Indigenous People

Screening and Due Diligence Report

Document stage: Draft for consultation

Project Number: 42486
Loan and/or Grant Number(s): {LXXXX; GXXXX; TAXXXX}
February, 2017

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Program.

Jhundpura Water Supply Scheme, District: Morena

This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not
necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be
preliminary in nature.
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(as of February ,2017)

Currency unit = Rupee (INR)

INR 1.00 = USD0.0148
USD 1.00 = INR 67.4332

Page | 2
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank

BPL – below poverty line
EA – executing agency
EMP – Environmental Management Plan
GOI – Government of India
GOMP – Government of Madhya Pradesh
GRC – Grievance Redress Committee
GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism
HA – Hectares
IA – implementing agency
INR – Indian rupee
IPP – Indigenous People’s Plan
IPPF – Indigenous People Planning Framework
IP – indigenous peoples
IR – involuntary resettlement
LA – land acquisition
MPUDC : Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited
MPUIF : Madhya Pradesh Urban Infrastructure Fund
MPUSIP : Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project
PIU – project implementation unit
PMC – project management consultants
PMU – Project management unit
PO (SSG) – Project Officer (Social Safeguard and Gender)
NGO – non-government organization
RF – resettlement framework
RP – resettlement plan
SPS – safeguard policy statement
TP – Tribal Population
UADD - Urban Administration and Development Directorate
UDHD - Urban Development and Housing Department
ULB - urban local body
WTP - water treatment plant

Page | 3
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 6

A. Project Description ...................................................................................................... 6

B. Overview...................................................................................................................... 6

C. Scope of Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF) ......................................... 6

D. Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India ................. 7

II. IDENTIFICATION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE/TRIBAL PEOPLE ................................ 8

III. PROPOSED SUB PROJECT COMPONENTS .............................................................. 9

IV. PRELIMINARY SCREENING ....................................................................................... 11

V. MITIGATION MEASURES............................................................................................ 12

VI. STRATEGY FOR TRIBAL PEOPLE’S PARTICIPATION ............................................ 13

VII. MONITORING ............................................................................................................... 15

VIII. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 17

A. Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................................. 17

B. Next Steps ..................................................................................................................... 18

Page | 4
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Water Supply Distribution Zones ................................................................................. 9

Table 2: Raw Water Pumping Main details ............................................................................... 9

Table 3: Clear water Feeder Main details ................................................................................. 9

Table 4: Consultation with Indigenous People ....................................................................... 13

Table 5: SC & ST Population of Jhundpura ............................................................................ 14

Table 6: Monitoring Indicators ................................................................................................. 15

Table 7: Ward wise detail of Indigenous People of Jhundpura town...................................... 16

Table 8: Budgetary Provision................................................................................................... 17

ANNEXURE

Annexure 1: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as Provided by Ministry

of Tribal Affairs, Government of India...................................................................................... 19

Annexure 2: List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by the Scheduled

Areas under the Sixth Schedule of Indian Constitutions ......................................................... 21

Annexure 3: Stakeholder Consultation photographs and list of participants .......................... 22

Annexure 4: Screening Questions for Indigenous People Impact .......................................... 26

Page | 5
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Project Description
1. Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) with a sector project loan funding from Asian
Development Bank (ADB) has proposed to implement Madhya Pradesh Urban
Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP), herein after referred as ‘the Project’. Madhya
Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) shall be the Implementing
Agency (IA) and the State Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) shall
be the executing agency for the Project. A project management unit (PMU) created
under MPUDC is implementing MPUSIP.

2. MPUSIP’s physical components include (a) improvements to water in 64 project towns;

and (b) sewage and storm water collection and treatment services proposed in two (2)
identified towns (Khajuraho, and Rajnagar). The project also includes an institutional
strengthening component and a project management and administrative support
component.

3. The Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) for MPUSIP outlines the
objectives, policy principles and procedures for compensation and other assistance
measures for tribal people who may be displaced/ affected due to project
implementation. A detailed description of compensation measures and assistance is
provided in the entitlement matrix.

B. Overview
4. The total population in the 64 project towns is 1544971 as per Census 2011, of which
96020 (6.2%) belong to scheduled tribes at Appendix 1. Of the nine priority packages,
only one package (7B) consisting of towns Jaithri, fall under ‘scheduled area’. 1 To
achieve the overall goal of the project, an understanding of how social elements
influence poverty, inequality, and vulnerability is important.

C. Scope of Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF)

5. The IPPF has been developed to manage and mitigate possible impacts to the
indigenous people in the investment program area.

6. The IPPF sets out the policy, principles, and implementation mechanisms to address
such impacts according to ADB’s Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS) requirement no.
3 on indigenous people (IP). During the course of project identification and social
impact assessment, if any IPs are identified, the impacts (both positive and negative)
of the subproject component on affected groups/communities will be addressed
according to the prepared framework. The framework will address the developmental
needs of indigenous people/ tribes as a distinct community through a process of
sustainable development.

1
The state of Madhya Pradesh has 21.1 percent of its population classified as scheduled tribe (ST),
which comprises 14.7 percent of the total ST population in the country, the highest among Indian
states. Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Statistics Division. Government of India. Statistical Profile of
Scheduled Tribes in India, 2013, New Delhi. www.tribal.nic.in

Page | 6
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

7. Tribal’s constitute 8.61 percent of the total population of the country, with a total
population of 104.28 million (Census 2011). In Madhya Pradesh 46 tribal communities
reside. Appendix 1, provides the list of tribal communities in the state of Madhya
Pradesh as provided by Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India.
.

D. Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India

8. The tribal population of Madhya Pradesh increased to 15,316,784 in 2011 from

12,233,474 in 2001. The decadal growth rate during this period is 25.20 percent.
9. In Madhya Pradesh certain areas have been declared as scheduled area as Specified
by the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitutions 2. List of
Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh is provided in Appendix 2.

2
Scheduled areas are autonomous areas within a state, administered federally, usually populated by
a predominant Scheduled Tribe.

Page | 7
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

II. IDENTIFICATION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE/TRIBAL PEOPLE

10. ADB’s Indigenous People Policy uses the following characteristics to define IP: (i) self-
identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and recognition of this
identity by others; (ii) collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or
ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats
and territories; (iii) customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are
separate from those of the dominant society and culture; and (iv) a distinct language,
often different from the official language of the country or region.

11. According to the Census of India 2011, 8.61 percent of the Indian population is
classified as ST. In comparison with the national figure, Madhya Pradesh has 21.1
percent of its population classified as ST, which comprises 14.7 percent of the total ST
population in the country. The major tribes of Madhya Pradesh are classified in
Appendix 1.

Page | 8
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

III. PROPOSED SUB PROJECT COMPONENTS

12. Proposed subproject components include:

 Proposed Source: Ground Water using existing 4 tube wells and 2 additional tube
wells are required till 2048 (i.e. Ultimate Year).
 Number of Water Supply Zones: 03 (Three)

Table 1: Water Supply Distribution Zones

Sl Zone Wards Area Area/Locality Population within the Zone

No Covered Sq.Km 2018 2033 2048
1,2 (Partly), 3
Nagar Parishad, Police
(Partly), 5
Station, Bus Stand,
Partly),6,7
1 Zone-1 5.46 Ambedkar Park, Singhpura 7810 9665 11542
(Partly)
Dhani, Ladhpura,
8,9,10,11,12,1
Rawatpura, Sahayapura
3,14 & 15
2 Partly), 3 Madhopura, Brikhupura,
2 Zone-2 (Partly) & 7 2.86 Ramchandrakapaura, 1798 2106 2382
(Partly) Rajpura

3 Zone-3 4 & 5(Partly) 4.27 Bharra, Karjoni, Pahadpura 1100 1233 1377
Total 12.59 10708 13004 15301

 Water Treatment Plant: As the quality of ground water is not meeting drinking water
standards, hence WTPs have been proposed with capacities of 1.00MLD, 0.25MLD
& 0.15 MLD for Zones 1, 2 & 3 respectively.

 Raw Water Pumping Main (RWPM): RWPM of 1730 m length and 100 to 200 mm
dia of DI K-9 pipes
Table 2: Raw Water Pumping Main details

Sl No Diameter Length (m) Material Class

1 100 710 DI K-9
2 150 590 DI K-9
3 200 430 DI K-9
4 Total 1,730

 Clear water Feeder Main: CWFM of 280 m length and 100 to 150 mm dia of DI K-9
pipes
Table 3: Clear water Feeder Main details

S. Zone From To Diameter Length Static Head Material Class

No (m) (m)
1 Zone-1 WTP-1 OHT-1 150 180 25.60 DI K-9
2 Zone-2 WTP-2 OHT-2 100 50 24.40 DI K-9

Page | 9
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

3 Zone-3 WTP-3 OHT-3 100 50 25.15 DI K-9

Total 280

 Raw Water Pumps: For Tube Wells submersible pumps are proposed

Zone-1: with 5.00lps @ 101.30 mtrs head – 6Nos (4W+2S) with 50% standby
Zone-2 & Zone-3: with 3.90lps @ 114.40 mtrs head – 4Nos (2W+2S) with 100%
standby

 Clear Water Pumps: Submersible pumps are proposed at clear water sump with
100% standby for Feeding of OHTs:
For Zone-1 - 9.90lps @ 26Mtr head – 2Nos (1W+1S)
For Zone-2 - 2.20lps @ 24Mtr head – 2Nos (1W+1S)
For Zone-3 - 1.30lps @ 25Mtr head – 2Nos (1W+1S)

 Reservoirs:
Zone-1: Sump at WTP for 30KL & OHT for 325KL with 15m staging height at ward
no.6
Zone-2: Sump at WTP for 6KL & OHT for 75KL with 15m staging height at ward no.3
Zone-3: Sump at WTP for 5KL & OHT for 50KL with 15m staging height at ward no.4

 Distribution System: HDPE pipes (PE100 PN10) are proposed for distribution
system with 10mtr head at ferrule. Total 41.8km length of distribution network is
proposed.

 Other Provisions: Bulk flow meters, Domestic water meters with house connections
(1330 nos) & SCADA and Environmental safeguards, Ground Water Recharge
Structures etc

Page | 10
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

IV. PRELIMINARY SCREENING

13. The preliminary screening of all IP communities and villages within and in the vicinity
of the proposed sub-project area. The ULB arranged public meetings at IP
communities to provide information regarding the Jhundpura Water Supply sub-
project. During these meetings, community leaders and other participants will be
given an opportunity to present their views and concerns. An initial screening will
check for the following:

o Presence and names of tribal community groups in the area;

o Cultural and religious distinction of the tribal groups vis-à-vis other
communities, and mainstreaming of the TP with the dominant population;
o Laws and legislations related to tribal groups;
o Total number of tribal community groups and percentage of tribal population
to total population in the area;
o Number and percentage of tribal households likely to be affected by the
subproject component; and
o Initial assessment to also include level of vulnerability of the TP, such as
being a (primitive) tribal groups (PTG) and existing socioeconomic conditions
that may further deteriorate due to project impact. If such especially
vulnerable groups among the IP community are identified within the project
area, they warrant special measures for protecting their socio-cultural identity
and baseline economic standard. While determining vulnerability of these TP
groups, assessment will be made if there is any possibility of future impact
due to the project.

14. An IP impact assessment done on the basis of the IP Impact Screening Checklist of
SPS 2009.The results of the preliminary screening show that there are IP households
in the proposed sub-project area, but they are not affected by construction activities
during implementation. For their safeguards a social impact assessment (SIA) will be
conducted to capture IP issues and development opportunities that exist in the area
at preconstruction stage. A checklist format for screening of IPs in the sub projects is
in Appendix 3.

Page | 11
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

V. MITIGATION MEASURES

15. The proposed subproject Jhundpura Water Supply is classified as Category B for
Indigenous people impact, as the proposed investment will have positive impacts on
IPs living in the project town.

16. The impacts on indigenous households are potentially positive; measures will be taken
to ensure that benefits are equally shared. This will be through ensuring indigenous
peoples as stakeholders taking part during all stages of the investment program

Page | 12
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

VI. STRATEGY FOR TRIBAL PEOPLE’S PARTICIPATION

17. Consultations and information disclosure are an integral part of IPP preparation in
order to ensure that the priorities, preferences, and needs of the tribal groups have
been taken into consideration adequately. With that objective in view, a strategy for
consultation with tribal communities and their leaders will be developed so that these
are conducted in a participatory manner. The MPUDC/ PIU, MPUDC/ULB
representatives will be part of evolving that strategy and consultation process.
Table 4: Consultation with Indigenous People

Date location Participa Stakeholder Topic Discussed Issues Raised

nts
02.06.20 Wards -6 Total =8 Indigenous  Status of existing  Water supply to the
16 having (M=6,F=2 Men, women , drinking water area is done
maximum ) Poor men and supply system through a tube well
population Women and need for that supplies water
improvements to the community
of ST
 Relevant people through
persons information of the stand posts. The
upcoming project area faces severe
and benefits of water crisis during
the project the summer when
 Potential positive the ground water
and negative level drops.
impacts due to  The community
project willingly accepts the
implementation project.

 Response of the The community
community members expressed
towards the that their economic
situation would
project
prevent them from
paying
water user charges.

18. The IPs will be actively engaged in all stages of the project cycle, including project
preparation, and feedback of consultations with the IPs will be reflected in the project
design, followed by disclosure. Their participation in project planning will inform project
design, and the TPs should be convinced of their benefits from the project. The
awareness material prepared will be translated into the local language of the IPs and
made available to them before implementation of the project.

19. Local CBOs/tribal community representatives will be involved in IPP implementation

and resolving all issues related to the IP through consultation and facilitation by the
PIU/ULB and PMU. The PMU/ULB will ensure adequate flow of funds for consultation
and facilitation of planned activities within IP.

Page | 13
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

20. One project information disclosure (PID) brochure will be prepared, translated into a
language understandable to the tribal people, and distributed among them.

21. Jhundpura Municipal Parishad - According to census 2011, the total population of
Scheduled Caste is 1783 and that of Scheduled Tribe is 76 accounting for 18.18% and
0.77% that of total Jhundpura nagar Parishad population (9803), respectively. Overall,
SCs and STs account for 18.96 % (1859) out of the total Jhundpura population.

Table 5: SC & ST Population of Jhundpura

Sr.No. SC/ST Population %

1 SC Population 1783 18.18

2 ST Population 76 0.77

3 SC& ST Population 1859 18.96

Total Population 9803

Source: Census of India, 2011

22. Ward wise detail of IP population as per Census 2011 given in Table-7. SC and ST
population is about 18.18 % and 0.77 % only. The maximum IP population confined in
wards 6 and 10, these IP are anticipated to be directly benefitted by the project as
project will cover the whole town. .

23. IP communities living in the assigned project wards no.6 and 10 will be included as
project beneficiaries :-

1) by ensuring connections to 100% IP households through the policy of

universal connection coverage will be adopted under the project
2) Through inclusion of a clause in the contract requiring contractors to give
preference to ST, women and other vulnerable sections for project
construction related work and for project operation related work, if IP persons
are willing and able to take up the same.

Page | 14
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

VII. MONITORING

24. Monitoring indicators suggested for inclusion of Indigenous people in the project and
to check the positive impact /benefits ensured for Indigenous people of the different
wards in Jhundpura town. Following activities suggested and indicators will be
monitored for inclusion.
Table 6: Monitoring Indicators

s.no Activities Suggested Indicators for inclusion

1 Consultation with Indigenous
people throughout the
implementation phase
2. Training programs for project
related jobs/other work
3 Individual/House connections
4. Employment Generation in
project construction related
work
5. Employment generation in O/M
6. participation of IP women in
Income generation activities of
different departments
* As there is no record of number of SC/ST households having existing water connection. It is
being ensured that 100% IP HHs will have individual water connections
Number and percentage of ST
persons participated (M/F)
Number. of participation(M/F)
* Number of connections given as
per unit/FHH
Percentage of IP HHs vulnerable
HHs connected (male-headed /
female-headed)
No. of IPs got employment(M/F)
No. of IPs employed in project
operation related work by
contractor(M/F)
No. of women shown interest /
joined)

Page | 15
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Table 7: Ward wise detail of Indigenous People of Jhundpura town

Ward No
No_HH TOT_P TOT_M TOT_F P_SC M_SC F_SC P_ST M_ST F_ST
1
91 494 270 224 152 88 64 5 2 3
2
116 635 352 283 85 49 36 0 0 0
3
182 1088 584 504 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
83 674 385 289 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
66 477 270 207 9 4 5 0 0 0
6
101 602 322 280 547 296 251 38 17 21
7
125 728 398 330 310 179 131 0 0 0
8
89 632 289 343 57 10 47 1 0 1
9
82 518 291 227 53 27 26 0 0 0
10
94 598 342 256 173 99 74 6 3 3
11
135 937 515 422 8 4 4 26 15 11
12
93 503 270 233 0 0 0 0 0 0
13
90 674 367 307 0 0 0 0 0 0
14
82 568 301 267 52 24 28 0 0 0
15
96 675 379 296 337 186 151 0 0 0
Total
1525 9803 5335 4468 1783 966 817 76 37 39
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

VIII. CONCLUSIONS

A. Summary and Conclusions

25. No significant IP impacts are assessed at the identified sites and project area for sub
- project components, as ample vacant land is available for the projected facilities,
within the compound of the government lands. The site for all the three WTPs are
owned by the MP Government.

26. Temporary disruption to road users, pedestrians and community members will be
avoided in Jhundpura by ensuring proper traffic management with the help of local
police and concerned officials wherever required. Safety measures are taken during
construction time to avoid injuries. Inconveniences to the public are mitigated during
construction by the contractor through simple measures such as provision of planks
for pedestrian access to shops with effective traffic management.

27. IPs will be included in project benefits (a) 100% individual household connection for
BPL SC and 100% ST households will be ensured under the project, (b) the contract
will include a provision related to preferential employment of local SC/ST population
and women / vulnerable persons available for work, in construction-related work and
work related to O&M of project facilities. The contractor will maintain records of such
employment, which will be monitored by the PMU.

28. In the most congested zones of Jhundpura town safety measures and mitigations
during construction by the contractor through simple measures mentioned below be
ensured as safeguard measures for IPs.

29. Safety measures are taken during construction time to avoid injuries. Inconveniences
to the public are mitigated during construction by the contractor through simple
measures such as provision of planks for pedestrian access to shops with effective
traffic management. A budgetary provision is made for costs likely to be incurred for
updating of this DDR.

Table 8: Budgetary Provision

S.no Description Target group Estimated Source of fund

cost
1. Consultation and awareness Indigenous person INR 50000 Included in
generation majority wards subproject
Affected persons
2 provision of planks for Indigenous INR 50000 Included in
pedestrian access to shops persons of subproject
owned by Indigenous people majority wards
3. Training on Income generation project area INR 75000 Included in
activities subproject
4. 10% contingency project area INR 17500

Total INR 1,92,500

Page | 17
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

B. Next Steps

30. The DDR needs to be updated with the following information:

 To increase the participation of Indigenous People in project activities, the

frequency of consultations, will be increased; record of consultations held with local
communities and other stakeholders to be documented and included in
updated/final DDR.
 Due diligence report to be updated from time to time by PMU, initiation/completion
of due procedures reported, and ADB approval obtained prior to start of
construction.

Page | 18
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Annexure 1: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as Provided by

Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India

1) Agariya
2) Andh
3) Baiga
4) Bhaina
5) Bharia Bhumia, Bhuinhar Bhumia, Bhumiya, Bharia, Paliha, Pando
6) Bhattra
7) Bhil, Bhilala, Barela, Patelia
8) Bhil Mina
9) Bhunjia
10) Biar, Biyar
11) Binjhwar
12) Birhul, Birhor
13) Damor, Damaria
14) Dhanwar
15) Gadaba, Gadba
16) Gond; Arakh, Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Maria, Bada Maria, Bhatola, Bhimma,
Bhuta, Koilabhuta, Koliabhuti, Bhar, Bisonhorn Maria, Chota Maria, Dandami Maria,
Dhuru, Dhurwa, Dhoba, Dhulia, Dorla, Gaiki, Gatta, Gatti, Gaita, Gond Gowari, Hill
Maria, Kandra, Kalanga,
Khatola, Koitar, Koya, Khirwar, Khirwara, Kucha Maria, Kuchaki Maria, Madia, Maria,
Mana, Mannewar, Moghya, Mogia, Monghya, Mudia, Muria, Nagarchi, Nagwanshi,
Ojha, Raj, Sonjhari Jhareka, Thatia, Thotya, Wade Maria, Vade Maria, Daroi
17) Halba, Halbi
18) Kamar
19) Karku
20) Kawar, Kanwar, Kaur, Cherwa, Rathia, Tanwar, Chattri
21) (Omitted)
22) Khairwar, Kondar
23) Kharia
24) Kondh, Khond, Kandh
25) Kol
26) Kolam
27) Korku, Bopchi, Mouasi, Nihal, Nahul Bondhi, Bondeya
28) Korwa, Kodaku
29) Majhi
30) Majhwar
31) Mawasi

32) Omitted
33) Munda

Page | 19
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

34) Nagesia, Nagasia

35) Oraon, Dhanka, Dhangad
36) Panika [in (i) Chhatarpur, Panna, Rewa, Satna, Shahdol, Umaria, Sidhi and
Tikamgarh districts, and (ii) Sevda and Datia tehsils of Datia district]
37) Pao
38) Pardhan, Pathari, Saroti
39) Omitted
40) Pardhi, Bahelia, Bahellia, Chita Pardhi, Langoli Pardhi, Phans Pardhi, Shikari,
Takankar, Takia [In (i) Chhindwara, Mandla, Dindori and Seoni districts, (ii) Baihar
Tahsil of Balaghat District, (iii) Betul, Bhainsdehi and Shahpur tahsils of Betul district,
(iv) Patan tahsil and Sihora and Majholi blocks of Jabalpur district, (v) Katni
(Murwara) and Vijaya Raghogarh tahsils and Bahoriband and Dhemerkheda blocks
of Katni district, (vi) Hoshangabad , Babai, Sohagpur, Pipariya and Bankhedi tah sils
and Kesla block of Hoshangabad district, (vii) Narsinghpur district, and (viii) Harsud
Tahsil of Khandwa district]
41) Parja
42) Sahariya, Saharia, Seharia, Sehria, Sosia, Sor
43) Saonta, Saunta
44) Saur
45) Sawar, Sawara
46) Sonr

Page | 20
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Annexure 2: List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by the Scheduled

Areas under the Sixth Schedule of Indian Constitutions

1) Jhabua district
2) Mandla district
3) Dindori district
4) Barwani district
5) Sardarpur, Dhar, Kukshi, Dharampuri, Gandhwani and Manawar tahsils in
Dhar district
6) Bhagwanpura, Segaon, Bhikangaon, Jhirniya, Khargone and Meheshwar
tahsils in Khargone (West Nimar) district
7) Khalwa Tribal Development Block of Harsud tahsil and Khaknar Tribal
Development Block of Khaknar tahsil in Khandwa (East Nimar) district
8) Sailana and Bajna tahsils in Ratlam district
9) Betul tahsil (excluding Betul Development Block) and Bhainsdehi and
Shahpur tahsils in Betul district
10) Lakhanadone, Ghansaur and Kurai tahsils in Seoni district
11) Baihar tahsil in Balaghat district
12) Kesla Tribal Development Block of Itarsi tahsil in Hoshangabad district
13) Pushparajgarh, Anuppur, Jaithari, Kotma, Jaitpur, Sohagpur and
Jaisinghnagar tahsils of Shahdol district
14) Pali Tribal Development Block in Pali tahsil of Umaria district
15) Kusmi Tribal Development Block in Kusmi tahsil of Sidhi district
16) Karahal Tribal Development Block in Karahal tahsil of Jhundpura district
17) Tamia and Jamai tahsils, patwari circle Nos. 10 to 12 and 16 to 19,
villages Siregaon Khurd and Kirwari in patwari circle no. 09, villages
Mainawari and Gaulie Parasia of patwari circle No. 13 in Parasia tahsil,
village Bamhani of Patwari circle No. 25 in Chhindwara tahsil, Harai Tribal
Development Block and patwari circle Nos. 28 to 36,41,43,44 and 45B in
Amarwara tahsil Bichhua tahsil and patwari circle Nos. 05,08,09,10,11
and 14 in Saunsar tahsil, Patwari circle Nos. 01 to 11 and 13 to 26, and
patwari circle no. 12 (excluding village Bhuli), village Nandpur of patwari
circle No. 27, villages Nikanth and Dhawdikhapa of patwari circle no 28 in
Pandurna tahsil of Chhindwara district.

Page | 21
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Annexure 3: Stakeholder Consultation photographs and list of participants

Page | 22
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

List of Participants

Page | 23
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Page | 24
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Page | 25
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Annexure 4: Screening Questions for Indigenous People Impact

Below is the initial screening for indigenous people impacts and due diligence exercise.
Positive or negative/permanent and temporary/ directly and indirectly impacts must be
considered and reported in the screening process.
KEY CONCERNS
NOT
(Please provide elaborations YES NO Remarks
KNOWN
on the Remarks column)
A. Indigenous Peoples Identification

There are no IPs in the

subproject locations in
1. Are there socio-cultural groups Jhundpura. The city has a
present in or use the project area small proportion of Scheduled
who may be considered as "tribes" Tribe population which does
(hill tribes, schedules tribes, tribal  not have distinctive customs/
peoples), "minorities"(ethnic or cultural habits/ economic
national minorities) or "indigenous activities/ language/ collective
communities" in the project area? attachment to land. Hence the
water supply scheme is not
expected to unfavourably
impact IPs in any manner.
2. Are there national or local laws or
policies as well as anthropological
researches/ studies that consider
these groups present in or using the
 Na.
project area as belonging to "ethnic
minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal
peoples, national minorities, or
cultural communities?
3. Do such groups self-identify as
being part of a distinct social and  Na.
cultural group?
4. Do such groups maintain collective
attachments to distinct habitats or
ancestral territories and/or to the  Na.
natural resources in these habitats
and territories?

5. Do such groups speak a distinct

 Na.
language or dialect?

Page | 26
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

KEY CONCERNS
NOT
(Please provide elaborations YES NO Remarks
KNOWN
on the Remarks column)
6. Has such groups been historically,
socially and economically
marginalized, disempowered,  Na.
excluded, and/or discriminated
against?
There is a practice of
7. Are such groups represented as
reservation of 50% seats in
"Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic
the Municipal Council and
minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or
 State legislature for people
"tribal populations" in any formal
belonging to the Scheduled
decision-making bodies at the
Castes and Scheduled
national or local levels?
Tribes.
B. Identification of Potential Impacts

Yes. All the project

8. Will the project directly or indirectly
beneficiaries will get clean
benefit or target Indigenous 
and uninterrupted water
Peoples?
supply.
9. Will the project directly or indirectly The beneficiaries of the
affect Indigenous Peoples' project will be able to lead a
traditional socio-cultural and belief better lifestyle coupled with

practices? (e.g. child-rearing, better standards of
health, education, arts, and cleanliness and healthy
governance) living.
10. Will the project affect the livelihood
systems of Indigenous Peoples?
(e.g., food production system,
 Na.
natural resource management,
crafts and trade, employment
status)

11. Will the project be in an area (land

or territory) occupied, owned, or
 Na.
used by Indigenous Peoples, and/
or claimed as ancestral domain?

Page | 27
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

KEY CONCERNS
NOT
(Please provide elaborations YES NO Remarks
KNOWN
on the Remarks column)
C. Identification of Special Requirements. Will the project activities include

12. Will the project directly or indirectly

benefit or target Indigenous  Na.
Peoples?

13. Physical displacement from  Na.

traditional or customary lands?

14. Commercial development of natural

resources (such as minerals,
hydrocarbons, forests, water,
hunting or fishing grounds) within
customary lands under use that  Na.
would impact the livelihoods or the
cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses
that define the identity and
community of Indigenous Peoples?
15. Establishing legal recognition of
rights to lands and territories that
are traditionally owned or  Na.
customarily used, occupied or
claimed by indigenous peoples?
16. Acquisition of lands that are The land belongs to the
traditionally owned or customarily Government, hence

used/ occupied or claimed by acquisition of land is not
indigenous peoples? required.

D. Indigenous People Impact

After reviewing the answers above, EA/ Safeguard Team confirms that the proposed
subsection/ section/ subproject/component (tick as appropriate):

[ ] Has Indigenous People (IP) impact, an indigenous people plan (IPP) (or specific IP
action plan) is required.

[] Has No IP impact, no IPP/specific action plan is required.

Page | 28
 DDR (IP)
(Jhundpura, MP)

Prepared By: Darashaw and Verified by:

Company
Signature:
Signature: Name:
Name: Raja Kunth Jain Position:
Position:

Date: Date:

Page | 29