Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diana Ampath June
Diana Ampath June
Introduction
By investing in innovative, high-impact solutions, the Bristol Myers Squibb
Foundation, in partnership with its dedicated grantees, advances health
equity by improving access to and delivery of quality healthcare and
community services for at-risk and medically underserved populations
impacted by serious disease in Africa, Brazil, China, and the United States.
As we partner with a wide variety of community and health organizations
to drive change, we use a framework to understand and assess impact,
called the BMSF Impact Framework. The information below describes the
key elements of this impact framework. It is important for each of our
grantee partners to understand this framework as it guides the outcomes
and measures for which they are accountable.
Domains
The healthcare field includes more than just patient-provider interactions.
In the Impact Framework, we refer to the spaces in which our grantees
operate as Domains. Grantees often work in more than one domain or at
the intersection of multiple Domains. Th.D. Domains include the following:
• Health Systems, Organizations, and Staff - Healthcare organizations
(e.g., hospitals, clinics, providers) and their associated resources, staff, and
infrastructure.
• Community Support Services - Complementary support services in a
community (e.g., nonprofit groups, religious organizations, transportation
services) that can help contribute to improved health outcomes.
• Social Determinants - The setting in which individuals live, work, and
play (e.g., neighborhoods, parks, roads) and socioeconomic factors that
contribute to an individual’s health and wellbeing (e.g., education, income
level, social norms, prejudices).
• Public Policy - Health-equity-focused advocacy or collaboration with
government on legislation, regulation, policy, or public support.
Metric Accountability
Within each of the outcomes there are multiple metrics by which a
grantee will report the activity and impact of their work. While the list of
outcomes and underlying indicators is extensive, note that a grantee will
only be asked to report for the outcomes and indicators that are most
relevant to their project given the diseases on which it focuses, populations
it reaches, and activities in which it engages. Additionally, to demonstrate
the degree to which a grantee's efforts have improved health equity,
grantees will be asked to provide a target and achievement to date. The
target is a quantifiable goal that project aims to achieve and the
achievement is what your project has accomplished to date in reaching
the target.
Health Outcomes
When true improvements are made to Access to and Quality of healthcare,
health risks are mitigated and the Health Status of individuals and
communities follow. Given the nature of certain projects and time horizons
necessary to affect Health Outcomes, we do not expect each grantee to be
accountable for measuring impact in each Health Outcome area. However,
where reasonable, based on the scope of their project, a grantee should
identify their work with one or more Risk Factor or Health Status.
Health Status
• Mortality - The amount of time people can reasonably expect to live.
• Morbidity - The presence and severity of disease among individuals.
• Quality of Life - The degree to which individuals can experience all-
around well-being.
Continuum of Care
We also recognize that our grantee partners aim to create change across
the outcomes highlighted above at various points in an individual's life. We
account for these points in time by identifying how grantee partner
projects focus on one more stage of a Continuum of Care.
TEXT.01.01
This survey provides an opportunity for you, the BMSF grantee, to share
details about yourself, your project, and your audience, and to select the
indicators you have been tracking and reporting to BMSF.
Some of the questions in this survey are considered indicators and will be
the questions asked to you in future, bi-annual Impact Surveys. For these
questions, you will mark if your project has been tracking the indicator and
include a target to date and the achievement so far, if possible (see
definitions below). In some parts of the survey the terms Target and
Achievement are replaced with words like Expected and Realized
respectively depending with the nature of the indicator under discussion.
Forward/Back Buttons
At the bottom of each page of the survey, you will have two green buttons
that will allow you to either advance to the next question or go back to the
previous question. You can use these buttons to navigate through the
survey to see what questions will come and to go back to make some
corrections. The last button in this survey is red and clicking it will submit
your responses to Nedico.
Saving the Survey
Qualtrics is a web-based platform and saves your progress automatically.
The “Allow respondents to finish later” feature is enabled which uses
cookies on your browser to save progress.
Africa
Brazil
China
United
States
GEN.01.01. In which country or countries does your project focus? Select all
that apply.
Botswana
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Kenya
Lesotho
Malawi
South
Africa
Uganda
Tanzania
Zimbabwe
Nationwide
GEN.01.02. What is the name of your project?
RP.01. Please specify the reporting period that this submission reflects
(mm/dd/yyyy).
Start Date End Date
11/30/2020
RP.01-end date. Please specify the reporting period that this submission
reflects (mm/dd/yyyy).
05/31/2022
11/30/2023
Yes
No
Monthly report
5500
22213
GEN.02.01. How many individuals has your project reached within each of
the below groups to date?
. Number
157 225
Patients or participants
177 150
Families of patients or caregivers
30544 3000
A broad Community
1895 1500
Health Professionals and administrators
397 600
Local/Community Leaders
GEN.02.02. Thinking about the big picture, which of the following vulnerable
and/or medically undeserved populations have you ultimately supported
through your efforts?
Select all that apply.
Distinct Racial or Ethnic Groups
Low Socioeconomics-status
Rural
Differently Abled
Uninsured
Medicaid
Youth/teens
LGBTQ+
Veterans
Prisoners
Pastoralists
Fisherman
Miners
Public/Government Insurance
Other, please
specify
GEN.02.05.
Did your project sought IRB approval?
Yes
No
33209
GEN.02.06.Tgt. What is the total number of individuals needed to prove the
effectiveness of the intervention?
5500
5500
. Total number of
397 600
Community partnerships
Clinical Partnership
11 30
Governmental/Public Partnerships
OO.03.01. Has your project been able to create or join new partnerships as
a result of your affiliation with or support from BMSF? If yes, input the
number of new partnerships.
Yes
25
No
Yes
No
OO.03.03. How many educational material (ie curricula, toolkits, etc) have
been developed to date?
Achievement Target
The project has created training curricula for training HCPs, CHEWs, and for ECHO online training
Oncology
Cardiology
Immunology
Hematology
Palliative Care
Research
AIDS-related cancers
Breast Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Lung Cancer
Multiple Myeloma
Pediatric Cancers
Prostate Cancer
Colorectal
cancer
Oesophageal Cancer
Other, please
specify.
Health Systems, Organizations, and Staff - Healthcare organizations (e.g., hospitals, clinics, providers) and
their associated resources, staff, and infrastructure.
Community Support Services - Complementary support services in a community (e.g., nonprofit groups,
religious organizations, transportation services) that can help contribute to improved health outcomes.
Social Determinants - The setting in which individuals live, work, and play (e.g., neighborhoods, parks,
roads) and socioeconomic factors that contribute to an individual’s health and wellbeing (e.g., education,
income level, social norms, prejudices).
GEN.04.01. Which Results based Objective does your project focus on?
Improvement/renovation of treatment
facilities.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
GEN.05. On which stages along the Continuum of Care does your project
primarily focus?
Select all that apply.
Prevention - Use of resources, outreach, and education to decrease the risk of getting a disease or minimize
or control the severity of the diseases
Diagnosis - Tests, examination, or procedures to identify a disease or condition from its signs and
symptoms
GEN.06.01.
Of these Access indicators , which of the following outcomes did your
project aim to improve? Select all that apply.
Awareness &
Engagement
Resource availability
Physical/Virtual Access
Community Intergration
Service Affordability
Not Applicable
GEN.06.02.
Of these Quality indicators , which of the following outcomes did your
project aim to improve? Select all that apply.
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Timeliness
Patient-centeredness
Not Applicable
Risk Factors
Health Status
No - My project will not focus on, or will not measure at this time, indicators for Risk Factors or Health
Status.
Morbidity
Quality of life
No - My project will not focus on, or will not measure at this time, indicators for Health
Status.
Text.03. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Access to healthcare through improved Awareness & Engagement, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
POA.01.01. What are the ways in which your project educates or engages
individuals?
Select all that apply.
POA.01.01.03.
How many In-Person/Virtual events have been conducted to date.
Achievement Target
76
85
POA.01.02.
How many patients did you reach through your education/awareness
building efforts?
Achievement Target
33209
5568
22170
Text.04. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Access to healthcare through improved Resource Availability, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
Navigation services
Prevention services
Screening services
Diagnostic services
Treatment services
Other, please
specify:
Health information dissemination
POA.02.01.
How many patients have received navigation services?
Achievement Target
1063
225
1048
107
98
3
Renal Disease
3
Aplastic Anemia
5
Plasmacytoma
3
Amyloidosis
2
MGUS
3
CUP (cancer of unknown primary)
1
Breast cancer
89
210
85
73
210
66
0
POA.02.05.MM.3.Tgt. How many patients have completed treatment for
Multiple Myeloma to date?
107
210
98
107
POA.02.06.2.MM.Tgt. How many patients with Multiple Myeloma have
received psychosocial support to date?
210
107
210
98
107
POA.02.07.2.MM.Tgt. How many patients with Multiple Myeloma have
received palliative or hospice care to date?
210
107
210
98
107
POA.02.08.2.MM.Tgt. How many patients with Multiple Myeloma have
received survivorship services to date?
210
31
20
31
0
POA.03.01.Tgt. How many healthcare facilities/community partners that
have been established or renovated for care delivery?
The project donated 31 BMA needles to the 11 counties where CMEs were done. The project also
Increased the knowledge base of the HCPs in the 11 counties through the CMEs we conducted. The
project improved access to BMA procedures, SPEP, B2 Microglobulin, and other laboratory workups
in Moi teaching and referral hospital hospitals
Text.05. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Access to healthcare through improved Health Worker Capacity, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
Yes
No
POA.04.01. How many professional or lay health workers have been trained
to date?
Achievement Target
2292
2100
POA.04.05. How many healthcare providers applied the new skills and
knowledge?
Achievement Target
POA.04.05.Tgt. How many healthcare providers applied the new skills and
knowledge?
Text.06. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Access to healthcare through improved Physical/Virtual Access, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
Transportation
assistance
126
Food
assistance
Housing
assistance
Yes
No
POA.10.01. Please describe the ways in which your project has engage with
community stakeholders (non-clinical) such as (i.e...faith leaders, food
banks, local government etc.)
200-word limit.
Your word count is: 0
N/A
The program engages clinical stakeholders through training and routine refresher sessions on the
ECHO platform. The program also does routine BMA and lab technicians mentorship processes.
146
133
POA.13. In a few sentences, please describe how your project has resulted
in permanent positive change in community-based support structures.
Write "N/A" if not applicable
200-word limit.
Your word count is: 0
N/A
Text.08. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Access to healthcare through improved Service Affordability, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
POA.14. Which of the following best describes the ways your project works
to ensure affordable patient care?Select all that apply.
Assist with navigating medical expenses(e.g., reading bills, connecting with billing
departments
Other, please
specify
NHIF support, SPEP support, B2 Microglobulin support, diagnostic support
POA.14.01. For how many individuals in your target population has your
project improved service affordability?
Achievement Target
429
POA.14.01.Tgt. For how many individuals in your target population has your
project improved service affordability?
975
POA.14.01.Prev. For how many individuals in your target population has your
project improved service affordability?
381
POA.16. In a few sentences, please describe the ways in which your project
has generated cost savings for individuals seeking care.
200-word limit.
Your word count is: 0
Text.10. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Quality of healthcare through improved Efficiency, please answer the
following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
7.6
30
30
Text.11. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Quality of healthcare through improved Timeliness, please answer the
following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
POQ.07.MM. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from screening to diagnosis ?
Achievement Target
Input number in days
10
POQ.07.MM.Tgt. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from screening to diagnosis ?
POQ.08.MM. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from diagnosis to treatment?
Achievement Target
Input number in days
POQ.08.MM.Tgt. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from diagnosis to treatment?
Input number in days
2
POQ.09.MM. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from scheduling an appointment to seeing a care provider?
Achievement Target
Input number in days
POQ.09.MM.Tgt. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from scheduling an appointment to seeing a care provider?
Input number in days
Text.12. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Quality of healthcare through improved Patient-centeredness, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
Yes
No
83
POQ.10.02.Tgt. What percent of patients report being satisfied with their
care?
50
83
72
50
72
0
POQ.13.Tgt. How many patients have received translation or interpretation
services?
POQ.14. Does your project focus on providing culturally inclusive care (e.g.,
family/community interactions, religious beliefs affecting healthcare,
languages spoken by patients, diverse health beliefs held by patient
populations, cultural or language competency training to professional or
lay health workers)
Yes
No
TEXT.17.MM. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Health Status related to Mortality towards Multiple Myeloma, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
50
Text.16.MM. Thinking about the ways in which your project aims to improve
Health Status related to Quality of Life towards Multiple Myeloma, please
answer the following questions.
You can also hover over each framework term, shown in bold text, for a
description.
30
30
. .
To what extent do you feel that physical pain prevents you 30 100
from doing what you need to do? (WHOQOL Q3):
30 100
How well are you able to get around? (WHOQOL Q15):
30 100
How satisfied are you with your sleep? (WHOQOL Q16):
How satisfied are you with your ability to perform your daily 30 100
living activities? (WHOQOL Q17):
How satisfied are you with your capacity for work? 30 100
(WHOQOL Q18):
30
HS.30.01.MM. What percent of patients indicated improvements in the
following aspects of Psychological Health?
. .
50 0
How much do you enjoy life? (WHOQOL Q5):
50 0
How well are you able to concentrate? (WHOQOL Q7):
50 100
How satisfied are you with yourself? (WHOQOL Q19):
How often do you have negative feelings such as blue mood, 50 100
despair, anxiety, depression? (WHOQOL Q26):
50
. .
50 100
How satisfied are you with your sex life? (WHOQOL Q21):
. .
How satisfied are you with the support you get from your 50 100
friends? (WHOQOL Q22): Select all that apply Achievement Target
50
. .
50 0
How safe do you feel in your daily life? (WHOQOL Q8):
50 0
How healthy is your physical environment? (WHOQOL Q9):
50 100
Do you have enough money to meet your needs? (WHOQOL Q12):
How available to you is the information that you need in your day- 50 100
to-day life? (WHOQOL Q13):
To what extent do you have the opportunity for leisure activities? 50 100
(WHOQOL Q14):
How satisfied are you with the conditions of your living place? 50 100
(WHOQOL Q23):
How satisfied are you with your access to health services? 50 100
(WHOQOL Q24):
50 100
How satisfied are you with your transport? (WHOQOL Q25):
Text.RBO.4. Thinking about your Results Based Objectives and how your
project aims to train local clinical haematologist to increase ratio of
clinical haematologist towards Multiple Myeloma, answer the following
questions.
RBO.04.01. How many protocols were developed and submitted for ethics
approval for all proposed research projects?
Achievement Target
Yes
No
0
RBO.04.03.Tgt. How many Multiple Myeloma epidemiological researches
were conducted?
0
RBO.05.01.Tgt. How many data capturers were appointed?
the patient has shown improvement in terms of improvement in their energy, from before to now,
there has been an improvement. there has also been an improvement in them having enough
money to meet their needs, this was not so before.
Text.18. Thinking about internal program management goals for which
BMSF is providing support, please answer the following questions.
Goal Milestone
Goal 4
Goal 5
Goal 6
Goal 7
Goal 8
GM.01.01.M1. For the milestone "Proper and timely diagnosis of multiple
myeloma patients has improved during this reporting period. We
managed to support 261 patients to do the routine diagnostic work ups to
aid in timely diagnosis due to financial constrains that were limiting them
to do this tests.", rate your progress to date.
Significantly exceeded
Exceeded
Met
Approached
Changed approach
Significantly exceeded
Exceeded
Met
Approached
Changed approach
GM.01.01.M3. For the milestone "#To provide support for diagnostic testing
to needy MM patients. #To provide health insurance support to needy MM
patients #To provide peer support to MM patients #To determine factors
affecting treatment completion among MM patients in MTRH #To
determine changes in Health-Related Quality of Life in MM patients
receiving treatment", rate your progress to date.
Significantly exceeded
Exceeded
Met
Approached
Changed approach
GM.01.02. Please describe the reason(s) for your progress rating including
any significant accomplishments and/or challenges, any adjustments or
integrated any new elements and any changes made in response. (skip if
not applicable)
200-word limit.
Your word count is: 0
We managed to achieve 53% of the life of the program target since we supported 261 patients to
do their routine work-ups thus we have not yet met the target but we are approaching it.
TEXT.19. Thinking about operational activities and other outputs from your
project, please answer the following questions.
OO.01.01. List the titles of the Peer reviewed manuscripts created to date.
OO.02. Is your project engaged in improving or advancing health policy?
Yes
No
OO.02.01. Please indicate the ways your project has been engaged in public
health policy changes. Select all that apply
Policymaker education
Legislative advancements
Agency/policy
revisions
Policy
advocacy
OO.03. Has your project been able to secure additional funding as a result
of your affiliation with or support from BMSF? If yes, input the amount of
additional funding. Input amounts for public and private if both apply
Yes, public:
Yes, private:
No
POQ.11. Does your project focus on building trust between patients and their
healthcare provider(s)?
Yes
No
The program has ensured the clinicians are confidential with what the patients share. the
program clinician is also available anytime the patients need assistance of any kind.
OO.04. How is the project going overally? How would you rate the overall
progress of your project?
Your word count is: 0
So far we have achieved a number of targets, surpassed some targets, and are almost achieving
the rest. So far the progress is fairly excellent. The program is however experiencing challenges in
how to calculate or collect data on impact indicators due to systematic challenges from partners.
Training HCPS in the various health facilities to provide MM care decentralizes care to the counties
and therefore makes sure the patients get care at the counties. Sharing our MM model of care/
experience through publications of manuscripts can contribute to policy changes and advocacy
Yes
No
Yes
No
OO.08. What are the key lessons learned from your project to date?
Your word count is: 0
The project needs to be flexible and change strategies, in cases where the strategies in place are
not working to create impact and achieve the set targets.
AMPATH MULTIPLE MYELOMA PROGRAM HEALTH WORKER My name is Austin Omondi, I am a clinician
for the Ampath Multiple Myeloma program. My main role as a clinician is to attend to myeloma
patients every day, have been doing this for the past 3 years in my workstation. At first, I used to
see few patients in the clinic but with time the number keeps on rising every day, this is a good
thing since health care workers can flag myeloma symptoms and refer them appropriately.
However, there are still a lot of challenges in myeloma care. The majority of these patients are
elderly people who are either retired or are on the edge of the retirement period, and the few
energetic working individuals are not productive due to the disease burden. Myeloma symptoms
are masked with other diseases e.g., arthritis hence delayed diagnosis. and in terms of treatment,
it's normally prolonged over years which harms their finances. These are patients who undergo a
lot of psychological and psychosocial challenges of rejection by family and friends, financial
constraints, and treatment side effects. They are always depressed because they cannot meet
their needs and that of their family. There is still a need for advocacy and awareness on myeloma
screening for early diagnosis at premalignant state for better outcome and treatment. The
government also should have an inclusive insurance package for the diagnostic and treatment of
myeloma.
OO.14. Is there any other input regarding your project or work with BMSF
that has not been captured yet that you would like to share? If so, please
explain in a few sentences.
200-word limit.
Your word count is: 0
POQ.07.MM.Prev. For patients with Multiple Myeloma, what was the average
length of time from screening to diagnosis ?
10
Powered by Qualtrics