PRELIMINARY GROUNDWATER

RESOURCES ANALAYSIS IN
ALL ACQUIRED WATER DISTRICTS

April 2020

Prepared by: Noted by:

Water Resources Team Niño O. Lukban

Department Head
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................2
1.1. Objectives..............................................................................................................................2
2. METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................................3
2.1. Compilation of Existing Data..................................................................................................3
2.2. Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysis...........................................................................5
2.3. Graphical Analysis of Flowrate, Drawdown, and Rainfall Data..............................................6
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS...........................................................................................................6
3.1. Timeseries Maps of the Flow Rate, Drawdown, and pH of Cabanatuan City.........................6
3.2. Graphical Analysis of the Specific Capacity of Wells..............................................................9
3.2.1. Shallow Wells.................................................................................................................9
4.1.1. Deep Wells...................................................................................................................10
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................11
6. APPENDIX………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14
1. INTRODUCTION

Primewater Infrastructure Corporation (PIC) currently collects data on the different

water districts for the improvement of their water systems. These are collected at least
once a year when a fieldwork is done to update the current water system of each water
districts. Data gathered are centralized in the North office for processing, analysis, and
interpretation. However, these data are insufficient for the analysis of the groundwater’s
current status and potential.

Each water district also has their own data monitoring. However, these are localized
and are not readily available for processing and analysis. Data being monitored are also
different for each water district, depending on what they need for their analyses. These
usually do not focus on groundwater analyses.

1.1. Objectives
To create a comprehensive groundwater data analysis, Primewater’s Water Resources
Team is initiating to collect and centralize monitoring data of existing groundwater
resources, both deep well and spring, from partnered water districts. The centralized
data will include the checklist of each groundwater sources. Periodic measurement of
flowrate, static water level, pumping water level, pressure, and motor control setting is
also needed. Available physiochemical results of the groundwater sources are also
necessary to assess and monitor the changes in the water quality of each sources and
identify the causes of contamination, if there are any.

A complete centralized monitoring data collected from water districts aims to create
not only an analysis for each available groundwater source, but the whole aquifer within
the area. This includes, but is not limited to:

 Assessment of historical changes of the groundwater discharge;

 Assessment of the current status of the area’s aquifer;
 Analysis of the effects of extraction to the overall groundwater table of the
area;
 Detailed mapping of the groundwater condition and availability than
traditional manual and localized sampling;
 Delineation of possible extent of groundwater contamination;
 Establishing trends on aquifer behavior;
 Identification of other potential sources without the need for geo-resistivity
survey; and
 Extrapolation of the future capacity of the groundwater based on current
extraction rates

This paper is an initial assessment and proposal based on the data gathered and
analyzed from the different water districts. Method of data acquisition and processing,
interpretation of acquired data, and recommendations for future analyses are detailed in
the succeeding sections. The precedents detailed are ultimately to request for the
acquisition of all available data necessary for groundwater assessment.

2|Page
2. METHODOLOGY

The following procedures were adopted by the team to formulate an assessment and
analysis of the condition of the groundwater resources in the water districts partnered
with Primewater:

2.1. Compilation of Existing Data

The team conducted an initial study based on the existing data gathered from the
branches (Table 1). Well data collected includes the geographic coordinates,
elevation, pump setting, well depth, casing, flow rate, pumping water level (PWL),
static water level (SWL), pressure, rating, and frequency. Physiochemical data
contains results of the water quality testing of the wells conducted by the respective
water districts, in accordance with the Philippine National Standards for Drinking
Water (PNSDW).
Table 1. List of the range of data from the water districts gathered by the team as of April 2020.
WATER DISTRICT RANGE OF ACQUIRED DATA
WELL DATA (GENERAL) PHYSIOCHEMICAL DATA
ILOCOS NORTE WATER DISTRICT March 2020 November 2019
BATAC WATER DISTRICT March 2020 November 2019
DINGRAS WATER DISTRICT March 2020 December 2019
METRO SAN FERNANDO (LA
April 2020 May 2019
UNION) WATER DISTRICT
1st and 2nd Quarter
LINGAYEN WATER DISTRICT March 2020
(2016 to 2019)
SAN CARLOS CITY WATER
Pending Pending
DISTRICT
ROSALES WATER DISTRICT March 2020 September 2019
POZORRUBIO WATER DISTRICT March 2020 February 2020
SANTA MARIA WATER DISTRICT September 2019 – March 2020 January 2020
MAPANDAN WATER DISTRICT March 2020 June 2019 & January 2020
URDANETA CITY WATER DISTRICT January 2018 – February 2020 January 2019
ORANI WATER DISTRICT March 2019 – February 2020 February 2020
June 2019 & February
MARILAO WATER DISTRICT January 2016 & March 2020
2020
MEYCAUAYAN WATER DISTRICT March 2017 & March 2020 Pending
SAN JOSE DEL MONTE CITY
March 2020 2018 – 2019
WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF MALOLOS WATER March 2019 & 2nd half
August 2018
DISTRICT 2019
January 2019 & December
SAN RAFAEL WATER DISTRICT March 2020
2019
October 2018 & January
SAN ILDEFONSO WATER DISTRICT January – March 2020
2019
March 2019, March 2019 & September
JAEN WATER DISTRICT
May 2019 – January 2020 2019
CABANATUAN CITY WATER
January 2017 – March 2020 2017 – 2019
DISTRICT
SAN ANTONIO WATER DISTRICT March 2020 March 2018 & March 2019
GAPAN CITY WATER DISTRICT July 2019 October 2019

3|Page
MUNOZ WATER DISTRICT March 2020 March 2019
FLORIDABLANCA WATER
February 2020 November 2019
DISTRICT
January & July 2017,
CITY OF SAN FERNANDO
February 2020 February & August 2018,
(PAMPANGA) WATER DISTRICT
March & September 2019
GUAGUA WATER DISTRICT March 2020 October 2019
LUBAO WATER DISTRICT March 2020 November 2019
MABALACAT CITY WATER
September 2019 October 2019
DISTRICT
PORAC WATER DISTRICT March 2020 December 2019
TARLAC CITY WATER DISTRICT March 2020 November 2019
CAMILING WATER DISTRICT April 2020 Feb, Nov 2018 – Nov 2019
PANIQUI WATER DISTRICT March 2020 December 2019
MAYANTOC WATER DISTRICT April 2020 June 2019 and Feb 2020
GERONA WATER DISTRICT March 2020 July 2019
SUBIC WATER DISTRICT March 2020 February 2020
SAN JOSE (MINDORO) WATER
November 2019 2018 - 2019
DISTRICT
QUEZON METROPOLITAN WATER
- July 2017
DISTRICT
MAUBAN WATER DISTRICT - July 2017
LEMERY WATER DISTRICT 2015 - 2019 2017 & 2020
AGONCILLO WATER DISTRICT July 2018 February 2020
ROSARIO (BATANGAS) WATER
February 2020 2017 - 2019
DISTRICT
BATANGAS CITY WATER DISTRICT December 2019 2010 – 2014, 2019
January 2017 – January
NASUGBU WATER DISTRICT December 2019
2018
TAAL WATER DISTRICT July 2019 No data available
TRECE MARTIRES CITY WATER February – December
March 2019
DISTRICT 2018
SILANG WATER DISTRICT January 2019 July 2017
TAGAYTAY CITY WATER DISTRICT August 2018 August 2018
DASMARINAS WATER DISTRICT December 2017 No data available
SAN PEDRO WATER DISTRICT March 2020 2016-2019
SANTA CRUZ (LAGUNA) WATER
February 2020 February 2020
DISTRICT
DARAGA WATER DISTRICT 2019 Pending
CAMARINES NORTE WATER June & October 2019;
January – October 2019
DISTRICT January 2020
IRIGA CITY WATER DISTRICT Pending Pending
SORSOGON CITY WATER
2020 November 2019
DISTRICT
HIMAMAYLAN WATER DISTRICT October2019 Pending
CADIZ CITY WATER DISTRICT 2019 July 2019
PINAMUNGAJAN WATER
April 2020 Pending
DISTRICT
MAASIN WATER DISTRICT Pending Pending
4|Page
 METRO HILONGOS WATER
April 2020 Pending
DISTRICT
LEYTE METROPOLITAN WATER
No data available Pending
DISTRICT
SURIGAO METROPOLITAN May 2019 &
April 2019
WATER DISTRICT December2019
METRO OZAMIZ WATER DISTRICT April 2020 Pending
PANABO WATER DISTRICT January 2019 – March 2020 Pending

2.2. Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysis

Geostatistics focuses on the study of spatial variability dealing with regionalized
variables. These variables are composed of two elements namely, an attribute value
and a location in a two- or three-dimensional space. Furthermore, geostatistics
allows the user to explore data, create variogram models, and make interpolated
surfaces because they are also tools and techniques utilized for variable analysis and
prediction. These values are commonly distributed in space or time.

Kriging is an advanced geostatistical procedure that generates an estimated

surface from a scattered set of points with z-values. More so than other interpolation
methods, a thorough investigation of the spatial behavior of the phenomenon
represented by the z-values should be done before you select the best estimation
method for generating the output surface1.

Kriging assumes that the distance or direction between sample points reflects a
spatial correlation that can be used to explain variation in the surface. The Kriging
tool fits a mathematical function to a specified number of points, or all points within a
specified radius, to determine the output value for each location. Kriging is a
multistep process; it includes exploratory statistical analysis of the data, variogram
modeling, creating the surface, and (optionally) exploring a variance surface. Kriging
is most appropriate when you know there is a spatially correlated distance or
directional bias in the data. It is often used in soil science and geology.2

The IDW (Inverse Distance Weighted) tool uses a method of interpolation that
estimates cell values by averaging the values of sample data points in the
neighborhood of each processing cell. The closer a point is to the center of the cell
being estimated, the more influence, or weight, it has in the averaging process.1

Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) assumes that the variable being mapped
decreases in influence from its sampled location. It also relies mainly on the inverse
of the distance controlled by the mathematical power parameter which helps to
control the significance of known points on the interpolated values based on their
distance from the output points. By defining a higher power, the more emphasis is
placed on the nearest detail while for a lower power will give more influence to the
points that are farther away, resulting in a smoother surface.3

Another statistical process used was normalization, wherein it refers to the

creation of shifted and scaled versions of statistics. The intention is that these
1
https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/3d-analyst-toolbox/comparing-interpolation-methods.htm
2
https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/3d-analyst-toolbox/how-kriging-works.htm
3
https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/3d-analyst-toolbox/how-idw-works.htm
5|Page
 normalized values allow the comparison of corresponding normalized values for
different datasets in a way that eliminates the effects of certain gross influence, as in
an anomaly time series. Unity-based normalization used to bring all values into range
[0, 1].

Additionally, ArcGIS 10.3.1 is a powerful tool that is able to meet various need
regarding vectors, raster and satellite imagery. Through this software’s interpolation
function, concentration of each parameter in the area were assessed and analyzed.

2.3. Graphical Analysis of Flowrate, Drawdown, and Rainfall Data

Normalization is a statistical process wherein different datasets are normalized to
eliminate the different units of measurement of the data. This allows for better
correlation and comparison of the data. In this report, the flowrate, rainfall, and
drawdown data are normalized by rescaling these data to have values between 0 and
1.

The formula for normalization is:

' X−X min

X=
X max− X min
Wherein,

X’ is zero if X is the minimum value,

X’ is one if X is the maximum value, and
X’ is between 0 and 1 if the value of X is between the minimum and maximum values

In this report, average of the previous and next month data were substituted to
the datasets with zero and negative values. The normalized data were plotted in graphs
make an analysis of the relationship between the changes in flowrate, drawdown and
rainfall data.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

3.1. Timeseries Maps of the Flow Rate, Drawdown, and pH of Cabanatuan City
To emphasize the importance of having a regular record of well data, map samples
were generated using the data acquired from Cabanatuan Water District. Flow rate,
drawdown, and pH were used to generate three timeseries maps to identify the changes
in these parameters over time. Maps are illustrated in Figures 1, 2 and 3 below.

6|Page
Fig 1. Flow Rate Map of Cabanatuan City from January 2019 to January 2020.

Fig 2. Drawdown Map of Cabanatuan City from January 2019 to January 2020.

7|Page
 Fig 3. pH Map of Cabanatuan City from May 2017 to September 2019

Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) tool in ArcMap was used to interpolate data
collected and generate the maps. By creating timeseries maps from the historical data of
the pumping stations, changes in the values of the parameters can be seen through
time. In contrast, incomplete data cannot be used and would not be able to generate a
comprehensive analysis on the groundwater status in the area over time.

Significant changes in flowrate can be observed from Fig 1. A general increase in

flowrate can be seen within the year of 2019. January 2019 has the lowest flowrates
within the year whereas October 2019 had the highest flowrates. This may be attributed
to the change of season from January to October, in which higher chances of rainfall
occur at the later months of the year. Comparing January of 2019 and 2020, there is a
significant difference in flowrate between the two. Significantly higher flowrate values
can be observed in January 2020. An El Niño which occurred in 2019 may have
significantly affected the water that can be extracted within Cabanatuan City. It can also
be seen that January 2020 still has a higher flowrate compare to the rainy season of
2019, as exemplified in the map of July and October 2019. El Niño may still have
affected the groundwater within the area at this time. More analysis could be drawn from
these if data prior to 2019 are also available to analyze further the differences in
flowrate for each year, for each month within the year, and for the same month of every
year.

Drawdown also has a similar trend with flowrate (Fig 2). A change from January
2019 to October 2019 shows an increase of pumping stations with smaller drawdown
compared to January 2019. Rainfall values may have also affected the recharge rate of
the groundwater, thereby decreasing the drawdown for each pumping stations. Changes
in drawdown between January 2019 and January 2020 can also be observed. In January

8|Page
2020, smaller drawdown values can be seen in the densely populated pumping stations
while an increase in drawdown is observed in less densely populated pumping stations.
This may show a difference in the recharge rate among the different areas in which the
pumping stations are located.

Another factor affecting both flowrate and drawdown shown in Fig 1 to Fig 2 is
the pump motor setting during measurement of the two former parameters. A change in
the frequency rating may have occurred during the measurement of flowrate, PWL, and
SWL. If historical data for pump motor setting is also available, these changes may be
factored in during analyses to have a more wholistic understanding of the groundwater
extraction occurring in the area.

pH patterns from May 2017-September 2019 were also delineated (Fig 3). As
seen on the timeseries maps, the municipality generally has a basic and hard
groundwater. Based on the 2017 PNSDW limit, acceptable level of pH for drinking water
ranges from 6.5 to 8.5. The May 2017 results showed that more than half of the
pumping stations exceeded the PNSDW limit for pH. In February 2018, all pumping
stations have normal levels of pH. However, succeeding tests from September 2018 to
September 2019 showed that some pumping stations exceeded the pH limit again.

Changes in pH may be attributed to both natural and man-made activities

occurring in the area. pH levels of groundwater may vary depending on the underlying
geology of the area. The different rock and sediment compositions, and the contact time
of groundwater to the rocks can affect its pH. On the other hand, anthropogenic causes
of pH changes include agricultural runoff, industrial runoff, and wastewater discharge.

3.2. Graphical Analysis of the Specific Capacity of Wells

3.2.1.Shallow Wells
4. Table 2. List of shallow wells with corresponding well depth

Well
  Well Type Well Name Depth
(m)
1 Shallow Kapitan Pepe 71
2 Shallow Aduas Shallow 71
3 Shallow Melencio 71
4 Shallow Bitas Shallow 71
5 Shallow Valdefuente Shallow 65
6 Shallow Mayapyap Shallow 71
7 Shallow Sumacab 71
8 Shallow Del Pilar Filtration 71
9 Shallow Lakewood 90
1
Shallow Magsaysay 107
0
1
Shallow H. Concepcion 71
1

Eleven (11) shallow wells were identified with well depth of 107 m and below
(Table 2). Most shallow wells show a generally constant drawdown and flowrate over
9|Page
time with minor fluctuations in some wells, except for Bitas Shallow, Lakewood, and
Sumacab which had noticeable spikes or drops in flowrate and drawdown. Four out of
the eleven shallow wells are discussed to represent the behavior of the shallow wells in
Cabanatuan Water District, namely Valdafuente PS, Kapitan Pepe PS,Sumacab PS, and
Bitas Shallow PS. Data and figures can be seen in Appedix 1-A. Using these data, the
specific capacities of the wells were calculated by dividing the discharge rate by the
drawdown.

Valdafuente PS represents the wells with relatively constant specific capacity over a
span of three years, from 2017 to 2020. These wells did not have any significant
changes over time as shown by the flat, horizontal plots. This indicates that the said
wells are still performing at the same quality from their initial installation. Only a minor
gradual increase in drawdown can be observed from January 2017 to July 2019 in
Valdafuente PS. This slightly decreased on August 2019 at the period when high
accumulated rainfall occurred in Cabanatuan City. Rainfall within Cabanatuan City does
not seem to heavily affect these wells. Similar patterns can be observed in Aduas
Shallow PS, Melencio PS, Del Pilar Filtration PS, Mayapyap PS, and Magsaysay PS.

Kapitan Pepe PS has moderately fluctuating flowrate with a relatively constant

drawdown. Its flowrate pattern seems to be more affected by rainfall than the other
pumping stations identified above albeit with some delay. The offset is most noticeable
during the high accumulated rainfall that occurred from July 2019 to September 2019.
Flowrate increased starting only in September 2019 which also gradually decreased as
rainfall decreased. Its specific capacity, therefore, is affected more by its flowrate.
Possibly, higher rating can be used at times when flowrates are relatively lower to
increase the discharge capacity of the well without changing much of its specific
capacity. This is also observable in H. Concepcion PS, but with also a noticeable minor
drop in drawdown after September 2019.

Sumacab PS had a significant drop in flowrate in August 2017 and a sudden spike in
January 2018. A minor drop in drawdown is also observed in August 2017, but is not
observable during the spike of flowrate in January 2018. This does not seem to have
been an effect of rainfall changes within Cabanatuan City, since this fluctuation is not
observable within the period of highest accumulated rainfall. Specific capacity, however,
seem to have a slow gradual increase as the flow rate gradually decreases and
drawdown gradually increases over time. This same pattern can be observed in
Lakewood PS.

Bitas Shallow PS had an opposite trend with Sumacab PS wherein both flowrate and
drawdown instead had a spike in September 2019. A higher increase in drawdown
compared to flowrate greatly decreased its specific capacity, noting that Bitas Shallow PS
also has one of the lowest discharges among the pumping stations. Its drawdown seems
to be affected by rainfall albeit only slightly. It must be noted that a nearby well, Bitas
Deep PS, has a significantly higher specific capacity compared to Bitas Shallow PS. An
assessment on the cost-efficiency of this well is recommended.

4.1.1.Deep Wells
The drawdown of all the deep wells in Cabanatuan WD generally remains constant as
observed from the almost flat, horizontal plots. When it comes to flowrates, constant and
horizontal patterns can also be observed in San Isidro PS, Barrera PS, Bitas Deepwell,
Valdafuente Deepwell, Don Jose PS, P. Garcia PS, Caalibangbangan PS, Dicarma PS,
Cruz Roja PS, and Ibabao Bana PS. Appendix 1-B shows the generated graphs for
deep wells.

10 | P a g e
 Table 3. List of deep wells with corresponding depth

Well Well Well Well

  Well Name   Well Name
Type Depth (m) Type Depth (m)
1 Deep Mabini 190   15 Deep Grand Victoria 209
2 Deep Daan Sarile 215   16 Deep Bangad 214
3 Deep Aduas Deepwell 224   17 Deep Caalibangbangan 140
4 Deep San Isidro 180   18 Deep Villa Benita 191
5 Deep Barrera 206   19 Deep Dicarma 210
6 Deep Burgos 190   20 Deep Imperial 160
7 Deep Bitas Deepwell 350   21 Deep Cruz Roja 210
8 Deep Valdefuente Deepwell 200   22 Deep Ibabao-Bana 151
9 Deep Don Jose 220   23 Deep Samson Subdv 200
10 Deep P. Garcia 209   24 Pagas -
11 Deep Lourdes 192   25 Deep Sta. Arcadia 2 214
12 Deep Camp Tinio 206   26 Deep Pangatian - Temporary Facility 215
13 Deep Mayapyap Deepwell 208   27 Lamarang -
14 Deep Sta. Arcadia 210  

Mabini PS, Daan Sarile PS, Aduas PS, Grand Victoria PS, and Bangad PS all have
moderately fluctuating flowrates. However, a similar peak in flowrate which occurred in
March 2019 was observed in Bangad and Grand Victoria during the same period when
rainfall was lowest.

There are deep wells that have generally constant flowrate except for one significant
fluctuation. One example can be observed in Burgos PS where there was only one steep
rise in flowrate which occurred in April 2017. In Lourdes PS, on the other hand, there
was a slow decline observed from February to September 2018. In Camp Tinio PS, the
significant fluctuation observed was a decline that started in April 2017 that was also
followed by a rise that started in June of the same year. The opposite was observed in
Imperial PS where, like Bangad and Grand Victoria PS, the peak of flowrate occurred in
March 2019.

Sta. Arcadia PS and Mayapyap Deepwell has the same moderately constant pattern
of flowrate until a steep decline occurred in February 2019 and immediately followed by
a steep rise that started in March 2019. This may be related to the decreasing amount of
rainfall which began in December 2018 and reached zero from February to April.

Among the deep wells, Villa Benite PS and Imperial PS have higher drawdown than
flowrate. In relation to this, Imperial PS, along with Valdafuente Deepwell and Mayapyap
Deepwell, have low specific capacity.

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In order to achieve a detailed groundwater analysis, complete data for pumping

water level, static water level, and drawdown are needed. By delineating these data into

11 | P a g e
maps, the groundwater flow and the aquifer behavior of the area concerned can be
modeled. Records of historical data made it possible to create timeseries maps where
patterns and trends of groundwater behavior within a given period were presented and
possible causes were identified. Moreover, historical data for drawdown and flowrate
patterns were compared with a 3-year rainfall data to further understand the capacity of
the existing wells.

Kriging is only one of the many geostatistical tools available in ArcGIS.

Interpretations and analysis can be further improved with more available time and data
at hand. Geostatistical software other than ArcGIS can also be used with the acquired
data.

A deterministic interpolation method called Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) was

also used to interpret the data. This method assumes that the level of influence of a
variable decrease with increasing distance from its sampled location. In this report, IDW
was employed to high interval variables.

Moreover, historical data of physiochemical results are also needed especially if a

number of groundwater sources suffer from different contamination issues. By
delineating all the data gathered for a specific parameter, a map showing the extent of
the contamination in a certain location can be produced. Historical data can also help in
analyzing the time period wherein the values of parameters change.

The drawdown and flowrate of the pumping stations were also correlated with the
amount of rainfall using graphical analysis. The graphs also showed fluctuations in the
flowrate and drawdown of the wells, as well as the relationship of the two variables. Low
specific capacities, as shown by wells with higher drawdown to flowrate ratio, were
observed. Optimization and cost-efficiency analysis are recommended for wells with low
specific capacities. Generally, rainfall patterns have no significant effect to fluctuations in
flowrate and drawdown.

Listed below are the recommended data by the Water Resources Team to the
different water districts to be included in the database in order to produce accurate
analysis of the groundwater characteristics of the area:

 General Pumping Station and Spring Data

 Daily record of flow rate (in lps) and discharge pressure (in psi), to be
measured preferably during peak hours of consumer usage to be measured on
the same time and day of the week for each pumping stations
 Weekly Pump and motor control setting (rating, frequency), to be measured on
the same time and day of the week for each pumping stations
 Historical Data of Physical-Chemical Test/Retesting of failed parameters

The Water Resources Team will request a copy of all the monitoring data listed
above. The team will collate all the data from the acquired water districts in order to
create a centralized database.

This initiative was done to update the groundwater availability map that the Water
Resources Team currently use to infer future possible sources of groundwater. With a
centralized database for the needed data, a more detailed and accurate groundwater
analysis can be produced and used for future source development.

12 | P a g e
APPENDIX
Rainfall vs. Flowrate vs. Drawdown Graphs of
Pumping Stations

13 | P a g e
 14 | P a g e
0.40M
O

0.80RD

M
1.00 N

0.60EA
0.80LIR

M
OE
M

0.00NZ
0.20 L

0.20D
0.60N

A
R
I

O
O

1.00N
D

E
N

0.00Z
A

0.20DL
0.80R
0.60A
0.80R

0.20D

E
0.40Z
0.60A

L
Z

I
E
0.40Z
L

I
I
1.00

0.40
1.00
0.20

0.00

0.00

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.00

2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03

2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01
2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN

2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09

2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07
2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05
FILTRATION
MAYAPYAP SHALLOW

2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03

ADUAS SHALLOW
BITAS SHALLOW

MAGSAYSAY PS

2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE

2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11

2018-09 2018-09 2018-09 2018-09 2018-09
DATE

DATE

DATE
DATE

DEL PILARDATE

2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07

2018-05 2018-05 2018-05 2018-05 2018-05
M
O

0.20D
1.00N

0.60A
0.80R

E
0.40Z
L
I

2018-03 2018-03 2018-03 2018-03 2018-03

0.00
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)

2018-01 2018-01 2018-01

2020-03 2018-01 2018-01
2017-11 2017-11 2017-11
2020-01 2017-11 2017-11
2017-09 2017-09 2017-09
2019-11 2017-09 2017-09
N-DRAWDOWN

2017-07 2017-07 2017-07

2019-09 2017-07 2017-07
2017-05 2017-05 2017-05
2019-07 2017-05 2017-05
2017-03 2017-03 2017-03
2019-05 2017-03 2017-03
H. CONCEPCION PS

2017-01 2017-01 2017-01

2019-03 2017-01 2017-01
6000

2000
600
R 500

400
300
200
100

600
500
400
300
200
100
0

0
I 600

R 500
I 400
L 300

200
LR 500
100
I 400
N 300
F 200
L 100

0
600
500
400
300

100
2019-01
N-FLOWRATE

2018-11
A

A
N

N
A

A
R
L
AF
NL

RF
A
NL

A
F
L

F
L
L
I

LI
2018-09
DATE

2018-07
2018-05
0.40ZM

ZM
LO

LO
0.20OD

0.20D
0.60AN

0.60AN
0.60EA

0.60EA
0.80IR

0.80IR
E

E
M
0.40Z

0.00 Z
0.20DL

DL
M
M

I
0.20D
N

0.00A

0.80O
R

N
O

R
1.00N

E
0.40Z
L
0.80R

I
1.00

1.00

0.40

0.00
2018-03
1.00

0.80

0.60

0.00

1.00

0.40

0.20
0.00
RAINFALL (mm)

2020-03 2020-03 2018-01

2020-03 2020-03 2020-03
2020-01 2020-01 2017-11
2020-01 2020-01 2020-01
2019-11 2019-11 2017-09
2019-11 2019-11 2019-11
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

2019-09 2019-09 2017-07

2019-09 2019-09 2019-09
2019-07 2019-07 2017-05
2019-07 2019-07 2019-07
VALDAFUENTE SHALLOW

2019-05 2019-05 2017-03

2019-05 2019-05 2019-05
2019-03 2019-03 2017-01
2019-03 2019-03 2019-03
KAPITAN PEPE PS

0
600
500
400
300
200
100
LAKEWOOD PS

2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01

PS
2019-01

MELENCIO PS
Appendix 1-A: Shallow Wells

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11

N
A

A
R

SUMACAB
F
L
L
I
2018-09 2018-09 2018-09 2018-09 2018-09

DATE

DATE
DATE

DATE
DATE
2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07
2018-05 2018-05 2018-05 2018-05 2018-05
2018-03 2018-03 2018-03 2018-03 2018-03
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

2018-01 2018-01 2018-01 2018-01 2018-01

2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11
2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09
2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07
2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05
2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03
2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01

0
600
500
400
300
200

AL 100

600
500

LI 400
300
F 200
L 100
0
A 600
RL 500
I 400

300
A 200
L 100

0
0

600
500
400
300
AA 200
LN 100
600
500
400
FR 300
L 200
100
LN

FR
AA

A
F

L
N
I

F
L

N
A
R
N
R
A

I
I
 15 DZ|DP age
M
ZMO
ON

0.40RZIA
EAR

0.20 ZEI E
0.00AI Z
RL
LDI
DM
M
M

M
1.00N

R
EO

0.80ID
1.00IN

AE
0.60A
R
M

L
O

D
O

LZE
1.00N
0.20D

0.80 M
1.00N

0.00A

0.60ML
R
0.60A

O
0.80R

D
0.60N
OE
E

M
L
Z
L

AI
D
N

0.20O

E
0.00A

O
0.80R

D
N

0.00L
0.40ZI

R
I

E
0.40Z
L

O
N

0.00A
0.20R
I

Z
L
0.40

0.20
0.80

0.40

0.20

0.00
0.80

0.60

0.20

1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
1.00

0.60

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00
1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.00
1.00
0.80

0.40
0.20
0.00

1.00

0.60
0.40

0.00

2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03

2020-03 2020-03
2020-03
N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN

2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01

2020-01 2020-01
2020-01
2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11
2019-11
2019-11 2019-11
N-DRAWDOWN

PSN-DRAWDOWN

2019-11
PSN-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09

2019-09
2019-09 2019-09
2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07
2019-07
2019-07 2019-07
DATE DEEPWELL

2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05

2019-05 2019-05
2019-05 2019-05
2019-05
2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03
2019-03 2019-03
2019-03 2019-03
2019-03
DAAN SARILE PS

PS

PS
PS
IBABAO-BANA

2019-01
SAN ISIDRO PS

TINIOPS

2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01

N-FLOWRATE

2019-01 2019-01 2019-01

P. GARCIA PS

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
BENITE
BURGOS PS
N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

2018-11
N-FLOWRATE

STA ARCADIA

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11

2018-11 2018-11
2018-11
2018-11
RAINFALL (mm)IMPERIAL
BANGAD

2018-09
DATE

2018-09 2018-09 2018-09

2018-09 2018-09 2018-09
2018-09
VALDAFUENTE

2018-09
DATE

DATE

2018-09
DATE

DATE
DATE
DATE

DATE
DATE

2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07

2018-07 2018-07
2018-07
2018-07 2018-07
2018-07
CAMP

2018-05 2018-05 2018-05 2018-05

2018-05 2018-05
2018-05
2018-05
2018-05 2018-05
VILLA

2018-03 2018-03 2018-03

2018-03
2018-03
2018-03
2018-03
2018-03 2018-03 2018-03
RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

2018-01
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

2018-01 2018-01 2018-01 2018-01 2018-01

2018-01 2018-01
2018-01 2018-01
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)

2017-11 2017-11
2017-11
2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11
2017-09 2017-09
2017-09
2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09
2017-07 2017-07
2017-07
2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07
2017-05 2017-05
2017-05
2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05
2017-03 2017-03
2017-03
2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03
2017-01 2017-01
2017-01
2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01

3000
600
LNA 600500
400
300
200
100
2017-01
0
600
500
400
300
200
100

L 100 0
600
500
NIL 400

200
100
0

0
600
500
400
300
200
100

600
500
AIR 400
RL I 300
200
100
0
F 600
LA 500
N 400
I 300
A 200
FAL 100
I 4000
600

RL 500
400
N 300

200
R 100

I 4000
F 600
500

N 300

200

AL 100

0
RFN 500
AIA 400
L 300
A L 200
0
F 600
RL 500

300
AR 200
LRI 100

FA
F

L
N
A

A
R

R
N
A
F

AL

A
A

F
L
I

LF
L
AL

L
L
A

A
I

N 0.60 M

AM
0.00OM
M

0.20DO

0.20DZD
EN

DD
EN
ID
ZM
O

1.00N
0.20RD

0.60 M

0.40RA
0.80 R

R
1.00N

0.20M
A
0.40MRR
R
0.60A
0.80R

0.60E
Z

LNE

IZ

EE
0.40AZ
OE

Z
1.00NZ

L
L

0.00LL
M

A
0.80R
DLI

0.60OO D
I

N
0.20NOI

DI
E

0.20ZEIEI
R

Z
L

LA
0.20RD
0.00A

I
OE
0.40Z

M
L
I
N

N
0.00A
0.40

0.40Z
L

0.80

0.20

0.00
I

1.00

0.60
0.80

0.60

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.00
1.00

N-DRAWDOWN 0.40

1.00
N-DRAWDOWN 0.80

0.20
0.00
1.00

0.80

0.60

0.00

1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40

0.00
1.00
0.80

N-DRAWDOWN 0.40
0.20
0.00

1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03 2020-03
2020-03 2020-03 2020-03
2020-03
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
2020-01 2020-01 2020-01 2020-01
N-DRAWDOWN

2020-01 2020-01
2020-01 2020-01 2020-01
2020-01
2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11 2019-11
2019-11 2019-11 2019-11
2019-11

N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

N-DRAWDOWN
N-DRAWDOWN

2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09 2019-09

2019-09 2019-09 2019-09
2019-09
2019-07

PS
2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07
MAYAPYAPDATEDEEPWELL
2019-07 2019-07 2019-07 2019-07
2019-07

PS PS
2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05
2019-05 2019-05 2019-05 2019-05
2019-05

CAALIBANGBANGAN
2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03 2019-03
2019-03

ADUAS DEEPWELL
2019-03 2019-03 2019-03

VICTORIA
2019-03

ROJA PS
BITAS DEEPWELL
2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01 2019-01
2019-01 2019-01
2019-01 2019-01 2019-01

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
BARRERA PS

N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
DON JOSE PS

PS
MABINI PS
N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE

CRUZN-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE

N-FLOWRATE
N-FLOWRATE
2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11
2018-11
2018-11 2018-11 2018-11 2018-11
2018-11

(mm)DICARMA
LOURDES
Appendix 1-B: Deep Wells

2018-09 2018-09 2018-09

2018-09 2018-09
2018-09

DATE

DATE

DATE
2018-09 2018-09 2018-09

DATE

DATE
DATE
2018-09

DATE
DATE

DATE
DATE
2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07 2018-07
2018-07 2018-07
2018-07
2018-07 2018-07
2018-05 2018-05 2018-05
2018-05 2018-05
2018-05 2018-05
2018-05
2018-05 2018-05

GRAND
2018-03 2018-03 2018-03 2018-03
2018-03 2018-03
2018-03
2018-03 2018-03
2018-03

RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL (mm)
RAINFALL (mm)
2018-01 2018-01 2018-01
2018-01 2018-01
2018-01
2018-01

(mm)
RAINFALL (mm)
2018-01 2018-01

RAINFALL (mm)

RAINFALL(mm)
2018-01
2017-11 2017-11 2017-11
2017-11
RAINFALL (mm)
2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11 2017-11
2017-09 2017-09

RAINFALL
2017-09 2017-09

RAINFALL
2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09 2017-09
2017-07
2017-07 2017-07 2017-07
2017-07
2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07 2017-07
2017-05 2017-05 2017-05
2017-05
2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05 2017-05
2017-03 2017-03 2017-03
2017-03
2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03 2017-03
2017-01 2017-01 2017-01
2017-01
2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01 2017-01

6000

100 00
600
500
400
300
200
100

600
500
400
600
300
500
200
400
100
300
200
100
0
500
400
300
200
100

600
500
400
300
200
100
I 4000
600
500
400
300
200

AL 100

0
600
500
400
300
200
100

2000
600
500
400
300
200
100
N 4000
F 600
RL 500

300
200
L 100

0
600
500
400
300
0
A 600
L 500

300
A 200
L 100

FN
N

LN

N
A

RAA

AA

A
NA
A

LA
R

FALR

RR
R

L
N

F
ANL
IL

AL
FL
AL
L
LF
A

A
R

LNI

LI
LFI
R

IA
I

NAF
RL

F
R
A
N

I
F
L

I
F

A
I