Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bda Hewlett
Bda Hewlett
Bda Hewlett
I. Scenario
II. AIHA & UK/ILO Control Banding Models
III. Intro to Bayesian Decision Analysis
IV. Incorporating Professional Judgment
V. Incorporating Exposure Modeling
VI. Feedback
0 X0.95 < 1%
High
1 1% > X0.95 < 10%
2 10% > X0.95 < 50% Medium
3 50% > X0.95 < 100%
4 X0.95 > 100% Low
* Adapted from Tables 5.2 and 6.2; rating 0 taken from 1991 version
Copyright 2006 Exposure Assessment Solutions, Inc. 12
Copyright 2006 Exposure Assessment Solutions, Inc. 13
Example Control Category Follow-up
(Exposure Control Banding)
Exposure Control Recommended Control
Category**
0 (<1% of OEL) No action
5
4
3
GSD
2
0 1 2 3 4
1
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
GM
Copyright 2006 Exposure Assessment Solutions, Inc. 15
UK and ILO “Control Banding”:
Hazard group vs. target exposure range
Target airborne concentration
Hazard Group range
(w/ examples)
Particulate Vapors
5
4
3
GSD
2 D C B A NR
1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1,000
GM
Correction Factor
Copyright 2006 Exposure Assessment Solutions, Inc. 21
Modified Bayes’ Equation
Decision Probability
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.17 0.17
0.4
0.03 0.03
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4
Exposure Rating
Quantity – ml, L, m3
Vaporization potential – lo, med, hi
Copyright 2006 Exposure Assessment Solutions, Inc. 31
A typical “Control Banding” Posterior
Decision Chart ? ? ? ?
Decision Probability 1.000
0.996Prior
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.000
0.001 0.000
0.001 0.000
0.001 0.000
0.001
0.2
0
D C B A NR
Exposure Rating