Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drying of Red Pepper
Drying of Red Pepper
Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 4 2005 Article 1
Recommended Citation:
Simal, Susana; Garau, Carme; Femenia, Antoni; and Rosselló, Carmen (2005) "Drying of Red
Pepper (Capsicum Annuum): Water Desorption and Quality," International Journal of Food
Engineering: Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 1.
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022
Abstract
Capsicum annuum samples were dried at different air-drying temperatures, ranging from 30
to 90ºC. Modelling of the drying curves was satisfactory when the Page model (average
percentage of explained variance was 99.0 ± 0.2%) was used, whereas the Peleg model provided a
less accurate simulation (average percentage of explained variance was 91± 14%). Both k and n
parameters of the Page’s model exhibited a clear temperature dependence. In fact, n parameter
varied linearly with the temperature (r2=0.92), whereas k parameter followed an Arrhenius
relationship (r2= 0.96). An activation energy value of ca 27 kJ/mol was estimated using the Page
equation. Air-drying temperature influenced the final quality of the dried red pepper (paprika).
According to the results, drying within the range of 50 to 75ºC, would be the optimum conditions
to achieve a final product with the best colour characteristics (highest ASTA and chroma values)
and also, with the highest antioxidant capacity.
KEYWORDS: Red pepper, drying, color, quality, antioxidant, Peleg’s model, Page’s model
Author Notes: The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of CICYT
(AGL2003-03889) and the Conselleria d’Agricultura i Pesca of the Balear Government
Red peppers Capsicum annuum v. Tap de cortí, (moisture 4.8 g/g dm; ash 8.9 g/100 g dm and fat
content 14 g/100 g dm) autochthonous from the island of Majorca (Spain) were cut perpendicular to
the long axis and dehydrated at different air-drying temperatures (30°C, 50°C, 65°C, 75°C and 90°C).
In all cases, the final moisture content was 0.2 kg water/kg dm.
Drying experiments were performed in a laboratory scale hot air drier (Simal et al., 1996)
operating at an air mass flux of 2.5 kg/(m2s) ensuring that drying was controlled by the internal
resistance and drying rate was not dependent on mass transfer from the solid surface to the gas phase.
The drier has an automatic temperature controller (±0.1°C). The air flowed perpendicular to the bed. A
monolayer loading was used. The average air room characteristics were of 22 ± 1°C and 68 ± 5%
humidity. Water losses were measured by weighing the basket and its content automatically. Three
replications of each experiment were carried out. After dehydration, pepper samples were ground with
a mill and sifted by a 0.5 mm aperture sieve.
Initial and final moisture contents were measured by using AOAC method 22103 (AOAC,
1990). The recommended measure for the red color intensity is the ASTA value -American Spice
Trade Association- based on pigment extraction by acetone and espectrofotometric measure at 460 nm
(ASTA, 1985). Color of paprika samples was also determined according to the CIELAB coordinates
by using a Minolta (CR-300) spectrocolorimeter with specular component included, C illuminant, and
an observer with angle of 2º, as a reference system. The chroma (Cab*) parameter was calculated as
(Eq. 1):
2 2
C *ab = a* + b* (1)
The measurements of the antioxidant capacity were conducted in a Rancimat 679 Instrument
(Metrohm Ltd., Switzerland). The air flow rate and temperature were 20 l/h and 110 °C, respectively.
The oxidations took place on commercial sunflower oil, to which 10% of dehydrated pepper was
added. Thus, the protection factor for each sample (PF) was calculated by dividing its induction period
by that corresponding to the sunflower oil (Louli et al., 2004).
Statistical analysis was performed on pooled data by using the SPSS statistical software package.
One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s analysis were used to determine the statistical significance
of differences of the experimental values.
Peleg (1988) proposed a two-parameter sorption equation. This equation is known as the Peleg’s
model (Eq. 2):
t
W = W0 ± (2)
( 1 + 2 t)
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022 2
100 N Ve i − Vc i
%E = ∑ (5)
N i=1 Ve
i
These modules have been used in the literature to evaluate the goodness of fit of different
mathematical models. It is generally considered that %E values below 10% give a good fit (Park et al.,
2002).
The drying kinetics of red pepper (Capsicum annuum) were determined at 30, 50, 65, 75 and 90ºC for
average moisture contents from 4.8 to 0.2 kg water/kg dm. Drying curves up to 30000 s have been
represented in figure 1. These curves showed an important increase in the drying rate when the air
temperature increased. A significant reduction of the drying time needed to reach the final moisture
content, could be obtained by increasing the drying temperature, i.e. at 90ºC, 1.3 h were required to
obtain a moisture content of 1.3 kg/kg dm, whereas at 30ºC up to 16.5 h were necessary to reach the
some moisture content. Similar results have been described by different authors (Kaymak-Ertekin,
2002; Sanjuan et al., 2003).
3.1 Modelling
Experimental results of moisture variation with drying time were fitted to the proposed models,
the Peleg model (Eq. 2) and the Page model (Eq. 3). By using SOLVER, an optimization tool (GRG2
method) included in the Microsoft Excel 2002TM spreadsheet, the parameters of the different models,
which provided the lowest sum of the square differences between the experimental and the estimated
moisture values, were identified.
The k2 parameter of the Peleg model is related to the maximum water absorption capacity
(Thurhan et al., 2002). In the literature, no effect of temperature on k2 has been reported in water
absorption studies using the Peleg model (Hung et al., 1993; Abu-Ghannam and McKenna, 1997;
Maharaj and Sankat, 2000).
3
6
30˚C
50˚C
5 65˚C
75˚C
90˚C
4
W (kg/kg dm)
0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
t (s)
Figure 1. Drying curves of red pepper at different drying air temperatures, from 30 to 90°C.
Table 1. Identified figures for the two model parameters together with the percentages of error (%E)
and explained variance (%var).
Peleg model
k2= 0.17±0.02 Page model
(kg dm/kg water)
k1
T(°C)
(kg k (104)
%E % var n %E % var
dm/kg (s-n)
water/s)
30 4616.57 7.2 99.2 2.60 0.7812 7.12 99.0
50 1688.98 10.1 99.2 1.59 0.9915 5.80 99.8
65 858.89 11.7 98.3 1.02 0.9795 5.22 99.6
75 565.21 27.5 95.2 0.85 1.1827 2.02 99.9
90 315.05 26.9 75.8 0.42 1.2485 9.4 98.7
Average 17 ±10 93±10 6 ±3 99.4±0.5
The k1 parameter decreased as the temperature increased. Thus, the linearised Arrhenius equation
adequately interpreted the effect of the temperature (r2=0.99) (Eq 6).
The equilibrium moisture content value (We) was obtained by using both the room air conditions
and DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022
the moisture isotherm obtained by using the GAB equation parameters proposed by Sanjuan et4 al.,
The values obtained for the n parameter were similar to those presented by Doymaz and Pala,
(2002) for the drying of sliced peppers (1.12 and 1.22) using different pretreatments and drying air
conditions. However, no similarity was found for the k parameter. This difference could be attributed
either to the variety of red pepper and/or the pretreatment used before drying. The k values obtained
for the different temperatures, varied according to the Arrhenius type relationship (r2=0.96) (equation
8). Similar trend has been observed by most authors for the k parameter when studying a wide variety
of biological materials (Ezeiki and Otten, 1991; Hossain and Bala, 2002; Madamba, 2003).
Similar results were found by Madamba (2003) who concluded that the Page equation with an
Arrhenius type relationship for the temperature dependence of the drying constant k and n as a linear
function of the slice thickness, satisfactorily described the behaviour of coconut strips during hot air
(convective) drying stage.
⎛ - 26678.25 ⎞
k = 7.22 10 - 9 exp ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (8)
⎝ R (T + 273 ) ⎠
From equation 8, a figure of 26.7 kJ/mol was estimated for the apparent activity energy. Values
of the same order have been proposed in the literature for the drying process of different foods: 26.2
kJ/mol for broccoli drying (Simal et al., 1998); between 49 and 54 kJ/mol for grapes (Azzouz et al.,
2002); 12.3 and 39.5 kJ/mol for potato and bean, respectively (Senadeera et al., 2003). Different
studies based on the water diffusivity in pepper proposed Ea values also similar 36.6 kJ/mol (Carbonell
et al., 1986), 28.4 kJ/mol (Turhan et al., 1997) and 44-61 kJ/mol (Sanjuan et al., 2003).
The accuracy of the Peleg and the Page models to simulate the drying curves of red pepper at
different temperatures was evaluated. By using the obtained figure for k2 parameter and equation 6
(Peleg model) and equations 7 and 8 (Page model), the moisture content variation during drying has
been estimated for the temperatures of 30, 50, 65, 75 and 90°C. Figures 2 and 3 show the
representation of the estimated vs experimental moisture contents of red pepper during drying through
both Peleg (figure 2) and Page (figure 3) models.
In order to mathematically evaluate the simulation, the percentage of explained variance and the
mean relative error obtained by comparing the experimental average moisture contents and those
given by the proposed models for the whole range of temperatures studied, from 30ºC to 90ºC, were
calculated. These results are shown in table 1. The average percentages of explained variance
calculated for the simulation of the drying curves through the Peleg and the Page model were
93 ± 10% and 99.4 ± 0.5%, respectively. The %E values were below 10% for all the temperatures
studied only in the case of the Page model.
Simulation of average moisture content during drying obtained by solving the Peleg model was
not satisfactory. As the drying air temperature increased, the %E increased and %var decreased until
figures that could be considered inadequate. Thus, the Peleg model could be useful to simulate the
drying curves of red pepper (var. Tap de cortí) only at temperatures up to 65ºC.
Otherwise, the Page model allowed an accurate simulation of the drying curves of red pepper for
the whole range of temperatures studied (from 30 to 90ºC) exhibiting a high concordance between
experimental and estimated moisture contents (figure 3 and table 1).
In conclusion, by using the empirical model of Page, an adequate description of the drying
curves of red pepper could be obtained, and although this is a simple empirical model, could represent
a useful tool for engineering purposes.
30°C
2 50°C
65°C
75°C
1 90°C
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
experimental moisture content (kg/kg dm)
Figure 2. Estimated vs. experimental moisture content. Simulation of experiments by using the Peleg
model.
6
estimated moisture content (kg/kg dm)
30°C
2 50°C
65°C
75°C
1 90°C
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
experimental moisture content (kg/kg dm)
Figure 3. Estimated vs. experimental moisture content. Simulation of experiments by using the Page
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022 model. 6
c
140 b, c
b
ASTA.
115
a
90
d
65
30˚C 50˚C 65˚C 75˚C 90˚C
Air-Drying Temperature
Figure 4. Effect of drying air temperature on the ASTA measurements in paprika samples (American
Spice Trade Assn. units). abcd: letters indicate differences among samples (p<0.05).
55
b b
b
50
c
C*ab
45 a
40
35
30˚C 50˚C 65˚C 75˚C 90˚C
Air-Drying Temperature
Figure 5. Effect of drying air temperature on the chroma (C ab*) of paprika samples. abc: letters indicate
differences among samples (p<0.05).
7
2.2
c
2.0
b
1.8 b b
PF
1.6
a
1.4
1.2
1.0
30˚C 50˚C 65˚C 75˚C 90˚C
Air-Drying Temperature
Figure 6. Effect of drying temperature on the Antioxidant protection factor (PF) of the paprika
sample. abc: letters indicate differences among samples (p<0.05).
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022 8
4. CONCLUSIONS
From these results, it could be concluded that the three studied parameters -ASTA, chroma and
antioxidant protection factor (PF)-allowed the evaluation of the influence of the drying air temperature
on the final quality of the paprika. During red pepper drying, the air temperature seems to be an
important factor which should be taken into consideration to ensure the quality of the final dried
product. Furthermore, it could be inferred that in order to obtain an optimum final product, drying
should be carried out at an air temperature within the range from 50 to 75 ºC.
NOMENLATURE
Cab* Chroma
Ea Energy of activation kJ/mol
Empirical constant, (Page model)
k s−n
Empirical constant, (Peleg model)
k1 kg dm /kg water
Empirical constant, (Peleg model)
k2 kg dm /(kg water.s)
n Empirical constant (Page model)
Sy Standard deviation (sample)
Syx Standard deviation (estimation)
t Time s
T Temperature °C
Ve Experimental value
Vc Calculated value
W Average moisture content kg water/kg dm
We Equilibrium moisture content kg water/kg dm
W0 Initial moisture content kg water/kg dm
%E Mean relative error
%var Percentage of explained variance
REFERENCES
Abu-Ghannam, N. and McKenna, B. (1997). The application of Peleg’s equation to model water
absorption during the soaking of redkidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Food
Engineering 32:391–401.
Akpinar, E.; Midilli, A. and Bicer, Y. (2003). Single layer drying behaviour of potato slices in a
convective cyclone dryer and mathematical modelling. Energy Conversion Management 44:1689–
1705.
AOAC 1990. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemist. Nº 934.06.
Arlington. 9
Azzouz, S.; Guizani, A.; Jomaa, W. and Belghith, A. (2002). Moisture diffusivity and drying kinetic
equation of convective drying of grapes. Journal of Food Engineering 55:323–33.
Carbonell J.V.; Piñaga F.; Yusá V. and Peña J. L. (1986). The dehydration of paprika with ambient
and heated air and the kinetics of color degradation during storage. Journal of Food Engineering
5:179-193.
Doymaz, I and Pala, M. (2002). Hot air drying characteristics of red pepper. Journal of Food
Engineering 55: 331-335.
Ezeiki, G.O.I. and Otten, L. (1991). Two-compartment model for drying unshelled melon (egusi)
seeds. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 33(1):73–78.
Gómez-Ladrón de Guevara R.; Parra-López V.; Pardo-González J. E.; Amo-Saus M.L.I. and Varón-
Castellanos R. (1998). Influence of storage conditions on pigment degradation in paprikas from
different greenhouse pepper cultivars. Journal Science Food Agricultural 78:321-328.
Ho J.C.; Chou S.K.; Chua K.J.; Mujumdar, A.S. and Hawlader M.N.A. (2002). Analytical study of
cyclic temperature drying: effect on drying kinetics and product quality. Journal of Food Engineering
51(1): 65-75.
Hossain, M.A.; Bala, B.K.(2002). Thin layer drying characteristics for green chilli. Drying
Technology 20(2):489–505.
Hung, T.V., Liu, L.H., Black, R.G., and Trewhella, M.A. (1993).Water absorption in chickpea (C.
arietinum) and field pea (P. sativum) cultivars using Peleg model. Journal of Food Science 58:848–
852.
Iguaz, A.; San Martín, M.B.; Maté, J.I.; Fernandez, T. and Vírseda, P. (2003). Modelling effective
moisture diffusivity of rouge rice (Lido cultivar) at low drying temperatures. Journal of Food
Engineering 59:253–258.
Kaymak-Ertekin F. (2002). Drying and rehydrating kinetics of green and red peppers. Journal of Food
Science 67(1):168-175.
Kim S.; Park J.B. and Hwang I.K. (2002). Quality attributes of various varieties of Korean red pepper
powders (Capsicum annuum L.) and color stability during sunlight exposure. Journal of Food Science
67(8):2957-2961.
Kiranoudis C.T.; Maroulis Z B. and Marinos-Kouris D.(1992). Drying kinetics of onion and green
pepper. Drying Technology 10(4):995-1011.
Lee D.S.; Chung S.K. and Yam K.L. (1992). Carotenoid loss in dried red-pepper products.
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 27 (2):179-185.
Liu J.B.; Chang S.K.C. and Wiesenborn D. (2005).Antioxidant properties of soybean isoflavone
extract and tofu in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(6):2333-2340.
Louli, V. ; Ragoussis, N. and Magoulas, K. (2004). Recovery of phenolic antioxidants from wine
industry by-products. Bioresource Technology 92:201 –208.
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022 10
Maharaj, V. and Sankat, C.K. (2000). Rehydration characteristics and quality of dehydrated dasheen
leaves. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 42:81–85.
Matsufuji H.; Chino M. and Takeda M. (2004). Effects of paprika pigments on oxidation of linoleic
acid stored in the dark or exposed to light. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52(11):3601-
3605.
Menkov, N.D. and Durakova A.G. (2005). Equilibrium Moisture Content of Semi-Defatted Pumpkin
Seed Flour. International Journal of Food Engineering 1(3), April 1.
Nguyen, T.A.; Verboven, P.; Daudin, J.D. and Nicolaï, B.M. (2004). Measurement and modelling of
water sorption isotherms of “Conference” pear flesh tissue in the high humidity range. Postharvest
Biology and Technology, 33:229-241.
Panchariya, P.C.; Popovic, D. and Sharma, A.L. (2002). Thin-layer modelling of black tea drying
process. Journal of Food Engineering 52 (4): 349–357.
Park, K.J.; Vohnikova, Z. and Reis Brod, F.P. (2002). Evaluation of drying parameters and desorption
isotherms of garden mint leaves (Mentha crispa L.). Journal of Food Engineering 51:193-199.
Peleg, M. (1988). An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves. Journal of Food
Science 53:1216–1217.
Perez-Galvez A.; Hornero-Mendez D. and Minguez-Mosquera M.I. (2004). Changes in the carotenoid
metabolism of capsicum fruits during application of modelized slow drying process for paprika
production. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52 (3): 518-522.
Proestos, C.; Chorianopoulos, N. ; Nychas, G.-J. E. and Komaitis M. (2005). RP-HPLC Analysis of
the Phenolic Compounds of Plant Extracts. Investigation of Their Antioxidant Capacity and
Antimicrobial Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(4), 2005 1190-1195.
Ramesh, M.; Wolf, W.; Tevini, D. and Jung, G. (2001). Influence of processing parameters on the
drying of spice paprika. Journal of Food Engineering 49:63-72.
Sanjuan, N.; Lozano, M.; García-Pascual, P.; Mulet, A. (2003). Dehydration kinetics of the red pepper
(Capsicum anuum L var Jaranda), Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83:697-701.
Sanjuan, N.; Simal, S.; Bon, J. and Mulet, A. (1999). Modelling of broccoli stems rehydration process.
Journal of Food Engineering 42:27-31.
Senadeera, W.; Bhandari, B.R.; Young, G. and Wijesinghe, B. (2003). Influence of shapes of selected
vegetable materials on drying kinetics during fluidised bed drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 58:
277-283.
11
Simal, S.; Mulet, A.; Tarrazo, J. and Rosselló, C. (1996). Drying models for green pea. Food
Chemistry 55(2):121-128.
Simal, S.; Rosselló, C.; Berna, A. and Mulet, A. (1998). Drying of Shrinking Cylinder-shaped Bodies.
Journal of Food Engineering, 37:423-435.
Sopade P.A. and Kaimur K. (1999). Application of Peleg's equation in desorption studies of food
systems: A case study with sago (Metroxylon Sagu Rottb.) starch. Drying Technology 17(4-5):975-
989.
Turhan M.; Sayar S. and Gunasekaran S. (2002). Application of Peleg model to study water absorption
in chickpea during soaking. Journal of Food Engineering 53 (2): 153-159.
Turhan M.; Turkaan K. N. and Sahbaz F. (1997). Drying kinetics of red pepper. Journal of Food
Process and Preservation 21:209-223.
Uquiche, E.; del Valle, J.M. and Ortiz, J. (2004). Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of red pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.) oleoresin. Journal of Food Engineering 65:55–66.
Vági, E.; Rapavi, E.; Hadolin, M.; Vásárhelyiné Perédi, K:; Balázs, A. ; Blázovics, A. and Simándi.
(2005). Phenolic and Triterpenoid Antioxidants from Origanum majorana L. Herb and Extracts
Obtained with Different Solvents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(1):17-21.
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1022 12