CLASSIFICATION OF OBLIGATIONS Atty. Jamie-Lyn D. JamiasOBLIGATIONS WITH A PERIOD Article 193. Obligations for whose fulfillment a day certain has been fixed, shall be demandable only when that day comes. Obligations with resolutory period take effect at once, but terminate upon arrival of the day certain. A day certain is understood to be that which must necessarily come, although it mat not be known when. If the uncertainty consists in whether the day will come or not, the obligation is conditional, and it shall be regulated by the rules of the preceding section * obligation with a period - one whose effects or consequences are subjected in one way or another to the expiration or arrival said period or term. * period - future and certain event upon the arrival of which the obligation is subject to arise or terminate - a day certain which must necessarily comeDistinction between a period and a condition As to fulfillment As to time As to influence on the obligation As to effect when left to debtor’ wi As to retroactivity of effects PERIOD Certain event which must happen sooner or later Future Merely fixes the time for the efficaciousness of the obligation Empower the court to fix the time No retroactive effect except when agreed upon CONDITION Uncertain event Future but may also refer to the past but unknown to the parties Causes an obligation to arise or to cease Invalidates the obligation Has retroactive eventKinds of period or term: 1. According to effect * suspensive - obligation begins upon arrival of the period or term * resolutory - obligation is valid until the arrival of the period or term 2. According to source * legal - provided by law * conventional or voluntary - agreed upon * judicial - fixed by the court 3. According to definiteness * definite - fixed or known when it will come * indefinite - not fixed, not known when it will comeArticle 1195. Anything paid or delivered before the arrival of the period, the obligor being unaware of the period or believing that the obligation has become due and demandable, may be recovered, with the fruits, and interests. - Article applies only to obligations to give - Discusses payment before arrival of the period - Debtor may recover with fruits and interests - based on principle of unjust enrichment - Debtor is presumed to know the period - burden to prove that he was unaware - If debtor was fully aware and still decided to comply with his obligation, he is deemed to have waived the period Example: Emer borrowed P10,000 from Ronan and promised to pay by 31 December 2020. - If Emer paid on December 2019 thinking in good faith that it was already due, today, he can recover the amount he paid with interest (12%) - By December 2020, he can only recover the interestArticle 1196. Whenever in an obligation a period is designated, it is presumed to have been established for the benefit of both the creditor and the debtor, unless from the tenor of the same or other circumstances, it should appear that the period has been established in favor of one or of the other. GENERAL RULE: period stipulated is for the benefit of BOTH EXCEPTIONS: agreement or stipulation of the parties - If period was fixed for the benefit of the debtor, he cannot be compelled to pay beforehand - If period was fixed for the benefit of the creditor - he may demand fulfillment before the arrival of the term COMPUTATION OF TERM OR PERIOD - Based on the Administrative Code i. Year - 12 months ii. Month - 30 days; calendar month - according to actual days ina month iii. Day - 24 hours iv. Night - sunset to sunriseArticle 1197. Obligations without a fixed period - discussed in connection with Article 1180. Article 1198. The debtor shall lose every right to make use of the period: (1) When after the obligation has been contracted, he becomes insolvent, unless he gives guaranty or security for his debts; (2) When he does not furnish to the creditor the guaranties or securities which he has promised; (3) When by his own acts he has impaired said guaranties or securities after their establishment, and when through a fortuitous event they disappear, unless he immediately gives new ones equally satisfactory; (4) When the debtor violates any undertaking, in consideration of which the creditor agreed to the period; ‘5) When the debtor attempts to abscond. GENERAL RULE: Obligation is not demandable before the lapse of the period or term mataArticle 1199. ‘A person alternatively bound by different prestations shall completely perform one of them. The creditor cannot be compelled to receive part of one and part of the other undertaking Kinds of period or term: 1. Simple - only 1 prestation 2. Compound - there are 2 or more prestations + Conjunctive - there are several prestations and ALL of them are due * Distributive - there are several prestations and only 2 or more prestations are due i. Alternative - several prestations are due but performance of 1 is enough Example: Christian borrowed P 10,000 from Hillary. it was agreed that Christian can pay in cash, or give gift certificate in the same amount, or grocery items. Facultative - only 1 prestation is due but the debtor may substitute another Example: John borrowed P100,000 from Jalen. If he falled to pay on the due date, John will mortgage his car to Jalen.Article 1200. The right of choice belongs to the debtor, unless it has been expressly granted to the creditor. The debtor shall have no right to choose those prestations which are impossible, unlawful or which could not have been the object of the obligation GENERAL RULE: right to choose prestation belongs to the debtor EXCEPTION: Express grant to the creditor Limitations on the right of debtor to choose the prestation: 1. Prestation should NOT be impossible, unlawful or those that could not have been the object of an obligation; 2. No choice if despite alternative prestations, only one is practicable 3. Debtor cannot partially from each prestation.Article 1201. The choice shall produce no effect except from the time it has been communicated Obligation remains alternative until after a choice have been made and communicated Once communicated, it is irrevocable and can only be changed with the consent of the other party Concurrence of the creditor to the choice made is not required No required form of communication - written or oral Burden of proof rests on the one who made the choiceArticle 1202. The debtor shall lose the right of choice when among the prestations whereby he is alternatively bound, only one is practicable: * Obligation becomes simple Article 1203. If through the creditor's acts, the debtor cannot make a choice according to the terms of the obligation, the latter may rescind the contract with damages * Instance when the debtor has the option to rescind Article 1204, The creditor shall have a right to indemnity for damages when, through the fault of the debtor, all the things which are alternatively the object of the obligation have been lost, or the compliance of the obligation has become impossible. The indemnity shall be fixed taking as basis the value of the last thing which disappeared, or that of the service which last became impossible Damages other than the value of the last thing or service may also be awarded. * In case of disagreement, the creditor has the burden to prove the valueArticle 1205, When the choice has been expressly given to the creditor, the obligation shall cease to be alternative from the day when the selection has been communicated. Until then the responsibility of the debtor shall be governed by the following rules: (1) If one of the things is lost through a fortuitous event, he shall perform the obligation by delivering that which the creditor should choose from among the remainder, or that which remains if only one subsists; (2) If the loss of one of the things occurs through the fault of the debtor, the creditor may claim any of those subsisting, or the price of that which, through the fault of the former, has disappeared, with a right to damages; 3) If all the things are lost through the fault of the debtor, the choice by the creditor shall fall upon the price of any of them, also with indemnity for damages. The same rules shall be applied to obligations to do or not to do in case one, some or all of the prestations should become impossible * Pertains to rules in case of loss when the creditor is given the choice =>Article 1206. When only one prestation has been agreed upon, but the obligor may render another in substitution, the obligation is called facultative The loss or deterioration of the thing intended as substitute, through the negligence of the obligor, does not render him liable. But once the substitution has been made, the obligor is liable for the loss of the substitute on account of his delay, negligence or fraud. Facultative obligation - only one prestation has been agreed upon but the obligor may render another in substitution. Example: | will give you my phone but | may give you my smart watch as a substitute. Effect of loss: (1) Before substitution a. Through fortuitous event - obligation is extinguished b. Debtor is not liable with (damages) or without fault c. Loss will extinguish the facultative character (2) After substitution a. Debtor is not liable for whatever cause because it is no longer due b. Once substitution is made, the obligation becomes simpleJOINT AND SOLIDARY OBLIGATIONS Article 1207. The occurrence of two or more creditors or of two or more debtors in one and the same obligation does not imply that each one of the former has a right to demand, or that each of the latter is bound to render, entire compliance with the prestation. There is a solidary liability only when the obligation expressly state, or when the law or the nature of the obligation requires solidarity. Article 1208. If from the law, or the nature or the wording of the obligations to which the preceding article refers, the contrary does not appear, the credit or debt shall be presumed to be divided into as many as there are creditors or debtors, the credits or debts being considered distinct from one another, subject to the Rules of Court governing the multiplicity of suits. Kinds of obligations according to the number of parties 1. Individual obligation - 1 obligor or 1 obligee 2. Collective obligation - 2 or more debtors and/or 2 or more creditors a. Joint obligation - whole obligation is to be paid or fulfilled by the different debtors and/or is to be demanded proportionately by the different creditorsb. Solidary obligation - each one of the debtors is bound to render and/or each one of the creditors has a right to demand from any of the debtors entire compliance * Collective obligations are presumed to be JOINT + Jointly, proportionately, pro-rata Example: A, B and C borrowed Php 15,000 from D + Presumed JOINT since there is no indication to the contrary + Debts and/or credits are separate and distinct + Each debtor is liable only for proportionate share - Php5,000 each + Solidary obligations arises only when: o The obligation expressly states so o Law requires solidarity o Nature of the obligation requires solidarity o Imposed upon a final judgment + Jointly and/or severally, in solidum, solidaria, individually and/or collectivelyKINDS OF SOLIDARITY =z According to parties bound Passive solidarity - on the part of the debtors; any one can be compelled to comply with the entire obligation - MUTUAL GUARANTY Example: Elle and Yanna are solidary debtors of Mayumi in the amount of P10,000 - Mayumi can demand P10,000 from either Elle or Yanna - The debtor who pays has the right to demand payment from the other debtor Active solidarity - solidarity on the part of the creditors; any one can demand the fulfillment of the entire obligation Example: Mayumi is liable for P10,000 to Elle and Yanna who are solidary creditors - Elle or Yanna can demand from Mayumi na payment of P10,000 - If Elle received payment, he is responsible for giving Yanna’s share Mixed solidarity - solidarity on the part of debtors and creditors where each one of the debtors is liable and each one of creditors has a right to demand compliance or fulfillment of the obligation Example: Michael and Jhun are solidarily liable to Dez and Mina, who are solidary creditors, in the amount of P50,000. - Either Michael or Jhun can pay Dez or Mina - Either Dez or Mina can demand from Michael or JhunKINDS OF SOLIDARITY According to source * Conventional solidarity - solidarity is agreed upon * Legal solidarity - solidarity is imposed by law, i.e. partnership « Real solidarity - solidarity isimposed by the nature of the obligationArticle 1209. If the division is impossible, the right of the creditors may be prejudiced only by their collective acts, and the debt can be enforced only by proceeding against all the debtors. If one of the latter should be insolvent, the others shall not be liable for his share, Joint (in terms of liability) indivisible (in terms of compliance) obligation Example: Regine, Donna and Mikey are jointly liable to deliver sa laptop worth P30,000 to Perlie. On the due date, Regine was not willing to comply. Resort of the creditor is found in Article 1224Article 1209. If the division is impossible, the right of the creditors may be prejudiced only by their collective acts, and the debt can be enforced only by proceeding against all the debtors. If one of the latter should be insolvent, the others shall not be liable for his share, Joint (in terms of liability) indivisible (in terms of compliance) obligation Example: Regine, Donna and Mikey are jointly liable to deliver sa laptop worth P30,000 to Perlie. On the due date, Regine was not willing to comply. Resort of the creditor is found in Article 1224Article 1210. The indivisibility of an obligation does not necessarily give rise to solidarity. Nor does solidarity of itself imply indivisibility. INDIVISIBILITY SOLIDARITY Prestation Juridical or legal tie Only the debtor guilty of All debtors are liable for the breach of any breach is liable one of them Can exist with only 1 debtor There must at least be 2 debtors or 2 and 1 creditor creditors Others will not be liable for the | Debtors are proportionately liable insolvency of 1 debtor Example: Lee and Park are jointly liable to deliver to Suju a car.Article 1211. Solidarity may exist although the creditors and the debtors may not be bound in the same manner and by the same periods and conditions. KINDS OF SOLIDARY OBLIGATIONS ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL TIE: 1. Uniform - same stipulations 2.Non-uniform or varied - not subject to the same stipulations Example: Jennie, Rose, Lisa and Jisoo obliged themselves solidarily to pay RM P10,000 as follows * Jennie to pay by monthly installment of P1,000 starting October 2020 * Rose to pay by monthly installment of P1,000 starting November 2020 * Lisa to pay by monthly installment of P1,000 starting December 2020 * Jisoo to pay when she graduates from college.Article 1212. Each one of the solidary creditors may do whatever may be useful to the others, but not anything which may prejudicial to others. « Based on the “theory of mutual agency” - right of one to act for and in the name of the others elf one of the creditor act prejudicially and results in the extinguishment of the obligation, he shall be liable to the other creditors Article 1213. A solidary creditor cannot assign his rights without the consent of the others. * Trust and confidence « Assignment to a third person - not allowed + Assignment to a co-creditor - allowed Article 1214, The debtor may pay any one of the solidary creditors; but if any demand, judicially or extrajudicially, has been made by one of them, payment should be made to him.Article 1215. Novation, compensation, confusion or remission of the debt, made by any of the solidary creditors or with any of the solidary debtors, shall extinguish the obligation, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 1219. The creditor who may have executed any of these acts, as well as he who collects the debt, shall be liable to the others for the share in the obligation corresponding to them Article 1216. The creditor may proceed against any one of the solidary debtors or some or all of them simultaneously. The demand made against one of them shall not be an obstacle to those which may subsequently be directed against the others, so long as the debt has not been fully collected. « Right of the creditor to proceed against any solidary debtorArticle 1217, Payment made by one of the solidary debtors extinguishes the obligation. If two or more solidary debtors offer to pay, the creditor may choose which offer to accept. He who made the payment may claim from his co-debtors only the share which corresponds to each, with the interest for the payment already made. If the payment is made before the debt is due, no interest for the intervening period may be demanded When one of the solidary debtors cannot, because of his insolvency, reimburse his share to the debtor paying the obligation, his share shall be borne by all his co- debtors, in proportion to the debt of each. * Reimbursement + Interest from the time of paymentArticle 1218. Payment by a solidary debtor shall not entitle him to reimbursement from his co- debtors if such payment is made after the obligation has prescribed or become illegal Prescriptive periods of actions - lapse of time * 10 years from the time the right of action accrues o Written contract o Obligation created by law o Upon a judgment ° 6 years o Oral contract 0 Quasi-contract ° 4 years o Injuries to the rights of the plaintiff © Quasi-delictArticle 1219. The remission made by the creditor of the share which affects one of the solidary debtors does not release the latter from his responsibility towards the co-debtors, in case the debt has been totally paid by anyone of them before the remission was effected * Remission or waiver has no effect if payment was made first Article 1220. The remission of the whole obligation obtained by one of the solidary debtors, does not entitle him to reimbursement from his co-debtors. Article 1221. If the thing has been lost or if the prestation has become impossible without the fault if the solidary debtors, the obligation shall be extinguished. If there was fault on the part of any one of them, all shall be responsible to the creditor, for the price and the payment of damages and interest, without prejudice to their action against the guilty or negligent debtor. If through fortuitous event, the thing is lost or the performance has become impossible after one of the solidary debtors has incurred in delay through judicial or extrajudicial demand upon him by the creditor, the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall applyArticle 1222. A solidary debtor, may, in actions filed by the creditor, avail himself of all defenses which are derived from the nature of the obligation and of those which are personal to him, or pertain to his own share. With respect to those which personally belong to the others, he may avail himself thereof only as regards that part of the debt for which the latter are responsible. Defenses from the nature of obligation i. Payment ii. Fraud iii. Prescription iv. Remission v. Illegality or absence of consideration vi. Res judicata - judged matter vii. Non-performance of suspensive condition Defenses personal to, or which pertain to share of, debtor sued i. Insanity ii. Incapacity iii, Mistake iv. Violence v. Minority Defenses personal to other solidary debtorsDIVISIBLE AND INDIVISIBLE OBLIGATIONS RS Article 1223. The divisibility or indivisibility of the things that are the object of obligations in which there is only one debtor and only one creditor does not alter or modify the provisions of Chapter 2 of this Title Divisible obligation - object is capable of partial performance: Indivisible obligation- object is not capable of partial performance Test for the distinction: intention of the parties - If the object if not physically divisible or the service is not capable of partial performance, it is always indivisible Example: John agreed to pay Krismy P10,000 in 4 equal installment - DIVISIBLE will become INDIVISIBLE if the agreement was for John to pay the full amount at a certain dateDIVISIBLE AND INDIVISIBLE OBLIGATIONS > KINDS OF DIVISION: 1. qualitative division - based on quality 2. quantitative division - based on quantity 3.ideal/intellectual division — exists only in the mind KINDS OF INDIVISIBILITY: l.legal indivisibility - declared by law to be indivisible - divisible by nature 2. conventional indivisibility - will of the parties - divisible by nature 3.natural indivisibility - nature of the object/prestation does not admit divisionArticle 1224. A joint indivisible obligation gives rise to indemnity for damages from the time anyone of the debtors does not comply with his undertaking. The debtors who may have been ready to fulfill their promises shall not contribute to the indemnity beyond the corresponding portion of the price of the thing or of the value of the service which the obligation consists « Non-compliance with a joint indivisible obligation results in an action for damages + Specific performance or rescission is not demandable since there is no cause of action to the other debtorsArticle 1225. For the purposes of the preceding articles, obligations to give definite things and those which are not susceptible of partial performance shall be deemed indivisible When the obligation has for its object the execution of a certain number of days of work, the accomplishment of work by metrical units, or analogous things which by their nature are susceptible of partial performance, it shall be divisible. However, even though the object or service may be physically divisible, an obligation in indivisible if so provided by law or intended by the parties. In obligations not to do, divisibility or indivisibility shall be determined by the character of the prestation in each particular case.- Obligation deemed indivisible: i. To give a definite thing ii. Not susceptible of partial performance - sing a song, tiktok challenges iii. Provided by law - even if the thing is physically divisible - taxes iv. Intended by parties to be indivisible - one time payments - Obligation deemed divisible: i. Execution is for certain number of days ii. Accomplishment by metrical units iii. Susceptible of partial performance by their natureOBLIGATIONS WITH A PENAL CLAUSE a Article 1226. In obligations with a penal clause, the penalty shall substitute the indemnity for damages and the payment of interests in case of non-compliance, if there is no stipulation to the contrary. Nevertheless, damages shall be paid if the obligor refuses to pay the penalty or is guilty of fraud in the fulfillment of the obligation The penalty may be enforced only when it is demandable in accordance with the provisions of this Code. * Principal obligation - can stand by itself; not dependent on another obligation * Accessory obligation - attached to a principal obligation Obligation with a penal clause - contains an accessory undertaking to pay a previously stipulated indemnity in case of breach of the principal prestationOBLIGATIONS WITH A PENAL CLAUSE > Penal clause - accessory undertaking attached to an obligation to assume greater liability in case of breach * To insure performance * To substitute a penalty for the indemnity for damages and payment of interests in case of non-compliance (1) As to origin a. Legal - provided by law b. Conventional - stipulated by the parties (2) As to purpose a. Compensatory - takes the place of damages b. Punitive imposed as punishment for breach (3) As to demandability or effect a. Subsidiary or alternative - only the penalty can be enforced b. Joint or cumulative - both principal obligation and penal clause can be enforcedOBLIGATIONS WITH A PENAL CLAUSE > When can a creditor recover damages in addition to the penalty: - when agreed upon - when debtor refuses to pay the penalty - debtor is guilty of fraud in the fulfillment of the obligation penalty is demandable only when there is a breach of obligation and it is not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policyArticle 1227. The debtor cannot exempt himself from the performance oft he obligation by paying the penalty, save in case where this right has been expressly reserved for him. Neither can the creditor demand the fulfillment of the obligation and the satisfaction of the penalty at the same time, unless this right has been clearly granted him. However, if after the creditor has decided to require the fulfillment of the obligation, the performance thereof should become impossible without his fault, the penalty may be enforced. ¢ Penalty not substitute for performance Article 1228. Proof of actual damages suffered by the creditor is not necessary in order that the penalty may be demanded.Article 1229, The judge shall equitably reduce the penalty when the principal obligation has been partly or irregularly complied with by the debtor Even if there has been no performance, the penalty may also be reduced by the courts if it is iniquitous or unconscionable. When penalty may be reduced by the courts: i. Partial or irregular performance ii. Penalty agreed upon is iniquitous unconscionable Article 1230. The nullity of the penal clause does not carry with it that of the principal obligation The nullity of the principal obligation carries with it that of the penal clause. General principle: Accessory follows the principal - not vice versaEND OF PRESENTATION