Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

NSTEMI/UA(first line) Drugs IV (DIA)MORPHINE 2.

5-10 mg IV + IV METOCLOPRAMIDE 10 mg, if pain severe Note: though there is some evidence that opiates can cause harm in ACS [Ref] PO ASPIRIN 300 mg stat, then 75 mg od PO CLOPIDOGREL 300 mg stat, then 75 mg of for 1 year (use only CLOPIDOGREL if ASPIRIN allergy) Note: give higher dosages even if on one/both drugs already SC ENOXAPARIN 1 mg/kg bd Note: some junior doctors wait for a registrar review, if it can be quick (eg do you want to give 3 anticoagulant drugs, in a frail older patient, if this is NOT an ACS?); don't give ENOXAPARIN, if on WARFARIN SL GTN 1-2 tabs; consider IV GTN infusion 10-200 mcg/min (start high, if systolic BP >100 mmHg) if pain does not improve/recurrent IV line (cardiac arrest possible at any time, especially in 1st 24h) OXYGEN, high flow, if hypoxic [Ref] Treatment - STEMI (first line) Drugs IV (DIA)MORPHINE 2.5-10 mg IV + IV METOCLOPRAMIDE 10 mg, if pain severe Note: though there is some evidence that opiates can cause harm in ACS [Ref] PO ASPIRIN 300 mg stat, then 75 mg od PO CLOPIDOGREL 600 mg stat, then 75 mg of for 1 year (use only CLOPIDOGREL if ASPIRIN allergy) Note: give higher dosages even if on one/both drugs already Either, IV ALTEPLASE (rt-pA) 10-15 mg (see BNF) or TENECTEPLASE 30-50 mg over 10 secs, if indication below; if <12h; f no contraindication (also below) and unless having PCI Note: thrombolysis reduces mortality by 2-3%; rt-PA has greater risk of CVA (mainly haemorrhagic) to streptokinase but lower risk of major bleed and reinfarction Or, Primary percutaneous intervention (PCI); if local policy, and <12h SL GTN 1-2 tabs; consider IV GTN infusion 10-200 mcg/min (start high, if systolic BP >100 mmHg) if pain does not improve/recurrent IV (cardiac arrest possible at any time, esp in 1st 24h) OXYGEN, high flow, if hypoxic: [Ref] Benefit of thrombolysis and PCI Most benefit of thrombolysis occurs in first 6h. In one meta-analysis of the 9 randomised trials with more than 1000 patients, there was a 3.5% reduction in mortality in first 1 hr, 2.5% in next 2-3 hrs and 1.9% in 3-6 hrs This gives an NNT of 15 in first hr; and 27 in next 2-3 hrs: [Ref] .

The advantage of PCI over thromolysis is unclear. There is some evidence that pre-hospital thrombolysis has the most effect on mortality. PCI may be 'better' unless thrombolysis can be done in first 3 hrs So, why does neither technique have a huge effect on mortality? Perhaps because in 2/3rds of cases, there is spontaneous thrombolysis of the clot. Also the 'before hospital' mortality is high (50%) and some in-hospital ones (eg bad LVF) have a poor prognosis. Ie, the 'good ones' get better and the 'bad ones' die whatever you do Prescribing issues Round up dose of ENOXAPARIN (calculated in mg/kg) to available dose (20, 40, 60, 80 + 100 mg) Thrombolysis: indications, contraindications Indications 1. ST elevation >1mm in 2 or more limb leads 2. >2mm in 2 or more consecutive chest leads 3. New LBBB 4. Posterior infarction Contraindications 1. Cardiac Suspected aortic dissection Prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (>5 mins) 2. Neurological Previous stroke Known intracranial neoplasm Recent head trauma Other intracranial pathology Severe hypertension (BP>180/110mmHg) 3. Gastro/surgery Acute peptic ulcer Acute internal bleeding Recent (less than 1 month) internal bleeding Recent (less than 1 month) major surgery 4. Haematological Known bleeding diasthesis 5. Other: Advanced CRF/CLF; current use of anticoagulants? Key management decision (STEMI) PCI or Thrombolysis Admit? Always Bed plan CCU, or straight to cardiac catheter laboratory Referrals

Medical Cardiology Other Cardiac rehabilitation nurse

You might also like