Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hume Rothery1953
Hume Rothery1953
To cite this article: William Hume-Rothery F.R.S. (1953) CXXII. Metallic carbides and nitrides
of the type MX, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of
Science: Series 7, 44:357, 1154-1160, DOI: 10.1080/14786441008520375
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information
(the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor
& Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties
whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and
views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The
accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently
verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable
for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/
page/terms-and-conditions
[ 1154 ]
ABSTRACT
The structures of the metallic carbides and nitrides of the type MX
with the sodium chloride structure are discussed. The view t h a t this
structure is formed in order to provide the non-metallic atom with an
Downloaded by [University of Bristol] at 07:33 25 January 2015
T~E metallic carbides and nitrides with the Na-C1 type of structure are
of great interest in view of their hardness and high melting points. I t has
long been recognized that in these compounds there is some kind of
homopolar bonding between the metallic and non-metallic atoms.
These compounds were discussed by Brager (1941), who unfortunately
did not take into account the effect of co-ordination number on the atomic
radii. A more recent discussion by Rundle (1948) is of great interest, but
appears to us to be only partly correct, and in the present note an attempt
is made to remove some of the inconsistencies.
The MX carbides and nitrides of high melting point have the sodium
chloride structure, with the metal atoms arranged on a face-centred cubic
lattice. The metallic elements concerned nearly all crystallize in the
close-packed hexagonal, or body-centred cubic structures, and hence,
as pointed out by Rundle, it is not justifiable to regard the MX carbides
or nitrides as solid solutions of carbon or nitrogen in the crystals of the
metallic elements themselves. The compounds may quite properly be
regarded as interstitial compounds, with the small carbon and nitrogen
atoms in holes between the larger metallic atoms, but some additional
factor must be present to account for the taking up of a face-centred
cubic structure by the metallic atoms.
Rundle points out that, whereas in some cases (e.g. LaN) the metal-
metal distances in the MX compound are almost the same as those in the
metallic element, there are other cases where the former distance is the
Interstitial diameter
Downloaded by [University of Bristol] at 07:33 25 January 2015
Table 2
ature are not from their own work. Some appear to be taken from the
work of Friedrich and Sittig (1925) and there is seldom evidence t h a t the
exact composition MX was obtained. In spite of the higher melting
points, the specific resistances of the compounds are greater than those of
the constituent metals by factors which may be as high as 10. In so far as
the data are valid, one interesting point is the similarity between the
specific resistances at room temperatures of all the carbides and nitrides
between TiC and TaC in table 2. For all these the specific resistances lie
between 1 × 10-4 and 2 × 10-4.
According to Rundle, the carbon atoms give rise to mutually perpendi-
cular bonds derived from one (sp) and two (p) orbitals, whilst the nitrogen
atoms m a y exhibit the same behaviour, or more probably use three
mutually perpendicular p orbitals. Rundle then regards the metal atoms
as changing to the face-centred cubic structure, i n order to provide
' octahedral interstices ' in which the carbon or nitrogen atoms will have
six neighbours. This, however, appears incorrect, because the close-
packed hexagonal structure itself contains ' octahedral interstices ' to the
number of one per atom, and so far as the environment of the carbon or
nitrogen atoms is concerned, this could be obtained equally well in a close-
packed hexagonal structure. The difference between the two structures
lies in the environment of the metal atoms when the octahedral holes are
filled by atoms of carbon or nitrogen. In the NaC1 type of structure for
the MX compounds, each metal atom has six interstitial neighbours
arranged on three mutually perpendicular axes, whereas in an MX inter'-
stitial compound built up by filling the octahedral holes of a hexagonal
structure of close packed spheres, only some of the MX bonds proceeding
from an M atom are mutually perpendicular, and others are at an angle of
about 70 ° . I f the axial ratio of the close-packed hexagonal structure is
slightly different from that for close-packed spheres [~/(8/3)= 1-633], the
bonds to an atom in an octahedral interstice will not be exactly at right
angles, but it seems improbable that this would invalidate the above
argument. In any case, if we regard the environment of the carbon or
nitrogen atom as the controlling factor, we shall be left with the problem
1158 William Hume-Rothery on M e t a l l i c
of why the metallic atoms prefer the arrangement of the cubical close
packing rather than t h a t of hexagonal close packing of spheres, parti-
cularly since the latter could be obtained by such a slight alteration of t h e
lattices of the actual close-packed hexagonal metals. We m a y thus
conclude that, although the provision of octahedral holes for the carbon or
nitrogen atoms m a y be one factor, the face-centred cubic arrangement of
the metal atoms is favoured mainly because it provides the metallic atoms
with mutually perpendicular bonds to six neighbours. This clearly
suggests t h a t d~sp3 bonding from the metallic atoms is the main factor
underlying the formation of these MX carbides and nitrides.
We may now suggest the following qualitative picture of the MX
carbides and nitrides with the NaC1 type of structure. The interatomic
distances make it almost certain that these involve covalent rather than
Downloaded by [University of Bristol] at 07:33 25 January 2015
ionic bonding, because the C ++++ ion would be too small for an interstitial
fit, whilst a C. . . . ion would be too large, and also too unstable. In the
carbides we may regard each carbon atom as tending to acquire a share in
an octet of electrons. Since the carbon atom itself contains four electrons,
it must obtain on the average 2/3 of an electron from each of its metallic
neighbours which give rise to resonating co-valent bonds. This is
essentially the same view as t h a t of Rundle, and in TiC, ZrC, and HfC,
where the metal atoms are tetravalent, all the electrons of the metal atoms
are needed to build up the octet, and the conductivity arises from the fact
t h a t only some of the hybrid (spd) orbitals are filled. On passing to VC,
NbC and TaC, Rundle's view is t h a t the additional electron goes to form
M-M bonds, but the melting points in table 3 do not support this
view. On passing from TiC-VC, there is a fall in melting point, and on
passing from ZrC-NbC, and from HfC-TaC the melting point is unchanged
(see below).
In the nitrides, each nitrogen atom has five electrons and so requires
half an electron from each neighbour to complete its octet. Unless
charges are to be built up, the nitrogen atom will not contribute more than
it gains, and consequently the bonding in the nitrides will be weaker than
in the carbides, because the former involve three and the latter four
electrons per atom. This is strikingly borne out by the data in table 3,
which show t h a t in every case there is a fall in melting point on passing
from the carbide to the nitride of a given metal. At the same time we
can understand why the M-M distance in the nitride is less than that in the
carbide, because the atomic diameter of nitrogen is less than t h a t of carbon.
We can also understand why there are compounds SeN and LaN with the
NaC1 structure, but not ScC or LaC. Rundle's view is t h a t in passing
along a sequence such as TiN-VN, the additional electrons are used to
form M-M bonds, until the latter are so strong t h a t the metallic atoms
are pulled into some other structure, but the melting point data for the
nitrides do not support this view. The marked fall in melting point on
passing from TiN -> VN, and from ZrN -> NbN suggests t h a t the additional
electrons weaken rather than strengthen the bonding.
Carbides and Nitrides of the Type M X 1 t59
We have next to consider why the MX nitrides and carbides are not
formed by the elements of Group VI, and here it is interesting to note t h a t
WC and MoC have not structures in which the metal atoms considered
alone are in close-packed assemblies. Instead we find hexagonal struc-
tures with the atoms arranged so t h a t each metal atom is surrounded b y
six carbon atoms forming a trigonal prism, and each carbon atom is
surrounded b y metal atoms in the same way. The actual dimensions of
the lattices are :
lY[oC : a~2.90 WC : a~2.91
c-~2.77 c~2.83
c/a-~ O.955 c/a--~0.975
The vertical side of the trigonal prism is thus nearly a square.
Downloaded by [University of Bristol] at 07:33 25 January 2015
Table 3
VC 2750 Goldschmidt
2750 Emeleus
VN 2300 Sidgwick
2050 F. and S.
~EFERENCES
BRAGER, A., 1941, Acta Physicochim., U.R.S.S., 14, 1.
EMELEUS, H. J., 1940, Modern Aspects of Inorganic Chemistry (Routledge and
Paul).
EY~rsG, tI., WALTER, J., and KIMBALL, G. E., 1944, Quantum Chemistry
(New York : John Wiley ; London : Chapman & Hall).
FRIEDRICH, E., and SITTIG, L., 1925, Zeit. anorg. Chem., 143, 293.
GOLDSeHMIDT, H. J., 1948, J. Iron and Steel Inst., 160, 345.
HUME-ROTtIERY, W., IRVING,H. M., and WILLIAMS,1~. J. P., 1951, Proc. Roy.
Soc. A, 208, 437.
~{EISSNER, W., and FRANZ, H., 1930, Zeit. Physilc, 65, 30.
RUNDLE, R. E., 1948, Acta Crystallog., 1, 180.
SIDOWICE, N. V., 1950, Chemical Elements and their Compounds (Oxford:
Clarendon Press).
ZENg~, C., 1950, Acta Crystallog., 3, 352.