Republic of the Philippines

PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS

Institute of Engineering and Technology

REVISION MATRIX
 Redefense

Proposed Title : PERCEPTIONS OF CEBU PACIFIC AIRLINE’S AIRCRAFT MECHANICS,

RELEASERS/INSPECTORS, UNIT CHIEF, AND CABIN ENGINEERS ON THE CONTRIBUTING
FACTORS OF EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION INSIDE AN AEREI DATRASPORTO REGIONALE
CABIN

Name of DE OCAMPO, LATRELL

:
Proponents DICHOSO, JAKE ANDREW
DIMARUCOT, MARK ANTHONY
MANAYSAY, RIKA

Comments, Suggestions and

Action Taken Page Number
Recommendation

Name: Ms. Airine Andal

Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Changing the format of the title 1
page according to the PHILSCA
1. Format of the title page Research Student Handbook

Name: Ms. Airine Andal

Chapter 1: Introduction 2
2. Discussion of the respondent’s
2. Additional information at the perception based on the specific
Introduction part contributing factors

Name: Engr. Augustine Buenaventura

Chapter 1: Introduction

1. Removing SOP 4 due to the lack of 1. SOP 4 is removed already

tests and results 9
2. Following the statistician
2. Reconstruct the SOP 3 suggested SOP revision for SOP
3

Name: Engr. Augustine Buenaventura

Chapter 1: Introduction
1. Reconstruct the Conceptual
Framework
1. Additional variables which are the
demographic profiles and the 14
general and specific contributing
factors to be considered in
innovating cabin interior design
based on impact priority

1
 Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
Institute of Engineering and Technology
Comments, Suggestions and
Recommendation
Name: Ms. Airine Andal
Chapter 2: Materials and Methods
1. Validation of the Instruments are
required
2. Separating Data Analysis and
Statistical Treatment of Data
Name: Engr. Augustine Buenaventura
Chapter 2: Materials and Methods
1. Additional Statistical Treatment of
Data for the SOP 3
Name: Engr. Jayson Baga
Chapter 2: Materials and Methods
1. For the ethical considerations,
request a letter of approval for the
conduction of survey
Name: Engr. Augustine Buenaventura
Chapter 3: Results and Discussion
1. Use bar graph for interpretations
2. Lessen the tables and summarize
the data
Action Taken Page Number
1. Mentioning the validators (Mr. Carl
Michael R. Aguilar, MEAM, Ms.
Maria Jessica F. Martin, MEAM,
and Engr. Realyn M. Labayna) to 21-22
ensure that the instruments and
methods is correct and aligned to
the study.
2. Separation of the Data Analysis
and Statistical Treatment of Data
1. Kruskal-Wallis H-Test (KWHT)
and Mann-Whitney U-Test are the
two statistical treatments used to
test the significant difference on 25-26
respondent’s perception when
grouped according to their
demographic profile which is the
SOP 3
1. Providing the letter signed by Ms.
Princess Araceli Mae Sarapanan 27
for gathering the data of the
respondents in Cebu Pacific
Airline
1. Bar graph interpretations are used
for the frequency and percentage
distribution of the respondent’s
perception 30-50
2. From table 36, it became table 21
already
2
 Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
Institute of Engineering and Technology
Comments, Suggestions and
Recommendation
3. Remove the variance and standard
deviation at the descriptive
statistics
4. Lack of test and results for SOP 3
which is testing the significant
difference on respondent’s
perception when grouped
according to their demographic
profile
Name: Engr. Jayson Baga
Chapter 3: Results and Discussion
1. Additional literatures for
implications and discussion of
results for SOP 3
Name: Engr. Jayson Baga and Engr.
Augustine Buenaventura
Chapter 4: Summary, Conclusions, and
Recommendations
1. Reconstruct the summary,
conclusions, and
recommendations. It should be
separated from each other which
are specific, measurable, and
relevant.
Name: Ms. Airine Andal, Engr. Jayson
Baga and Engr. Augustine
Buenaventura
Appendices
1. Appendices are required
Action Taken Page Number
3. Variance and standard deviation
at the descriptive statistics are
removed already because it is
longer needed for the descriptive
statistics wherein mean rank
results are the only one necessary
for the interpretation 30-50
4. Table 19-21 presents the
summary of test of significant
difference on the following general
contributing factors on ATR
passenger aircraft based on
impact priority according to age,
sex and job position group.
1. Providing literatures for
implications and adding 50-54
discussion of results of the SOP 3
1. Providing specific, measurable
and relevant information for the 55-63
three parts of Chapter 4 which are
the Summary, Conclusions, and
Recommendations
1. Appendix A to Appendix H are 72-129
added in the paper according to
the PHILSCA Research Student
Handbook
3
 Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
Institute of Engineering and Technology

Comments, Suggestions and

Action Taken Page Number
Recommendation

Name: Ms. Airine Andal, Engr. Jayson

Baga and Engr. Augustine
Buenaventura
Chapter 1 to Chapter 4 1. Spacing, numbering of pages, and
arrangement of manuscript is 1-129
1. Format of the Manuscript already fixed.

Approved by : Engr. Franz Yves Eria

Name of Adviser