Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sevilla vs. CA
Sevilla vs. CA
Sevilla vs. CA
SARMIENTO, J.:
FACTS:
Lina Sevilla (Sevilla) and Tourist World Service (TWS) entered into a lease contract with
Segundina Noguera (Noguera) to use the premises of the latter for their travel business office.
Sevilla and TWS were held solidarily liable for the payment of the rentals of the branch.
TWS was later informed that Sevilla was connected with a rival firm. The TWS branch
was losing money and considered closing its office. The office was later locked, and Sevilla and
her employees were not able to use the said office. Sevilla went to court and filed a complaint
with prayer for the issuance of a mandatory preliminary injunction. The case was later
dismissed.
On appeal, Sevilla claimed that she is not an employee of TWS but rather in a joint
business venture with them.
ISSUE:
RULING:
The Court stated that Sevilla and TWS had not embarked on a joint venture or
otherwise, a partnership. And apparently, Sevilla herself did not recognize the existence of such
a relation. In her letter of November 28, 1961, she expressly 'concedes your [Tourist World
Service, Inc.'s] right to stop the operation of your branch office in effect, accepting Tourist World
Service, Inc.'s control over the manner in which the business was run. A joint venture, including
a partnership, presupposes generally standing between the joint co-venturers or partners, in
which each party has an equal proprietary interest in the capital or property contributed and
where each party exercises equal rights in the conduct of the business. furthermore, the parties
did not hold themselves out as partners, and the building itself was embellished with the electric
sign "Tourist World Service, Inc. in lieu of a distinct partnership name.