The document provides instructions for a performance task that requires students to:
1) Choose one article from the provided choices and write a review.
2) The article review must analyze the article, provide the student's opinion on the topic, include personal reflection and evaluation, and cite sources properly.
3) The article review must be at least 1,000 words.
4) Students can choose any formal format for the article review.
The rubric evaluates the article review based on content, reflection, organization and development of ideas, and mechanics. Strong reviews will have an in-depth analysis, clear summary, and engagement. Satisfactory reviews will have some analysis and basic structure. Reviews needing improvement will
The document provides instructions for a performance task that requires students to:
1) Choose one article from the provided choices and write a review.
2) The article review must analyze the article, provide the student's opinion on the topic, include personal reflection and evaluation, and cite sources properly.
3) The article review must be at least 1,000 words.
4) Students can choose any formal format for the article review.
The rubric evaluates the article review based on content, reflection, organization and development of ideas, and mechanics. Strong reviews will have an in-depth analysis, clear summary, and engagement. Satisfactory reviews will have some analysis and basic structure. Reviews needing improvement will
The document provides instructions for a performance task that requires students to:
1) Choose one article from the provided choices and write a review.
2) The article review must analyze the article, provide the student's opinion on the topic, include personal reflection and evaluation, and cite sources properly.
3) The article review must be at least 1,000 words.
4) Students can choose any formal format for the article review.
The rubric evaluates the article review based on content, reflection, organization and development of ideas, and mechanics. Strong reviews will have an in-depth analysis, clear summary, and engagement. Satisfactory reviews will have some analysis and basic structure. Reviews needing improvement will
1. Choose one (1) article among the given choices.
2. Read the article and make an article review. 3. The piece must contain an analysis of the given article, your opinion on the subject discussed, your own reflection and evaluation (check lesson on Forming Evaluative Statements), and proper citations. 4. The article review must not be less than 1,000 words. 5. You are free to make any format you want, as long as it is formal.
Rubric:
Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement
1. Content • In depth analysis of • Minimal analysis of • No content (missed
(40 points) the content (all major the content (some of all major points of points discussed). the major points the content). • Excellent summary. discussed). • Incomplete summary. • Communicates the • Basic summary. • Key ideas/ themes/ key ideas/ themes/ • Communicates the Findings are not findings with a key ideas/ themes/ communicated high degree of clarity findings with little clearly and/or and insight. clarity or insight. missed in analysis. • Engaging introduction • Introduction and • There is no clear and conclusion, both conclusion do not introduction or indicate the overall indicate the overall conclusion. focus of the paper. focus of the paper. 2. Reflection Demonstrates thorough Demonstrates some Demonstrates little (30 points) understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the article by listing all key article by listing some of article with few or no findings and reflecting the key findings, but key findings reported. upon their implications. documentation is lacking in completeness.
3. Organization Logical development of Logical organization, No evidence of
and ideas through well- paragraphs not fully structure or Development developed paragraphs, developed. organization. of Ideas good use of transitions. (15 points) 4. Mechanics • Meets the length • Length requirement is • Length requirement (15 points) requirement not met; minimal is not met; poor • Little to no content. content. grammatical errors. • Moderate amount of • Large amount of • With proper citations. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. • Missed some citations. • Missed majority of citations.