Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disease and Insect Mauritius
Disease and Insect Mauritius
yellow spot
Yellow Spot
Symptoms
Epidemiology
- high humidity (80%) and moderate Control
temperature (March - May) - resistant varieties
Economic importance - delay harvest
- not important in dry conditions - application of fungicide
- in humid conditions severe in to reduce infection but not
susceptible vars practical and not
- destruction of leaves recommended
- infected cane : high levels of reducing
sugars affecting juice purity
- up to 30% reduction in sugar
- cane yield reduced by up to 25%
- less pronounced effect in non-flowering
varieties
Brown rust
Brown rust
Transmission
- wind and rain
Economic importance
• Up to 50% loss in susceptible varieties
Control measures
- resistant varieties
- date of plantation to avoid the disease
- selective fungicides e.g. mancozeb
Smut
Symptoms
- length of whip varies from a few cm to up
to 1.5 m
- whips shorter in ratoons but more numerous
- whip covered by a thin membrane
- growth of the stalk stops and the cane dies
- infected stalks are long, and weak with short
leaves
- thin leaves
- maximum number of whips at 6-7 months
Conditions favourable for the disease
- warm and dry
Smut
- more important in rainfed cane
Transmission
- Wind: each whip produces more than 108 spores per day (100 000 000)
- Cuttings: infection can be latent in the bud
- Soil: less important under humid conditions, spores do not survive humid conditions
Economic importance
- Very important in dry regions of Africa
- Affects:
• Number of millable stalks
• Cane diameter
• Cane yield and
• Sugar recovery
Control measures Smut
• healthy cuttings from nurseries
• hot water treatment of cuttings 52oC/30 min
and a fungicide dip
• replantation of severely infected fields
• roguing:
• Resistant varieties
• Crop rotation
• Flooding
Pineapple disease
Pineapple disease
Transmission
Spores transmitted by the soil which infect the cuttings, by the ends, borer tunnels,
cracks
Economic importance
- poor germination
- recruiting necessary or need to replant
Control measures
Dip cuttings at planting in:
• thiophanate-methyl (Topsin) at 0.6 ml/litre
Chlorosis
Gumming
Transmission
• Water and wind,
• Infected cuttings
• By knives when preparing cutings or during harvest
Conditions favouring development of disease
• Strong winds, rains, high humidity, high temperature
• Effect on yield is more important when the plant is stressed at
maturity and cool weather.
• Reduction of 19 – 40% in cane yield and 9 -19% in sugar yield
observed.
Gumming
Control measures
•Resistant varieties
Red line
Leaf scald
Symptoms: chronic phase
Chlorosis
Leaf scald
Symptoms: phase chronique
Reddening of nodes and internodes
Leaf scald
Transmission
- rain and wind
- infected cuttings
- knives and harvesters
Host plants
- Several weed species
Conditions favourable for development of the disease
- humid and cold or warm and dry
Economic importance
- Cane yield, juice quality are affected depending in the degree of
infection
Leaf scald
Control measures
- Resistant varieties
- Cold soak of cuttings (48 h) followed by HWT 50 oC/ 3 h
- Use of healthy cuttings from nurseries
- elimination of infected plants
- disinfection of knives, harvester blades,
CONTROL OF SUGAR CANE DISEASES
Varietal resistance
HOST PLANT Chemical treatment
Good growth conditions
DISEASE TRIANGLE
PATHOGEN ENVIRONMENT
Disease-free cuttings Adapted variety
Uprooting (roguing) of diseased plants
Date of plantation
Eradication of infected fields
Knife disinfection Good drainage
Alternative hosts
1. Varietal resistance
2. Sanitation
3. Heat treatment
4. Nurseries
5. Cultural practices
6. Chemical treatment
Gumming
Spreader rows of susceptible varieties
inoculated with bacterial suspension
Transmission to test varieties takes place in a
natural way
VARIETAL RESISTANCE
Leaf scald
Direct inoculation simulating knife transmission
VARIETAL RESISTANCE
Vs
Vs V1 Vs V2 Vs V3 Vs S1 Vs
Vs
Vs V4 Vs V5 Vs S2 Vs V6 Vs
Vs
Replicates: none
Vs
V1 V2 S1 V3
Vs
V4 S2 V5 V6
Vs
Vs (B 3337)
Vs V1 Vs V2 Vs V3 Vs S1 Vs
Vs (S 17)
Vs V4 Vs V5 Vs S2 Vs V6 Vs
Vs (B 3337)
Replicates: two
SMUT
¾ Hot water
¾ Hot air
¾ Aerated steam
HEAT TREATMENTS
DHWT: is effective against RSD, but is not as effective against leaf scald
HEAT TREATMENTS
A NURSERY (x ha)
¾ Date of plantation/harvest: e.g. rust and red rot – avoid cool and wet weather,
yellow spot: delay harvest
Treatment of cuttings
Pineapple disease:
• thiophanate-methyl at 0.30 g a.i./litre in cold dip or 0.15 g a.i./litre in hot dip
• difenoconazole: 0.25 g a.i/litre (cold dip) or 0.125 g a.i/litre in hot dip
Moth borers
Chilo sacchariphagus (Crambidae)
Sesamia calamistis (Noctuidae)
Tetramoera schistaceana (Eucosmidae)
MAIN SUGAR CANE PESTS IN MAURITIUS
Scale insects
Aulacaspis tegalensis (Diaspididae),
Pulvinaria iceryi (Coccidae)
MAIN SUGAR CANE PESTS IN MAURITIUS
White grubs
Heteronychus licas, Alissonotum piceum (Dynastidae)
Phyllophaga smithi (Melolonthidae)
MAIN SUGAR CANE PESTS IN MAURITIUS
Armyworms
Mythimna spp. (Noctuidae)
MANAGEMENT OF SUGAR CANE PESTS
Xanthopimpla stemmator
Cotesia flavipes
Le borer rose (Sesamia)
Sesamia calamistis (pink borer)
Pulvinaria iceryi, the sugar
cane soft scale
Pulvinaria iceryi ‘Pou à poche blanche ’
Biology
• Life cycle simple
• All stages develop on leaves
• Males do not exist
• Reproduction through parthenogenesis
• Female stages :
• egg, 3 larval stages, adult
• Reproducing adult recognized by its white
ovisac
• Life cycle: 30 –60 d
Estimated sugar loss (1976/77):
15000 - 20000 T
Pulvinaria iceryi
Effects of infestation
•Reduced growth
•Death of stools
• Affects the sugar cane plant more than any other homopteran pest
1
mm
Mature larvae
Well developped
ovisac
1
mm
Ovisac formation
1
mm
Pulvinaria iceryi
Pulvinaria iceryi
Pulvinaria iceryi
Infestations recorded over the past years
Year Area infested
(ha)
1998 23.0
1999 5.0
2000 161.5
2001 154
2002 101.1
2003 158+
2004 10.7+
2005 609
2006 50+
Factors responsible for recent infestations
• Dispersal passive
•Cane cuttings
• Cleaner/scavenger
Nature of losses
•poor ratooning
Cryptolaemus montzourieri
Australian origin, introduced from S Africa in 1938/39 for the
control of pineapple mealy bug
Size: 4 mm
Other hosts:
Scale insects,
Control
¾ Never apply insecticides to infested fields
¾ Do not replant fields near standing infested canes
¾ Cut back infested areas
¾ Planting materials should not be taken from infested fields
¾ Harvest attacked fields as soon as possible (stubble shave)
¾ Never burn fields or debris
Control strategies
Long term
Medium term
2. Cut back most severely infested part of field to allow predators and
parasitoids to migrate to less infested areas.
the scale insect
Aulacaspis tegalensis
(Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
Distribution
Java, Kenya, Madagascar, Malaya, Mauritius, Philippines,
Réunion,Tanzania and Uganda
Biology
The life cycle
egg + two larval stages for females
egg +four larval stages for males.
Eggs laid under the female scale
First larval stage (the crawler) is the only mobile stage.
Life cycle (from egg to adult) lasts about 47 days in
females and about 32 days in males.
• Rotting of canes.
• Field carry-over
Factors affecting incidence
In Mauritius:
• Lack of cane trashing favours increase in scale insect
population
• cane fires?
What are white grubs?
… the larvae of some scarabeid beetles which feed on
underground parts of sugar cane and other crops
What are white grubs?
Alissonotum
Phyllophaga
piceum
smithi
Heteronychus licas
Univoltine life cycle
1 2 3
Adults feed for
1‐2 weeks
y Larvae available for 6 months or longer, but all look the same-
adults different?
y Different species- different biologies, natural enemies.
Field damage
Heteronychus licas
Severe damage to plant canes can cause total destruction of fields which have to be replanted.
Damage to mature standing canes can decrease cane yields by more than 25%
¾ In addition to the direct losses in cane yields, damage by the white grub present added costs of
recruiting/replanting and insecticide application.
Economic importance of Heteronychus licas
Plant canes
•Cost of replanting one ha sugar cane after treatment with insecticides: ~ MUR
50 000 (1200 €)
• Yield loss (loss of one harvest, field cannot be harvested in the same year)
implies loss in revenue ~MUR 200,000/ha (5000 €)
Ratoons
• Chemical control- complicated by long term nature of the crop, difficulty in treating
soil and white grub life cycle: Confidor® (imidacloprid)
Why?
• Resistant populations
• Environmental effects
• Costs
Trash removed – no
armyworm Trash blanket - infested
Male longevity: 11.1d (7 – 16)
Female longevity: 10.2d (4 – 16)
Fecundity: 668.4 eggs (207 – 1128)
Pupal stage
Life cycle of
armyworms Male: 10.7d (9 – 13)
Female: 9.2d (7 – 11)
Incubation : 3.46 d (2 – 6)
Larval stage
Male: 24.7d (19 – 31) / Female: 23.6d (19 – 32)
• Armyworms Mythimna spp.
• Management
• Chemical control
Trash management ?
CHEMICAL CONTROL
Several insecticides have been tested and thiodicarb (Larvin) at
the rate of 1.5 g a.i. - more efficient
The following should be considered before attempting chemical
control of sugar cane armyworms
•Timing
•Economics of treatment
•Presence of parasitoids
•Presence of other trash caterpillars