Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1054 155585159 Response To Fab's Motion To Compel Dispostion of Laruence's & For Sanctions
1054 155585159 Response To Fab's Motion To Compel Dispostion of Laruence's & For Sanctions
Plaintiff,
v.
PY
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et al.
CO
Defendant(s).
____________________________________/
D
OF LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER AND FOR SANCTIONS
IE
COMES NOW, Defendant LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER (hereinafter “Defendant” and/or “L.
IF
Schneider”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Response to Plaintiff
RT
FIRST AMERICAN BANK’s, as successor by merger to Bank of Coral Gables, LLC (hereinafter
“Plaintiff” and/or “First American”), Motion to Compel Deposition of Defendant and for
CE
1. On September 22, 2020, this Court entered a Final Judgment in favor of First American
A
and order L. Schneider and his wife, Defendant Stephanie Schneider (hereinafter “S. Schneider”)
T
to pay First American $1,547,391.54 with interest rate of 6.03% per year.
O
2. On March 9, 2022, the Fourth District Court of Appeals entered an Opinion reversing the
N
final deficiency judgment against S. Schneider and remanded for the entry of an amended
3. On March 22, 2022, Plaintiff as Appellee filed a Motion for Rehearing, and, Motion for
Rehearing en Banc.
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 08/18/2022 08:30:29 AM
4. On April 28, 2022, the Fourth District Court of Appeals entered an Order denying
5. The Mandate of the Fourth District Court of Appeals reversing the final deficiency
judgment against S. Schneider and remanded for the entry of an amended judgment against only
L. Schneider.
6. Yet, the issue has yet to be dealt with regarding the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to enter the
PY
Final Judgment in which is the subject of these post-judgment proceedings.
CO
7. On June 6, 2022, First American filed its Notice of Taking Deposition of L. Schneider,
setting the deposition in person for June 28, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Meland Budwick
D
P.A.
IE
8. At 2:52 a.m. on the day of the deposition, Defendant’s counsel reached out to Plaintiff’s
IF
counsel requesting for the deposition to either be postponed until June 29, 2022 of to commence
RT
at noon as the undersigned was consumed with an appellate filing in a different case, and the
undersigned sought the extension as he solely required such to provide him with the time to rest to
CE
9. Upon Plaintiff’s confirmation that the deposition could commence at noon, the
A
undersigned’s office emailed L. Schneider, and the undersigned texted L. Schneider of the new
T
start time.
O
10. While the undersigned was on the way to the in-person deposition, the undersigned
N
requested that his office contact Plaintiff’s counsel to advise that he may be approximately twenty
11. Shorty thereafter, the undersigned received a call from L. Schneider advising that he was
severely ill and experiencing covid like symptoms after being exposed to an individual with covid.
12. Pursuant to L. Schneider's health, the undersigned reached out to Plaintiff's counsel to
advise that the deposition must be rescheduled, and that L. Schneider will pay the court reporter's
mv01ce.
13. When Plaintiffs counsel found out about the news, they demanded that the severely ill
Defendant log into zoom to swear under oath as to his exposure and current health state; however,
the undersigned was unable to get a hold of L. Schneider to request for such.
PY
14. While Plaintiffs pro hac vice counsel, Neal Litman, Esq., of Freeborn & Peters, LLP, 1 was
CO
emailing my office he engaged in behavior disrespecting and harassing my staff accusing her of
engaging in the unauthorized practice of law for simply stating that the undersigned spoke with
D
the client, and that it is our opinion that he is too ill to provide any testimony under oath in his
IE
cunent state. See full composite Exhibit "A" attached hereto of all emails in the order that they
IF
were sent and received as Plaintiff left out the emails to our office provided by Neal Litman, Esq.
RT
15. Meaghan E. Murphy, Esq. has continued the parade of harassing my paralegal throughout
the Motion, while my paralegal sent every email under my direction and obtained clearance for
CE
such to avoid any possibility of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, and as Meaghan E.
Murphy, Esq. indicated such was border line in the sense that my paralegal was capable ofreading
A
the Notice of Taking Deposition and was able to see the signature line in the certificate of service,
T
1 eal Litman Esq. is employed by the same finn (Freeborn & Peters LLP) that Schott Fishman is employed.
Scott Fishman is a private investigator (not licensed in Florida) that harassed and stalked L. Schneider's family
children and their son 's sixteen-year-old girlfriend. The Affidavits filed by the Defendant's children (DE 584 and
REDACTE
585) assist with tbe explanation of the events. It is tbe undersigned 's belief that • • • • was working under the
direction of ea! Litman, Esq. at the time oftbese events.
16. Until the emails received from Neal Litman, Esq., the undersigned nor L. Schneider had
any knowledge that REDACTED . intended to appear or had anything to do whatsoever with
this deposition.
17. In fact, the Notice of Taking Deposition of REDACTED only indicates that Meaghan
18. Plaintiff is attempting to mischaracterize the events that happened on June 28, 2022.
PY
19. The undersigned’s firm has already requested for dates to reschedule L. Schneider’s
CO
deposition from the Plaintiff (See Exhibit “A”) prior to Neal Litman, Esq.’s “tomfoolery” of email
harassment to my firm, and to date, we have yet to receive any proposed dates whatsoever.
D
20. Further, the undersigned’s firm has already indicated that L. Schneider will pay the cost of
IE
the court reporter (See Exhibit “A”), and to date, no invoice has been received for payment.
IF
21. As to the fees that Neal Litman, Esq. is attempting to collect for travel, L. Schneider objects
RT
to these fees.
22. The trial court is also directed to eliminate from the fee award any fees attributed to time
CE
the wife's Polk County counsel spent traveling to and from Sarasota County. The wife could and
did hire competent counsel in Sarasota County. Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So. 2d 406, 407 (Fla. 2d
A
DCA 2000) [citing therein Chandler v. Chandler, 330 So.2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)].
T
23. We are faced with the question of whether Travel time is properly included in an award of
O
attorneys' fees. We think not. We are aware of no authority for including it and, indeed, Canon 2
N
of the Code of Professional Responsibility indicates to the contrary when, among other factors
properly to be considered in determining a reasonable fee, it cites the fee ‘customarily charged in
the Locality for similar legal services…..Certainly a reasonable fee for Local counsel would not
contemplate the inclusion of travel time as compensable time. It would be incongruous, to say the
least, it in the ordinary case nonlocal counsel should fare better insofar as his fees may be assessed
against the other party. Chandler v. Chandler. 330 So.2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
24. First American has local counsel that would not charge for travel, and such request should
be denied as to the travel time of Neal Litman, Esq. based on the caselaw prohibiting such.
25. Further, First American should not be entitled to two (2) hours of attorney time in the
amount of $880 for bringing their motion and attendance at the hearing, based on the email from
PY
L. Schneider's counsel requesting for dates to reschedule the deposition, and offering to pay the
CO
court reporter fee.
26. Further, First American's request to sanction L. Schneider in the amount of $15,000.00 for
D
being severely ill unable to provide his testimony is completely absurd, especially considering the
IE
harassment that First American has put L. Schneider's family through, including but not limited
IF
to, stalking, defamation, tortious interference with business relationships, seeking judgments
RT
against his wife, S. Schneider that they are not entitled to, and so much more.
deny the Plaintiffs Motion, deny the Plaintiffs request for sanctions, order the Plaintiff to provide
L. Schneider' s counsel with proposed deposition dates per their request via email (See Exhibit
A
"A", provide L. Schneider' s counsel with the invoice for the court reporter expense per their
T
request via email (See Exhibit "A"), and any relief this Court finds just.
O
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
N
I CERTIFY that a copy hereof has been furnjshed on August 18, 2022, via email service to all
parties designated to receive Service of Court documents via Florida' s eFiling Portal pertaining
to this case, via e-mail to Meaghan E. Murphy, Esq. , Meland Budwick, P .A., 200 South Biscayne
Blvd., Ste. 3200, Miami, FL 33131, mmurphy@melandbudwick.com,
mramos@melandbudwick.com , and mrbstate@yahoo .com, and via email to John W. Keller, III,
Esq., Sioli REDACTED , REDACTED REDA
• •, •REREDA_ ,
jkeller@siolilaw.com and smesa@siolilaw.com.
Respectfully Submitted,
PY
Martin G. McCarthy, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 149896
Service Email: mccarthy@myattorneyservices.com
Service Email 2: lawclerk@myattomeyservices.com
CO
D
IE
IF
RT
CE
A
T
O
N
7129122, 2:37 PM Mail - Kaitlyn Bunnell - Outlook
If we do not get confirmation in the next 30 minutes that they w ill be attending, we will suspend the deps and further seek
relief from the Court.
PY
Best,
Neal
CO
On Jun 28, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Levin, Neal H. <nhlevin@freeborn.com > wrot e:
D
Kaitlyn, I t ru st that you are continuing this argument as a Paralegal and not trying t o assert a legal position on
behalf of Martin's client as to whether a deposition is attributable to an attorney fo r a party or the party itself.
IE
Clearly, it's the latter, though in either event, we fail to see how that is even remotely relevant.
What's more, your decision to exclude me from the email chain is itself compelling and will be noted for the Court
IF
when we seek appropriate remedies against Martin and his client for today's Tomfoolery.
RT
Neal
CE
EXTERNAL EMAIL:
Dear Ms. Murphy:
N
As this your deposition, I am kindly writing to you to readvise that Mr. Schneider is ill and is unable to attend nor
testify per Mr. McCarthy's last communication with him. Mr. McCarthy was not able to get a hold of him after the
zoom instructions were provided.
Thank you,
Miami, FL 33155
Telephone: (305) 407-8006
Cell: (305) 335-5543
Fax: (866) 676-4671
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The infom1ation contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above. Iftbe reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Jfyou have received this
transmission in error, do not read it. P lease immediately reply to the sender that you have received this co1m1mnication in error
and then delete it. Thank you.
On Jun 28, 2022, at 11:40 AM, Levin, N eal H. <nhlev in@freeborn.com> wrote:
PY
I am now counsel of record. I do believe I was asking factual questions. and have not received factual responses. To the
contrary, you are sending us a bunch of malarkey.
CO
On Jun 28, 2022, at 11 :38 AM. Kaitlyn Bunnell <lawc lerk@mY.attorneY.services.com> wrote:
External Email
Mr. Levin: Unless if you have something factual and not vexatious, please refrain from
D
sending our firm emails.
Thank you,
Was he ·severely ill" at 3 a.m. w hen he w as conspiring with Martin over the appellate brief deadlines?
Was he "severely ill" at 9:12 this morning when you advised Larry of the new start time, per your email?
Was he "severely ill" at noon, when he w as supposed to be here and Martin indicated that they were 20 minutes
late?
On Jun 28, 2022, at 11 :22 AM, Kaitlyn Bunnell < lawclerk@myattorneY.services.com> wrote:
External Email
I have spoken with Mr. McCarthy, and it is our impression that Mr. Schneider is
severely ill; however, he is attempting to call him now and will advise thereafter.
Thank you,
PY
From: Levin, Neal H. <nhlevin@freeborn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 12:14 PM
CO
To: Kaitlyn Bunnell <lawclerk@mv.attornev.services.com>; Martin McCarthy
<mccarthy.@mv.attornev.services.com>
Cc: Meaghan Murphy <J!l.!!lli.!Jl.b.y.@melandbudwick.com>; Emre Yersel
<g_v.ersel@mv.atto rnev.services.com>; Isenberg, Shira R.
<sisenbeni@freeborn.com>; roby.n.@adamsteinberglaw.com<robyn@adamsteinberg@
D
w.com>
Subject: Re: Deposition of Larry Schneider
Zoom instructions:
CE
We look forward to Martin's agreement to the foregoing and Laurence and Martin joining the call
N
Neal
External Email
now feeling ill. Mr. McCarthy asked that you provide us with the
invoice for the court reporter, and we will pay such.
lliank you,
PY
Cell: (305) 335-5543
Fax: (866) 676-4671
CO
transnussion is privileged and confidential intended only for the use of tlie
individual or entity named above. lfthe reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in en-or, do not read it. Please immediately
D
reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and
then delete it. Thank you.
IE
From: Meaghan Murphy <mmurruiy..@melandbudwick.com>
IF
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 6:59 AM
To: Martin McCarthy <mccarthy..@myattorneyservices.com>
Cc: Emre Verse! <~yersel@myattorneyservices.com>; Kaitlyn Bunnell
RT
Good morning,
We can move the start time today to noon to accommodate you and Mr.
Schneider.
As for Jordyn and Zachary, it is our opinion that that were properly serviced by
A
Meaghan Murphy
Meland Budwick, P.A.
T
<mccarthy.@mY.attomeY.services.com> wrote:
N
EXTERNAL EMAIL:
Dear Ms. Murphy:
Sincerely Yours,
PY
(305) 407-8006 office
(866) 676-467 1 facsimile
(305)522-6224 cellular
email: mccarth:v.@m:v.attome:v.services.com
CO
Our Address Changed! Please note effective Februa1y
22, 2021 , our new Office Address is 4929 SW 74th CT,
Ste 5, Miami, f L 33155
D
Confidentiality Notice: Thjs e-mail transmission, and
IE
any documents, files or previous e-mail messages
attached to it may contain confidential information that
IF
is legally privileged If you are not the intended
recipient, or a person responsible for del ivering it to the
RT
NEAL H. LEVIN
Attorney at Law
N
<image001.jpg>
www.freeborn.com
NEAL H. LEVIN
Attorney at Law
<image001.jpg>
PY
311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000
Chicago, IL 60606
www.freeborn.com
CO
Neal H. Levin Bio
Connect on Linkedln
How the CelebritY.. Surgeon Scu/12.ted His Prev.
Chicago [rain's Feature
D
Plav.book of_ Fraud's Aftermath
IE
IF
NEAL H. LEVIN
Attorney at Law
RT
<image001.jpg>
CE
www.freeborn.com
O
NEAL H. LEVIN
Attorney at Law
nhlevin@freeborn.com
www.freeborn.com
Connect on LinkedIn
PY
CO
NEAL H. LEVIN
Attorney at Law
D
Freeborn ,-
IE
IF
+1(312) 360-6530 direct
RT
nhlevin@freeborn.com
Chicago, IL 60606
www.freeborn.com
A
Connect on Linkedln
T
PY
Plaintiff,
vs.
CO
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Defendants.
D
___________________________________/
IE
NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
Date and time coordinated with opposing counsel
IF
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310 and
RT
1.560, First American Bank will take the deposition of the below-named persons on the dates and
CE
Miami, FL 33131
O
N
Regarding the matters described in the subpoena attached hereto. The deposition will be taken
upon oral examination before a court reporter Veritext Court Reporter, Notary Public, in and for
the State of Florida at Large, or some other officer duly authorized by law to take deposition. This
deposition is being taken for discovery, use at trial, or any other purpose permitted under the Rules
of Civil Procedure and Rules of Evidence. The deposition will continue from hour to hour and
from day to day until completed.
MELAND I BUDWICK
3200 SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL CENTER I 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULE VA RD I MIAMI , FL 33131 I T 305-358-6363
In accor<lance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special
accommodation to participate in this proceeding shouhl contact Meaghan E. Murphy, Esquire
at Melaml Budwick, P.A. telephone number (305) 358-6363, no later th,m seven (7) days prior
to the proceeding. If hearing impaire,l, telephone Florida Relay Service at 1-800-955-8771 for
assistance.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I CERTIFY that the foregoing document has been furnished to all registered users via the
PY
Florida Courts e-Filing Portal on June 6, 2022.
s/ Meaghan E. Murphy
CO
Meaghan E. Murphy, Esquire
Florida Bar No. 102770
lmmurphy@melandbudwick.com1
MELAND BUDWICK, P.A.
D
200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3200
Miami, Florida 33131
IE
Telephone: (305) 358-6363
Facsimile: (305) 358-1221
IF
Counsel for Plaintiff
RT
ahoo.com
A
T
O
N
MELAND I BUDWICK
3200 SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL CENTER I 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD I MIAMI, FL 33131 I T 305-358-6363