NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT AGENCY

TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR)

STUDY OF PRIORITY LOCATION IDENTIFICATION AND TSUNAMI DISASTER RISK

ANALYSIS IN THE EASTERN REGION

Directorate of Mapping and Evaluation of Disaster

Risk in Fiscal Year 2022
 TERMS OF REFERENCE
(TOR)

STUDY OF PRIORITY LOCATION IDENTIFICATION AND TSUNAMI DISASTER RISK

ANALYSIS IN THE EASTERN REGION
(103.01. 648521 4280.ABS.002)

Ministry/ State Institutions : National Disaster Management Agency

Echelon Unit I : Deputy for Systems and Strategy
Echelon II Unit : Directorate of Mapping and Evaluation of
Disaster Risk
Program : Disaster Resilience
Program Goals : Improvement of Reliable, Innovative,
Collaborative, and Implemented Disaster
Prevention Systems and Strategies
Program Performance Indicators : 1. Increase Regional Resilience Index (IKD)
in disaster management.
2. Percentage increase in the number of
areas that have disaster management
strategies and are implemented based on
risk assessments
Activities : Assessment and Evaluation of Disaster Risk
Activity Targets : Planning and implementation of technical
support through mapping and evaluation of
disaster risk
Activity Target Indicator : Number of disaster risk mapping and compiled
analysis studies
Classification of Output : Policies in the Field of Disaster Resilience and
Breakdown climate change
Output Breakdown Classification : Number of Policy Recommendation
Indicator Documents in the Field of Disaster Resilience
and climate change
Output Breakdown : Priority location Identification and Risk
Analysis to Support IDRIP
Volume breakdown of output : 1 (One) Document
Output Breakdown Unit : Policy Recommendations

2
A. BACKGROUND

1. Legal Basis

a. Law No. 25 of 2004 on National Development Planning System (State Gazette

of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2004 Number 104, Supplement to State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4421)

b. Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local Government (State Gazette of the Republic of

Indonesia year 2004 Number 125, Supplement of State Gazette Number 4437)
as has been amended several times recently by Law No. 12 of 2008 on The
Second Amendment to Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local Government (State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2008 Number 59, Additional State
Gazette Number 4844)

c. Law No. 17 of 2007 on National Long-Term Development Plan 2005-2025

(State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 Number 33, Supplement
to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4700)

d. Law No. 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management (State Gazette of the Republic of

Indonesia year 2007 Number 66, Supplementary State Gazette of the Republic
of Indonesia Number 4723)

e. Law No. 26 of 2007 on Spatial Arrangement

f. Law No. 27 of 2007 on The Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands
(State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 Number 84, Supplement
to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4739)

g. Government Regulation No. 39 of 2006 on Procedures for Control and

Evaluation of Implementation of Development Plan (State Gazette of the
Republic of Indonesia Year 2006 Number 96, Supplement to State Gazette of
the Republic of Indonesia Number 4663)

h. Government Regulation No. 38 of 2007 on The Division of Government Affairs

Between Government, Provincial Government, and District/City Regional
Government (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 Number 82,
Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4737)

i. Government Regulation No. 8 of 2008 on Stages, Procedures for Preparation,

Control and Evaluation of Implementation of Regional Development Plan (State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2008 Number 21, Supplement to
State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4817)

3
 j. Government Regulation No. 21 of 2008 on The Implementation of Disaster
Management (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia year 2008 Number
42, Supplementary State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4828)

k. Government Regulation No. 50 of 2011 on National Tourism Development

Master Plan 2010-2025

l. Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency No. 4 of

2008 on Guidelines for The Preparation of Disaster Management Plan

m. Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency No. 3 of

2010 on the National Disaster Management Plan

n. Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 54 of 2010 on the Implementation

of Government Regulation No. 8 of 2008 on Drafting Procedures,
Control and Evaluation of Regional Development Plan Implementation

o. Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency No. 2 of

2012 on General Guidelines for Disaster Risk Assessment

p. Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency No. 3 of

2012 on Guidance on Regional Capacity Assessment in Disaster Management.

2. Overview

In Indonesia, the issuance of Law No. 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management changed

the paradigm of disaster management implementation to be carried out in a planned,
integrated, coordinated and comprehensive manner. Indonesia is also progressively
taking various structured measures to mainstream disaster risk reduction in
development plans included in the Indonesian National Long-Term Development Plan
(RPJPN) 2005-2025. At the National Coordination Meeting on Disaster Mitigation in
March 2021, President Joko Widodo expressed the government's commitment to
Disaster Risk Management through "6 Directives" of which state that efforts to reduce
disaster risk are an integration of disaster prevention and mitigation aspects that are
carried out upstream, central and downstream.

One of the efforts to realize the directive is to implement the Indonesia Disaster
Resilience Initiatives Project (IDRIP) as the first step in the development of a multi-
hazard disaster early warning system in Indonesia. The IDRIP project will provide
program support and funding to the Government to increase the disaster
management capacity of central government and select local governments, as well
as community readiness in dealing with the hazard of earthquake and tsunami
hazards, which have high levels of risk in Indonesia.

4
 IDRIP project as a government program that is supported by the World Bank, will be
implemented by the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) and the
Indonesian Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG), through 2
main technical components of activities consisting of enhancing risk governance and
disaster preparedness components, as well as the development of geophysical early
warning service systems. The implementation of these technical activities is
supported by a project management component.

In order to support the improvement of risk governance and preparedness for tsunami
disasters, BNPB through the Directorate of Disaster Risk Mapping and Evaluation will
conduct capacity mapping of communities and village-level governments in priority
locations that have a high level of tsunami disaster risk. In addition, this activity will
also carry out mapping of the response and supporting information from the
community and government related to the implementation of ecosystem-based
tsunami mitigation.

Coastal and marine areas have a very important ecological function, and about 65%
of Indonesia's population live around coastal areas. The number of tsunami-prone
villages amounts to 7,801 villages, with a total population of approximately 15 million
people. The capacity of community and village-level government becomes one of the
important components in efforts to reduce the level of disaster risk, in this case
especially against earthquake and tsunami hazards. Based on this consideration,
understanding related to the capacity of the community and village-level governments
can be well mapped based on existing conditions as the basis in the planning stage
in making targeted efforts and adjusted to the characteristics of the community and
regional (subnational) areas in disaster risk reduction programs.

Through this study, it is also expected that the perception and response of the
community and village-level government in priority locations with a high level of
tsunami disaster risk. The existence of information to be a consideration in
determining the priority location that can be used as a location for community-based
tsunami mitigation activities to reduce the risk of tsunami.

B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

This activity aims to obtain appropriate mitigation concepts based on the characteristics of
tsunami, physical, existing land use, spatial planning, and socio-cultural in priority locations
with village analysis units. This is based on the consideration that the level of tsunami risk
will be unique depending on the physical characteristics, land use, as well as socio-cultural
of different villages.

The objectives of this activity include the following:

5
 1. Inventory of villages with a high level of tsunami risk by conducting a review of several
disaster sources, especially data from InaRisk, as a priority location.

2. The preparation of priority location criteria that may include a short tsunami wave lead
time, high level of community activities (such as tourist attractions), urban areas,
transportation nodes and similar locations, important space values in spatial planning
and other related criteria.

3. Conducting tsunami analysis with probabilistic methods while reviewing the history of
tsunami disasters around pre-determined priority locations to conduct improvement
of tsunami hazard maps in the area around the village locations that have been
determined.

4. Primary survey phase I for the collection of topographic data and aerial photos that
will be used as input in conducting an analysis of village hazard and risks

a. The availability of Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Terrain Model (DTM)
data with high accuracy reaches at least 2.5 meters. Map Coordinates in
Latitude-Longitude and UTM Projection Coordinates.

b. The 1:5,000 scale of based/line map includes topographic maps for study
locations that is identified as areas with a high level of risk.

5. Mapping of disaster risk in priority location village

6. Focus Group Discussion in priority location areas to capture community / stakeholder

responses and aspirations related to hazard maps and risk maps that have been
generated as part of village mitigation planning

7. Primary survey phase II to conduct town watching with communities in the village as
part of simple spatial mitigation planning

8. Preparation of village mitigation concept documents that are hard protection or soft
protection.

C. STUDY LOCATION

The study area in the implementation of this activity covers all coastal areas of Indonesia
as the target of IDRIP program activities. In IDRIP 2021 draft on the approach of determining
the location, the priority location will be grouped based on several factors, namely: 1)
accessibility, 2) connectivity, 3) similarities in community character, customs, origins,
livelihoods, vulnerabilities, structures, values, and religious figures, indigenous figures and
community figures as shown in the figure below. The distribution of territory as in the figure
refers to the distribution of the IDRIP program implementation plan as stated in the IDRIP
Grand Design 2021.

6
 Figure C.1 Distribution of Indonesian territory for IDRIP activities (source: Master
Plan of Indonesia Disaster Resilience Initiative, 2021)

In this study, the location is focused on the activities implementation in Eastern Indonesia
consisting of area 3 (Central Sulawesi, Gorontalo, and North Sulawesi), area 4 (West
Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, and North Maluku), and area 5 (Maluku,
Papua, and West Papua).

D. OUTPUT

The output of this technical study is a review document determining the priority location
areas for implementation under the IDRIP program. The determination of this priority
location is based on various aspects, both from the aspect of tsunami hazards, physical
conditions in alternative priority locations, and the growth of the area around the alternative
priority locations.

E. SCOPE OF SERVICES

In general, the overall approach and methodology of this activity can be seen in the diagram
below.

7
 Figure 2 Approaches and methodologies of work

Technical management of the implementation is carried out in several phases that will be
explained below:

1. Inception Phase

Preparatory activities are carried out in this inception phase where in this activity the
consolidation of the team with the client to produce a work approach, methodology,
and detailed work program based on the initial understanding of the study location.

8
2. Preparation of priority location selection criteria.

The development of village selection criteria parameters shall be prepared to

determine priority locations that represent not only the greatest loss factor but also
locations with high levels of risk due to short tsunami lead times. Based on this,
location intervention with these characteristics becomes a top priority to minimize the
number of fatalities. In addition, locations with high density footfall characteristics that
can be identified from the space function in patterns and space structures planning
(is part of the regional spatial plan, RTRW or RDTR) become other considerations,
because locations with these characteristics will potentially cause considerable
fatalities, the concept of emergency especially the evacuation process, should be
considered very comprehensively and integrated in the mitigation concept. The
definition of a footfall area is an area with the intensity of people activities in the area
during a certain period of time. To get priority locations obtained through preliminary
analysis. The analysis was carried out on indicative locations as shown in the table
below. alternative locations are locations that have a high level of tsunami risk based
on inarisk. The analysis is carried out by conducting a study of several criteria
compiled by the implementing party. Based on this, it can be understood that priority
locations are locations selected from several indicative locations based on the criteria
that have been prepared, including a short tsunami leading time at a high-density
footfall location.

Table 1 Indicative villages in region 3 IDRIP

KECAMATAN/NEIGHBORHO
PROVINCE KABUPATEN/REGENCY DESA/VILLAGE
OD
SULAWESI BOLAANG MONGONDOW BOLAANG INOBONTO SATU
UTARA
BOLAANG TIMUR AMBANG I
TADOY
MINAHASA TOMBARIRI POOPOH
MOKUPA
MANDOLANG KALASEY SATU
KEPULAUAN SANGIHE TAMAKO POKOL
TAHUNA SAWANG BENDAR
APENG SEMBEKA
KEPULAUAN TALAUD DAMAU DAMAU
SALIBABU BITUNURIS
BEO BEO
MINAHASA SELATAN TENGA SAPA
AMURANG BUYUNGON
AMURANG TIMUR RANOMEA
BOLAANG MONGONDOW SANGKUB SANGKUB I
UTARA
PINOGALUMAN TUNTUNG
DUINI
SIAU TAGULANDANG BIARO TAGULANDANG BAHOI
TULUSAN
BALEHUMARA
MINAHASA TENGGARA RATATOTOK BASAAN
BELANG MOLOMPAR

9
 KECAMATAN/NEIGHBORHO
PROVINCE KABUPATEN/REGENCY DESA/VILLAGE
OD
PONOSAKAN
BELANG
BOLAANG MONGONDOW POSIGADAN
SELATAN
BOLAANG MONGONDOW TIMUR NUANGAN LOYOW
BITUNG MAESA BITUNG BARAT
SATU
BITUNG TENGAH
BITUNG TIMUR
SULAWESI BANGGAI KEPULAUAN BULAGI BULAGI SATU
TENGAH
BANGGAI BATUI NONONG
LUWUK LUWUK
BUNGIN
DONGGALA BANAWA LABUAN BAJO
LABUAN LABUAN LELEA
SIRENJA TANJUNG PADANG
TOLI-TOLI DAMPAL UTARA OGOTUA
TOLITOLI UTARA LAULALANG
LAKUAN TOLITOLI
BAOLAN BARU
BUOL LAKEA LAKEA II
BIAU BUGIS
BOKAT NEGERI LAMA
PARIGI MOUTONG PALASA ULATAN
TOJO UNA-UNA TOJO BARAT MALEI TOJO
TOJO BAHARI
AMPANA KOTA AMPANA
PALU PALU TIMUR BESUSU BARAT
MANTIKULORE TALISE
TAWAELI PANTOLOAN
GORONTALO GORONTALO UTARA SUMALATA TIMUR WUBUDU
TOLINGGULA TOLINGGULA
PANTAI

Table 2 Indicative villages in region 4 IDRIP

PROV KAB KEC DESA

SULAWESI KEPULAUAN SELAYAR PASIMARANNU BONERATE

SELATAN
BENTENG BENTENG SELATAN

BENTENG UTARA

BULUKUMBA UJUNG BULU BINTARORE

BONTO BAHARI TANAH BERU

KAJANG LEMBANGLOHE

BANTAENG BISSAPPU BONTO JAI

BANTAENG TAPPANJENG

PA'JUKUKANG RAPPOA

JENEPONTO BANGKALA PANTAI BAHARI

TAMALATEA TONROKASSI TIMUR

TONROKASSI BARAT

10
 PROV KAB KEC DESA

TAKALAR MANGARA PUNAGA

BOMBANG
SANROBONE UJUNG BAJI

GALESONG GALESONG KOTA

GOWA BONTONOMPO SALAJANGKI

SELATAN
BAROMBONG BENTENG SOMBA
OPU
PULAU SEMBILAN PULAU BUHUNG
PITUE
PANGKAJENE DAN KEPULAUAN LIUKANG MATTIRO SOMPE
TUPABBIRING
LIUKANG MATTIRO BAJI
TUPABBIRING
UTARA
MANDALLE MANDALLE

PINRANG SUPPA LERO

PAREPARE BACUKIKI BARAT SUMPANG MINANGAE

UJUNG UJUNG SABBANG

SOREANG WATANG SOREANG

SULAWESI BUTON UTARA BONEGUNU BONEGUNU(KIOKO)

TENGGARA
SULAWESI BARAT MAJENE BANGGAE TIMUR LABUANG

TUBO SENDANA ONANG

MAMUJU MAMUJU BINANGA

KALUKKU BERU-BERU

PAPALANG PAPALANG

MAMUJU UTARA BARAS BULU PARIGI

BAMBALAMOTU BAMBALAMOTU

SARJO SARJO

MAMUJU TENGAH PANGALE PANGALE

BUDONG-BUDONG PONTANAKAYANG

TOPOYO BUDONG-BUDONG

MALUKU UTARA HALMAHERA BARAT JAILOLO GUFASA

GUAEMAADU

JAILOLO SELATAN TONIKU

SIDANGOLI DEHE

SAHU ROPU TENGAH BALU

HALMAHERA TENGAH PATANI YEISOWO

KEPULAUAN SULA SULABESI SELATAN SEKOM

WAI BOGA

MANGOLI TENGAH MANGOLI

HALMAHERA SELATAN OBI SELATAN GAMBARU

PULAU MAKIAN GURUA

GANE TIMUR TOBARU

HALMAHERA UTARA TOBELO UTARA GORUA SELATAN

11
 PROV KAB KEC DESA

HALMAHERA TIMUR MABA SELATAN KASUBA

WASILE TENGAH LOLOBATA

MABA SAILAL

PULAU TALIABU TALIABU SELATAN BAPENU

TABONA HABUNUHA

LEDE TOLONG

Table 3 Indicative villages in region 5 IDRIP

PROV KAB KEC DESA

MALUKU SERAM BAGIAN BARAT TANIWEL TIMUR SUKARAJA

KAIRATU KAIRATU
MALUKU TENGGARA BARAT TANIMBAR SELATAN SAUMLAKI
BOMAKI
MALUKU TENGAH TELUK ELPAPUTIH SAHULAU
BURU NAMLEA NAMLEA
LALA
BATA BUAL NAMLEA ILATH
KEPULAUAN ARU ARU TENGAH BENJINA
SERAM BAGIAN TIMUR PULAU GOROM DAI
SERAM TIMUR GESER
MALUKU BARAT DAYA LETI MOA LAKOR TUTUKEY
LAKOR KETTY
PULAU MASELA BULULORA
BURU SELATAN KEPALA MADAN WAEKEKA
NAMROLE FATMITE
OKI LAMA
AMBON NUSANIWE NUSANIWE
TELUK AMBON
BAGUALA NEGERI LAMA
TELUK AMBON TAWIRI
TUAL PULAU DULLAH FIDITAN
UTARA
DULLAH
PULAU DULLAH
SELATAN KEL. MASRUM
PAPUA BARAT TELUK WONDAMA WASIOR WASIOR I
MANOKWARI MANOKWARI BARAT MANOKWARI BARAT
MANOKWARI TIMUR PASIR PUTIH
MANOKWARI
SELATAN ANDAY
MANOKWARI SELATAN ORANSBARI WAROSER
SORONG SORONG BARAT RUFEI
KLAWASI
SORONG MANOI KLALIGI
SEGET KASIM
PAPUA NABIRE NABIRE SIRIWINI
KEPULAUAN YAPEN KEP. AMBAI AMBAI II
YAPEN SELATAN PASIR PUTIH
SERUI KOTA

12
 PROV KAB KEC DESA

BIAK NUMFOR NUMFOR TIMUR KORNASOREN

PADAIDO WUNDI
BIAK KOTA BUROKUB
SARMI PANTAI TIMUR
BAGIAN BARAT DABE
SARMI SARMI
PANTAI BARAT WAIM
SUPIORI SUPIORI SELATAN FANINDI
SUPIORI BARAT NAPISNDI
SUPIORI TIMUR MARSRAM
JAYAPURA ABEPURA WAHNO
JAYAPURA UTARA BAYANGKARA
MANDALA

In the table above, it can be seen that in one district there are several sub-districts
and several villages. The villages in the table above are indicative locations from
which 1 priority village will then be selected for one district with the minimum criteria
being the village with the shortest leading time and the highest risk, as well as other
criteria developed by the consultant. The scope of this activity location will include
about 20 villages for areas 3, 21 villages for areas 4, and 20 villages for region 5, so
that the total priority village location for areas 3, 4 and 5 is about 61 priority villages
that will be used as priority locations and continued at a later phase.

3. Topographic survey scale of 1:5,000 at priority locations

Sufficient support data is required to conduct a detail study with the village
administration analysis unit. One of the necessary data is the availability of
topographic data. This data can be provided by conducting aerial mapping surveys
using drones that are equipped with LiDAR sensors. The scope of aerial mapping is
an area with topographic height of < 200 m which is one of the criteria of cultivation
area. To obtain good quality data, GPS surveys for geo reference binding from LiDAR
data is also conducted. The results of this survey are then processed to get
topographic maps and high point maps of priority location areas to at least a minimum
scale of 1:5,000.

GPS surveys are designed to follow the appropriate mapping rules to get a high point
distribution that can represent the survey area clearly. Before the GPS survey is
conducted, the survey design is discussed and approved by the client.

The equipment is as follows:

a. GCP (Ground Control Point), this GCP is made in such a way that it can be seen
on aerial photos that taken by the drone at the time of drone data retrieval. The
number of GCP is adjusted to the area and characteristics of the villages that
have been determined as priority locations.

b. Geodetic GPS is used as a tool to obtain horizontal coordinated data x and y

13
 and vertical (z) from BM and GCP. This data is used for the process of binding
drone imagery as well as validation of altitude data from LiDAR.
c. UAV/Drone, is a tool that used to fly lidar sensors as well as high-resolution
cameras

d. LiDAR Sensor, is a device flown using a drone to get altitude data from the
terrain

More details about the minimum specifications of the main equipment will be explained
below:
Table 1 Minimum specifications of UAV/drone

Physical Body with propellers, frame arms and GPS mount

unfolded (including landing gear)

Hovering Accuracy (P-GPS) Vertical: ±0.5 m, Horizontal: ±1.5 m

Maximum Angular Speed Pitch: 300°/s, Yaw: 150°/s

Table 2 Minimum specifications of LiDAR

Measurement Accuracy 0.1m

Storage Memory 64 GB storage, maximum support 128GB TF card

90m@10% Reflectivity, 130m@20% Reflectivity,

Measurement Distance 260m@80% Reflectivity

Laser Class 905nm Class1 (IEC 60825-1:2014)

Maximum Distance 260 m

Minimum Distance 0.3 M

Accuracy range ±5cm (@0.3m~1m), ±2cm (@1m~200m)

data Double echo, 100,000 Points/Sec

Heading Accuracy 0.08°

Pitch Accuracy 0.03°

Roll Accuracy 0.03°

Position Accuracy ≤0.05m

GNSS Signal Type GPSL1/L2 GLONASS L1/L2 BDS B1/B2

Table 3 Specifications of GPS Geodetic

GNSS Channels 220
performance
GPS L1C/A, L2C, L2E, L5
GLONASS L1 C/A, L1 P, L2 C/A (GLONASS M Only),
L2 P
BDS B1, B2
GALILEO E1 BOC, E5A, E5B, E5AltBOC

14
 SBAS L1C/A, L5 (Just for the satellites supporting
L5)
QZSS, WAAS, MSAS, EGNOS, GAGAN
L-Band --
Positioning output rate 1Hz~50Hz
Initialization time <10s
Initialization reliability >99.99%
Positioning Static surveying Horizontal: 2.5mm+0.5ppm; Vertical:
precision 5mm+0.5ppm
Code differential Horizontal:0.25m+1ppm;
positioning Vertical:0.50m+1ppm
Real-time kinematic Horizontal: 8mm+1ppm; Vertical:
surveying 15mm+1ppm
RTX --
SBAS positioning Typically <5 m 3DRMS
xFill
IMU tilt compensation
Single positioning --
Hardware Dimension 165mm(L) × 168mm(w) × 122mm(H)
performance Weight 1.85kg (battery included)
Material --
Operating temperature -45°C ~ +60°C
Storage temperature -55°C ~ +85°C
Humidity 100% non-condensing
Waterproof/Dustproof IP67 standard, protected from long time
immersion to depth of 1m, and fully
protected against blowing dust
Shock and vibration Withstand 3 meters pole drop onto the
cement ground naturally
Power Supply 9-25V DC, overvoltage protection
Battery 7.4V, 6800mAh internal Li-ion battery,
rechargeable
Battery solution --
Battery life 16h (static mode); 10h (internal UHF base
mode); 12h (rover mode)
Inertial Tilt survey Optional, built-in tilt compensator,
sensing correcting coordinates automatically
system according to the tilt direction and angle of
the centering rod
Electronic bubble Optional, controller software display
electronic bubble, checking leveling status
of the centering rod real time
Thermometer Optional, built-in thermometer sensors,
adopting intelligent temperature control
technology, monitoring and adjusting the
receiver temperature in real time
Products resulting from photogrammetry mapping can be categorized in several
categories, including:

15
 a. Orthophoto is a photo with the concept of orthogonal projection with a
resolution of 5 cm.
b. Generalized surface model or Digital Surface Model (DSM) with a resolution of
50 cm

c. The Digital Terrain Model (DTM), derived from the DSM with a resolution of
50 cm

d. Contours resulting from a model of DTM, DTM at intervals of 50 cm

e. Orthomosaic/orthophoto with a maximum resolution of 5 cm

f. 2 (two) Permanent Benchmark (BM) (concrete) with BM spec size 20 cm x 20

cm x 100 cm and 18 Benchmark (BM) pipe with a diameter of 2-inch and height
of 1 meter All products are stored in digital format, such as ECW for Orthophoto,
Geo TIFF for DSM, DTM as well as dxf and dwg for Contour.

The data from the primary survey is then processed to produce DTM data and height
contour maps. Contour lines are formed from DTM by adding break line and
smoothing to produce contour lines that match the actual terrain shape and
conditions. The resulting contour line must meet the following conditions:

a. The index contour interval for the scale of 1:5,000 is 5 meters.

b. The contour interval distance for the scale of 1:5,000 is 2.5 meters.

c. For relatively flat areas are given auxiliary contour lines with intervals half of the
contour interval distance.

d. Contour lines do not intersect with each other.

e. Contour line is unbroken, except for auxiliary contours.

f. Contour lines with the same elevation do not cut the same river more than
once.

g. Contour lines do not cut the waterfront lines (lakes, braids, swamp water, and
beaches).

h. At the location of the intersection of contour lines with rivers and tributaries,
contour patterns tend to protrude toward the upstream.

i. At the location of the intersection of contour lines with ridge lines, then the
contour pattern tends to protrude toward the downstream.

4. Preparation of hazard and risk map of tsunami disaster scale area minimum
1:5,000

Tsunami hazard maps on this activity at least include information leading time
tsunami, tsunami runup, tsunami heigh, and delineation of tsunami inundation. This
information is required as a basis for community empowering as

16
 an active part in the process of drafting mitigation concepts in priority locations. The
preparation of this hazard map using numerical modelling of propagation and tsunami
inundation. The preparation of this hazard map can adopt the methodology as
described in the technical instructions for the preparation of tsunami hazard maps
from Perka BNPB No. 2012. This map is further expected to be used as a basis for
space utilization planning, especially on a detailed scale (³ 25,000), as for spatial
planning on a smaller scale, for example RTRW Province or Regency/city can be
used to provide feedback in determining mitigation policies or emergencies in the
location of these priority villages.

5. Planning of community empowerment-based mitigation concepts

The community as part of the subject of preparing mitigation concepts for the area is
needed so that mitigation planning products can be realized and implemented by the
community. One form of community empowerment as part of the concept of bottom-
up planning is to conduct FGD, where this FGD becomes the basis in the process of
planning the concept of mitigation. In addition to FGD community participation in the
process of planning, the concept of mitigation and emergencies in this activity is to
conduct a town watching survey, where the community conducts spatial based
planning as part of mitigation planning. Methodology that can be done to get for
example by doing qualitative analysis so that the perception of society and
government can be well illustrated.

6. Emergency Analysis

Emergency analysis is carried out to compile parts of the mitigation plan that will be
prepared, which include evacuation lines and operational plans, temporary
evacuation site placement, increased self-evacuation capacity from communities and
local governments, as well as other things that support the emergency phase to avoid
large fatalities.

7. The concept of village mitigation

Village disaster profile that describes the characteristics of the regional (subnational)
tsunami hazard, vulnerability conditions, as well as the level of capacity and resilience
of the community and local governments around the village that are priority locations.
The disaster profile of villages that are priority locations become the basis in delivering
the concept of Regional mitigation that can be used as a reference by the local
government in preparing regional planning both in the form of patterns and spatial
structures for the preparation of large-scale regional planning (regional RDTR level),
or in the form of regional policy planning for the basis of small-scale planning (RTRW
Province, Regency/City). The concept of village mitigation compiled at this stage is
mitigation efforts that are hard protection or soft protection. Soft protection mitigation
is the main choice in the preparation of the mitigation concept that is carried out. The
concept of mitigation that is expected is mitigation that is in accordance with the

17
 physical and socio-cultural characteristics of the community. In addition, the mitigation
concept produced is prioritized to be implemented and maintained by the community
in the location. The expected mitigation concept is in the form of further analysis based
on the main product resulting from this activity, namely a disaster risk study combined
with information that can be taken from the community for consideration. Physical and
non-physical needs as support are part of the mitigation concept that must be
prepared. The mitigation concept is also equipped with identification of the person in
charge of its implementation, be it the community itself, the government, the private
sector, or other competent parties. In addition, determining the priority scale of
activities in the village mitigation concept is an expected part.

F. NEEDS OF EXPERTS AND SUPPORT PERSONNEL

The execution time of this work is approximately 180 calendar days from the contract
signing date. The implementation of this work requires the support of experts who have the
capacity and expertise in accordance with the needs of the scope of services. In addition to
experts, other support is also needed to carry out the work implementation. The composition
of experts involved in this study service consists of multi-disciplinary. The involvement of
experts is adjusted to the phase of work implementation that have been described earlier.
In general, the duration of involvement for each expert is shown in the table below.

Table F.1 List of expert minimum needs

NUMBER OF DURATION PERSON EXPERIENC
NO SKILLS EDUCATION
PERSONNEL (MONTH) -MONTH E
(minimum)
1 Team leader S2 Planning/Civil 1 6 6 7 years
(Team Leader) Engineering/Managem
ent
2 Regional S1 Planning 5 6 30 5 years
Planning Expert Engineering

3 Tsunami modelling S1 Oceanography / 5 6 30 5 years

Marine Engineering
4 Hazards S1 Geophysical 5 6 30 5 years
Experts Meteorology /
Oceanography /
Marine / Geology
5 GIS expert S1 Geodetic 5 6 30 5 years
Engineering
6 Social Expert S1 Social science 5 6 30 5 years
7 Survey and S1 Geodetic 5 6 30 5 years
Mapping Experts Engineering
8 Disaster S1 Communication 5 6 30 5 years
Communications science
Expert
9 Assistant Disaster S1 Planning 5 6 30 1 year
Management Engineering
expert
18
10 Survey and S1 Geodesy 5 6 30 1 year
mapping
assistant
11 Tsunami S1 Oceanography 5 6 30 1 year
expert
assistant
12 GIS expert assistant S1 Geodesy 5 6 30 1 year
13 Social expert S1 Social 5 6 30 1 year
assistant
14 Assistant S1 Communication 5 6 30 1 year
Communications science
expert
15 Surveyor S1 Geodesy / Social 15 3 45 1 year
/ Planning / Civil /
Geology
16 Operator GIS S1Geodesis / 5 6 30 1 year
Geography
17 Operator Basis General D3 5 6 30 1 year
Data
17 Administration/ General D3 1 6 6 1 year
Finance

The explanation and role of experts as shown in the table above will be explained below:

Table F 2 Description of expert tasks

EXPERT QUALIFICATION ASSIGNMENT

Team Leader • Have a minimum degree in Planning • Design the work
Engineering/Civil engineering/Management implementation in general
or other disciplines that have equivalent • Design a survey with other
technical capabilities experts
• Have at least 7 years of accumulative work • Conducting carrying
experience, and at least have 1 year capacity (disaster resilience
experienced in the field of disaster/Public and toughness) of
Policy/Management/Regional Planning or community and village level
work experience with similar work activities. government
• Have at least 1 years of work experience • Develop the concept of
including projects with overseas funding regional mitigation
sources (PHLN).
• Have management skills, good
interpersonal communication and be able to
act effectively and efficiently.
• Have the ability to communicate and be
able to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and
mentoring processes in the field

19
Regional • Have a minimum degree in Planning • Support team leaders draw
planning Engineering or other disciplines that have up priority location criteria
equivalent technical capabilities • Spatial analysis and
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative work structure related to
experience, and at least have 1 year assessment of potential
experienced in the field of regional planning priority locations for
and disaster or work experience with similar ecosystem-based tsunami
work activities. disaster mitigation
• Have management skills, good • With other experts compiling
interpersonal communication and be able to a village-level disaster profile
act effectively and efficiently
Have the ability to communicate and be able
to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and mentoring
processes in the field
Tsunami • Have a minimum degree in • Conduct a study of tsunami
modelling Oceanography/Marine Engineering or history
other disciplines that have equivalent • Probabilistic tsunami
technical capabilities modeling (PTHA)
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative work • Tsunami level analysis for
experience, and at least have 1 year scale of shoreline coverage
experienced in oceanography or marine in the Village region
field or work experience with similar work
• Modeling of tsunami
activities.
inundation (tsunami
• Have management skills, good inundation) for data
interpersonal communication and be able preparation of tsunami
to act effectively and efficiently. hazard maps
• Have the ability to communicate and be
able to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and
mentoring processes in the field

Hazard expert • Have a minimum degree of S1 • Support the team leader in

Oceanography/ Geophysics Meteorology conducting disaster capacity
/Marine Engineering / Geological analysis
Engineering or other disciplines that have • Together with tsunami
equivalent technical capabilities experts conduct disaster
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative work hazard analysis
experience, and at least have 1 year • Compiling a village-level
experienced in oceanography or marine disaster risk analysis
field or work experience with similar work • Together with other experts,
activities. develop mitigation concepts
• Have management skills, good based on hazard
interpersonal communication and be able characteristics and disaster
to act effectively and efficiently. risk at the study site.
• Have the ability to communicate and be
able to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and
mentoring processes in the field

20
GIS • Have a degree in Geodetic Engineering / • Identify blanks space based
Geography or other disciplines that have on imagery analysis
equivalent technical capabilities • Tsunami Level Map as a
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative result of PTHA analysis
work experience, and at least have 1 year • Visualization vulnerability,
experienced in the field GIS and mapping social mapping of
or work experience with similar work community capacity and
activities. village government
• Have management skills, good • Support team leaders draw
interpersonal communication and be able up survey designs
to act effectively and efficiently.
• Have the ability to communicate and be
able to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and
mentoring processes in the field
Social • Have a minimum bachelor's degree in • Support the team leader in
Social Sciences or other disciplines that drafting the adaptation of
have equivalent technical capabilities IKD IKM
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative work • Together with coastal
experience, and at least have 1 year ecosystem experts, arrange
experienced in the field of Social Disaster material related to the
or work experience with similar work potential mitigation of
activities. ecosystem-based tsunami
• Have management skills, good disasters.
interpersonal communication and be able • Perform social mapping
to act effectively and efficiently. analysis
• Have the ability to communicate and be • Together GIS experts
able to write in Indonesian for smooth compile a social map of
communication, coordination, and disaster capacity
mentoring processes in the field

Disaster • Have a minimum degree in • Design FGD materials to

communicati Communication Science or other maximize information and
on disciplines that have equivalent technical aspirations obtained from
capabilities the community
• Have at least 5 years of accumulative work • Designing the technical
experience, and at least have 1 year implementation of
experienced in the field of communication town watching survey with
or work experience with similar work the community
activities. • Conduct qualitative analysis
• Have management skills, good to be able to describe the
interpersonal communication and be able perception of the community
to act effectively and efficiently. and local government related
• Have the ability to communicate and be to disaster conditions,
able to write in Indonesian for smooth mitigation concepts, and
communication, coordination, and emergency concepts that
mentoring processes in the field are in accordance with the
study site
• Develope the concept of
Regional Mitigation
Survey and • Have a degree in Design a survey mapping the
mapping Geodetic Engineering or other disciplines topography of aerial photos in
that have equivalent technical capabilities a priority location
21
 • Have at least 5 years of accumulative work • Conduct aerial photo
experience, and at least have 1 year mapping surveys and
experienced in mapping and surveying or geodetic GPS surveys
work experience with similar work • Processing mapping data
activities. into contour or topographic
• Have management skills, good maps
interpersonal communication and be able • Compile topographic maps
to act effectively and efficiently. and high-point maps in
• Have the ability to communicate and be priority locations
able to write in Indonesian for smooth
communication, coordination, and
mentoring processes in the field

The performance and quality of each expert's output towards the assignment output as
specified in the TOR becomes a joint responsibility between the service provider and the
relevant experts in front of Directorate of Risk Mapping.

The continuation of the expert assignment is determined based on the results of

performance evaluations which include:

1. Ability, professionalism, discipline, and dedication to produce the output of job

assignments as determined by the Leader with quality and timely in their
implementation.

2. The team leader will compile an indicator of the assessment evaluation of each expert
so that it becomes a more objective and professional measuring tool for the leadership
of the Directorate of risk mapping that will provide an assessment evaluation.

G. SCHEDULE OF WORK IMPLEMENTATION

Here is the scheduling of the implementation of this work which is seen in the matrix table
below.
Table G.1 Work plan schedule
ACTIVITIES Month 1
I II III IV IV VI
NO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 Preparation
2 Identify the location of areas with a high level of
risk
3 Assessment of priority location criteria
4 Aerial photo mapping survey
5 Map of hazard and risks of the region
6 FGD and town watching
7 Preparation of regional disaster profiles
8 The concept of regional mitigation
9 Reporting and presentation

22
H. REPORTING

The form of reporting that is carried out in the implementation of this work is as follows:

1. Inception report.

This reporting contains an explanation of the proposed work implementation plan that
includes the work implementation approach, phased plan, the detailed tasks and
involvement of experts, and the work plan that will be carried out at a later phase while
carrying out this work. Reporting at this phase includes the following:

a. Identify village locations with a high level of risk

b. Concept of assessment of priority location determination criteria

c. Identify priority locations

d. Survey design

This report is submitted in the first month after contract signing.

2. Interim report. Progress in the implementation of the work is reported at this phase,
where the report describes the progress of the work implementation based on the
work plan that has been agreed at the previous phase. the progress report at this
phase at least includes the following material:

a. Aerial photo mapping survey

b. Topographic mapping and high point maps

c. Tsunami hazard analysis based on modeling of tsunami propagation and
inundation at each priority location

d. Analysis and map of village tsunami risk

e. FGD dan Town Watching

Reports between these are submitted in the fourth month of the activity implementation

3. Final report. This final report includes reporting on the overall implementation of the
work, and the main materials include the following:

a. Preparation of Regional disaster profiles

b. Formulation of the area mitigation concept, including the analysis of the stake
holder and activity priority.

I. QUALIFICATIONS OF CONSULTANT

To carry out the components of the activities referred to above, the consulting service provider
must have the following qualifications:

1. Has NIB (Nomor Induk Berusaha), NPWP (Nomor Pokok Wajib Pajak) and SIUP (Surat
Izin Usaha Perusahaan) for national companies.

23
 2. Have a business license as a provider of Other Management Consulting Services
(KBLI 70209) for national companies.
3. Have a valid status of taxpayer information based on the confirmation result of
taxpayer status for national companies.

4. Have a certified expert for UAV /Drone pilots as the person in charge of aerial photo
surveys

5. Financial statements of the last 1 (one) year that have been audited by the Public
Accounting Firm.

6. Owning or controlling a place of business / office with the right address, fixed and
clear in the form of own property or rent.

7. It legally has the capacity to bind itself to a contract as evidenced by the deed of
establishment of the company and/or its changes.

8. Similar work experience based on the type of work, complexity of the work,
methodology, technology, or other characteristics that can describe similarities, at
least 1 (one) work in the last 10 (ten) years in both government and private
environments, including subcontracting experience as evidenced by proof of contract
/ reference from users equipped with the value of the work.

9. Experience in performing tasks or projects funded by foreign loan/grant in the last 10

(ten) years.; and

10. The strong company's technical and managerial capabilities in terms of: (i) years in
core business (technical assistance, consulting services, and facilitation services,
including training and capacity building), and (ii) availability of technical resources,
including permanent staff with skills and expertise relevant to this task.

J. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RISK ASPECTS

IDRIP is committed to implementing environmental and social risk management in its

activities in accordance with the provisions of IDRIP’s Environmental and Social
Management Framework (ESMF) document. Relevant environmental and social risks to the
scope of this TOR and mitigation efforts are as follows:

1. Potential risk of COVID-19 transmission in the implementation of this activity, namely

meetings and FGD activities. Therefore, preventive measures are needed:

a. The swab test must be carried out for all participants of the meeting and FGD,
and only participants who show non-reactive results of COVID 19, are allowed
to participate in such meetings and FGDs.

24
 b. During the implementation of the meeting in the form of Coordination Meetings,
Semi workshop, Seminars, FGD, etc., all participants must apply a strict Health
Protocol in the form of 5 M: (1) wash their hands with soap and running water
periodically; (2) wear a mask at all times; (3) maintain a distance of at least 1-
meter between participants; (4) avoid crowds and (5) limit mobility

2. Potential risk of work accidents in travel and field survey conduct. Prevention efforts
in the form of Work Regulations in accordance with applicable Occupational Safety,
Health and Safety (K3) regulations. Related to the risk of accidents on the way, project
executors are specifically required to adhere to the following protocols:

a. Provide life, accident and health insurance policies for workers who travel to the
target area

b. Minimize travelling at night. If it is not possible to avoid travel using land and
water transportation at night, the executor of the activity requests an escort from
the police.

3. Potential risk of gender-based violence and sexual violence (GBV/SEA). Prevention

efforts in the form of the application of a code of ethics in the employment contract as
a requirement of implementation: Review of PB Strategy Development in priority
village locations

Potential involvement of indigenous community groups. The study team is required to

examine the presence of indigenous groups at the study site and if necessary, plan their
involvement in conducted surveys, consultations and studies in accordance with the culture
and language of the indigenous peoples group.

K. CONCLUDING REMARK

Thus, the Term of Reference of this activity is conveyed to the attention of the parties
involved in the study of Priority location Identification and Tsunami Disaster Risk Analysis
Review in The Eastern Region

Jakarta, March 2022

Director of Mapping and Disaster Risk Evaluation

Udrekh

24