8
The Rise of Yuppie Coffees
and the Reimagination of
Class in the United States
William Roseberry
Lexus bein a Zahara gourmet oe prion Maan’ Upper We Sie
ue Mountain style Mocha styl, ‘ Expres
Wane Proce Ccafe Kena AN 2 and’ hell le wats il ou ley,
seston, and siggest one of 3 sal select
0 yay and exces his rather modes sletion
“The evidence of plenty and wate canbe found inthe sire
Krups Semiprofesional Programmatic ($349) or the Olympia Caffree (51,000),
z on of coffe ss nor espevally dtingushed. They eschew the trend
hocolte amaretto, vail, and the hike, in
* few prepackaged cofes in flavors and
ores of Favored eyrupe for those stoner wh reer them. But ony ovo
a Puerto Ric, and so 0.
TFL visit the dl across the street from my apartment, can choose from a much
wider vaciet of cotes, 43 i all inlading Jamaican Ble Mountain, Venezuela
Maracaibo, Geran Chocolate, Swedish Delighr, Double Vanilla Swedish Delihy,
hope, which p
abo presen i
{struts th
wel ot ie
nd relations
2 38 well
instar
termed the zh
relition bese
‘sig cote
bor whar wat
untlated‘UM cones ano ass HE UTED STATES 3
Swiss Mocha Almond, a Decaf Swise Mocha Almond o name just afew, These
ave displayed in burlap bags that ake up much more space than coffee sections wed
te-occupy when my only choices were Manoel Hose, Flges, Chock Flo” Nas,
EL Pico, and Medaglia dro. And they eequize the asiveance of + clerk to weigh,
hag, an rind the colle
Net walk down the sere, virally every deli offers a simile vaiery, generaly in
rmnibarrels, thowgh sometimes the barrels are diebuted in apparently cas
abundance throughout the stre so that I can also select breads seca tas,
‘chocolates, and cheeses as [decide which among the many roasts, atetals, ile,
te lars Iwill choos is week. no longer need the outmer shop = though such
“hops which peliferatein the 1980s, comin ro thrive, concentated in cfs but
also present in suburban wns and shopping malls ro buy what cofle trader call
specialty” cottes nor dp I need 0 he gourmet to buy and enjoy them (or beter
said need not he goummer ro look, act and fel ike one. can got the corner
‘or the major supermarket, where ven Maxvtell House and ASCP hae oied he
speci” end
Surely these developments are “good.” Specialy cofes tase better than mass
marker coffees. They fer pleasure in many ways: the aroma, ambience and expe
ence of the cole shop or ven che deisel Gndeed, parol the experience of place
like Zabar'sis the sucesso of sell); the canal conversation withthe shop owner
oe diner guest about varetals roasts, preparation methods; he ienticatin with
parila places trough consumption ~ Copenhagen or Vienna, Jamaica or he
CClebes or the inclusion of coffe purchasing, preparation, and consumption in
widening spectrum of foots ~inclading Wines, vers, water, bread, chess, ace
snd the ike ~ through which one ean ctv and display “este” and "sri
ation.” Moreover. he expansion of speciale coves masks distinct beeak with 3
past characterized by mas production and consomption. The move toward these
ote seas not initiated bythe giants that dominate the coffe eae but by stall,
‘exional ossters who developed new sources of spply, new modes and networks of
“istribution chat allowed among ahr things, for consumers o uy soe dtctly
(rh fm pe ernie cso Ce Ny
oles, more chores, ere divert, lee concentration, new capital he eve
sae of postmodern,
Proper understanding of the proliferation of specaty colees require consider
ston of the expeneners ind chovces of the comsnmer im the coe shop an at the
dinner cable, but Te abo. eequues consideration of the methods, nenenk7
snd. relations of coffee production, procesung, dienbution, and sale inthe
1980s, as well as placenent of thove methods; networks, and elatons within a
wer history
Th esay comeenates on that second range of guestiosrom-wat mig be
seme hs apg 53 be with ca ge ~ thea
‘aioe best ec of spay coferandg carly pened arse
‘Sp aia a mace, ees Sec iat aad masearin, ascent a ot
‘Easley cots cherie Tp cootetig tout, Pear ei cole parte
fr what was RappERE Wich cofee marking snd consumpwon was ot a all
tnrelated to what was happening wth many othe food commodities I then urn vo
{range of questions that might be orn sociologcal: How has the tur coweda uit sean
specialty coffes been organized? What hasbeen the postion and vole of the giant
oeporations shar dominated the colle tad during the period of stanardiaton?
‘Who have been the inovators and “agents” of changes the move toad specialty
ovees? How hive they vesanizd themselves? How have they reimaxined. and
organized the market? What kinds of hase ad generational napso United States
egy have ther used in thee reigiagination of the market? How ave they ine
igibed thensalvs, and We Sar and generstinal segments they target th
‘market niche, in relation toa wider wotld of coffee produces?
These mote hetorcal and sociological questions rase ses for anthropologkl
toterpretation. Can the study of changing mgekeing md consumption raters of
singe sommodi 3 paricalacmament (even a mundane commodity produced
Tor everyday an routine consumpeion hed some light on a wider range of social
and alta sa? We have» wo etanpleof lear alae ody HIRST
Stet ant Foc (199), an cxpaon of he rowing chai rence
«fsa inthe Eg dc tom he hog Ish coma, kd expy
ind neceaniy to nda nthe owt o's mek sas cara
Indes of i ecrumprio, and sci tn gown tes England sad the
sratisment of cmt owes, panaon onomie, and slave sr the
CCntbesm Thea of ster cosieed here ore mode but shee Mn
‘onvcon tha esac ser = =
‘ona sé anbropsey of nue 98 oer
SS REMAN ESTE oF To Soy a daa comelngely from ewo rade
tourna World Coffee snd Tay (WCET) a0 fle and esos Moboanond
“TEFCT These oral ce several question the sof whch s methodlopeal
ike eof wade fools in elason wo her pense methods and soc
clang chographic oe. The uals ge waco the Peeecupetne
Gagnon and sates ofa ange of str in the lee ade rowcs es
coasters dbus and res age asain prong el 5 conu
inte cole tae ee
theta fh wc word in which they ae thr reenter
ind actions ae oural conse 3 cn eadly sate od end
tied sur Base we ay eond seed anderen ue he ne
igual so he atc nthe jonas speak a prtcalat Kd of bic in
is eavesdropping or 10 rurm fo the kext ~ pecrng ever the hoele ofthe
vend enter
‘Connections and Contrasts
‘We undersand and vale the new speci cffes im relation 0 “the past though
im fact more thanone pasts bei imagined. On the one hand specialty cee ste
Placed in posive elation tothe pao, say, two decades ago, when most coffe in
he Unived Sar
he dealt
sind, and thet
the other hand. 1
a
Tota bags es
sirematonal sk
ses he lce-2
Seneca score. T
Sollee le, Fox
Hensal a
Cte, explain
onan cale
In he sare et
ees
Simutart he 5
Sonal
‘horde, Bur ¢
in-an impor
which cote
Space
‘spel
snd eosolidat
had developedYUM COMES ano cass our TATE bs
‘he Unie Seats wa sold in cans in supermatkets, the casts weoe light and band,
the Tecalfenated colles undenkable, the chokes limited t9 brand and perhaps °
fand, and the tale dominated hy General Foods and Peaster and Gamble. On
inet hand, the ne wlles Seem to connect witha mare gine pastor she
nation and massbsation the cade, The wenification of pariclae Meads
sid vital reals he dey days ofthe rade; the sale of whole Beane in barrels oF
buslap bags seals tha pt (or a present in which the "coneaincrzation” in
interanonal shipping fuk endeted such bags obsolete} atthe same time that i
the lte-20h century gourmet af ie Teeny
‘Eocalscone The semicon hte diced wth eal doy of ol
Cole cll, foasters, an brewing apparition He ore eet Tere
Cote, explained 10 World Coffee and Tas in 1981
‘here was certain pei be cole
i neration colfemen sound: Andi wa sus the
her doy, the balla he charged ad sunk the ones in
lide No became “shaper cheap!
Alf sudden. conte slong sebny who intereedin guy. He dee ae
shat he may have oe mice the peice of canned il he ly net
‘jy All we're ding ray copying what ou fathers and andere i ene
tnd yea ago -Spcety cof bas ev the ede that os Tos some
wry who was bor aod rated in the eee snes
that bine [COT VA]
In che same isue of World Coffe amd Tea, the journal enthused:
z Aa they did in che early daa of ote
chy. [WOOT 1983
Similarly, the journal noes that apscialty coffecsaopeal ro consumers who preter
“atu” Teods. Imagining yet another past, the amie Tournal
acevounly tacks the lates gonerament reports on the fect of eafeine or mete ne
“Rowe Boto wha een ie new a ein? Unapsha a ane e
Specialy ster actualy ik?
in an important essays Wichal Jimenez (1995) describe the prosesses dou
wheal wos tanloinel an snelasTepennre terete oakstet er
‘Sit conseipton are United States at thes Gaonie We TOU rcesey
San By Mosher he mat ee
iRedahcomane yen me coe wan wily deur ond consumed
‘tape lacs mene anal the cere sare coment
snd consolidated eofee wade in the ist three decades of the 20eh century. one that
had developed a cenual diecting (though nor controling) auchority and imposed
pot
sme tertriiisneSvonealcamng wenn] >
)a
126
seandaediaed no
lagenez shows that we eannoe enderand transformations inthe c
rious of qualey and tae i the creation of a national market
fe trade
ihout understand a Bead TS of scone snd socal WasToomsaTe
THE Ry of Area capil the industaltevolu ofthe Tate 1h
cational martes and modes of dsmbatom the fvoluon in sl produson,
procesing, and
“istbtion that resulted in the creation of The aapetmaskes
mong other things indeed the histories ofthe supermarket and of santandion
inthe offs trad
ad consolidati
dare contingent; the revolution in adysrsing: the concentration
of America indsty and 0 00. nal thi the particular hatory
‘ofthe standardization of coffee for mass markets isnot united od
SGndardiraon,|
The penees of standardization and
indeed “industalizaton,” of oods in general nthe 1th and 00h
ncentaton begun before the depression
vas consahidatedover the succeeding decades, Fell after World War dering
which we can Tecate two new developments The fe im
‘nternanonal consol insrumen
red the cenion of
and agreemenrs, beginning ia World War I and
‘sulminating in the cation of she Inemauonal Cofiee Organization an over
national Coffee Agreement signed by producing and consuming countries, through
lowed for new produces (especialy WORT AMATO CHP the market, cney and
paercipatin we
+e controlled. With such asteuments, and withthe widening pe
shction and consumption of soluble, the end vowatd coe afte owen comon
raiaued
The second poswar development inv
the long-tem decline in consumption
esinning TH TRETPEOE-TaroUEh The 1950s, consurpcion was SaeaTally Tae
mimo Toccoa From 1962 onecan chav some dckce Take see
Percent of he adult population was alulaed to he colle denkers: by 1988 only 80
percent drank si
fee (See Table 8-1). Even thowe who drank es
ee were drinking
less. In 1962, average coer consumption was 3.12 cups pet days by 1980 i had
sunsand by 1991 had dropped to 1.75, whch epeevented sight
te 1988 low of 1.67 {WCET 1991:19). Wor, in the view of
“offemen,” consumption“ oe
egining oF the
"90s they worried that dey had not been abe to ateet the
20- to 29-yearold generation, who scemed to identdy.cofce dunking wih the
seed ways of
olds dean 3.
tee paren and grandparents. According to their calculations,
drank only 1.47 cups per day n 1980, while 30: to S9-eae
06 cups, and those over 60 drank 2.40 | WCerT 1980222),
Differentiation and the ldentification of Market Niches
The longterm ren coward decline wat exacerbated by the eects ofthe fly 1975
up ns, an cfc purchases declined
sional earings ere called wo nvergate the cofee tae, and the
1 OMe onde an official inquiry and publ + report
A the beginn
Kemet Roma
relations frm wl
Tam incre
Peto
po ese
Mame eee
‘ous couples 36
‘nd saggeste
biohes The Fst
for whom cof
hop. Others
penis, for whTable 8.1 Perentaye of US population drinking coos, 1962-88.
Redraw and simp ter WC? 19633
yer Percentage rinking
tone ae
136 sat
1978 ser
300 566
982 $63
‘4 53
the eginning of the 1980s, then, many “votfemen” had reason 0 worn
Kenneth Roman fe, prideae of Ogisc and Macher, a major advertising and public
felts tien which abe qu count, offered them some advice
Ian mcriew withthe ediors of World Cofec and Tea he commented
Coffee ca wontetl prt Iker, however hat have got sling the
onston oe, We mae sl colleen gain, alteaanage Tele cee Rica
In a speech tothe Green Clee Assocation of New York, Roman suggested ft
tions eouples an individale who could serve as markers of distinc marker niches
vo sugested tha voflecmen” should develo different coffees ro appeal to specie
dikes Te cle was he Grays dnl mcome coupe a Tet mT
ehom collec “way Wea who peter to hy thir coffe ina gourmet
Shop. Ores inhaded “the Pitchers.” m their Lae hie and watching thee
renmis, for whom price 8 sane gestion “Katen Spering,” 2 singleus —__wuswerosomer _
‘vrkngwomaninker res who des oe wat spend machine thy kc
ind for wom steer inna colier should be devapad he ter tee
scope: nfo cee aden who doesn dence oe dor kao
yer what odo Bute ints igh aero tat qua el Ree
toughest and pohsbiy the mone port sk cle market wl le he
soe wceT Bene
Kenneth Rota sii “clemson sementedat shan 4
na mh anda asne sit eneasas and senesnanal Tats
‘he wpe “Gra and the myer “Joh who pees soit dri. These Peo
the markers guy vara om one han and the poroan hosed
Cc the coun a oi hom sowie
ama dace st sms of proc derion wade tha ad
sown on the bs of standardization. Ye the andar self was 3 Beare
>
inde Lecolcoeessatenest te mectoe ad)
side cle foes and ts ty Come ewe a cle andes nt
Concentration tht restored the colee market, wesc thatthe eofee rade ws
SS aes oom erat eae
‘eau wapan thet ponders window Tagichecin. | +
‘Tae ao itor an Soc tanonRaon TIC rose of anda
Gao tens wee Consort many foods ee oo —
Cai Sets ae afc would theo te one of many Kod thro which
dete srt of cite, the remaking of work and domestic Iie and onganaaton
‘emote specie concems, such asthe rise of averting othe supermarket. Here
Jnmaeds wort on coftglachelnnd Stes complomsts Mins¥work onsen 3°
[England (1985), YergGfee and sugar Bong to a smal subs of commositis tat
(Routledge Studies in Anthropology, 35) Susana Narotzky (Editor), Victoria Goddard (Editor) - Work and Livelihoods - History, Ethnography and Models in Times of Crisis-Routledge (2016)