Techniques that: Reliable and valid indicator Time and Effort Feedback Evaluate: Reading Listening Grammar Vocabulary Multiple choice items Structure: A few options, one of which being correct, while the other ones being distractors. Perfectly reliable, rapid, and practical scoring and evaluation system. Better possibilities to include more items than in another type of test or exam. It allows the testing of receptive skills without requiring the production of written or spoken language. Disadvantages Only recognition knowledge: ability’s poor indicator. Guessing: assuming. Restriction: distractors. It is very difficult to written successful items: More than one correct answer. No correct answer. There are clues in the options as to which is correct. Backwash may be harmful: Some benefits: Ensure the test is known and understood by students and teacher. Use direct testing. Provide assistance to teachers. Cheating may be facilitated: Easy to communicate to the other candidates non-verbally. The order of the options is different between versions. YES/NO and TRUE/FALSE items Weakness Reason of choices Assessments Formal test Short-answers items (listening and reading tests) Disadvantages May take longer and reduce the number of items. The test taker analyzes in its own language to answer. Scoring takes more time. Scoring can sometimes be invalid or unreliable. Advantages Guessing the options should reduce the test score. Have distractors with alternatives that resemble the answer. Help them no to cheat. Answers should be easy to write, this reducing scoring time. Gap filling items Fill a gap with a word → Does not always work well Tests of grammar and vocabulary. Variety of modal verbs. Only one word. Reader activities and further reading Fill in the blanks Re write technique Analysis structure