Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Global Desalination Market Overview

Tom Pankratz, Water Desalination Report

1
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Global Desal Capacity 1990-2020

2
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Global Desal Capacity 1990-2020
Close-up on Latin America
Total installations: 1191 desal plants producing 4.13 million m3/d
Total seawater: 425 plants producing 2.75 million m3/d
Total RO plants: 921 Total Thermal: 123 Other: 47
Online >2000: 908 plants, with 283 are SWRO
Online >2010: 610 plants

3
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Global Desal Capacity 1990-2020

4
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Global Contracted Capacity

Seawater + Brackish Water Desalination

7
Capacity – million m3/d

6
5
4
3
2
1
0

5
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Desal Forecast CapEx versus OpEx

Source: GWI DesalData

6
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Capacity w/ Private Sector Involvement

7
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Spending by Market 2017-2022

8
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
SWRO Energy Consumption

The most energy- Trend towards systems Complex interplay


efficient design is approach: between large number
integration of factors
not necessarily the OVER
most cost-effective optimization

Source: GWI DesalData

9
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
SWRO High versus Low Recovery

The most energy- Trend towards systems Complex interplay


efficient design is approach: between large number
integration of factors
not necessarily the OVER
most cost-effective optimisation

10
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
SWRO High versus Low Recovery

The most energy- Trend towards systems Complex interplay


efficient design is approach: between large number
integration of factors
not necessarily the OVER
most cost-effective optimisation

11
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
SWRO is more than Membranes

12
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
SWRO is more than Membranes

Intake

Pretreatment

Post-treatment RO
Membranes

Outfall
Pumps &
Piping

13
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com
Membranes, Vessels = 7.1% of CapEx

Based on 100,000m3/d SWRO


at a CapEx of $133.7 million

source: GWI DesalData


SWRO Development Challenges
Justification
• Is it really necessary and how big should it be?
Intake/Outfall
• Primary siting challenge
• Most significant cost variable
Pretreatment
• Biggest impact on plant availability
Post-treatment
• Biggest underestimated challenge
Conveyance
• Can equal intake/outfall in siting impact
Procurement Method
• Affects project cost, timeline
• Politically sensitive
15
Tom Pankratz – 6 March 2019 – Santiago, Chile – tp@globalwaterintel.com

You might also like