Monares Vs Munoz

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3
a Date —___ —_lomovres __vs _ Mine MCN. 5587 Lenacy 24,2018 TR Ta case is aledd The gual pein por rpyien po ~~ dedlebon lle plat by ee ei TAT disbacm en fr —Dwno2. Thi in connection wi IL ih Cases piled ogoinst hi rn r € pe Constante Haves, Aly Olvee Olajbaliop ALECD, and Ba silieh overs Avipw Holo Hvnez in vil cos i Hed gained ae ches | | O¢e; Mbay Pr £50. = FRices | ay oVince Ta th < complaint. giled by AM nod guclese te dhe board the Mune ilegal, colleded notavie despite eve lainey agreement reoreseated his bro thee _dvvi raat at ene poses while he was eaplayed as the Provinesal the aint siled by Avlhw Moneves, he alleged thd At Ife: ust ck Pelkee bene ces had Aly Monee 1,Olebal he ene The old board of ALECO g¢l tho seraey or tty VNOZ AS ibs sate be 4 Att, Nunez kl ewes emp joy ec | he PLO. of we fe also alleged td i My. et a ste res he Kad with Inthe complaint ciled by Bensiich Content, the Frecutive Ascisten For We Lom FFai ¥S oF Sunwes ons TYue Vion and Deve opment fergecion & ale ed thet Aly. Maier while being the PLO of Alba, filed CASES BHai nst etl in chale_of \is brethty. Lu Fo. Scanned with CamScanner dn Ws Siew, Mh, Ts Tel be ahead ack the exetnor for authority to gust ice_in_peivete. The DIG. tpn Vis request un ow the conditions the —theve ene ove © j lime a 2 nd s_used overnm en _personnel of fu Se ond thed there would kno wonghd ah interead dhed dhe time devote d 4 hi vachice is ovlsice oF office hovvs, wad That We videloon_op the said veslicd oe ion_or the said veclvidione will be fthe said ¥ ions & round ov the can MNelion or revocation 0 hie puthenh, + “ — . 5 When The complaints weve referred i. the coved to the IBP IBP Commissioner Aguile said thet My. Munoz thooldt. b ec Found guilty of ayo ss miscondyet and Violebion s ee Tal, 6.02,15.01 and 15.03. oF oe ohh Responesbilily. 7 efescione | Tssve: Whether A, Bes is guilty oF gYoss. _wiscondued io and Violafion of the ah of Frogess iona Respone billy 7 7 Ruling: 7 ae — le Thner_shoold hav engage in_privale practice fer Tal ool bl ——— oe Jo officer ov employee sh cll_diveclly engage in any private business, vocal ion, or propetionwiheal a : i Yeque sted _f ox_aulbevify fo om Ihe Seevelary of DI IG __ wei then Permission from he he o¢ DI ema Hf wos issved move the "S450 priv be Munest agesloel os PLO, has \. ble opecal, i wae incombon opan_ lunes Ty Neneh op tb DIG nt alee eee and iv se igmpas caf Lal vee he er ally pn “only porhis find fem, bet iS Scanned with CamScanner = lis peiluve \, ie vondeved him Vg Dh_p_vngetacd — _1.0| o¢ is profession and Violation oF T vaclice of SACL tecabianal Responsible. My. Muxez was round vill of gtors misconed ond viola lion of Bhat ag he err was sus pende From Ye precice of law for period of. Byeavt and was Siven with a "stern Wav nine A 4 Vio a hion oF any Juve undev shall oe dealt idee gevevely: Scanned with CamScanner

You might also like