Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.2 Failure Behaviour, Moment Redistribution - pp.45-53 - CIVL3320 - 2017!02!15
3.2 Failure Behaviour, Moment Redistribution - pp.45-53 - CIVL3320 - 2017!02!15
3.2 Failure Behaviour, Moment Redistribution - pp.45-53 - CIVL3320 - 2017!02!15
Balancced section
n (Fig. 2.33-4)
Thee failure of
o an undeer-reinforrced beam
m is characterised bby large
eco
onomy, designers ussually aim
m at under-reinforcem
ment.
Over-rreinforced
d section
Con
ncrete straain reaches εcu beforre steel strrain reachees εy .
45
The faailure of an
n over-reiinforced beam
b is innitiated byy the crushhing of
the con
ncrete, whhile the steeel strain is
i still relaatively low
w. The faailure is
Reinfo
orcement ratio
r shoulld be conttrolled by min .
1/r
(a) (b)
46
For a secction of thhe beam subjectedd to an inncreasing moment M, the
1
curvature at thatt section increases
i linearly with
w M unntil the vaalue MP
r
(plastic moment
m off resistancce) is reaached; thee curvature then inccreases
indefinitely, as show
wn in Fig. 2.3-7(b)..
■ Exaample 2.3--4
Fig. 2..3-8(a) shoows a twoo-span uniiform beam (all crooss-sectionns have thhe same
sectionns is MP.
Solutioon:
(a)
(
(b)
(
(c)
(
(d)
(
47
Fig. 2.3-8(b) shows the elastic beading moments.
Suppose P is just large enough for the moment at C to reach MP, i.e. MC =
MP. A further increase in P, say P, to P′, will not increase the value of
hinge).
5 1
MB Pl P l
32 4
the value MP, as shown in Fig. 2.3-8(c). The beam behaves as though
The beam will collapse in the mode shown in Fig. 2.3-8(d), where the
Pu l M C
From Fig. 2.3-8(c), M B , where both MB and MC are now
4 2
Pu l M P
equal to MP; hence M P . Then,
4 2
1
M P Pu l (2.21)
6
48
From Eq. (2.21), the collapse load
MP
Pu 6 (2.22)
l
3
( M elastic )C Pu l
16
1 3
o Comparing M C Pu l with ( M elastic )C Pu l shows that the rotation
6 16
there is smaller (and that B greater) than what it would have been if
1
The bending moment at C after the moment distribution is Pu l ,
6
3 1 3
but not Pu l (note that Pu l < Pu l ).
16 6 16
MC Pl /6
u 0.889
M elastic C 3Pu l /16
■
49
(3) In general, structural design that takes account of moment redistributions
mechanism is produced.
of the moment from the elastic analysis; hence the code allows a
50
Allowing up to 30% moment redistribution is to prevent an
design practice.
o Hence, from Eq. (2.25a) the neutral axis depth x = (0.3 to 0.5)d.
(4) HKConcrete2013
■ Example 2.3-5
distributed load. It is assumed that the ultimate flexural strengths (Mu) at mid-
span and supports are the same and equal to wL2/12, where w is a uniformly
distributed load to cause the first plastic hinge. Determine: (1) The collapse
load the beam may carry with moment redistribution; (2) The moment
51
Solution:
wL2
(1) Elastic support moments =
12
wL2
Elastic mid-span moment =
24
wL2
MA = MC = Mu =
12
wL2 wa L2
MB = Mu =
24 8
wa L2
where is the additional moment at B, as for a simply supported beam with
8
wL2 wa L2 wL2
24 8 12
Hence
wa w / 3 0.33w
The collapse load the beam may carry with moment redistribution is
w' = w + wa = 1.33w
52
(2) When
W the beam
b o the collaapse load, the momeent redistribution
is suubjected to
raatio at C iss
L2 /12
wL wL2
b 0..75
wL2 /12 1.333wL2
■
2.4.1 Design fo
ormulae [[derived based
b on fcu 45 N/mm2. When fcuu > 45
Sections with
w momment redistrribution appplied nott greater thhan 10%
M 0.156 f cu bd 2
o From equilibrium
e m,
53