Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interference in Mobile Networks
Interference in Mobile Networks
NETWORKS
INTERFERENCE IN MOBILE
NETWORKS
Contents
Introduction...............................................................................................................................................2
Co-channel interference.............................................................................................................................3
Out-of-Band Emitters.........................................................................................................................3
Desensitization...........................................................................................................................3
In-Band Emitters.................................................................................................................................4
Adjacent-channel interference...................................................................................................................6
Types of ACI........................................................................................................................................6
Imperfect Filtering......................................................................................................................6
References:.................................................................................................................................................8
Interference in mobile networks
Introduction
Interference results from a variety of sources, usually other transmitters in the area,
both licensed and unlicensed. Whether licensed or unlicensed, sources of
interference cause the same results—impaired system performance. The only
difference is that there are more potential uncontrolled sources of interference in
the unlicensed bands.
Interference in mobile networks
Co-channel interference
Out-of-Band Emitters
Even though the affected system is designed to reject signals outside its assigned
band, there are effects caused by out-of-band emitters which can impact the in-band
performance.
Desensitization
This interference mechanism is called the “rusty fence” syndrome. If two high-
powered transmitted signals, f1 and f2 , impinge on some random rusty element
such as a steel fence, a rusty metal roof, or even corroded coaxial cable elements, an
electric effect sometimes takes place. The corrosion junction acts like a rectifying
diode and mixes all the transmit signals hitting it. This results in a whole list of new
signals, called intermodulation products, which are re-transmitted. These signals are
mathematical combinations of the original transmitted signals, such as (f1 – f2 ), (2f1
– f2 ), (3f1 +2f2 ), etc. While this effect is typically a random problem, there are
certain transmitter frequency assignments which cause the mixed products to fall
right on top of other assigned bands. When the f1 and f2 signals have exact
frequency spacing equal to the affected receiver’s input, it tries to accept these re-
transmitted intermodulation products as its own in-band data.
In-Band Emitters
modulation over a wider band. They operate in the ISM band which is also the home
frequency of the typical microwave oven, for example. Microwave ovens operate at
the 2.4 GHz resonance frequency of the water molecule. Although the spread
spectrum modulation schemes defend against interference from the oven leakage,
the location and power level of the leakage may overcome the interference
resistance.
While modulation designs are supposed to offer some rejection of interference due
to different frequency-hopping parameters or different DSSS code patterns, it is
possible that the interfering signal levels at the affected receiver might still
overwhelm the rejection tolerance of the modulation scheme. It should be noted
that even if the antenna pattern lobes of the affected system are relatively narrow
(high gain), there is still considerable sensitivity to signals that are as much as 20 to
30 degrees off boresight.
There are sidelobe and backlobe characteristics in every antenna. This means that
interfering signals might cause problems if they enter one of the sidelobes or the
backlobe of the affected system. Typical sidelobe and backlobe sensitivity is only 15
– 30 dB down from the main lobe.
Interference in mobile networks
The affected system often operates in signal environments which affect its system
signals. Heavy rainfall attenuates microwave frequencies. Buildings, hills, and other
natural obstructions bend or cause multiple paths to form between transmitter and
receiver. These multiple paths, or multipaths, lead to destructive signal cancellations
and cause random fades in signal strength. Other buildings, might reflect
interference into the side of the affected antenna’s main lobe. Low flying airplanes
can cause a moving reflection which might degrade data randomly.
Cellular systems, with their theoretical hexagonal base station cell pattern spacing,
take advantage of frequency band re-use by assigning the same frequencies to cells
that are spaced just one cell distance away. As such, any given cell antenna that
happens to be misadjusted for tilt can easily overfly the adjacent cell and impinge on
an affected receiver two cells over where the signal frequency assignments are the
same.
Adjacent-channel interference
Two most common causes of interference from adjacent channels are poor
frequency control and inadequate filtering. Poor frequency control occurs when one
or both of the adjacent channels are broadcast with too much or too little power
behind them. Inadequate filtering occurs when the receiving channel does not have
the proper modulation to filter out the interfering signal.
Interference in mobile networks
Proper management of the broadcast spectrum is the preferred way for controlling
adjacent-channel interference.
Types of ACI
Imperfect Filtering
Present customers’ demand is low cost of handset,i.e less cost of filter which results
in more interference. So filtering can’t be much more effective at the MS site. The
alternate way is to use expensive, very well designed filters at the base station. In
fact, the cost of the base station is being shared by so many numbers of users. So,
adjacent channel interference is actually handled more at the base stations rather at
the handsets level. The problem can be severe if the interferer is very close to the
subscriber’s receiver. This is because the mobile unit in close proximity has a strong
signal which causes adjacent channel interference. Thus resulting in crosstalk at the
receiver or if the interference is in control channel, then one of the calls might get
dropped.
Another effect of adjacent channel interference is called the near far effect. What is
the near far effect? Suppose Transmitter A and Transmitter B are operating on
adjacent channels in frequency; when the receiver is far from the desired transmitter
and very close to the undesired transmitter, adjacent channel interference is
exacerbated. When interference is close to the base station, they radiating in the
adjacent channel, while the sub-scriber is actually far away from the base station. It
is to note that the path loss exponent is close to four. The signal strength goes down
very fast to the power of four of the distance. So if the interfering handset is close to
the base station, whereas the subscriber far away from the base station, the signal
will get a lot of interference at the base station. Now let us look at it from an
example. At first put a base station and the subscriber. So the subscriber is mobile
and he is located at a certain distance from the base station. But there are lot of uses
and let us have an interfering handset sitting inside a car which happens to be closer
to the base station. As bad luck would have it, the interferer is radiating in an
adjacent frequency band. So even though the subscriber is trying to communicate
Interference in mobile networks
with the base station, by the time the signal reaches the base station, it is fairly
weak. The path loss exponent is pretty high. So what is being received at the Base
station is a low signal level but still it can be handled. It is within the threshold. On
the other hand, for the interferer which happens to be located much closer to the
base station, it is radiating in the adjacent band and because of the imperfect filters,
a lot of energy is leaking in. But it’s a lot high energy.
References:
https://www.reference.com/technology/adjacent-channel-interference-
53c1e077c3a273d8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-channel_interference
Interference in mobile networks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjacent-channel_interference