Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TCPO Lsn13 - Reading Material
TCPO Lsn13 - Reading Material
TCPO Lsn13 - Reading Material
Lesson 13
Wear offsets
This compensation type allows the setup person or operator to deal with minor size
variations as workpieces are machined. While many CNC people (somewhat
inappropriately) use wear offsets to compensate for minor setup imperfections and tool
pressure, the major application for wear offsets is to compensate for tool wear during a tool’s
life.
You know that the tolerances commonly held on CNC turning centers are quite small. It is not unusual to see
at least one overall tolerance of under 0.001 inch (0.254 mm) on turned workpieces.
You also know that each cutting tool has its own program zero assignment – and that there are several ways
to assign program zero. And you know that unless you are using a properly calibrated tool touch off probe,
mistakes with program zero assignment – even minor ones – as well as the effects of tool pressure, make it
difficult to perfectly assign program zero. That is, even after program zero is assigned, there is no guarantee that
every tool will machine the workpiece perfectly – or even within specified tolerances. The tighter the
tolerances you must hold, the greater the potential there will be for sizing problems.
Wear offsets provide a way to make minor adjustments when machined surfaces are not within their tolerance bands – or when
they’re close to a tolerance limit.
There are at least four times when a typical CNC setup person or operator will use wear offsets:
?During setup and after mounting a cutting tool in the turret - After machining with the
new tool, if the setup person discovers that the cutting tool has not machined a
surface within the tolerance band, or if the surface is close to a tolerance limit, they
can change a wear offset to make the needed adjustment.
?When trial machining – Trial machining is done when the setup person or operator is
worried that a cutting tool (that has just been placed in the turret) will not machine
within the tolerance band. Wear offsets are commonly used with which to make trial
machining adjustments (Remember, if you are using a properly calibrated tool touch
off probe, you shouldn’t need to trial machine.)
?When compensating for tool wear – As a cutting tool wears, it will cause the surfaces
it machines to grow or shrink in size. Wear offsets are used to keep cutting tools
machining on-size for their entire lives.
?After a dull tool is replaced – Again, during a cutting tool’s life, tool wear commonly
causes the need for sizing adjustments in wear offsets. When a dull tool is replaced
with a new one, the wear offset must be set back to its initial value – otherwise the
new tool will machine too much material from the workpiece.
In the introduction to Key Concept Four, there is a lengthy presentation about tolerance interpretation. From this
presentation, you know that every dimension has a tolerance. You know that each tolerance will have a high
limit (largest acceptable dimension), a low limit (smallest acceptable dimension), and a mean value (the
dimension right in the middle of the tolerance band.
You also know that each dimension to be machined on a workpiece will have a target value – this is the
dimension you shoot for when an adjustment must be made. Many CNC people use the mean value of the
tolerance band as the target value. That is, when an adjustment must be made, they target the mean value.
While there are times when this may not be appropriate (large lot sizes with small tolerances), we’ll use this
technique throughout Lesson Thirteen. That is, for each surface needing an adjustment, we’ll be targeting the
mean value.
You know that the deviation is the amount of needed adjustment. It is the difference between the measured
value and the target value. In all cases, there will be a polarity to the deviation (plus or minus). The current
wear offset value must be either increased or decreased by the amount of the deviation. The polarity is
determined by judging which way the cutting tool must move (plus or minus) in order to bring the dimension
back to the target value. We’ll discuss more abut the deviation and its polarity later in this lesson.
Which dimension do you choose for sizing?
It is very common for a finishing tool to machine several surfaces. One finish turning tool may, for example,
finish three external diameters and faces. Each surface may have its own tolerance specification. And of
course, you program the mean value for each tolerance. In almost all cases, only one wear offset will be used
to control all surfaces machined by each tool, meaning one adjustment will handle all surfaces machined by
the tool.
For example, say a finish turning tool machines three external diameters: a 1.5 inch diameter, a 2.0 inch
diameter, and a 3.0 inch diameter. Unless there is a substantial tool pressure problem, when the 1.5 inch
diameter is coming out correctly (based on a wear offset adjustment in X), so will the 2.0 and 3.0 inch
diameters.
When it comes to making sizing adjustments, you should use the two surfaces (one for diameters and one for
lengths) that have the smallest tolerances. Use them to make sizing adjustment decisions.
T0300
for example, indexes the turret to station number three but will not instate a wear offset. In the first approach
motion for the tool, instate the offset. Here is a program segment that eliminates unwanted motion for a
machine that will move by the amount of the wear offset as soon as the offset is instated.
O0003 (Program number)
N005 G28 U0 W0
N010 G50 X8.3432 Z10.2383 (Assign program zero)
N015 T0100 M41 (Index to station one, no wear offset, and select the low range)
N020 G96 S600 M03 (Start the spindle CW at 600 sfm)
N025 G00 X2.2 Z0.005 T0101 M08 (Instate wear offset during the approach movement)
.
.
.
In line N015, the turret is indexed to station one but no wear offset is being instated (yet). During the first
approach movement in line N025, notice the T0101. Since the turret is already indexed to station one, it will
not index – but the wear offset will be instated. The machine will actually consider the current values in wear
offset number one as it makes its approach movement. In essence, the machine will modify the commanded
end point in X and Z by the amounts stored in wear offset number one, and then rapid to the modified
position. Note that this technique will only be required older machines when program zero assignment is
done in the program – and only if the machine moves as soon as a wear offset is instated.
N020 G00 X2.2 Z0 T0101 M08 (Invoke offset during the approach movement)
N025 G01 X-0.062 F0.010 (Face workpiece)
N030 G00 Z0.1 (Move away in Z)
N035 G00 X8.3432 Z10.2383 T0 (Move back to tool change position, cancel offset)
N040 M01 (Optional stop)
N045
.
. (Program continues)
.
In line N035, we’re sending the tool back to where it started and canceling the offset with T0.
Once again, remember that programming wear offsets is simpler when geometry offsets are used to assign
program zero. Here is the same program segment modified to use geometry offsets to assign program zero.
O0003 (Program number, example when geometry offsets are used to assign program zero)
N005 T0101 M41 (Index to station one, select wear offset one, and select the low range)
N010 G96 S600 M03 (Start the spindle fwd at 600 sfm)
N015 G00 X2.2 Z0 M08 (Move into approach position, turn on the coolant)
N020 G01 X-0.062 F0.010 (Face workpiece)
N025 G00 Z0.1 (Move away in Z)
N030 G00 X7.0 Z5.0 (Move back to tool change position)
N035 M01 (Optional stop)
N040
.
. (Program continues)
.
Again, geometry offsets make things easier. Notice that program zero assignment values are not in the
program (they’re in the geometry offsets). In line N005, the wear offset can be easily instated right in the
turret index command. And at the end of the tool in line N030, there’s no need to cancel the wear offset
(though doing so won’t hurt anything).
How wear offsets are entered
Figure 4.6 shows the wear offset display screen page.
16T
Offset / Wear
No. X Z R T
1 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
2 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
3 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
4 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
5 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
6 00.0000 2.9735
00.0000 0.0000 0
7 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
8 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
POSITION PROGRAM OFFSET PRG_CHK +
16T
Offset / Wear
No. X Z R T
1 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
2 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
3 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
4 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
5 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
6 00.0000 2.9735
00.0000 0.0000 0
7 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
8 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
0.005 INPUT + INPUT +
Notice that the cursor is currently on the X register of wear offset number two. The operator has just typed
0.005 from the keyboard on the control panel (the entry shows up in the lower-left corner of the display
screen. As the operator types the first digit (zero in our case), the soft keys change. While Fanuc control
models vary with regard to what the soft keys show, two of the soft keys will be INPUT and +INPUT. These
two keys are used to enter offset adjustments.
INPUT – This soft key (or the INPUT key on the control panel) will cause the machine to replace the value
that is currently in the offset register with the entered value. For the example in Figure 4.7, if the operator
presses the INPUT soft key, the X register of offset number two will be set to 0.005.
+INPUT – This soft key will cause the machine to modify the value that is currently in the offset register by the
entered value. For the example in Figure 4.7, if the operator presses the +INPUT soft key, the X register of
offset number two will be set to 0.005.
Since the initial value of the offset register is zero, INPUT and +INPUT happen to have the same result in
this example (0.005 being placed in the register). But consider what happens after an initial entry. Figure 4.8
illustrates.
The difference between INPUT and +INPUT
16T
Offset /
No. X Z R T
1 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
2 00.0050 00.0000 0.0000 0
3 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
4 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
5 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
6 00.0000 2.9735
00.0000 0.0000 0
7 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
8 00.0000 00.0000 0.0000 0
0.0003 INPUT + INPUT +
Figure 4.8 – Better example to stress the difference between INPUT and +INPUT
This time, the current value in the offset register is 0.005. The operator has typed the value 0.0003. If they
press the INPUT soft key, the register’s value will change to 0.0003. If they press the +INPUT soft key, the
register’s value will change to 0.0053.
Which is better, INPUT or +INPUT?
In almost all cases, a CNC setup person or operator will need to modify the current value in the offset register
by the amount of the offset entry, meaning the +INPUT soft key will be the offset entry soft key. Think
about it. Whenever a wear offset adjustment is required, you will have calculated the deviation – which is the
difference between the target value and the dimension you have measured on the workpiece. You must
modify the offset’s current setting by the amount of this deviation. The +INPUT soft key will keep you from
having to calculate the resulting offset value – the machine will make this calculation for you.
Remember that the deviation has a polarity. Sometimes it will be negative. The +INPUT soft key is still used.
Say for example, the current value in the offset register is 0.005 (like it is in Figure 4.8). You’ve determined the
deviation – and it is -0.0007. To make the adjustment, you will type -0.0007, and then press the +INPUT key.
After you do, the register will show 0.0043 (when you add 0.005 to -0.0007, the result is 0.0043). Again, the
machine will do the calculation for you when you use the +INPUT soft key.
3.0
2.75 1.5
4.0
0.125
2.0 1.0
0.05 stock
(each end) 3.75
Workpiece drawing
Finish face and turn operation
From the drawing on the left side of Figure 4.8, notice that all dimensions have a tolerance specified as +/-
0.001 inch (0.002 overall). On the right side, the finish face and turning operation is about to take place and is
done by tool number two. The roughing operation has already been done.
We’ll say that this is the first workpiece being machined in the job, and during setup, tool number two (the
finish face and turn tool) has just been placed in the turret. The setup person has done their best to measure
program zero assignment values and enter them into geometry offsets. The X and Z wear offset registers for
this tool are currently set to zero.
Notice that tool number two will be machining the 1.5 inch diameter – and it is this diameter we’ll concentrate
on for this example.
After tool number two runs – machining the 1.5 diameter – the setup person stops the cycle and measures the
1.5 inch diameter. Say they find that this diameter is currently 1.5024. It is, of course, oversize – larger than
the high limit for the tolerance band (1.501). An adjustment must be made.
Since we’re targeting the mean value, the adjustment must bring the diameter to 1.5 inches. The amount of
the adjustment – the deviation – will be the difference between the target dimension and our measured
dimension of 1.5024 (this comes out to 0.0024). Since the measured diameter is larger than the target diameter,
the deviation will be negative. And since this is a diameter deviation, we must modify the X register of the
offset (not the Z register).
So we must modify the current value of wear offset number two’s X axis register by -0.0024. After bringing
the cursor to the X register of offset number two, we type -0.0024 and press the soft key under +INPUT.
After doing so, the value in this register will be -0.0024 (remember that it started at zero). The next time tool
number two machines a workpiece, this diameter will come out 0.0024 smaller – and right at our target value
of 1.5 inches.
In the scenario just given, we got lucky. Since the 1.5 inch external diameter is oversize, there is still a little
stock to be removed. After making the offset adjustment, the setup person can re-run tool number two on
the same workpiece. After tool number two runs the second time, the 1.5 diameter will be within its tolerance
band (though it may not be exactly 1.5 since the amount of material being removed now is only 0.0024).
Consider the other possibility. After machining with tool number two for first time, maybe the setup person
measures the 1.5 inch diameter and finds it to be 1.4975. Now the diameter is undersize – smaller than the low
limit. Since there is no (feasible) way t put material back on this diameter, the workpiece is scrap. The
deviation in this case is (positive) 0.0025, and the X register of wear offset number two must be modified by
this amount before the next workpiece can be machined.
We call the technique just shown sizing after the fact. While it may be acceptable for some cutting tools (like
roughing tools), it is not recommended when the cutting tool must machine surfaces having tight tolerances.
In the fourth step, the setup person measures the 1.5 inch diameter. It will, of course, be oversize. Say they
find it to be 1.5082. The needed adjustment is -0.0082 to bring the diameter back to the target value of 1.5
inch. So the X register of wear offset number two is modified by -0.0082 (setup person types -0.0082 and
presses the soft key under +INPUT). While it may not be important at this time, the X value of wear offset
number two will end up as (positive) 0.0018.
In the fifth step, the setup person reruns tool number two. This time it will machine the 1.5 inch diameter
within its tolerance band – and for the next workpiece to be machined, the 1.5 inch diameter should come out
to precisely to its target value, 1.5 inches.
By the way, in the trial machining example just given, trial machining saved us from machining a scrap
workpiece. After trial machining, the diameter came out to only 0.0082”oversize. Yet we had initially
increased the offset by 0.01”. If we had not used trial machining techniques, the 1.5 inch diameter would have
come out to 1.4982, which is smaller than the low limit – again, this diameter would have been undersize.
With small lots, it is likely that the production run will be completed before the cutting tools wear enough to
require an adjustment. And with wide open tolerances, it is likely that a new cutting tool can completely wear
out without causing the surfaces being machined to approach tolerance limits.
But with large lots, cutting tools will eventually wear out and will need to be replaced. And if tolerances are
small, surfaces will eventually grow (or shrink) out of their tolerance bands long before the tool is completely
dull. This means adjustments must be made during the tool’s life in order to keep the cutting tool machining
all surfaces within tolerance bands.
In the drawing shown on the left side of Figure 4.8, notice once again that the 1.5 inch diameter has a
tolerance of +/-0.001. The high limit is, of course, 1.501 and the low limit is 1.499. During setup, we’ll say
the setup person uses the trial machining techniques shown in the second example to size in the 1.5 inch
diameter – they use wear offsets to do so. When the production run begins, a value of 0.0018 is in the X
register of wear offset number two and the 1.5 inch diameter is coming out to precisely 1.5 inches.
For this discussion, we’ll say there are thousands of workpieces to produce in this production run. So maybe
the job is turned over to a CNC operator at this point to run out the job. As they begin running workpieces,
the 1.5 inch diameter will continue coming out very close to 1.5 inches. But after fifty workpieces are
machined, the operator notices that the 1.5 inch diameter is 1.5002. The finish turning tool has worn by
0.0001 inch. The diameter is still well within the tolerance band, so the operator simply continues running
workpieces.
After fifty more workpieces, the 1.5 inch diameter comes out to 1.5005. The growth trend is continuing. But
the diameter is still within the tolerance band – and nothing needs to be done (yet).
After fifty more workpieces (one-hundred-fifty total), the 1.5 inch diameter comes out to 1.5008. While this
diameter is still within its tolerance band, it is getting dangerously close to the high limit (1.501). If this trend
continues much longer, the diameter will be larger than the high limit (oversize). So at this point, the operator
decides to make a sizing adjustment.
Since the target value is the mean value of the tolerance band, the operator will target 1.5. Currently the
workpiece is 1.5008. So the operator must modify the current X value of wear offset number two by -0.0008.
To do so, they position the cursor to the X register of wear offset number two (which currently happens to
have a value of 0.0018). Then they type -0.0008 and press the soft key under +INPUT. The machine will
subtract 0.0008 from the current value of the offset.
With the next workpiece machined, the 1.5 inch diameter will come out to precisely 1.5 inches – which is back
at the target value. The operator will be able to run another one-hundred-fifty workpieces or so before
another offset adjustment will be required.
After running one-hundred-forty more workpieces, say they find the 1.5 inch diameter has grown to 1.5008
again. So they must make another adjustment. To do so, they position the cursor to the X register of wear
offset number two (which currently happens to have a value of 0.0010). Then they type -0.0008 and press the
soft key under +INPUT. The machine will subtract 0.0008 from the current value of the offset.
The operator may have to make several such adjustments during a given cutting tool’s life – the smaller the
tolerance, the more adjustments that will have to be made. Eventually, the cutting tool will be completely dull
and in need of replacement.
holder, rotate it to an unused cutting edge, and replace it in the cutting tool holder. This task is known as
indexing the insert. When all cutting edges on the insert have been used, of course, the insert must be replaced.
The key to insert indexing and replacement is consistency. If you can index or replace the insert in such a way
that the new cutting edge is in exactly the same location as the last cutting edge, the new cutting edge will
machine in exactly the same way as the last cutting edge when it was new. The only problem you’ll have to deal
with is related to the amount of offset change you made during the last cutting edge’s life.
In the previous example, after sizing the first workpiece in during setup with a new cutting edge, the X value
of wear offset number two started out at a value of 0.0018. During this tool’s life, several adjustments are
made. Eventually this cutting edge will be dull and the insert must be indexed or replaced. As long as it can
be perfectly replaced (the new cutting edge is in the same location as the old cutting edge), the operator will set
the X axis register for wear offset number two back to the initial value of 0.0018. This will cause the new
cutting edge to machine the 1.5 diameter precisely to 1.5, just as the last cutting edge did when it was new.
This is one time when the INPUT soft key will be used. Since you know the value you want in the offset
(0.0018 in our case), it will be easier to use than the +INPUT soft key – which would first require a calculation
to be made.
By the way, this is the reason why we recommend making the initial adjustment (including trial machining
adjustments) in geometry offsets. If you do, the wear offset will begin at zero. When cutting tools are replaced,
you won’t have to remember the initial wear offset value (0.0018 in our example). Instead, you can simply set
the wear offset value back to zero.
The M specification in CNMG-432 specifies a tolerance for the included circle of 0.004 (+/-0.002). The
tolerance for the insert’s thickness is +/-0.005. While the thickness of an insert isn’t very critical, the size of its
included circle controls the position of the cutting edge, as Figure 4.9 shows.
The tolerance for insert size
Included circle
80 degrees
CNMG-432
With a CNMG-432 insert, the included
circle diameter can vary by 0.004 inch Almost 0.004 inch of potential variance
from one insert to another!
A position variance of almost 0.004 inch is possible with a CNMG-432 insert. This can result in as much as
0.008 inch variance when machining a diameter. With this much variation, of course, you will not be able to
change inserts precisely enough to eliminate trial machining or using a tool touch off probe when inserts are
replaced.
Note that the tolerances specified above are maximum variations. In practice, you’ll probably find them to be
much less from insert to insert – especially with inserts coming out of the same package. You can easily
measure the amount of variation from insert to insert with a micrometer. If you find the variance to be under
about 0.0005 inch from insert to insert, you may be able to replace inserts precisely enough to eliminate the
need for trial machining or the need to use the tool touch off probe after insert replacement.
If the pin is turned in this direction If the pin is turned in this direction Two inserts are shown in a
the insert will be clamped against the insert will be clamped against superimposed manner to stress
the upper location surface the right location surface the potential for variation
When you turn the pin in the direction shown in the left-most illustration of Figure 4.10, the insert will be
pressed against the upper location surface of the tool holder. When you turn the pin in the direction shown in
the middle illustration, the insert will be pressed against the right location surface of the tool holder. The right-
most illustration super-imposes two inserts that are clamped in opposite directions. If the seat in the tool
holder is not perfect, you can see how inconsistently clamped inserts will vary in position.
To determine which way the pin should be turned, consider what the cutting tool is doing. For the tool
shown in Figure 4.10, if the tool will be predominantly facing, turn the eccentric pin in the direction shown in
the left-most illustration. If it will be predominantly turning, turn the eccentric pin in the direction shown in
the middle drawing. Once you determine which way the eccentric pin should be turned, use the same method
every time an insert must be indexed or changed.
The method by which inserts are located in the tool holder affects more than just the position of the cutting
edge. It also affects basic machining practice – especially for tools that perform powerful machining
operations. If an insert is not properly located in the tool holder, it will prematurely fail.
stock is being left for the finish turning tool. For the finish turning tool, they use trial machining techniques to
keep from scrapping the first workpiece. For the threading tool, they’ll use trial machining to ensure that the
thread will be properly machined on the first workpiece.
We’ll say one-hundred-fifty workpieces must now be run. During this time, the CNC operator must make
adjustments to the wear offset for the finish turning tool (wear offset number two). At the completion of the
first job, tool number two is not worn out, but two wear offset adjustments have been made to keep it
machining on size.
When the first job is completed, the second job must be run. Though it may be of a totally different
configuration, it requires the same three tools. In this scenario, there won’t be much work for the setup
person to do – at least related to cutting tools and program zero assignment. Since all three tools are currently
in the turret and in the correct turret stations, there will be no need to remove or mount cutting tools. Since
chuck face is the point of reference for geometry offsets, and since the chuck face position doesn’t change
from job to job, the geometry offsets need not be measured. Only one value – the work shift value – must be
measured and entered – assuming the workpiece in the second job is not of the same length as the workpiece
in the first job.
Additionally, there will be no need for trial machining in the second job. Again, all three cutting tools were
machining properly at the completion of the first job. They will continue to machine properly as the second
job begins.
3.0
1.5 2.75
4.0
0.125
1.0 2.0
0.05
3.75 stock
Process:
Tool 1: Rough face and turn, leave 0.08 on all diameters, 0.005 on all faces
Tool 2: Finish face and turn to size (mean value is target)
Tool 3: Neck 0.125 groove to size (with 0.125 wide grooving tool)
Figure 4.11 – Three cutting tools are used to machine this workpiece
This is the same workpiece shown in the previous example, but this time we’re working on the other side.
Notice from the illustration on the left that the workpiece is being held in a three-jaw chuck (in soft jaws) on
the 4.0 inch outside diameter. It is being located in Z against the jaw on the largest face. This exposes the
other end of the workpiece to the turret for machining.
We’ll say that we’re machining one thousand of these workpieces – and that all of the tools have been newly
placed in the turret (though in reality, the rough face and turn tool [tool number one] and the finish face and
turn tool [tool number two] were probably used to machine the other side of this workpiece).
The setup person has measured the program zero assignment values for each tool (without the help of a tool
touch off probe) and entered the related values into geometry offsets. They have also measured and entered
the work shift value.
diameters. But to be on the safe side, we’ll trial machine to ensure that this tool truly leaves precisely 0.005 on
all faces of the workpiece for finishing. To do so, we’ll add 0.01 to the Z register of wear offset number one.
(The Z adjustment must be positive in order to leave more material on all faces.)
After running the tool, say we measure the 3.0 inch diameter (while the workpiece is still in the chuck) and
find it to be 3.082. We then measure the 1.0 inch thickness of the flange and find it to be 1.0139.
We’re currently leaving 0.082 inch on all diameters, so we’ll reduce the X register of wear offset number one
by 0.002 inch (type -0.002 and press the soft key under +INPUT). To make this tool leave precisely 0.005
inch on all faces for finishing, we’ll reduce the Z register of wear offset number one by 0.0089 inch (type -
0.0089 and press the soft key under +INPUT).
Now we re-run tool number one. After we do, we measure the 3.0 inch diameter and find it to be 3.0796.
We measure the 1.0 inch flange thickness and find it to be 1.0049 inch.
We’ve made the rough turning tool machine properly. It is now leaving the appropriate amount of finishing
stock for the next tool.
Tool number Two: Finish face and turn tool
We’re now ready to run the second tool. Again, this tool will be machining some rather small tolerances (+/-
0.001), and we’re worried that our program zero assignment may not be precise enough. So we decide to trial
machine in both axes – in X to ensure that the three inch diameter comes out correctly, and in Z to ensure
that the faces are machined correctly.
We increase the X register of wear offset number two by 0.01 inches. In Z, we cannot increase it by such a
large amount (there is only 0.005 left on all faces at this point). So we’ll increase it by a smaller amount – say
0.003. When this tool is actually machining the faces, we must visually confirm that it is truly machining
material from the workpiece (you must see chips being formed). If this tool happens to be perfectly set, it will
only be machining 0.002 inch of material from the faces. If it is off at all in the positive direction, it won’
machine any material at all from the faces.
Now we let the finish turning tool machine the workpiece. And sure enough, during facing we notice some
chips are being formed.
When we measure the 3.0 inch diameter, we find it to be 3.0087. We must reduce the X register of wear
offset number two by 0.0087 (type -0.0087 and press the soft key under +INPUT). And note that if we had
not trial machined, we would have scrapped the workpiece.
When we measure the 1.0 inch flange thickness, we find it to be 1.0023. We must reduce the Z register of
wear offset number two by 0.0023 (type -0.0023 and press the soft key under +INPUT).
At this point, tool number two must be run again. After re-running this tool, we find the 3.0 inch diameter to
be 2.9998. We find the 1.0 inch flange thickness to be 0.9999.
(You might think these dimensions should come out to precisely 3.0 and 1.0 – and in some cases they will.
But there is a tool pressure difference between the first time the tool machines (when trial machining) and the
second time it machines. The first time – it will be removing about 0.07 inch of material from all diameters.
The second time it machines, it will be removing only 0.0087 inches. This difference in material removal will
also cause a difference in tool pressure. When you go on to the next workpiece, you should expect these
dimensions to come out to precisely 3.0 and 1.0.)
We happened to use the 1.0 inch flange thickness to determine whether this tool is machining properly. We
did so only because this workpiece attribute is very easy to measure while the workpiece is still in the chuck.
We could also have chosen the 3.75 inch overall length, but it may not be possible to measure this value while
the workpiece is in the chuck. We could also have used the distance from the right end of the workpiece to
the left side of the flange (a total dimension or 3.0 inches). But again, this might be tougher to measure.
Tool number two is now machining properly. And at this point, we still have a good workpiece. Now it’s
time to move on to tool number three.
If it is not possible to perfectly index inserts, trial machining must be done every time the insert is indexed.
The same goes for insert replacement. If inserts are varying, trial machining must be done whenever they are
replaced.
Tool number Three: 0.125 grooving tool
We’ll say this tool lasts for 700 workpieces before it gets dull. And during its life, the diameter it machines
doesn’t vary by more than about 0.0005 inch, meaning there will be no need for sizing adjustments. But as
with all insert indexing and replacement, it is critical that the new cutting edge position is in precisely the same
location as the previous cutting edge. This is true whether the insert is indexed of replaced. If there is any
doubt about insert placement, trial machining must be done when indexing or replacing inserts.
Flip jobs
Many companies like to complete the workpiece (both ends) in one operation. The operator will load the
workpiece and activate the cycle to machine one end. In the middle of the program the machine will stop and
the operator will turn the workpiece around. The cycle will be reactivated to run the second end.
In this application, it’s likely that at least some of the cutting tools used to machine one end will be used to
machine the other. If this is the case, it is wise to use different wear offsets on each end. We recommend
using wear offsets one through twelve for tool one through twelve for the first end and wear offsets twenty-
one through thirty-two for tool one through twelve for the second end.
Unwanted taper
In similar fashion, your tools may experience changes in deflection even as they machine one diameter. This
commonly appears as taper in the diameter (one end is larger than the other). A secondary offset can be
instated during the machining of the diameter to induce a reverse tapered movement to counteract the taper
being machined.