English Cyberspace Challenge Product Review Competition Concept Paper 2022 - State

JABATAN PENDIDIKAN WP LABUAN
ENGLISH CYBERSPACE
CHALLENGE:
PRODUCT REVIEW
COMPETITION
CONCEPT PAPER
2022
Organized by;
Jabatan Pendidikan WP Labuan
ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION CONCEPT PAPER 2022
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Product Review is a personal and voluntary feedback from the perspective of a

client about a particular product or service that he/she has previously purchased.
The commentary offers an insight into a product or service’s quality, function, and
usefulness and often helps others to decide whether the product or service is
worth purchasing or not.
Product Review Competition provides an opportunity for pupils to describe their

own experiences in using a product or service and deliver their honest opinions
through a solid and creative video presentation. This competition is an initiative to
promote and strengthen the use of the English language among pupils.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
2.1 To increase pupils’ proficiency in English language speaking skills.
2.2 To provide a platform for students to display their talent in speaking skills
using correct use of language, grammatically apt and precise creative
expression.
2.3 To inculcate pupils’ interest in using English language to present a

product review orally.
3.0 ELIGIBILITY
This competition is open to all primary and secondary school pupils from
government-aided schools. The competition is divided into two categories;
3.1 Primary School : Year4 –Year 6 pupils

3.2 Secondary School : Form 1 – Form 5 pupils
4.0 RULES AND GUIDELINES
4.1 The competition is divided into two sections, as follows;
● Section 1 : Product Review

● Section 2 : Q&A session (national level only)
4.2 Participants are allowed to submit ONE entry only based on the theme
‘Eco-friendly’.
4.3 Participants are NOT allowed to review a sponsored product or service.
1
4.4 All reviews must be a true reflection of the reviewer’s experience and
opinion of the product. Accordingly, all positive, neutral and negative
reviews are eligible.
4.5 The duration of the video should be 3 to 5 minutes. Video reviews must
be recorded and saved in MP4/3GP/AVI/MOV/WMV file and uploaded
via a link provided by the organizer. The organizer will not be responsible
for corrupt files submitted.
4.6 Video reviews must be the pupil’s own work, authentic and original and
must never have been published in any social media platforms or have
won a prize in any other competitions prior to this competition. Plagiarized
or translated works will be disqualified immediately.
4.7 Reviews must not touch on sensitive issues of ethnic, race and religion of
any kind.
4.8 Participants are allowed to use any video-editing tools and virtual props
when creating the video. However, the use of Computer Generated
Images (CGI) is NOT permitted. The use of virtual props and special
effects should enhance but not dominate the presentation as no
additional marks are awarded for it.
4.9 The recorded video must be submitted in landscape mode.
4.10 Professional assistance is NOT allowed in the creation of the video and
pupils should be the main content contributors of the reviews. Adults may
assist with production and assistance should be limited to verbal
guidance only.
4.11 All reviews upon submission cannot be corrected or edited. Reviews

submitted via schools will be going through district and state or national
level without any editing incurred.
4.12 The organizer reserves the right to print and publish the winning videos of
this competition for educational purposes.
4.13 The organizer will not be liable for any form of claim related to plagiarism
against participants by any relevant party or any kind of effects after the
products have been reviewed by the participants.
4.14 For Section 2 (Q&A session), contestants are to observe the following
rules:
i) Q&A session will be conducted via video tele-conferencing

between the contestant, the panel of judges and the timekeeper.
ii) Each contestant will get their turn for their Q&A session. The
time allocated for the Q&A session is up to 5 minutes.
2
5.0 LANGUAGE AND DEMEANOUR
5.1 It is compulsory to use the English language throughout the video. The
video recording must not have English subtitles.
5.2 Use of vulgar words and gestures are strictly prohibited and videos that
include sensitive issues such as politics or racial will be DISQUALIFIED.
6.0 ADJUDICATION
6.1 A panel of 3 judges will be appointed for all the rounds at all levels. The
competition at the state level will be judged by a panel of 3 judges,
appointed by JPWPL.
6. 2 Marks will be allocated according to the following criteria:
Section 1
i) Content - 35 marks
ii) Language - 35 marks
iii) Overall coordination - 20 marks
iv) Positive values/messages - 10 marks
Section 2
Q&A session - 20 marks
6.3 Penalty: A total of 5 marks will be deducted if:
6.3.1 performance is below or above designated time frame; or
6.3.2 stipulated exclusions under competition guidelines are infringed

(infringement of competition rules).
6.4 Judges will collectively determine the placing by a clear majority vote.
6.5 Individual marks are confidential and will not be disclosed.
6.6 All decisions are final. No appeal is allowed.
3
7.0 PRIZES AND CERTIFICATES

NO. POSITION PRIZE & CERTIFICATES
1 1st place Prize And Certificate Of Achievement
2 2nd place Prize And Certificate Of Achievement
3 3rd place Prize And Certificate Of Achievement
4 4th place Prize And Certificate Of Achievement
5 5th place Prize And Certificate Of Achievement
6 6th place and onwards Certificates Of Participation
7.1 Prizes and certificates of achievement will be awarded to the winners.

Certificates of participation will be awarded to all participants.
8.0 EXCEPTION
All matters not stated in the concept paper or any exclusion to the rules and
all other unexpected matters and issues on interpretation will be decided by
the organising committee of the competition.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
*This concept paper is valid as of 2022 until further notification or revision from the Ministry
of Education and can be used at all levels for competitions organized by the Ministry. The
competition will abide to the above rules ONLY.
*All rights reserved by the Ministry of Education Malaysia. Usage or adaptation by any
entities outside of the ministry requires prior permission.
4
ENGLISH CYBERSPACE
CHALLENGE:
PRODUCT REVIEW
COMPETITION
2022
ADJUDICATION FORMS
5
ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW

COMPETITION CONCEPT PAPER 2022
SCOPE OF ADJUDICATION: A GUIDE
Positive
Overall
Content Language Values/
Coordination
Message
● Original / authentic ● Suitable ● Development & ● Clear

commentary continuity
● Independent and
genuine review ● Overall ● Editing (transition,
pronunciation flow)
● Able to engage and comprehensible
convince audience ● Clear voice
● Proper enunciation
throughout
● Constructive
● Good fluency ● Creative review
presentation
● Appropriate tone
● Appropriate
language register
● Correct grammar
usage
6
ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

CATEGORY
_ LEVEL / YEAR __ _
TIME SHEET
Contestant’s No. Duration of video

(minutes)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Timekeeper's
Name
Signature
Date
7

_ CATEGORY
_LEVEL / YEAR _
SCORE SHEET – SECTION 8
Content Language Overall Positive Penalty

No. Coordination Values / Message Comments (Max. Time Total Placing
(35 marks) (35 marks) (20 marks) (10 marks) 5 marks)
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Judge’s Name: Date :
Signature:
8

_ CATEGORY
_LEVEL / YEAR _
SCORE SHEET – SECTION 9
Response to Understanding
Authenticity Quality of ideas Total
No. question of project Time Remarks
(5 marks) (5 marks) (5 Marks) (5 Marks) (20 marks)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Judge’s Name: Date :
Signature :
9

_ CATEGORY
_LEVEL / YEAR _
FREQUENCY COUNT
JUDGE
PLACING TIME 1 2 3 4 5 RESULT
PARTICIPANT
Position Name Signature

Chief Judge
Judge 2
Judge 3
Judge 4
Judge 5
Date
10

CATEGORY
_LEVEL / YEAR _
RESULT SLIP
TITLE OF
PLACING PARTICIPANT STATE/SCHOOL PRODUCT REVIEW
CHAMPION
SECOND
THIRD
FIRST
CONSOLATION
SECOND
CONSOLATION
Position Name Signature
Chief Judge
Judge 2
Judge 3
Judge 4
Judge 5
Date
11

English Cyberspace Challenge Product Review Competition Concept Paper 2022 - State

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

English Cyberspace Challenge Product Review Competition Concept Paper 2022 - State

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JABATAN PENDIDIKAN WP LABUAN

Product Review is a personal and voluntary feedback from the perspective of a

Product Review Competition provides an opportunity for pupils to describe their

2.1 To increase pupils’ proficiency in English language speaking skills.

2.3 To inculcate pupils’ interest in using English language to present a

3.1 Primary School : Year4 –Year 6 pupils

4.0 RULES AND GUIDELINES

4.1 The competition is divided into two sections, as follows;

● Section 1 : Product Review

4.3 Participants are NOT allowed to review a sponsored product or service.

4.9 The recorded video must be submitted in landscape mode.

4.11 All reviews upon submission cannot be corrected or edited. Reviews

i) Q&A session will be conducted via video tele-conferencing

5.0 LANGUAGE AND DEMEANOUR

6. 2 Marks will be allocated according to the following criteria:

6.3.1 performance is below or above designated time frame; or

6.3.2 stipulated exclusions under competition guidelines are infringed

6.5 Individual marks are confidential and will not be disclosed.

6.6 All decisions are final. No appeal is allowed.

7.0 PRIZES AND CERTIFICATES

7.1 Prizes and certificates of achievement will be awarded to the winners.

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW

SCOPE OF ADJUDICATION: A GUIDE

● Original / authentic ● Suitable ● Development & ● Clear

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

Contestant’s No. Duration of video

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

SCORE SHEET – SECTION 8

Content Language Overall Positive Penalty

Judge’s Name: Date :

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

SCORE SHEET – SECTION 9

Judge’s Name: Date :

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

Position Name Signature

ENGLISH CYBERSPACE CHALLENGE: PRODUCT REVIEW COMPETITION

Position Name Signature

You might also like