - 853 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 804 - - 1359 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 0 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0 -

4: FM 2818 & Viva Road 2:00-3:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Future Vol, veh/h 0 42 0 797 614 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 46 0 866 667 0

Stage 1 667 - - - - -
Stage 2 433 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 7.02 4.22 - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 3.36 2.26 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 200 650 892 - - -
Stage 1 461 - - - - -
Stage 2 610 - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 200 650 892 - - -
Stage 1 461 - - - - -
Stage 2 610 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 892 - - 650 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.07 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 - -

5: Viva Road & Driveway 3 2:00-3:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 0 46 0

Stage 1 - - - - 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 - - - 1012 1072
Stage 1 - - - - 1012 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 - - - 1012 1072
Stage 1 - - - - 1012 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 1596 - - - 1012
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.045
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.7
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1

1: FM 2818 & FM 1688 5:00-6:00 PM
Lane Configurations
Satd. Flow (prot) 1703 1665 0 1703 1715 0 1703 3317 0 1703 3341 0
Flt Permitted 0.624 0.482 0.166 0.156
Satd. Flow (perm) 1118 1665 0 864 1715 0 298 3317 0 280 3341 0
Total Split (s) 12.0 22.6 13.6 24.2 9.6 34.2 9.6 34.2
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Act Effct Green (s) 16.1 15.9 17.3 17.3 33.4 33.4 31.9 31.9
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.81 0.73 0.55 0.59 0.84 0.39 0.80
Control Delay 33.2 42.8 44.9 31.1 39.6 29.1 22.0 27.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.2 42.8 44.9 31.1 39.6 29.1 22.0 27.4
LOS C D D C D C C C
Approach Delay 39.9 37.9 30.2 27.0
Approach LOS D D C C
Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 #228 #163 146 #95 #427 56 #370
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.73 0.73 0.47 0.59 0.84 0.39 0.80
Cycle Length: 80
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service D

2: Driveway 1 & FM 1688 5:00-6:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 262 0 6 380 8 135
Future Vol, veh/h 262 0 6 380 8 135
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 285 0 7 413 9 147

Stage 1 - - - - 285 -
Stage 2 - - - - 427 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1255 - 393 745
Stage 1 - - - - 754 -
Stage 2 - - - - 650 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1255 - 391 745
Stage 1 - - - - 754 -
Stage 2 - - - - 646 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS B

Capacity (veh/h) 709 - - 1255 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.219 - - 0.005 -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 0 -

3: Driveway 2 & FM 1688 5:00-6:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 262 11 61 327 8 0
Future Vol, veh/h 262 11 61 327 8 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 285 12 66 355 9 0

Stage 1 - - - - 291 -
Stage 2 - - - - 487 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.16 - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.254 - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1242 - 359 739
Stage 1 - - - - 750 -
Stage 2 - - - - 610 -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1242 - 340 739
Stage 1 - - - - 750 -
Stage 2 - - - - 578 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM LOS C

Capacity (veh/h) 340 - - 1242 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.053 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 -

4: FM 2818 & Viva Road 5:00-6:00 PM
Intersection
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 33 1204 1188 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 33 1204 1188 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 36 1309 1291 0

Stage 1 1291 - - - - -
Stage 2 727 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.92 7.02 4.22 - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.56 3.36 2.26 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 48 405 512 - - -
Stage 1 214 - - - - -
Stage 2 429 - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 45 405 512 - - -
Stage 1 199 - - - - -
Stage 2 429 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 0
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 512 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 - 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - - -

5: Viva Road & Driveway 3 5:00-6:00 PM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Lane Configurations
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 36 0 0

Stage 1 - - - - 18 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.46 6.26
Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.554 3.354
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1549 - - - 989 1049
Stage 1 - - - - 994 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1549 - - - 989 1049
Stage 1 - - - - 994 -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM LOS A

Capacity (veh/h) 1549 - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 0
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -

Appendix F
Site Plan
0 25 50 100 200 300
SCALE: 1" = 100'

FULL SIZE = 22" x 34"
1335.2'
CR FM2818 - CL of Driveway
38'
CR Leonard Rd - CL of Driveway
703.35'
30'
649.88'
CL - CL
30'
SEK: April 22, 2022
K:\01599\01599-0047-00 BISD - New Transportation & Maintenance\2 Design Phase\CAD\Plans\Exhibits\Dimension Exhibit.dwg
MAINTENANCE &
TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
BRYAN ISD
Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Reg. No. F-23290
1575 Sawdust Road, Suite 400 The Woodlands, Texas 77380 281.363.4039
© 2022 Jones | Carter

Appendix G
Response to Comments
ROW and roadway width's added to the report.
Existing Conditions
A site visit was conducted to document the existing conditions of the study area roadways and site.
Existing lane assignments and traffic control at the study area intersections can be found in Appendix A.
Roadways Include right-

FM 2818 is a is a north-south roadway and is classified as a Super Arterial per the City of Bryan of-way width
foraeach
Thoroughfare Plan. It is an asphalt roadway and 74’ in width. It has two travel lanes in each direction,
two-way left turn lane, and a posted speed limit of 55 mph. classification
of roadway.
FM 1688 (Leonard Road) is an east-west roadway and is classified as a Minor Arterial per the City of
Bryan Thoroughfare Plan. It is an asphalt roadway and 24’ in width. It has one travel lane in each
direction and a posted speed limit of 55 mph.
Viva Road is a proposed roadway to be constructed by BISD. It will be an east-west roadway and is
classified as a Major Collector per the City of Bryan Thoroughfare Plan.
Proposed roadway
Intersections
The intersections included in the study area are:
width?
• FM 2818 at FM 1688
• FM 2818 at (Proposed) Viva Road
• (Proposed) Viva Road at (Proposed) Driveway 3
Site
The existing site is vacant.
Traffic Data
Turning movement counts were taken by CJ Hensch & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, November 30th, 2021.
Data collection included five weekday 13-hour TMC from 6 AM – 7 PM and another 30 min TMC from
5:30-6:00 AM. Two AM and PM Peak Hours of the proposed site were utilized. 5:30-6:30 AM and 8:30-
9:30 AM for the AM Peak Hours and 2:00-3:00 PM and 5:00-6:00 PM for the PM Peak Hours. The AM
and PM Peak Hour Factor (PHF) was determined for each intersection from collected traffic counts. A
PHF of 0.92 was assumed at proposed intersections. Heavy vehicle percentages for each intersection are
determined based on collected traffic data. The heavy vehicle percentage utilized is the percent of
Articulated Trucks, Buses, and Single-Unit Trucks. Heavy vehicle percentages at proposed intersections
were determined by overall heavy vehicle percentage of the adjacent intersection. Due to traffic
patterns returning to normal conditions, no COVID Adjustment Factor was utilized. The existing traffic
volumes can be found in Appendix A and raw traffic count data can be found in Appendix B.
2
Coordinated with the MPO to confirm the growth rate was reasonable.
Trip Generation and Distribution
Table 1 provides a summary of the estimated trips generated for the proposed development provided
by BISD. For the purpose of this study, two sets of AM and PM Peak Hours were analyzed corresponding
with the peak hours of the development. The hourly segments used in this analysis are listed below:
• AM Peak Hours
o 5:30-6:30 AM
o 8:30-9:30 AM
• PM Peak Hours
o 2:00-3:00 PM
o 5:00-6:00 PM
Table 1 – Trip Generation Volumes

24-Hour 5:30-6:30 AM 8:30-9:30 AM 2:00-3:00 PM 5:00-6:00 PM
Trips Size Two-Way
Volume Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Transportation
175 700 150 0 150 0 150 150 150 0 150 0 150 150
Staff
Other staff 15 30 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0
White Fleet
54 216 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0
Vehicles
Maintenance
57 114 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0
Staff
Buses 110 440 0 110 110 110 0 110 0 110 110 110 0 110
Total - 1500 171 125 296 110 150 260 150 146 296 110 150 260
A three percent annual growth rate for background traffic was assumed based on available historical
traffic data and engineering judgment. A summary of available data and annual growth percentage
calculations from TxDOT’s Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) are provided in Table 2.
Table 2 – TxDOT Traffic Count Database System Growth Rates
TxDOT Annual Linear

Location Year
AADT Growth Rate
2016 4,036
With increased
subdivision
2017 4,414 9.4%
FM 1688 West of FM 2818
development to the
2018 4,152 -5.9%
west on Leonard Rd, is
2019 4,050 -2.5%
it safe to assume that
2020 4,575 13.0%
an average of the
Average 3.5%
previous growth rates
Recommended Growth Rate 3.0%
is an accurate
representation of actual
growth? Were the MPO
growth rates consulted
for this calculation?
4
MPO coordination on growth rate.
Colby Wright
From: Bart Benthul <bbenthul@BCSMPO.ORG>

Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Colby Wright
Subject: RE: MPO Growth Rates - BISD project TIA
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning, Colby,
That particular tract of land used to belong to Blinn College. It was intended to be the location of a new Blinn College
Campus. They had even started moving dirt around in preparation for construction. Then Texas A&M announced the
establishment of the RELLIS campus and Blinn decided to locate their westside campus there.
At any rate, looking at our current model for FM 1688 just west of FM 2818:
2006 ADT = 1,825

2035 ADT = 5,395
Annual % Growth rate (using a compound growth formula) = 3.81%
So what we are showing is a bit higher than what you are calculating based on historic traffic counts, but given the
growth that we are projecting in that part of the area, I believe that it is reasonable.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Bart A. Benthul
Principal Planner
Bryan-College Station MPO
309 N. Washington Ave., Suite 14
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 260-5298 ext. 1002
From: Colby Wright <cwright@quiddity.com>

Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 9:19 AM
To: Bart Benthul <bbenthul@BCSMPO.ORG>
Subject: MPO Growth Rates - BISD project TIA
Bart,
Good morning. We are working on a project for BISD at the intersection of FM 2818 and FM 1688. A comment received
from the City of Bryan on the TIA questioned our background growth rate. Our traffic data was collected in 2021 and full
build of the facility will occur in 2023 so we used a growth rate of 3% per year for 2 years based on the below data.
Could you review the MPO growth rate in the area and let us know if it is consistent with 3%? Thanks.
1
Colby Wright, PE, PTOE, RSP1
Manager, Traffic Engineering
cwright@quiddity.com
713-777-5337
6330 West Loop South, Suite 150, Bellaire, Texas, 77401
www.quiddity.com
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential, or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), you may not retain copy or use this e-mail or any
attachment for any purpose or disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. Any such dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or its
attachments is strictly prohibited. Please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachment from your computer and/or
electronic devices. Any personal views or opinions expressed by the writer may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of Jones & Carter, Inc.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and
others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in
Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in;
Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here.
2
Trip distribution revised so buses use Driveway 1 and 2 to head north on FM
2818 and Driveway 3 (Viva Road) for southbound.
Summary and Recommendations
Bus fleet should utilize Driveway 1 or 2
Capacity Analysis in order to safely turn left onto FM 2818
Three scenarios were analyzed for instead
AM andof PMutilizing
peak hoursdriveway 3 and
as part of Viva Impact Analysis: 2021
the Traffic
Rd. IfConditions,
Existing Conditions, 2023 Background buses are andto2023
head southbound
Projected on All signalized
Conditions.
FM 2818are
intersections and unsignalized approaches driveway
projected3to would beat an acceptable LOS during the
operate
Peak Hours. acceptable. Any buses turning to go
northbound on FM 2818 should utilize
Access Management the traffic signal at FM 2818 and
A right turn lane analysis was performed
Leonard in Rd.
accordance with Table 2-3 of the Texas Department of
10
N
HA
RV
EY
M
1 inch = 350 feet
Ë
IT
CH
FFTT EL
335500 L
PW
CR EK
E
CR
00 FF TT
3344
HA RD
RD
FFTT
D
333300
AR
OC
R
N
K CR
O
LE
FFTT
332200
00FFTT
3311
LN
Z E
ON
FT
BR
R O CK HO L
300
W
LO
W
LO
10 FOOT CONTOURS
1 FOOT CONTOURS
This is a product of the City of Bryan Geographic Information System. This geospatial data product is for
informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or
surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey conducted by or under the supervision
of a registered professional land surveyor and represents only the approximate relative location of property
boundaries. This product may not reflect some data otherwise available. This product is not a substitute for
obtaining a survey or other professional advice about a specific property, specific question, or situation.
N
HA
RV
EY
M
1 inch = 350 feet
Ë
IT
CH
EL
L
PW
CR EK
E
CR
HA RD
RD
D
AR
OC
R
N
K CR
O
LE
LN
Z E
ON
BR
R O CK HO L
FLOODWAY AREAS WITHIN ZONE AE
W
ZONE AE (1% annual chance of flood)
ZONE A (1% annual chance of flood) LO
W
ZONE X500 (0.2% annual chance of flood) LO
ZONE X (areas outside the 0.2% annual chance of flood)
This is a product of the City of Bryan Geographic Information System. This geospatial data product is for
informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or
surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey conducted by or under the supervision
of a registered professional land surveyor and represents only the approximate relative location of property
boundaries. This product may not reflect some data otherwise available. This product is not a substitute for
obtaining a survey or other professional advice about a specific property, specific question, or situation.

Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

September 15, 2022

Rezoning case no. RZ22-13: Bryan Independent School District

CASE DESCRIPTION: a request to amend the development standards of a previously-approved

EXISTING LAND USE: vacant acreage

APPLICANT(S): Bryan Independent School District

STAFF CONTACT: Katie Williams, AICP, Project Planner

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the proposed rezoning.

RELATION TO BLUEPRINT 2040:

6. Any other factors affecting health, safety, morals, or general welfare.

The public hearing was opened.

The public hearing was closed.

Commissioner Salvato moved to recommend approval of RZ22-13 to the Bryan City

b. Rezoning RZ22-13: Bryan Independent School District

The public hearing was opened.

The public hearing was closed.

PD-M DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PRESENTED TO P&Z DURING 9/1 WORKSHOP

Section 1: General Purpose and Description

 Accessory or incidental uses to the main use;

 Accessory or incidental uses to the main use;

 Accessory or incidental uses to the main use;

 Detached dwelling units with no more than 4 unrelated persons;

 Private or public parks walking paths multimodal trails

Section 4: Physical Development

2. The following additional physical development standards shall also apply:

a) On all non-residential lots created by means of a subdivision plat in accordance with

c) Approved Exterior Material List (Limitations subject to paragraphs 2b and 2d)

k) Landscaping shall be provided in order to create and maintain a healthy environment,

REVIEWED & FILED

Re: BISD Transportation & Maintenance RZ22-13

1. Pg 2- Include Right of Way width for each classification of roadway.

Traffic Impact Analysis

Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-23290

Traffic Impact Analysis

Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-23290

Site Location and Analysis Area

Table 1 – Trip Generation Volumes .............................................................................................................. 4

Figure 1 – Project Location

Figure 2 – Site Plan

Table 1 – Trip Generation Volumes

Table 2 – TxDOT Traffic Count Database System Growth Rates

TxDOT Annual Linear

Table 3 – Level of Service Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions

2021 Existing Conditions

2023 Background Conditions

2023 Projected Conditions

2021 Existing 2023 Background 2021 Existing 2023 Background

Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of

FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 13.7 B 14.1 B 15.2 B 15.9

Table 5 – Existing and Background Conditions Capacity Analysis – PM Peak Hour

2021 Existing 2023 Background 2021 Existing 2023 Background

Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of Sec. of

FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 15.9 B 16.7 C 24.4 C 25.8

FM 2818 at FM 1688** B 18.1 C 20.2 C 21.1 C 31.3

Right Turn Lane Analysis

Table 7 – 2023 Projected Conditions Right Turn Lane Analysis

Left Turn Lane Analysis

Table 8 – 2023 Projected Conditions Left Turn Lane Analysis