INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-II
Name of Employee: BOCABO, NORIZA B. Name of Rater:  DE LOYOLA, MELANIE L.

Position:  TEACHER I Position:  MASTER TEACHER II

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PAGSANGHAN NAT'L HIGH SCHOOL – WESTERN SAMAR Date of Review:  AUGUST 12, 2021

Rating Period:  S.Y. 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Timel Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
ine Satisfactory Results
KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 24.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrated Demonstrat
Education Knowledge knowledge of Level 7 in d Level 6 in d Level 5 in Level 4 in ed Level 3
Services and content within Objective 1 as Objective 1 Objective 1 Objective 1 as in Objective
Pedagogy and across shown in COT as shown in as shown in shown in COT 1 as shown
curriculum rating COT rating COT rating rating in COT
teaching areas. sheets/interob sheets/intero sheets/intero sheets/interob rating
server bserver bserver server sheets/inter
agreement agreement agreement agreement observer
forms forms forms forms agreement
forms or No
acceptable
evidence
was shown
Efficiency
 Timeliness

2. Ensured the Quality Ensured that Ensured that Ensured that Ensured that No
positive use of the ICT used the ICT used the ICT used ICT are used acceptable
redefine and augment and modify but do not evidence
ICT to facilitate processes and
the teaching transform enrich create a new was shown
learning learning improve learning
and learning experiences experiences learning experience
process and are and are experiences and/or are
and are
documented documented documented
documented
properly and properly and but not
properly and
consistently consistently consistently consistent with
using any using any using any one referencing
referencing referencing referencing style as shown
style as shown style as style as shown in the submitted
in the submitted shown in the in the learning
learning submitted submitted material
material learning learning
material material

Efficiency

Timeliness

3. Applied a Quality Applied teaching Applied Applied Applied No

range of strategies that teaching teaching teaching acceptable
challenge strategies that
teaching learners to draw
strategies strategies evidence
strategies to that require that require lead learners was shown
conclusions and along a single
develop critical justify their learners to learners to path of inquiry
and creative thinking or put make describe and and/or to
thinking, as parts together to connections explain simple recall
well as other promote deeper using ideas ideas and rote
understanding of
higher-order ideas learned as learned as learned as memorization
thinking skills. shown in the shown in the shown in the of concepts as
submitted submitted submitted shown in the
learning material learning learning submitted
material material learning
material
 Efficiency

Timeliness

2. Diversity 4. Established 24.00% Quality Utilized Utilized Utilized an Utilized a No

of Learners a effective effective effective teaching acceptable
teaching teaching teaching strategy or
& learnercentere strategies that
evidence
Assessmen d culture by strategies that strategy that strategies that was shown
are appropriate are appropriate is appropriate partially
t and using teaching in responding in responding in responding respond to
Reporting strategies that to learners’ to learners’ to learners’ learners’
respond to linguistic,
linguistic, linguistic, linguistic,
their linguistic, cultural,
cultural, cultural, cultural,
socioeconomic
cultural, socioeconomic, , or religious socioeconomi socioeconomic,
socioeconomic or religious backgrounds at c, or religious or religious
and religious backgrounds at a group level* backgrounds backgrounds as
backgrounds an individual as shown in as shown in shown in the
level* as shown the submitted the submitted submitted
in the submitted learning learning learning
learning material material material
material
Efficiency

Timeliness

5. Planned and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrated Demonstrat

delivered Level 7 in d Level 6 in d Level 5 in Level 4 in ed Level 3
teaching Objective 5 as Objective 5 Objective 5 Objective 5 as in Objective
strategies that shown in COT as shown in as shown in shown in COT 5 as shown
are responsive to
the special
rating COT rating COT rating rating in COT
educational sheets/interob sheets/intero sheets/intero sheets/interob rating
needs of server bserver bserver server sheets/inter
learners in agreement agreement agreement agreement observer
difficult forms forms forms forms agreement
circumstances*, forms or No
including: acceptable
geographic
isolation; chronic evidence
illness; was shown
displacement due
 to armed conflict,
urban resettlement
or disasters; child Efficiency
abuse and child
labor practices Timeliness

6. Used Quality Provided Provided Provided Provided No evidence

strategies for learners with learners with learners with learners with was shown
providing accurate, and accurate, and accurate, and inaccurate
timely, specific and specific general and/or
directed constructive constructive destructive
accurate and constructive feedback as feedback as feedback as
constructive feedback* as shown in the shown in the shown in the
feedback to shown in the evidence evidence evidence
improve evidence submitted submitted submitted
learner submitted
performance Efficiency

Timeliness MOV submitted MOV MOV MOV submitted No evidence

shows submitted submitted shows was shown
feedback given shows shows feedback given
within 5 feedback given feedback given beyond 20
working days within 6-10 within 11-20 working days
from working days working days from
submission** from from submission**
submission** submission**
3. 7. Selected, 16.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Curriculum developed,
Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as
and organized and shown in COT
Planning used shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
rating
rating rating rating rating
appropriate sheets/interobs sheets/interob sheets/interob sheets/interobs
sheets/interob
server
teaching and erver server server erver agreement
learning agreement agreement agreement agreement forms or No
resources, forms forms forms forms acceptable
including ICT, evidence was
shown
to address
learning goals Efficiency

Timeliness
 8. Set Quality All of the Majority of the Half of the Less than half of No
learning learning learning the learning acceptable
achievable and
outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set evidence was
appropriate are aligned with are aligned with are aligned with are aligned with shown
learning the learning the learning the learning the learning
outcomes that competencies competencies competencies competencies
as shown in the as shown in the
are aligned as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted
with learning MOV submitted MOV submitted
competencies Efficiency

Timeliness

4. 9. Built 24.00% Quality Sustained Secured Communicate Communicated No

Community relationships engagement collaboration d with and with parents/ acceptable
Linkages with parents/ with parents/ with parents/ obtained guardians evidence
and guardians and guardians and/ guardians response from and/or wider was shown
or wider school and/ or wider parents/ school
Profession the wider community to school guardians community to
al school facilitate community to and/ or wider facilitate
Engageme community to involvement in facilitate school involvement in
nt & facilitate the educative involvement in community to the educative
Personal involvement in process as the educative facilitate process but
Growth and the educative evidenced by 2 process as involvement in received no
Profession process or more of evidenced by the educative response/reply
al MOV no. 1 or 2 one MOV no. process as as evidenced
Developme 1 or 2 evidenced by by MOV No. 3
MOV No. 3
nt
Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any No
4 of the 3 of the 2 of the 1 of the acceptable
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable evidence
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV was shown
Timeliness

10. Quality Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No

any professional any any any acceptable
Participated in
network/ activity professional professional professional evidence
professional that requires network/ activity
networks to network/ network/ was shown
output* and that requires
activity that activity that
share proof of output* and
requires does not
proof of
knowledge and implementation output* to require output
implementation
to enhance ** within the
** within the share to share
practice school to share
department/gra
 knowledge and de level to knowledge knowledge and
to enhance share and to to enhance
practice as knowledge and enhance practice as
evidenced by to enhance
practice as evidenced by
the submitted practice as
evidenced by evidenced by the submitted
MOV the submitted MOV
the submitted
MOV MOV
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds different kinds the acceptable evidence was
acceptable of acceptable of acceptable MOV shown
MOV*** MOV*** MOV***
Timeliness

11. Developed Quality Updated the Discussed Accomplished Accomplished No

Development progress on the the Strengths acceptable
a personal
Plan and the Development and evidence
improvement Plan from
plan based on approved by Development Development was shown
learning
the rater during Plan with the Needs portion
reflection of Phase II of the rater to check
objectives up to
of the
resources
one’s practice RPMS cycle whether Development
needed to
and ongoing Development address Plan after self-
professional Needs were Development assessment at
learning addressed Needs during the beginning
Phase I of the of the school
RPMS cycle
year
Efficiency Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the No
IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP IPCRF-DP IPCRF-DP with acceptable
any 4 of the with any 3 of with any 2 of any 1 of the evidence
acceptable the the acceptable was shown
Supporting acceptable acceptable Supporting
MOV* Supporting Supporting MOV
MOV* MOV*
Timeliness

5. Plus 12. Performed 12.00% Quality Performed at Performed at Performed at Performed at No acceptable
least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related evidence was
Factor various related
work/activity that work/activity work/activity work/activity that shown
works/ contributed to the that contributed that contributed contributed to the
activities that teaching-learning to the teaching- to the teaching- teaching-learning
contribute to process beyond learning learning process within
the school/ process within process within the class as
the teaching-
Community the school/ the learning evidenced by
learning Learning Center Community area/ submitted MOV
 process (CLC) as Learning Center department as
evidenced by (CLC) as evidenced by
submitted MOV evidenced by submitted MOV
submitted MOV
Efficiency Submitted any 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
of the acceptable of the of the of the acceptable evidence was
MOV* acceptable acceptable MOV shown
MOV* MOV*
Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding

3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory

1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory

below 1.499 Poor

______EVITA C. DOMINGUEZ_________ _______EVANGELINE T. CAÑONES________ _________MICHAEL M. ARTIZO________

Ratee Rater Approving Authority