Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Best SSRN-id1711647
Best SSRN-id1711647
net/publication/228271754
CITATION READS
1 823
1 author:
Jessy John
Institute of Rural Management Anand
8 PUBLICATIONS 79 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Jessy John on 16 May 2018.
Affiliation:
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Address:
Plot No.75, G-2, Shine Residency, shanti nagar, DCM Extension, Ajmer
road,Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Email: jessyjohn03@gmail.com
Ph: 09983665288.
Executive summary
3
According to Aguinis (2007) performance management is a continuous
process of identifying, measuring and developing the performance of
individuals and teams and aligning performance with the strategic goals of the
organization. So it can be deliberated as a system of evaluating performance
of employees so as to enable them to reach reasonable goals thereby to ensure
better performance of the company. Glendinning (2002) enumerates that
performance management measures the employees training needs, standards-
setting, appraisal and feedback, relative to how his or her performance should
be and how it is helping the organization in achieving its goals.
Aguinis (2007) has elaborated that performance management system
that do not explicit the employee contribution to the organizational goals are
not true performance management systems.
So there is a need to establish clear linkage between an employee’s
performance and organization’s goal achievement.
Providing response to the employees about their present state of
performance level is an important component of a well implemented
performance management system. Feedbacks about the present performance
level can be used as a mode to coach the employees to improve their
performance on an enduring basis. This feedback allows for the identification
of strengths and weakness as well as the causes for performance paucity
(London and Smither, 2002). So it can be deliberated that performance
management is not just a means of meeting with a subordinate once a year to
review performance; it is more about daily or weekly interactions to ensure
continuous improvement in the employee’s capacity and performance
(Wingrove, 2003).
Performance management can also facilitate adaptability and
continually improving performance in rapidly changing contemporary
workplaces (Heslin et al, 2008). To do so, however, traditional periodic
performance appraisal initiatives need to be supplemented by ongoing
performance coaching (London, 2003).
4
Efficiency improvement is the main agenda behind employee
performance management as it related to improving the ratio between the
inputs consumed and the outputs achieved by the employees.
5
employee performance management. The data derived from these activities
will give an insight about the current performance level of the employees.
Gantt chart is a tool that is commonly used for measuring the
effectiveness with which the organization achieves its goals. The same tool
can be used for evaluating each and every employee a propos to their
potentials and Key Result Areas as the criteria’s for evaluation. The
discrepancy that is found between actual and desired performance will give an
insight with respect to the courses of action to be embarked on to improve
employee performance.
When the aim is to develop individual employees, prominence should
be given to frame individualized employee developmental plan. Motivated
employees are always looking for better ways to do a job (Aswathappa, 2008).
6
Employee development plan should be framed after due consultation with
the concerned employees. Manager’s before jumping into a conclusion
regarding the areas that need employee development should try to understand
the employees with respect to their perception about job satisfaction, goals,
steps undertaken to control the present situation and so on. Information also
needs to be discovered with respect to the greatest strength of the employees,
areas that needed improvement, internal and external obstacles, constraints
with respect to the environment and the resources available. The outcomes of
these self appraisals will enable the employee to identify lacunae that exist in
them and areas that need improvement and where development can occur.
Illustrated below are few self appraising questions
These self appraisal questions will act as an eye opener for the employees
about their own skills sets and the areas that need improvement. These
employee needs when clubbed with the developmental and technological up
7
gradation that the organization will be undertaking in the next year will define
the actual developmental need of the organization. The supervisor along with
employees will then frame a developmental plan with a deadline for each and
every activity.
8
Objectives of developmental plans
9
to higher performance than when people strive to simply “do their best”
(Locke, 1966, Locke & Latham, 1990). The challenging and specific goals
have been found to influence the performance of employees and this has been
proved by hundreds of laboratory and field studies (Locke & Latham, 1990,
2002).
Setting challenging goals are not enough there should be some criteria
not the basis of which the achievement will be evaluated. These evaluation
criteria should be communicated to the employees also. According to Locke &
Latham (2002) by providing direction and a standard against which progress
can be monitored, challenging goals can enable people to guide and refine
their performance. It is proved without doubt that difficult goals can improve
the motivation and performance of employees by leading them to focus their
concentration on specific objectives (Locke & Bryant, 1969), increase their
effort to achieve these objectives (Bandura & Cervone, 1983) and for
developing new strategies to deal with complex challenges for goal attainment
(Wood & Locke, 1990).
When explored about the motivators of challenging goals it was found
that it often lead to valuable rewards such as recognition, promotions, and/or
increases in income from one’s work (Latham & Locke, 2006). Even though
lofty goals sets a higher bench mark to obtain self satisfaction, after attaining
these goals it was found to create a heightened sense of efficacy (personal
effectiveness), self satisfaction, positive affect, and sense of wellbeing
especially when the goals conquered were considered challenging (Wiese &
Freund, 2005). self satisfaction which the employees accrued after achieving
goals were found to increase organizational commitment (Tziner & Latham,
1989), which in turn positively affected organizational citizenship behavior
(Organ et al, 2006). Self satisfaction was found to have a negative relationship
with employee turnover (Wagner, 2007). A positive and linear relationship
was found between difficult goals and performance (Locke & Latham, 1990,
2002).
10
Personal development plan has increased the job performance of the
employees. It has become easier to promote the employees. As soon as they
are "signed off" on their own development plan they are then able to use their
training hours to work through the next one. This gives them a greater insight
and the manager will have the opportunity to see whether they are ready for
the next role (Higson and Wilson1995)
Aguinis (2007) has enumerated the major questions that need to be addressed
before framing a development plan.
11
Employee development plan process
Employee career goals1-5 years- what skills / experiences are needed to •meet
departmental needs, •enhance employee’s ability to meet current needs•enable
employee to meet future needs•develop staff and leadership qualities and •develop
knowledge worker skills
Employee requests funding and release time. Corporate release time and
or funding request form get leaders signature and forward to EIT member
EIT member Release time a/or funding request form and send to office of
strategy Mgmt for trafficking
Employee/ leader take action and apply learning: discuss with others
Employee and leader: discuss developmental plan and revise very other
year with updated information
12
The figure above explains the whole process involved in framing an employee
development plan.
Date of evaluation
13
Job profile: Education qualification:
Trainings undergone;
Job record:
A. Performance Goals:
List the employee's most important key performance indicator/ goals for the
evaluation period.
Employee himself
Immediate supervisor
Line manager
Gaps found
14
B. Personal and Professional Developmental Goals:
Middle range
goals (needed
both for the
present position
as well as for
future growth) for
next 2 years
Supervisor’s Signature:
Date:
15
employee development form and development plan. Before introducing a new
employee development programme it is the responsibility of the HR manager
to win employee confidence and readiness with respect its utility.
Aguinis (2007) has formulated several ways through which employees can
reach the objectives framed in the developmental plans.
1. On the job training : the targeted employees will learn from his/ her
coworker or supervisor
2. Courses: encourage the employees to undertake new courses relevant
for their professional growth for which they will be provided with
tuition reimbursement.
3. Self guided reading: it should be guided by the objective that needs to
be achieved and to be accomplished within the time frame and learning
outcomes.
4. Mentoring: developmental process under mentor
5. Attending conference
6. Getting a degree:
7. Job rotation
8. Challenging temporary assignments
9. Membership in professional trade organizations.
Higson and Wilson (1995) have put forth a series of factors that can
determine the success of any employee development programme.
16
Ø Every employee including the manager should have a development plan.
Ø Employees with less experience are entitled to undergo regular training
programmes.
Ø The manager will support with the assessment process of each individual
employee
Ø Manager should be committed in developing his staff and facilitate them in
realizing their career goals
Ø Development plan and programmes need to be frequently monitored and
evaluated by the manager.
Ø Manager need to seek the expertise of an external in order to ensure the
credibility of the programme.
Ø Development plan should be integrated with the appraisal system.
Learning should be appraised formally each year and at regular intervals.
The outcome of the review will guide the content of the next years training
programme.
Ø Manager’s appraisal should be linked with the development process of the
subordinate staff.
All the above mentioned factors give stress upon the highly significant role
that need to be performed by the managers.
Today all the organizations are adopting itself to the new challenges and
change management system. From this development perspective managers are
asked to shift their focus from the role of simple performance appraiser to
career developer of his subordinate. Employee development programmes
framed on the basis of development plan has become the way of life of today’s
learning organizations. Development programmes have not only enhanced
supervisor- subordinate relationship but has played a very significant role in
increasing employee motivation, job satisfaction and morale. Performance of
the employees will be measured on the basis of the development and
refinement happened to the employees with respect to the skills and overall
17
performance in the present job profile and ho they are preparing themselves
for future assignments. The manager’s will be evaluated on the basis of their
role in employee development. So development of employees should be one of
the new mantra for organization development.
Conclusion.
Well framed employee development plan will not only enable the
individual employee to manage his/ her career but will also lead the
organization to the future. When employees discover their own potentials and
lacunae’s along with their immediate supervisor it will be a real eye opener to
the employees. This will in turn increase employee’s commitment and
ownership towards the development programmes – platform through which
they will be able to polish their skills. When potentials of the existing
employees are utilized fully it will not only improve organization commitment
and job satisfaction but will also reduce employee attrition rate, hence helping
the organization in saving the cost involved in training and developing new
employees. So employee development plan should be made a part and parcel
of employee performance management. It will guide and equip the
organization and employees for discovering and facing present lacunae’s and
future challenges.
References
18
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E.A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits,
skill, and motivation to subsequent venture. Journal of Applied Psychology,
89, 587–598.
Dessler,G., & Varkkey,B. (2009). Human Resource Management. Dorling
Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Enhancing the benefits and overcoming
the pitfalls of goal setting. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 332-340.
19
Locke, E. A., & Bryan, J. (1969). The directing function of goals in task
performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 35–42.
Locke, E.A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task
performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall
O’LearyKelly, A.M., Martocchio, J.J., & Frink, D.D. (1994). A review of the
influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management
Journal, 37(5): 285-1301.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational
citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Rogers, R., & Hunter, J. (1991). Impact of management by objectives on
organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 322–336.
Tziner, A., & Latham, G. P. (1989). The effects of appraisal instrument,
feedback and goalsetting on worker satisfaction and commitment. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 10, 145-153.
Wagner, C. M. (2007). Organizational commitment as a predictor variable in
nursing turnover research: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
60, 235-247.
20
Wiese, B.S., & Freund, A.M. (2005). Goal progress makes one happy, or does
it? Longitudinal findings from the work domain. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 78, 287–304.
Wingrove, C. (2003). Developing an effective blend of process and
technology in the new era of performance management. Compensation and
benefits Review, January/February. 27.
Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1990). Goal setting and strategy effects on
complex tasks. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in
organizational behavior, 12, 73–109.
21