Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

960333

research-article2020
EJO0010.1177/1120672120960333European Journal of OphthalmologyChen et al.

EJO European
Journal of
Ophthalmology
Original research article

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Risk factors for central retinal


1­–10
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
vein occlusion in young adults sagepub.com/journals-permissions
https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120960333
DOI: 10.1177/1120672120960333
journals.sagepub.com/home/ejo

Tony Y. Chen , Aditya Uppuluri, Marco A. Zarbin


and Neelakshi Bhagat

Abstract
Purpose: Several risk factors have been identified for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in older population. CRVO
in young is uncommon, and the risk factors for this group are unclear. This large retrospective, cross-sectional study used
the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to evaluate the risk factors for CRVO in patients 18 to 40 years of age.
Methods: The 2002 to 2014 NIS database was used. All patients 18 to 40 years of age with a primary diagnosis of CRVO
were identified. Age- and gender-matched non-CRVO controls were randomly selected. The primary outcome was
identification of risk factors for CRVO. Chi-square analysis and Firth logistic regression were performed with IBM SPSS
23 and R packages versions 3.4.3, respectively. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: A total of 95 weighted young CRVO patients were identified. The average age was 31.44 ± 6.41 years with no
gender predilection. Systemic and ocular conditions found to have statistically significant associations with CRVO included
primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (OR 836.72, p < 0.001), retinal vasculitis (OR 705.82, p < 0.001), pseudotumor
cerebri (OR 35.94, p < 0.001), hypercoagulable state (OR 25.25, p < 0.001), history of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary
embolism (DVT/PE) (OR 21.88, p < 0.001), and hyperlipidemia (OR 3.60, p = 0.003).
Conclusion: The most significant risk factors for CRVO in young adults were POAG, retinal vasculitis, and pseudotumor
cerebri. Hypercoagulable states and DVT/PE were also associated with CRVO in this population. Systemic inflammatory
conditions were not associated with CRVO. Traditional risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes did not pose
significant risks, whereas hyperlipidemia was deemed a significant risk factor.

Keywords
Retina, venous occlusive disease, CRVO – medical therapies, retinal vascular disease, retinal degenerations associated
with systemic disease, arterial occlusive disease

Date received: 8 June 2020; accepted: 27 August 2020

Introduction CRVO is generally considered a disease of the elderly,


most prevalent in adults older than 65 years of age.5,15
Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common retinal Approximately 10% to 15% of CRVOs occur in patients
vascular disease, which affects an estimated 0.1% to 0.5% under the age of 40 years.16–18 Conflicting reports exist in
of the general population.1,2 Complications of CRVO the literature regarding the association of traditional risk
include macular edema and ocular neovascularization, the factors with CRVO in young patients. Many authors have
latter of which can lead to neovascular glaucoma (NVG),
vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment with signifi-
cant visual impairment. Traditional risk factors for CRVO
The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers-New
include advancing age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
hyperlipidemia, and glaucoma.3–6 Several studies have
also suggested potential roles of hypercoagulable and Corresponding author:
Neelakshi Bhagat, The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,
inflammatory conditions in the pathogenesis of CRVO,5,7–9 Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Doctor’s Office Center, 90
although other reports have provided contradicting Bergen Street, Suite 6100, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
results.10–14 Email: bhagatne@njms.rutgers.edu
2 European Journal of Ophthalmology 00(0)

advocated for extensive hypercoagulability workup in this with CRVO. Univariate and multivariable regression analy-
patient group, although evidence favoring this approach is ses were performed, comparing CRVO subjects to age- and
limited.5,16,19 gender-matched controls without CRVO to identify comor-
The aim of this study was to identify systemic and ocu- bidities associated with CRVO in young adults.
lar risk factors associated with CRVO in young adults
between the ages of 18 to 40 years, who were admitted to
Risk factors selections
hospital for workup and management, using the National
Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2002 to 2014. Systemic and ocular comorbidities selected for analysis in
this study were based on risk factors reported to be possi-
bly associated with CRVO in the literature.5,20 A total of 30
Methods potential systemic and ocular comorbidities were selected.
Data source Specific variables with their associated ICD-9 codes are
listed in Table 1.
Patient data for this study were obtained from NIS data- Comorbidities in which ICD-9 codes were provided by
base, 2002 to 2014. This database is founded and managed AHRQ included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity,
by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality congestive heart failure (CHF), bleeding diathesis, drug use
(AHRQ) as a component of the Healthcare Cost and disorder, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and rheumatoid
Utilization Project. It is the most extensive collection of arthritis/collagen vascular diseases (RA/CVD). Although
hospitalization data and the largest public source of dis- comorbidities such as atherosclerosis (systemic except
charge information in the United States. The database rep- carotid and coronary), cocaine use, oral contraceptive use,
resents a 20% sample of U.S. community hospitalization open globe injury, and non-stroke cerebrovascular disease
record, excluding rehabilitation and long-term acute care were included, no cases of these variables were identified in
hospitals, that encompasses approximately 97% of the either case or control groups, and, thus, did not undergo sta-
U.S. population. Data accessible through the NIS include tistical analysis. No other chronic cases of non-cerebral sys-
up to 15 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth temic venous thrombosis besides deep vein thrombosis
Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were identified.
codes and 15 procedural codes per patient, along with Systemic diseases with individual ICD-9 codes were
information on demographics, comorbidity measures, included as distinct variables. When specific ICD-9 codes
length and cost of stay, and mortality rate. were not available for a disorder, a group of systemic con-
ditions were combined – for instance, primary and second-
Patient identification ary hypercoagulable states were analyzed collectively as a
single variable. The ICD-9 diagnosis of primary hyperco-
This retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control, observa- agulable state comprised various coagulation factor abnor-
tional study was performed using the publicly available malities such as protein C and S deficiencies, antithrombin
NIS database. It was exempted for institutional review III deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome, Factor V
board approval according to our institution’s policy. The Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, and anti-cardi-
study complied with the tenets of the Declaration of olipin antibody, which do not have unique ICD-9 codes.
Helsinki. ICD-9 code 362.35 was used to identify all However, when specific ICD-9 codes were available for
patients with CRVO as the primary admitting diagnosis. some hypercoagulable conditions, such as DVT and PE,
Only patients between the ages of 18 to 40 years were they were analyzed separately. Importantly, hyperhomo-
included. Demographic and comorbidity data were then cysteinemia could not be included in our study because it
extracted for each patient. Gender- and age-matched con- does not have a specific ICD-9 code, and as per the NIS
trols without CRVO were randomly selected from the NIS website, it is not included in their comorbidity variable,
database using the “Select Random Cases” function in primary hypercoagulable state.
IBM SPSS 23. The ratio of cases to controls was 1:43 after RA/CVD are systemic conditions known to produce
the data was randomized and cases were weighted. inflammatory effects in multiple organ systems21–23 and, in
Diagnosis codes utilized for systemic disease variables are this study, were analyzed as a combined independent varia-
listed in Table 1. ble. Comorbidity ICD-9 codes were provided by AHRQ.
Included in the CVD group were systemic lupus erythema-
tosus, sicca syndrome, scleroderma, dermatomyositis, sys-
Outcome measures temic sclerosis, polymyositis, various inflammatory
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate systemic and arthropathies or spondylopathies, other unspecified diffuse
ocular risk factors for CRVO, specifically in young adults connective tissue diseases, and polymyalgia rheumatica.
between 18 and 40 years of age. The secondary goal of this Inflammatory vascular diseases, such as systemic vasculitis
study was to determine demographic variables associated and retinal vasculitis, were evaluated as distinct variables.
Chen et al. 3

Table 1.  List of variables and corresponding ICD-9 codes.

Variable Code
Aortic dissection/Aneurysm 441.0-441.7, 441.9, 441.00-441.03, 437.3
Arterial thromboembolic disease + coronary artery 444.0-444.2, 444.8-444.9, 444.01, 444.09, 444.21-444.22, 444.81, 444.89,
disease 445.0, 445.8, 445.01-445.02, 445.81, 445.89, 414.0, 414.00-414.07
Bleeding diathesis AHRQ comorbidity measure
Cocaine use 305.6, 305.60, 305.61, 305.62, 305.63
Congestive heart failure AHRQ comorbidity measure
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism V12.51, V12.55
(history)
Diabetes mellitus AHRQ comorbidity measure
Drug use disorder (non-intravenous) AHRQ comorbidity measure
Drug use disorder (intravenous) Utilizes algorithm detailed in “Methods” section
Glaucoma 365.10-365.15, 365.20-365.24, 365.31, 365.32, 365.41-365.44, 365.51,
365.52, 365.59-365.65, 365.70-365.74, 365.81-365.82, 365.89, 365.1-
365.6, 265.8, 365.9
Hypercoagulable state (primary) 289.81
Hyperlipidemia 272.0-272.4
Hypertension AHRQ comorbidity measure
Lyme disease 088.81
Migraine 346.00-346.03, 346.10-346.13, 346.20-346.23, 346.40-346.43, 346.50-
346.53, 346.70-346.73, 346.80-346.83, 346.90-346.93, 346.0-346.9
Obesity AHRQ comorbidity measure
Ocular trauma 365.65, 366.20-366.22, 376.47, 376.52
Oral contraceptive use V25.41
Peripheral vascular disease AHRQ comorbidity measure
Pregnancy V22.0, V22.1, 651.00, 630, 631.8, 632, 633.10, 633.90, 634.90, 637.90,
640.00, 656.40
Pseudotumor cerebri 348.20
Central retinal vein occlusion 362.35
Retinal vasculitis 362.18
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease AHRQ comorbidity measure
Sickle cell disease and trait 282.41-282.42, 282.5, 282.6, 282.60-282.64, 282.68, 282.69
Stroke (history) V12.54
Syphilis 090.0-097.9
Systemic vasculitis 446.0-446.2, 446.20-446.21, 446.29, 446.3-446.7
Tobacco use V15.82, 305.1, 305.10, 305.12, 305.13

Bleeding diathesis comorbidity variable (same as the Lastly, only primary open angle glaucoma (POAG)
comorbidity “coagulopathy” defined by AHRQ) contains a cases were included; neovascular glaucoma (NVG), which
group of systemic conditions to be bleeding disorders in is more likely a complication of CRVO was not included in
which blood cannot clot appropriately. Conditions within this the variable “glaucoma.”
group include various congenital or acquired coagulation fac-
tor disorders, von Willebrand disease, acquired hemophilia,
platelet disorders, and other non-specified clotting disorders.
Statistical analysis
A history of both ischemic and non-ischemic strokes Demographic descriptive analyses were performed
was included in the variable “stroke.” Acute cases of stroke using chi-square tests, with case and control groups
were separately included in the concurrent in-hospital controlled for age and gender. Chi-square analysis and
thrombotic complications in Table 2. Logistic Regression were performed using IBM SPSS
Diagnosis codes for drug use disorder is provided by 25 and R package version 3.4.3, respectively. Logistic
AHRQ, although no ICD-9 code specifically indicates intra- Regression was performed using the Firth Logistic
venous (IV) drug use. Thus, we utilized an algorithm used by Regression Model instead of the Standard Model to
Tookes et al. to identify cases of IV drug use.24 We assumed account for statistical separation that was observed
that any patient with documented “drug use” in addition to between the cases and controls. Adjusted odds-ratios
one or more conditions classically associated with IV drug (ORs) were calculated with multivariable regression
use (septicemia, endocarditis, soft tissue or skin infections, analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant for all sta-
or osteomyelitis) had a history of IV drug use. tistical analyses.
4 European Journal of Ophthalmology 00(0)

Table 2.  Results of chi square analysis for acute in-hospital complications and medications.

CRVO p-value

  No Yes

  (Weighted N = 4076) (Weighted N = 95)

  Count (%) Count (%)


Acute Complication
 DVT/PE 50 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.277
  Myocardial infarction *b 0 (0.0%) 0.733
  Stroke (hemorrhagic) * 0 (0.0%) 0.733
  Stroke (ischemic) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) –
 TIA * 0 (0.0%) 0.733
  Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) –
  Non-cerebral systemic venous thrombosis 14 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.567
Medicationsa
 Anticoagulants 28 (0.7%) * <0.001
 Antiplatelets 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) –
 Aspirin * 0 (0.0%) 0.733
a
For medications, it is not clear when the medication was started.
b
As per NIS Database guidelines, cells in which the count is between 1 and 10 must be redacted; “*” has been placed instead of the numerical value.
For variables that have a redacted cell and for which there is a statistically significant difference, the cell value in bold represents the cell with the
higher prevalence.

Results state (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.013), migraine


(p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001), glaucoma (POAG)
Patient demographics (p < 0.001), RA/CVD (p < 0.001), pseudotumor cerebri
A weighted total of 95 patients between the ages of 18 to (p < 0.001), retinal vasculitis ( p < 0.001). Non-IV drug use
40 years with a primary admitting diagnosis of CRVO was not seen in patients with CRVO (p = 0.004).
were identified in the NIS database (Table 3). The average Multivariable regression analysis in this study found
age of the case group was 31.44 ± 6.41 years. Among cases POAG (OR 836.72, CI 36.28–19295.13, p < 0.001), retinal
of CRVO, 57.1% occurred in women. The prevalence of vasculitis (OR 705.82, CI 28.55–17448.63, p < 0.001), and
CRVO in women was calculated to be 2.30% and 2.25% in pseudotumor cerebri (OR 35.94 CI 9.03–142.99; p < 0.001)
men; gender did not confer any additional risk per regres- to be the most significant associated comorbidities for
sion analysis (p = 0.924). We stratified these patients by CRVO. Other significant comorbidities included hyperco-
age groups, which showed an increasing prevalence of agulable states (OR 25.25, CI 7.78–81.97, p < 0.001),
CRVO with age. Nearly half (48%) of all young CRVO DVT/PE (OR 21.88, CI 10.58–45.26, p < 0.001), and
patients were between the ages of 33 to 40 years and 84% hyperlipidemia (OR 3.60, CI 1.57–8.30, p = 0.003).
were between 25 and 40 years. Univariate, but not multivariable, regression analysis
In the age- and gender-matched control group, a revealed the following comorbidities to be significantly
weighted total of 4076 patients without CRVO were associated with CRVO: RA/CVD (OR 9.98, CI 3.84–25.97,
selected randomly as described in the “Patient identifica- p < 0.001), migraine (OR 8.95, CI 4.45–18.00, p < 0.001),
tion” section. The average age of the control group was diabetes mellitus (OR 2.39, CI 1.24–4.61, p = 0.010), and
30.89 ± 6.31 years, comparable to the study group. The non-IV drug use (OR 0.06, 0.00–0.95, p = 0.046). A com-
age distribution of control group was also similar to the plete list of significant variables using univariate and multi-
study group, indicating good matching and randomization. variable regression analyses can be found in Table 4.
Women comprised of 56% of the control group. Furthermore, chi-square analysis for acute in-hospital
complications shows no cases of thrombotic complications
such as DVT/PE, myocardial infarction, ischemic and non-
Comorbidities
ischemic strokes, transient ischemic attack, cerebral venous
Chi-square analysis identified the following comorbidities sinus thrombosis, or non-cerebral systemic venous throm-
to have significantly increased prevalence in young adults bosis. A small percent (5.3%) of patients with CRVO were
with CRVO compared to those with no history of CRVO on anticoagulants. None of the study cases were on anti-
(Table 3): History of DVT/PT (p < 0.001), hypercoagulable platelets or aspirin during the course of hospitalization.
Chen et al. 5

Table 3.  Results of chi-square analysis.

CRVO p-value

  No Yes

  (Weighted N = 4076) (Weighted N = 95)

  Count Column N% Count Column N%


Sex 0.924
 Men 1779 43.6% 41 42.9%  
 Women 2297 56.4% 54 57.1%  
Average Age (years) 30.89 ± 6.31 – 31.44 ± 6.41 – 0.403
Age (years) 0.270
 18–24 850 20.8% 15 15.6%  
 25–32 1218 29.9% 45 36.3%  
 33–40 2008 49.3% 46 48.1%  
Systemic Comorbidities
  Aortic dissection/aneurysm *a * 0 0.0% 0.647
  Arterial thromboembolic disease + coronary artery disease 57 1.4% 0 0.0% 0.246
  Bleeding diathesis 90 2.2% 0 0.0% 0.142
  Congestive heart failure 20 0.5% 0 0.0% 0.492
  DVT/PE (history) 34 0.8% 16 16.5% <0.001
  Diabetes mellitus 198 4.9% 10 10.5% 0.013
  Drug use (IV) 36 0.9% 0 0.0% 0.356
  Drug use (non-IV) 332 8.2% 0 0.0% 0.004
  Hypercoagulable state (primary) * * * * <0.001
 Hyperlipidemia 115 2.8% * * <0.001
 Hypertension 413 10.2% 15 15.4% 0.076
  Lyme disease * * 0 0.0% 0.733
 Migraine 55 1.3% * * <0.001
 Obesity 208 5.1% * * 0.954
  Peripheral vascular disease * * 0 0.0% 0.628
 Pregnancy 25 0.6% 0 0.0% 0.444
  Pseudotumor cerebri * * * * <0.001
  Rheumatoid arthritis and collagen vascular disease 24 0.6% * * <0.001
  Sickle cell trait and disease 67 1.7% 0 0.0% 0.208
  Tobacco use 763 18.7% 15 16.3% 0.469
  Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke (history) * * 0 0.0% 0.453
 Syphilis * * 0 0.0% 0.733
  Systemic vasculitis * * 0 0.0% 0.733
Ocular findings
  Glaucoma (POAG) (excludes neovascular glaucoma) 0 0.0% * * <0.001
  Retinal vasculitis 0 0.0% * * <0.001

Variables with n = 0 in both the case group and control group were excluded:
- Atherosclerosis (systemic except carotid and coronary).
- Cocaine use.
- Oral contraceptive use.
- Open-globe injury.
- Non-stroke cerebrovascular disease.
a
As per NIS Database guidelines, cells in which the count is between 1 and 10 must be redacted; “*” has been placed instead of the numerical value.
For variables that have a redacted cell and for which there is a statistically significant difference, the cell value in bold represents the cell with the
higher prevalence.

Discussion Compared to older adults, hypertension and diabetes are not


prevalent in young adults with CRVO.5,25,26 Hypertension
Systemic diseases and CRVO and diabetes mellitus was noted in 15.4% and 10.5% of
Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia are weighted cases, respectively, in our study, but regression
well-documented risk factors for CRVO in older patients.2–6 analysis showed that these conditions were not significant
6 European Journal of Ophthalmology 00(0)

Table 4.  Results of univariate and multivariable firth logistic regression.

Variable Univariate Multivariable

OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value


Sex
 Women REF – – –
 Men 0.97 (0.65–1.47) 0.903 – –
Age
 18–29 REF – – –
 30–40 0.88 (0.58–1.33) 0.538 – –
Systemic Comorbidities
  Aortic aneurysm/dissection 2.36 (0.12–48.11) 0.578 – –
  Arterial thromboembolic disease 0.37 (0.02–6.12) 0.484 – –
  Bleeding diathesis 0.23 (0.01–3.76) 0.301 – –
  Congestive heart failure 1.01 (0.06–18.04) 0.993 – –
  DVT/PE (History) 23.74 (12.57–44.83) <0.001 21.88 (10.58–45.26) <0.001
  Diabetes mellitus 2.39 (1.24–4.61) 0.010 1.21 (0.46–3.12) 0.694
  Drug use (IV) 0.58 (0.03–9.83) 0.704 – –
  Drug use (non-IV) 0.06 (0.00–0.95) 0.046 0.10 (0.01–1.65) 0.108
 Hyperlipidemia 4.18 (2.13–8.18) <0.001 3.60 (1.57–8.30) 0.003
  Hypercoagulable state 47.54 (19.28–117.19) <0.001 25.25 (7.78–81.97) <0.001
 Hypertension 1.64 (0.94–2.88) 0.081 – –
  Lyme disease 3.87 (0.16–92.94) 0.404 – –
 Migraine 8.95 (4.45–18.00) <0.001 2.53 (0.86–7.49) 0.092
 Obesity 1.12 (0.47–2.69) 0.797 – –
  Peripheral vascular disease 2.06 (0.10–40.91) 0.635 – –
 Pregnancy 0.82 (0.05–14.31) 0.891 – –
  Pseudotumor cerebri 45.28 (12.85–159.52) <0.001 35.94 (9.03–142.99) <0.001
  Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease 9.98 (3.84–25.97) <0.001 0.91 (0.06–14.47) 0.949
  Sickle cell trait and disease 0.31 (0.02–5.13) 0.413 – –
 Smoking 0.87 (0.50–1.49) 0.601 – –
  Stroke (history) 2.21 (0.11–44.56) 0.603 – –
 Syphilis 3.57 (0.15–82.83) 0.428 – –
  Systemic Vasculitis 3.87 (0.16–92.94) 0.404 – –
Ocular findings
  Glaucoma (POAG) (excludes neovascular glaucoma) 558.86 (24.35–12824.38) <0.001 836.72 (36.28–19295.13) <0.001
  Retinal vasculitis 466.43 (18.96–11474.48) <0.001 705.82 (28.55–17448.63) <0.001

Variables in which n = 0 for both the CRVO and Non-CRVO groups were not included.
Firth Logistic Regression was used because of statistical separation that was present in the weighted data.
Variables with a p < 0.05 on univariate regression were included in the multivariable model.

risk factors for CRVO in young adults. The pathogenesis of Hypercoagulable states and CRVO
CRVO is likely multifactorial, but thrombosis of central reti-
nal vein due to mechanical compression by atherosclerotic Hypercoagulable disorders have been implicated to pro-
central retinal artery has been postulated to be an underlying mote CRVO. The most common of these conditions
etiology.27 Hypertension and diabetes mellitus can accelerate include hyperhomocysteinemia, anticardiolipin antibod-
atherosclerosis.28 However, we postulate that in young ies, Factor V Leiden, anticardiolipin antibodies, protein C
patients the atherosclerotic changes may be early, not clini- or protein S deficiencies, prothrombin mutation, and oth-
cally severe enough to cause significant total vein occlusion, ers.33–35 Extensive hypercoagulability workup is usually
although with time, progressive cumulative changes will suggested if older patients do not possess any of the tradi-
cause CRVO in an older adult. tional risk factors, or if the patient is younger than 50 years,
In contrast, multiple reports have suggested hyperlipi- or has bilateral CRVO, or a prior history or family history
demia to be an important underlying systemic comorbidity in of thrombosis.5,16,19,34,36
young CRVO patients.5,26,29–31 Our multivariable regression Hypercoagulable disorders were significantly more
analysis also showed that hyperlipidemia increased the odds prevalent in CRVO patients under the age of 45 years.37 In
of having CRVO three-fold (OR of 3.60). Hyperlipidemia young CRVO patients, hyperhomocysteinemia and
may predispose to CRVO by promoting thrombosis through antiphospholipid antibodies are more commonly seen
the release of β-thromboglobulin and platelet factor IV.5,30,32 compared with age-matched controls without the disease.34
Chen et al. 7

We analyzed hypercoagulable state as a single independent wide confidence interval, which was a result of low preva-
variable comprising all primary and secondary causes of lence in both control and study groups. The association
hypercoagulability; however, no cases of secondary hyper- between retinal vasculitis and CRVO had been described
coagulable state were identified in our study. Our result previously in a patient with Crohn disease-related retinal
revealed hypercoagulable state to be an important risk fac- vasculitis, and it was posited that severe inflammation of
tor for CRVO in young patients. It is important to note that the retinal vasculature can have occlusive effect on arteries
hyperhomocysteinemia was not included in this study and veins, resulting in CRVO.43 Retinal vasculitis has not
since it does not have a specific ICD-9 code. However, this been studied extensively and is not a well-recognized risk
underlying pathology may have caused various other factor for CRVO in older populations. Our result suggested
hypercoagulable comorbidities (as PE or DVT) and may a potentially unique risk factor of CRVO in young adults
have been indirectly included in our analyses. that warrants further investigation.
DVT/PE was analyzed as a grouped risk factor. As
stated in “Risk factors selections,” only “history of” DVT/
Central nervous system and CRVO
PE was considered in this study in order to evaluate this
comorbidity as a risk factor. Our data revealed that DVT/ Pseudotumor cerebri was the most significant systemic
PE was an independent risk factor for CRVO with a OR of comorbidity of CRVO in the present study with an OR of
21.88, further reaffirming the role of hypercoagulable con- 35.94. It occurs most commonly in patients age 20 to 50 and
ditions in the pathogenesis of CRVO in these patients. may be a unique risk factor in young patients. Association
CRVO may develop from direct mechanical compres- between pseudotumor cerebri and CRVO has been previ-
sion by the adjacent atherosclerotic central retinal artery ously reported.44,45 While the pathophysiology is not entirely
causing turbulent flow and thrombosis of central retinal understood, it is hypothesized that optic nerve swelling sec-
vein.27 In younger patients without known cardiovascular ondary to increased intracranial pressure impedes retinal
risk factors or significant atherosclerosis, the pathophysi- venous return and can precipitate CRVO.
ology of CRVO remains unclear. However, it was hypoth- Migraine headache has also been associated with young
esized that unprovoked thrombus formation in the central CRVO patients in multiple studies, with a prevalence of 4%
retinal vein secondary to a hypercoagulable state may con- to 12%.17,46 Benninger et al. reported a young woman with
tribute to developing CRVO in these patients.38 history of migraine headache who presented with new
It is worth noting that pregnancy and sickle cell trait or CRVO with a negative systemic work up for cardiovascular,
disease, conditions that can potentially predispose to autoimmune, and coagulation abnormalities.47 It has been
hypercoagulable states, did not increase the risk CRVO. speculated that platelet abnormalities related to migraine
Furthermore, no cases of oral contraceptive use were may predispose to CRVO.48 Our multivariable regression
found in both study and control groups and thus it was not analysis showed an OR of 2.64 with a p-value that was near
included in the analysis. statistical significance. Further studies would be helpful in
elucidating this potential risk factor association.
Inflammatory conditions and CRVO
Glaucoma and CRVO
Inflammatory conditions such as RA and CVD have
been associated with CRVO in young patients.5,39–42 In Elevated IOP and glaucoma are well-known risk factors
this study, RA/CVD was analyzed as a single variable to for CRVO in the general population.6,49,50 Their associa-
evaluate for the effect of systemic inflammation on tion specifically in younger patients has been reported
CRVO. While various CVDs were included in our analy- but not well-established.51 It is hypothesized that IOP
sis, SLE and sicca syndrome accounted for all cases in can cause external compression of the central retinal
this group. The association of RA/CVD with CRVO was vein at the level of lamina cribrosa, resulting in turbulent
statistically significant only in the univariate analysis flow and subsequent thrombus formation.52 Presumably,
but not multivariable regression analysis after adjusting deformation of the lamina cribrosa associated with glau-
for confounding variables. Systemic vasculitis was simi- comatous optic atrophy also contributes to vein com-
larly shown not to be a significant risk factor for CRVO pression and thrombus formation. All identified cases of
in the univariate analysis. glaucoma in this study were POAG. Using multivariable
Interestingly, a strong and significant association was regression analysis, we showed that POAG was the most
found between retinal vasculitis and CRVO, with an OR significant risk factor for CRVO in young patients with
over 700. As opposed to systemic vasculitis, the direct an OR over 800. However, the large OR and wide confi-
inflammatory effect on retinal vessels may underlie the dence interval resulted from low prevalence in study and
predisposition to CRVO. The magnitude of adjusted OR, control groups, the magnitude of OR should be inter-
however, should be interpreted with caution because of the preted with caution.
8 European Journal of Ophthalmology 00(0)

Cardiovascular risk factors and CRVO were identified through ICD-9 codes used on hospital
discharge. The validity of the study results depends
Studies on the association between CRVO and various car- largely on the accuracy and specificity of the ICD codes.
diovascular conditions such as stroke, PVD, arterial throm- Second, ICD-9 codes contain less-specific diagnoses
boembolic disease and coronary artery diseases, and CHF than ICD-10 codes, which limits the analysis undertaken
have yielded conflicting results.2,15,38,53 Such discrepancy in this study. For example, various coagulation factor
may suggest underlying weak associations of these risk deficiencies have no specific diagnosis codes, and they
factors. Limited studies have evaluated these risk factors must be coded under the less specific primary hyperco-
in younger population. Our statistical analysis did not agulable state diagnosis. Third, this study included only
show significant associations between CRVO and any of those patients who were hospitalized with a primary
these cardiovascular risk factors. diagnosis of CRVO. CRVO patients are not routinely
admitted for workup unless a concurrent severe comor-
Social lifestyle and CRVO bidity needs urgent management (for example, pseudo-
tumor cerebri or medically uncontrolled high blood
Cigarette smoking had been suggested by many reports to pressure). The results of this study may not be applicable
be a potential risk factor for branch retinal vein occlusion30,54; to a different patient population. Lastly, this study only
however, a statistically significant association had not been reveals associations between CRVO and various comor-
demonstrated consistently. Klein et al. presented data show- bidities. A causal relationship cannot be established on
ing an increased risk of BRVO and all-type RVO in current this basis. However, when possible, we included ICD-9
smokers, but none was found for CRVO.3 In contrast, data codes that distinguished between prior history and acute
from other studies have provided contradicting results.2,6 events in order to evaluate comorbidities as risk factors
We included both current and former users of tobacco in our rather than simple associations.
study, and did not find cigarette smoking to be a significant
risk factor for CRVO.
Non-IV illicit drug use was associated with decreased risk Conclusion
of CRVO in the univariate analysis; however, after adjusting
The pathogenesis of CRVO is likely multifactorial. It is
for confounding variables, a statistically significant associa-
postulated that atherosclerotic change of central retinal
tion was not found in the multivariable regression analysis.
artery causes stasis and thrombosis of the adjacent reti-
This variable consisted of illicit drug use as well as various
nal vein within the same adventitia, leading to CRVO.27
substance abuse-associated complications such as intoxica-
The risk of central retinal vein thrombosis potentially
tion, withdrawal, dependence, and altered mental status,
increases with underlying hypercoagulable diseases.
among others. Use of IV drugs was also shown to have no
The results of our study demonstrated that, except for
significant association with CRVO in our study.
hyperlipidemia, traditional risk factors such as hyper-
tension and diabetes may not be as significant in young
Acute in-hospital thrombotic complications patients. Additionally, hypercoagulable states, DVT/
PE, pseudotumor cerebri, retinal vasculitis, and glau-
Patients are not routinely admitted to hospital for workup or
coma may play important roles in the pathogenesis of
management for acute CRVO. We performed a chi-square
CRVO in this population. Given the results of our
analysis on various acute thrombotic complications to pro-
study, we believe that systemic workup for hypercoag-
vide an insight regarding the need for inpatient management
ulable risk factors are indicated for patients younger
(Table 2), but no cases of acute thrombotic events were identi-
than 40  years of age, along with treatment of
fied in the study group. Our data showed that the use of anti-
hyperlipidemia.
coagulants was more prevalent in patients with CRVO than
those without. No antiplatelet or aspirin use were identified in
Declaration of conflicting interests
the study group. Using the database, it was unclear if antico-
agulant was a part of patients’ pre-hospitalization medication The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of
or was initiated in the hospital. The reason for hospitalization interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publi-
is still unclear but we postulate that these patients may have cation of this article: M.Z. reports personal fees from
Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Novartis Pharma AG,
had an atypical presentation of CRVO or have other medical
personal fees and other from Iveric bio, personal fees from
conditions that necessitate inpatient management. Ophthotech, other from NVasc, personal fees from Healios
KK, personal fees and other from Frequency Therapeutics,
Limitations of the study personal fees from Chengdu Kanghong Biotech, grants from
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Iridex, outside the
While this study uses a large database, it has a number of submitted work. No conflicting relationship exists for the other
limitations. First, all primary and comorbid diagnoses authors.
Chen et al. 9

Funding 16. Bhagat N, Goldberg MF, Gascon P, et al. Central retinal vein
occlusion: report of two familial cases. Eur J Ophthalmol
The author(s) received no financial support for the research,
1999; 9: 181–195.
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
17. Walters RF and Spalton DJ. Central retinal vein occlusion
in people aged 40 years or less: a review of 17 patients. Br J
ORCID iD Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 30–35.
Tony Y. Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-3443 18. Kohner EM and Cappin JM. Do medical conditions have an
influence on central retinal vein occlusions? J R Soc Med
References 1974; 67: 1052–1054.
19. Nalcaci S, Degirmenci C, Akkin C, et al. Etiological fac-
1. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, et al. The epidemiology of tors in young patients with retinal vein occlusion. Pakistan
retinal vein occlusion: the beaver dam eye study. Trans Am J Med Sci 2019; 35: 1397–1401.
Ophthalmol Soc 2000; 98: 133–143. 20. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B, McCarthy MJ, et al. Systemic
2. Mitchell P, Smith W and Chang A. Prevalence and associa- diseases associated with various types of retinal vein occlu-
tions of retinal vein occlusion in Australia: the blue moun- sion. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131: 61–77.
tains eye study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 1243–1247. 21. Cojocaru M, Cojocaru IM, Silosi I, et al. Extra-articular
3. Klein R, Moss SE, Meuer SM, et al. The 15-year cumulative manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Maedica (Buchar)
incidence of retinal vein occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye 2010; 5: 286–291.
Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 513–518. 22. Jawad H, McWilliams SR and Bhalla S. Cardiopulmonary
4. O’Mahoney PRA, Wong DT and Ray JG. Retinal vein manifestations of collagen vascular diseases. Curr
occlusion and traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis. Rheumatol Rep 2017; 19: 1–10.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 692–699. 23. Androudi S, Dastiridou A, Symeonidis C, et al. Retinal
5. Bhagat N, Goldberg MF, Gascon P, et al. Central retinal vasculitis in rheumatic diseases: an unseen burden. Clin
vein occlusion: review of management. Eur J Ophthalmol Rheumatol 2013; 32: 7–13.
1999; 9: 165–180. 24. Tookes H, Diaz C, Li H, et al. A cost analysis of hospitaliza-
6. The eye disease case-control study group. Risk factors for tions for infections related to injection drug use at a county
central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: safety-net hospital in Miami, Florida. PLoS One 2015; 10:
545–554. e0129360.
7. Rehak M, Rehak J, Müller M, et al. The prevalence of acti- 25. Fong ACO and Schatz H. Central retinal vein occlusion in
vated protein C (APC) resistance and factor V Leiden is young adults. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 37: 393–417.
significantly higher in patients with retinal vein occlusion 26. Dodson PM and Kritzinger EE. Underlying medical condi-
without general risk factors. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: tions in young patients and ethnic differences in retinal vein
925–929. occlusion. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985; 104: 114–119.
8. Janssen M, den Heijer M, Cruysberg J, et al. Retinal vein 27. Klien BA and Olwin JH. A survey of the pathogenesis of
occlusion: a form of venous thrombosis or a complication retinal venous occlusion. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1956; 56:
of atherosclerosis? Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 1021–1026. 207–247.
9. Bucciarelli P, Passamonti SM, Gianniello F, et al. 28. Shantaram V. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in diabetes
Thrombophilic and cardiovascular risk factors for retinal and hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1999; 21: 69–77.
vein occlusion. Eur J Intern Med 2017; 44: 44–48. 29. McGrath MA. Systemic factors contributory to retinal vein
10. Kalayci D, Gurgey A, Guven D, et al. Factor V Leiden and occlusion. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 216–220.
prothrombin 20210 A mutations in patients with central and 30. Dodson PM, Galton DJ, Hamilton AM, et al. Retinal vein
branch retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; occlusion and the prevalence of lipoprotein abnormalities.
77: 622–624. Br J Ophthalmol 1982; 66: 161–164.
11. Adamczuk YP, Iglesias Varela ML, Martinuzzo ME, et al. 31. Kuo JZC, Lai CC, Ong FSC, et al. Central retinal vein occlu-
Central retinal vein occlusion and thrombophilia risk fac- sion in a young chinese population: risk factors and associ-
tors. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2002; 13: 623–626. ated morbidity and mortality. Retina 2010; 30: 479–484.
12. Ingerslev J. Thrombophilia: a feature of importance in
32. Dodson PM, Westwick J, Marks G, et al. Beta-

retinal vein thrombosis? Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 levels in retinal vein
619–621. occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 143–146.
13. Yaghoubi GH, Madarshahian F and Mosavi M.
33. Marcucci R, Bertini L, Giusti B, et al. Thrombophilic

Hyperhomocysteinaemia: risk of retinal vascular occlusion. risk factors in patients with central retinal vein occlusion.
East Mediterr Heal J 2004; 10: 633–639. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 722–726.
14. Gottlieb JL, Blice JP, Mestichelli B, et al. Activated pro- 34. Lahey JM, Tunç M, Kearney J, et al. Laboratory evaluation
tein C resistance, factor V Leiden, and central retinal vein of hypercoagulable states in patients with central retinal vein
occlusion in young adults. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: occlusion who are less than 56 years of age. Ophthalmology
577–579. 2002; 109: 126–131.
15. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB and Podhajsky P. Incidence of 35. Cruciani F, Moramarco A, Curto T, et al. MTHFR C677T
various types of retinal vein occlusion and their recurrence mutation, factor II G20210A mutation and factor V Leiden
and demographic characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; as risks factor for youth retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ter
117: 429–441. 2003; 154: 299–303.
10 European Journal of Ophthalmology 00(0)

36. Yau JWY, Lee P, Wong TY, et al. Retinal vein occlusion: 45. Voldman A, Durbin B, Nguyen J, et al. Fulminant idiopathic
an approach to diagnosis, systemic risk factors and manage- intracranial hypertension and venous stasis retinopathy result-
ment. Intern Med J 2008; 38: 904–910. ing in severe bilateral visual impairment. Eur J Ophthalmol
37. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Scharrer I, Lüchtenberg M, et al. 2017; 27: e25–e27.
Coagulation disorders and the risk of retinal vein occlu- 46. Fong ACO, Schatz H, McDonald HR, et al. Central reti-
sion: a subgroup analysis. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: nal vein occlusion in young adults (papillophlebitis). Retina
299–305. 1992; 12: 3–11.
38. Stem MS, Talwar N, Comer GM, et al. A longitudinal anal- 47. Benninger F, Saban T and Steiner I. Central retinal vein
ysis of risk factors associated with central retinal vein occlu- occlusion in a migraine patient. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22:
sion. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 362–370. 1833–1834.
39. Meyer CH, Schmidt JC, Rodrigues EB, et al. Risk of retinal 48. Magargal LE, Gonder JR and Maher V. Central retinal vein
vein occlusions in patients treated with rofecoxib (Vioxx). obstruction in the young adult. Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol
Ophthalmologica 2005; 219: 243–247. Otolaryngol 1985; 37: 148–153.
40. Matsuo T, Kono R, Matsuo N, et al. Incidence of ocular 49. Rath EZ, Frank RN, Shin DH, et al. Risk factors for retinal
complications in rheumatoid arthritis and the relation of vein occlusions: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 1992;
keratoconjunctivitis sicca with its systemic activity. Scand J 99: 509–514.
Rheumatol 1997; 26: 113–116. 50. Luntz MH and Schenker HI. Retinal vascular accidents in
41. Sinawat S, Bunyavee C, Ratanapakorn T, et al. Systemic glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;
abnormalities associated with retinal vein occlusion in 25: 163–167.
young patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11: 441–447. 51. Shahsuvaryan ML and Melkonyan AK. Central retinal

42. Rothman AL, Thomas AS, Khan K, et al. Central retinal vein occlusion risk profile: a case-control study. Eur J
vein occlusion in young individuals: a comparison of risk Ophthalmol 2003; 13: 445–452.
factors and clinical outcomes. Retina 2019; 39: 1917– 52. Dobree JH. Venous obstruction and neovascularization at
1924. the disc in chronic glaucoma. Trans Opthal Soc UK 1957;
43. Figueiredo L, Rothwell R, Brandão A, et al. Central retinal 77: 229–237.
vein occlusion in a patient with retinal vasculitis and crohn’s 53. Rim TH, Oh J, Kang SM, et al. Association between retinal
disease. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2014; 2014: 1–4. vein occlusion and risk of heart failure: a 12-year nation-
44. Chern S, Magargal LE and Brav SS. Bilateral central retinal wide cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2016; 217: 122–127.
vein occlusion as an initial manifestation of pseudotumor 54. Ellis CJ, Hamer DB, Hunt RW, et al. Medical investigation
cerebri. Ann Ophthalmol 1991; 23: 54–57. of retinal vascular occlusion. Br Med J 1964; 2: 1093–1098.

You might also like