CONCRETE ADVICE No.

68

Assessment of in-situ concrete strength

using data obtained from core and
indirect testing - BS EN 13791:2019
Neil Crook, PhD CEng MICE MICT

To assess the in-situ compressive strength of the concrete in situations where a) there is
little or no information available about the concrete used or b) there is doubt about
recently supplied concrete, the taking of cores tends to be the main course of action in the
UK. Unless the testing is carried out correctly, in the correct place, in sufficient numbers
and with the agreement of all parties concerned, it becomes less assured and there is
less confidence that the strengths obtained are a true reflection of either the characteristic
in-situ compressive strength or strength class. It is recommended that this Concrete
Advice is read in conjunction with the relevant Standards.

[3]
application with BS EN 1990 and BS EN
1 Introduction [4]
1992-1-1 . BS EN 13791 is aligned with
[5]
the requirements BS EN 206 .
This guidance considers the assessment
of in-situ concrete compressive strength Assessment of compressive strength
using the revised and recently published class of concrete in case of doubt –
[1]
BS EN 13791:2019 Assessment of Clause 9
compressive strength in structures and For use where there is doubt over the
precast concrete components based compressive strength of recently supplied
primarily on core compressive strength concrete resulting from identity testing or
data. If required, Rebound number and problems suspected in the execution of the
Ultra-sonic Pulse Velocity can be used works.
when correlated with core or test
specimens. The procedures referenced in Whilst the physical process of taking cores
[1]
BS EN 13791 are given in BS EN 12504 and determining of the in-situ compressive
[2]
Testing concrete in structures Parts 1, 2, strength is the same as Clause 8
and 4. The guidance below relates mainly procedures, the number of samples
to cores but also notes the use of indirect required is dependent on the assessment
testing. type and the volume of concrete involved.
Also the two assessments use different
[1]
BS EN 13791 covers two situations for design principles and analysis and should
the assessment of in-situ compressive be treated separately as there will be
strength: significantly different outcomes depending
on the method used.
Estimation of compressive strength for
structural assessment of an existing
structure – Clause 8
2 Publications
For use where there is none or very little
information about the concrete used in the
structure or where the supplier has Previously, the procedures for taking and
declared a non-conformity and cannot testing cores and assessing the in-situ
provide data to support an acceptable compressive strength of concrete has
[6]
estimated characteristic in-situ been based on BS 1881-120: 1983 , BS
[7]
compressive strength. The estimation of 6089: 1981 and Concrete Society
[8]
characteristic in-situ compressive strength Technical Report TR 11 (1987) . These
[1]
is the primary focus of BS EN 13791 for have all been withdrawn.

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 2 of 9
More recently the assessment has been based on
[9]
BS EN 13791:2007 complimented by the UK
[10]
guidance document BS 6089:2010 together with
(11)
BS EN 12504-1:2009 . All three documents have
been extensively reviewed to ensure the
procedures and test methods used provide a sound
and reliable method for assessing in-situ
compressive strength. This work resulted in the
[1]
publication of a totally revised BS EN 13791:2019
with a National Forward and a National Annex
which coexists with the revised BS EN 12504-
[2]
1:2019 test method for taking and testing of core
samples including its own National Annex.
[10]
Previous versions, together with BS 6089: 2010 ,
the main contents of which have included in the
[1]
revised BS EN 13791 , have been withdrawn. It is
anticipated that a new guidance document PD
[12]
CEN/TR 17086 will be published later in 2020.
The other test methods associated with in-situ
compressive strength assessment i.e. BS EN
12504-2: Non-destructive testing. Determination of
[2]
rebound number and BS EN 12504-4:
(2)
Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity , are
currently under review but significant changes to
the procedures are not anticipated.
3 Cylinder/cube & core relationship
There is no unique relationship between the core
strength and the strength of either cylinder or cube
test specimens from the same concrete. The
relationship is a function of many individual and
connected variables.
The in-situ compressive strength, as measured by a
core, will in most cases be lower than the
compressive strength obtained from standard cast
cylinder/cube specimens taken from the same
concrete. In-situ compressive strengths obtained
are a function of both the concrete supplied and the
workmanship employed in its placing, compaction
and curing.
4 Test methods
There are major changes to the procedures for
taking and testing of cored specimens in BS EN
[2]
12504-1 to ensure the strengths obtained align
[1]
with the principles used in BS EN 13791 . These
changes are as follows:
Cores are to be at least 75mm diameter (in UK
100mm is the normal diameter) except where not
practical and then not less than 50mm. The
diameter must also be at least 3.5 times the
maximum aggregate size.
--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit
CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68
As soon as the cored sample has been extracted it
needs to be enclosed in a sealed container to
prevent any exchange of moisture between the
specimen and the environment until it is prepared
and tested. This is to ensure the concrete remains
in the same state as it exists in the structure.
The specimen tested should not contain;
1. concrete from within 30mm of any surface.
2. concrete from within the top 50mm or 20%
(whichever is greater) of the lift in sections
where height or depth of the element is not more
than 1.5m.
3. concrete from the top 300mm of the lift where
the height or depth is 1.5m or more.
It is assumed that point 1 refers to a formed surface
and 2 and 3 to unformed surfaces. It may be
difficult to remove 30 or 50mm from the specimen
in the case of thin sections e.g. composite decks.
End preparation by grinding is considered to be the
reference method but other methods are detailed in
the standard.
[13]
Density by immersion, BS EN 12390-7 , and the
measurement of excessive voidage should be
determined and recorded as it gives an indication of
the compaction of the concrete.
The water used in the extraction of the core, density
measurement and end preparation is not
considered to impart a material change of overall
moisture condition of the specimen.
There is no adjustment to the compressive
strength recorded for the moisture condition or
direction of drilling of the specimen.
Depending on the type of assessment being carried
out the specimen needs to be within specific size
limits after preparation. These are:
For a 1:1 specimen the length to diameter ratio is to
be within 0.90:1 and 1.10:1;
For a 2:1 specimen the length to diameter ratio is to
be within 1.95:1 and 2.05:1.
Undersize specimens should be rejected and
oversize specimens trimmed to meet the limits.
There is no adjustment to the compressive
strength recorded where the specimen is within
these limits.
Generally, but not exclusively, 1:1 cores of 100mm
diameter should be used in cases of doubt over the
compressive strength of the concrete supplied as
the specimen length/diameter ratio should be the
same as that used by the supplier for their
production control.
Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 3 of 9
Estimation of characteristic in-situ compressive
strength is based on a 2:1 core, as cylinder strength
is used in structural design.
A 1:1 core can be converted to an equivalent 2:1
core by applying the core length factor (CLF) of
0.82 (0.91 in the case of lightweight concrete).
Cores having a diameter of 50mm should have a
1:1 ratio and because these size cores have a
higher variability than larger cores, 3 times the
number is required to achieve a test result at a
single test location.
Reinforcement should be avoided if at all possible.
If this is not possible any reinforcement must be
predominantly horizontal and not more than 2% of
the volume of the specimen. In the case of 2:1
specimens there is an additional requirement that
reinforcement must be contained within 30mm of
the ends of the specimen tested. If these
requirements are not achievable the specimen is to
be rejected.
There is no adjustment to the compressive
strength recorded if the reinforcement in the
specimen is within the above limits.
Whilst there is an accepted relationship between
excess voidage and strength reduction, it is not
used to adjust the core compressive strength.
However, high voidage and/or low density values
may indicate problems during the execution of the
works which have adversely affected the
compressive strength obtained.
The determination of the Rebound number at a
particular location is the median (whole number) of
at least 9 readings. This is calibrated against
concrete of known strength or is used on its own for
comparative testing in case of doubt. For UPV the
value is the reading taken at a location based on
the path length and pulse time; there is no universal
correlation between UPV and strength. This has to
be obtained for the specific concrete used. For an
unknown concrete the estimation of characteristic
in-situ compressive strength on the basis of pulse
velocity alone is not considered to be reliable.
5 Assessment of in-situ compressive strength
Assessment of results within a test region
– Clause 7
The compressive strength results need to be
visually assessed, e.g. using graphs to determine if
there is evidence that the test region contains
concrete of two or more concretes.
Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit
CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68
The data should also be checked for statistical
outliers from the specimens as tested i.e. before the
core length factor (CLF) is applied, if appropriate.
The Grubb test cited in the Standard is one method
to determine if a high or low test result is an outlier.
A minimum of 4 test results is required to carry out
this check. It is firstly applied to the result which
deviates most from the mean of all the results.
Highest value considered an outlier if:
(fc, is, highest – fc, m(n)is) / s >Gp Eq. 1
Lowest value considered an outlier if:
(fc, m(n)is – fc, is, lowest) / s >Gp Eq. 2
Critical values (Gp) are from BS EN 13791 Table 5.
It can be applied twice but if there are more than 2
outliers it may indicate that the region may contain
two or more concrete’s of different compressive
strength. The exclusion or inclusion of the identified
outliers is a matter of engineering judgement.
A set of indirect test results may also contain
outliers, which may indicate a need for further
investigation at this test location e.g. a core test.
--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Structural assessment of an existing structure
– Clause 8
The number of test results required depends on the
volume of concrete under consideration (undefined)
and the type(s) of element(s) involved. As it is an
unknown structure, it is possible that columns and
floor slabs could have different specified
compressive strengths and should be therefore be
treated as different test regions. This is matter of
engineering judgement but sufficient numbers
should be taken to ensure there is confidence in the
compressive strength(s) obtained and is
representative of the region tested.
The estimation of characteristic in-situ compressive
strength is based on a minimum of 8 valid results
but to allow for possible outliers at least 10 core
samples should be taken from a single test region.
However, for a small region consisting of 1 to 3
elements and a total volume not greater than 10m³,
the in-situ characteristic compressive strength is the
lowest compressive strength from 3 cores.
Note: all strengths are expressed as the equivalent
of a 2:1 core. If the test result has been determined
using a 1:1 core the value should be multiplied by
the core length factor (CLF) of 0.82 for normal and
heavyweight concrete or 0.91 for lightweight
concrete.
Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 4 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

The characteristic in-situ compressive strength is Assessment of compressive strength class in

the lower value of:
fck,is = fc,m(n)is) - kn.s Eq. 3
or
fck,is = fc,is,lowest) + M Eq. 4
Where;
fck,is characteristic in-situ compressive
strength expressed as the strength of a
2:1 core
fc,m(n)is mean in-situ compressive of n results
expressed as the strength of a 2:1 core
kn characteristic fractile factor (BS EN
13791 Table 6)
s standard deviation - the higher of the
calculated standard deviation of the data
or a value which provides a coefficient of
variation of 8% i.e. 0.08 x fc,m(n)is
fc,is,lowest lowest in-situ compressive strength of n
test results expressed as the strength of
a 2:1 core
M number from 1 to 4 based on the value
of fc,is,lowest (BS EN 13791 Table 7)
Procedures are also given for the determination of
characteristic in-situ compressive strength based
on indirect testing calibrated against cores taken
from the structure under investigation. Where the
test region is not greater than 30m³, indirect testing
without calibration can be used with at least 3 valid
core test results to estimate the in-situ compressive
strength.
case of doubt – Clause 9
Before embarking on a regime of in-situ
compressive strength determination where there is
doubt over the strength of the concrete supplied, it
is important that all interested parties are involved
in the decisions concerning required procedures,
who is to carry out the testing, and how the results
are analysed.
The main source of doubt normally arises from the
inability to confirm adequate compressive strength
of samples taken for identity testing, see Concrete
[14]
Advice 30 , either by insufficient number of test
results or compressive strengths not achieving the
required criteria as given in Annex B of BS EN 206.
In case of doubt, core testing shall not be
undertaken on cores with a maturity less than that
used as the basis for conformity testing, e.g. 28
days at 20°C.
The concrete under investigation is split into test
regions not exceeding more than approximately
180m³ and then sub-divided into volumes of
approximately 30m³. These might align with the
volumes used for identity testing. Where the total
volume in the test region does not exceed
approximately 30m³, and was placed on a single
day and there is no suggestion that any of the loads
were different from each other, it can be treated as
a single volume. The assumption is that the
compressive strength of the supplied concrete does
not vary significantly and the variation in test results
is due to location within the element and test
variability.
The minimum number of valid test results for each
test location and the criteria to confirm conformity of
compressive strength for the test region under
investigation is given in BS EN 13791 Table 8 as
reproduced in Table 1 below.

Table 1 – Criteria for assessment based on core test data – fc,1.1core (after BS EN 13791 Table 8)
Number of Mean of 1:1 core test
3 Minimum number Lowest 1:1 core test
approximate 30m results for the test
of valid test results result[a]
volumes in test region region
1[b] 3
2 4 ≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube + 1)
3 6
≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube - M
4 8
5 10 ≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube + 2)
6 12
[a]
where M = 4MPa for compressive strength class C20/25 or higher.
For C16/20, C12/15 and C8/10 the margin M is reduced to 3, 2, and 1 respectively.
[b]
provided it is treated as a single volume.

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 5 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

The core compressive strength should be based on

a 1:1 length to diameter ratio and within the limits 6 Example 1: Estimation of in-situ
given above to reflect production control based on characteristic compressive strength of a
cubes as used in the UK. test region within an existing (old) structure
– Clause 8
To allow for possible outliers it is recommended
that the number of specimens taken is at least 1 The following 3 examples assume that the cores
more than the minimum indicated for a single have been taken, prepared and examined in
volume of 30m³, increasing to 2 more than the accordance with BS EN 12504-1.
minimum number for volumes greater than 30m³.
Table 2 below shows a set of core compressive
If both the criteria are satisfied, the conformity of strengths with length:diameter ratio of 1:1, fc,1:1core
compressive strength may be accepted for the test
taken from a defined test region.
region under investigation.
The compressive strength is expressed in terms of
With indirect testing plus selected core test data,
the strength of an equivalent 2:1 core fc,is after
the test region and test locations are split as with
core testing only i.e. maximum of 180m³ and split applying the CLF of 0.82 i.e. relating to a cylinder.
into 30m³ volumes. The minimum number of test
locations for indirect test measurements and valid There is no adjustment for shape and any
core results for the test region is given in Tables 9 reinforcement present is less than 2% of the
[1]
and 10 of BS EN 13791 . If both the criteria are volume of the core.
satisfied, the conformity of compressive strength
may be accepted for the region under investigation. • Minimum valid core test
results required …………..……. 8
The NA to BS EN 13791 provides guidance on
[1] • Core diameter ………………….. 100mm
comparative testing using indirect testing on its own
where recently supplied concrete under
investigation is used in one or more of a series of Table 2: Strength of cores taken from an
elements where other elements have been unknown (old) structure
accepted as having been made with conforming 1:1 l/d ratio
fc,1:1 core fc,is
concrete (the reference concrete). A minimum of 20 Core l/d limit
MPa MPa
indirect readings are taken from the concrete under 0.90 to 1.10
investigation and 20 from the reference concrete. 1 0.99 ok 54.8 44.9
The mean and standard deviation of each set of 2 1.03 ok 29.1 25.3
data is compared and if the calculated numerical
3 1.00 ok 51.7 42.4
value is within set limits, the concrete under
investigation and the reference concrete are very 4 1.02 ok 44.5 38.0
likely to be of the same strength class. 5 1.06 ok 43.2 35.4
6 0.99 ok 54.8 44.9
Potential strength
[8]
Potential strength, promulgated in TR11 and BS 7 0.99 ok 49.3 42.5
[10]
6089 , should not to be confused with the in-situ 8 1.01 ok 43.3 35.5
compressive strength related to assessments of 9 0.85 fail Core rejected
unknown structures or in cases of doubt. 10 1.04 ok 49.6 40.7
Potential strength forms the basis for discussion 11 1.02 ok 48.3 39.6
between the supplier and constructor when lower 12 1.02 ok 48.4 43.3
than expected compressive strengths are obtained 13 1.01 ok 49.9 40.9
possibly from excessive voidage and lower than
14 1.03 ok 53.0 43.5
expected densities. Potential strength will also be
dependent on many other factors i.e. curing, 15 1.06 ok 50.3 41.3
compressive strength gain, which have been based
on concrete containing CEM I some 35 years ago.
For this reason acceptance of potential strength in Core 9 is rejected from the data set as it is outside
dispute resolutions can be problematical. the shape limits and cannot be adjusted to fit with
the limits.

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 6 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

Before converting the strengths to fc,is the data is Characteristic in-situ compressive strength
checked for outliers (Table 3) using the strengths (cylinder) for the test region fck,is is the lower
from the 1:1 specimens (fc,1:1core) as tested. calculated value i.e. 35.2MPa.

Table 3: Check for outliers

7 Example 2: Assessment of the in-situ
Check for outliers - fc,1:1 core
compressive of concrete in case of doubt
st nd
1 2 – Clause 9
Mean value 47.9 49.3
Standard deviation – s 6.55 3.86
Table 5 shows a set of core compressive strength
Lowest 29.1 43.2 results with length diameter ratio 1:1.
Highest 54.8 54.8
• Supplier’s production control sample size based
Difference to mean, low 18.8 6.1 on 100mm cubes.
• Reinforcement present in some samples.
Difference to mean, high 6.9 5.5
• Minimum number of valid core test results
Check low result as greater required (Table 1)……………..… 6
2.867 1.588
difference – Eq [2] • Specified strength class ……….. C32/40
n results 14 13 • Test region - volume in doubt …. 80m³
• Number of 30m³ volumes ……… between 2 & 3
Gp (from BS EN 13791
2.755 2.699
Table 5 for n results)
Core 6 is rejected from the data set as the volume
Outlier No of reinforcement in the core exceeds 2%.
Check if lo result is < or > Gp
Core 2 outlier
No adjustment to core strength due to shape or
presence of reinforcement after removal of core 6.
One possible outlier has been found. This would
need to be considered before excluding the result All cores within defined l/d ratio.
from the data set. In this case the result from core 2
has been removed.
Table 5: Strength of cores taken from a test
The estimation of characteristic in-situ compressive region where doubt exists about the strength of
strength based on a 2:1 ratio (cylinder) is given in the concrete conforming to the specified
Table 4. strength class
1:1 l/d ratio Reinfo-
Core l/d limit
f
rcement c,1:1 core
Table 4: Calculation for characteristic in-situ MPa
0.90 to 1.10 %
compressive strength - fck,is
1 0.90 ok 0 38.3
Calculation for characteristic compressive
strength based on 2:1 ratio - fc,is 2 1.04 ok 0 31.2
3 1.06 ok 0.6 40.2
Mean (fc,m(n)is) 41.0
4 1.00 ok 0.1 34.5
Lowest (fc,is,lowest) 35.4
5 0.97 ok 0 36.8
--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Standard deviation (s1) 3.14

Standard deviation (s2) 0.08 x mean 6 0.98 ok 2.1 Reject
based on 8% CoV = 3.28 7 1.01 ok 0 31.1
s1 < s2, s taken as 3.28 8 1.05 ok 0 40.9
kn (from BS EN 13791 9 1.02 ok 0.2 39.6
1.85
Table 6 for n=13) 10 1.00 ok 0 46.2
M (from BS EN 13791
4
Table 7 fc,is,lowest > 20)
41.0 - (1.85*3.28) The data is checked for outliers (Table 6) using the
fck,is = fc,m(n)is -(kn.s) Eq [3] = 35.2MPa strengths from the 1:1 specimens (fc,1:1core) as
35.4 + 4 tested.
fck,is = fc,is,lowest + M Eq [4] = 39.4MPa

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 7 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

Table 6 – Check for outliers • Minimum number of valid core test results
Check for outliers - fc,1:1 core required (Table 1) ……………… 10
st • Specified strength class ………. C50/60
1
• Test region - volume in doubt .… 130m³
Mean value 37.6
• Number of 30m³ volumes ……… between 4 & 5
Standard deviation 4.87
Lowest 31.1 Table 8: Strength of cores taken from a test
Highest 46.2 region where doubt exists about the strength of
Difference to mean, low 6.5 the concrete conforming to the specified
Difference to mean, high 8.6 strength class
Check high result as greater 1:1 shape limit fc,1:1 core
1.758 Core l/d
difference – Eq [1] 0.90 – 1.10 MPa
n results 9 1 0.92 ok 55.8
Gp (from BS EN 13791 Table 5 2 0.99 ok 45.3
2.387
for n results)
3 1.02 ok 69.5
Check if high result is < or > Gp No outlier
4 1.05 ok 44.5
No outliers found. 5 1.00 ok 43.9
6 0.99 ok 48.2
The calculation for checking conformity with 7 0.98 ok 49.3
specified strength class is given in Table 7.
8 1.00 ok 43.7
9 1.03 ok 50.1
Table 7 – Calculation for checking conformity 10 1.06 ok 52.1
with specified strength class
11 1.01 ok 47.6
Calculation for conformity
12 1.00 ok 49.0
C32/40 strength class
13 0.98 ok 53.2
Volume in test region under investigation - 80m³
i.e. 2 to 3 volumes of 30m³ 14 1.00 ok 50.0
Mean based
37.6 No adjustment to core strength due to shape.
on 1:1 cores
Lowest based
31.1 The data is checked for outliers using the strengths
on 1:1 cores
from the 1:1 specimens (fc,1:1 core) as tested.
fck,spec,cube 40
M (from BS EN Table 9 – Check for outliers
13791 Table 8, Check for outliers fc,1:1 core
4
strength class > st nd
C20/25) 1 2
From Table 1 mean ≥ 0.85 x 37.6 ≥ 34.8 Mean value 50.2 48.7
for C32/40 (fck,spec,cube + 1) pass Standard deviation 6.61 3.71
lowest ≥ 0.85 x 31.1 ≥ 30.6 Lowest 43.7 43.7
(fck,spec,cube - M) pass
Highest 69.5 55.8
Conformity of compressive strength class C32/40 Difference to mean, low 6.5 5.0
can be confirmed for the test region assessed. Difference to mean, high 19.3 7.1
Check high result as
2.926 1.923
greater difference – Eq [1]
8 Example 3: Assessment of the in-situ n results 14 13
compressive of concrete in case of doubt Gp (from BS EN 13791
– Clause 9 2.755 2.699
Table 5 for n results)
Check if high result Outlier
No outlier
Table 8 shows a set of core compressive strength is < or > Gp core 3
results with length diameter ratio 1:1.
One possible outlier has been found. This would
• Supplier’s production control sample size based need to be considered before excluding the result
on 100mm cubes. from the data set. In this case the result from core 3
• No reinforcement present in samples. has been removed.

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 8 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

The calculation for checking conformity with

specified strength class is given in Table 10.

Table 10 – Calculation for checking conformity with specified strength class

Calculation for conformity, C50/60 strength class
Volume in test region under investigation - 130m³ i.e. 4 to 5 volumes of 30m³
Mean based on 1:1 cores 48.7
Lowest based on 1:1 cores 43.7
fck,spec,cube 60
M (from BS EN 13791 Table 8,
4
strength class > C20/25)
From Table 1 for C50/60 mean ≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube + 2) 48.7 ≤ 52.7 fail
lowest ≥ 0.85 ( fck,spec,cube - M) 43.7 ≤ 49.3 fail

Conformity of compressive strength class C50/60 cannot be confirmed for the test region under investigation

Check against a lower strength class C45/55

fck,spec,cube 55
M (from BS EN 13791 Table 8,
4
Strength class > C20/25)
From Table 1 for C45/55 mean ≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube + 2) 48.7 ≥ 48.4 pass
lowest ≥ 0.85 (fck,spec,cube - M) 43.7 ≥ 43.3 pass

Conformity of compressive strength class C45/55 can be confirmed for the test region under investigation.

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT
 Page 9 of 9 CONCRETE ADVICE NO. 68

References
1. BSI. BS EN 13791: 2019, Assessment of compressive strength in structures and precast concrete
component, BSI, London
2. BSI. BS EN 12504. Testing concrete in structures. BSI, London
Part 1 Cored specimens - taking, examining and testing in compression (2019)
Part 2 Non-destructive testing. Determination of rebound number (2012).
Part 4 Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity (2004).
3. BSI, BS EN 1990:2002, Eurocode – Basis of structural design, BSI, London
4. BSI. BS EN 1992-1-1:2004, Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules
and rules for buildings, BSI, London
5. BSI.BS EN 206:2013+A1:2016. Concrete. Specification, performance, production and conformity,
BSI, London
6. BSI. BS 1881-120. Testing concrete. Method for determination of the compressive strength of
concrete cores, BSI, London, 1983
7. BSI. BS 6089:1981 Guide to assessment of concrete strength in existing structures, BSI, London
8. THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Concrete core testing for strength, Technical Report 11, The Concrete

--`,,````,`,```,`,,,```,`,``,``,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Society, Camberley, 1987
9. BSI. BS EN 13791:2007, Assessment of compressive strength in structures and precast concrete
component, BSI, London
10. BSI. BS 6089:2010, Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete
components – complementary guidance to BS EN 13791, BSI, London
11. BSI. BS EN 12504-1:2009 Testing concrete in structures. Part 1 Cored specimens - taking,
examining and testing in compression BSI, London
12. BSI, PD CEN/TR 17086:2020 Further guidance on the application of EN 13791:2019 and
background to the provisions, BSI, London (under preparation)
13. BSI. BS EN 12390-7: 2019. Testing hardened concrete. Density of hardened concrete, BSI, London
14. The Concrete Society. Identity testing for strength in accordance with BS EN 206 & BS 8500-1,
Concrete Advice 30, The Concrete Society, Camberley, 2016

Further reading
BSI. BS 8500-1: 2015 + A1: 2016, Concrete – Complementary British Standard to BS EN 206, BSI, London

Impartial advice can be sought from The Concrete Society. Members are entitled Contacts
to substantial discounts on services and products including site visits and
investigations, dependent on status. For publications and information, The The Concrete Society 01276 607140
Concrete Society Bookshop holds a wide range of books and pamphlets along Bookshop 07004 607777
with an extensive library stock. We provide many services such as literature www.concrete.org.uk
searches and notification of new references to our extensive catalogue www.concretebookshop.com

Issued Feb 2020

CONCRETE Advice Sheets are produced and published by The Concrete Society. The information and advice
contained in the Advice Sheets is based on the experience and knowledge of the Concrete Society’s
Technical Staff. Although The Society does its best to ensure that any advice, recommendation or information
it gives is accurate, no liability or responsibility of any kind (including liability for negligence), howsoever and
from whatsoever cause arising is accepted in this respect by The Concrete Society, its servants or agents.
Readers should also note that all Concrete Society publications are subject to revision from time to time and
should therefore ensure that they are in possession of the latest version

Copyright CS
Provided by IHS Markit under license with Concrete Society - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=Ove Arup and Partners/5969159008, User=Tai, Andrew
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Markit Not for Resale, 05/16/2022 19:30:48 MDT