Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • PT Rubrics For Jingle

    Uploaded by

    Janrey Oriña Navalta
    24 views1 page
    This document contains evaluation criteria and scores for five groups that presented on quality of presentation, melody, and effectiveness of presentation. The criteria include ease of understanding, volume, rhythm, catchiness, preparation, and creativity. Exemplary groups had easy to understand presentations that were loud and clear with accurate rhythm and were extremely catchy. Their presentations were very creative from start to finish and well thought out. Satisfactory groups were mostly easy to understand but lacked loud volume or had minor errors. Their presentations showed some creativity but lacked creativity towards the end. Unsatisfactory groups had presentations that were not easy to understand or loud with many errors and lacked creativity and thought.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    PT Rubrics for Jingle

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains evaluation criteria and scores for five groups that presented on quality of presentation, melody, and effectiveness of presentation. The criteria include ease of understanding, volume, rhythm, catchiness, preparation, and creativity. Exemplary groups had easy to understand presentations that were loud and clear with accurate rhythm and were extremely catchy. Their presentations were very creative from start to finish and well thought out. Satisfactory groups were mostly easy to understand but lacked loud volume or had minor errors. Their presentations showed some creativity but lacked creativity towards the end. Unsatisfactory groups had presentations that were not easy to understand or loud with many errors and lacked creativity and thought.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    24 views1 page

    PT Rubrics For Jingle

    Uploaded by

    Janrey Oriña Navalta
    This document contains evaluation criteria and scores for five groups that presented on quality of presentation, melody, and effectiveness of presentation. The criteria include ease of understanding, volume, rhythm, catchiness, preparation, and creativity. Exemplary groups had easy to understand presentations that were loud and clear with accurate rhythm and were extremely catchy. Their presentations were very creative from start to finish and well thought out. Satisfactory groups were mostly easy to understand but lacked loud volume or had minor errors. Their presentations showed some creativity but lacked creativity towards the end. Unsatisfactory groups had presentations that were not easy to understand or loud with many errors and lacked creativity and thought.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Name: Matt, Princess, Ruth, Samantha, Raina

    EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score


    (21-30) (16-20) (1-15)
    QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
    PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
     Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
     Loud and Clear
    MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error and Many Errors and not
     Catchy extremely catchy somewhat catchy catchy
    EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
    PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
     Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
     Creative thought out

    Name: Sydney, John Albert, Zaijohn, Nash, Erich


    EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
    (21-30) (15-20) (1-14)
    QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
    PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
     Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
     Loud and Clear
    MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error Many Errors
     Catchy extremely catchy
    EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
    PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
     Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
     Creative thought out

    Name: Ellyze, Noreen, Ronaldo, Crisianne


    EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
    (21-30) (16-20) (1-15)
    QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
    PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
     Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
     Loud and Clear
    MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error and Many Errors and not
     Catchy extremely catchy somewhat catchy catchy
    EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
    PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
     Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
     Creative thought out

    Name: Raizel, Athena, Lovely Gwen, Chloe Therese, Chloe Denise


    EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Score
    (21-30) (15-20) (1-14)
    QUALITY OF The presentation was The presentation was Some of the Lyrics is not
    PRESENTATION: 10% easy to understand, the easy to understand but easy to understand, the
     Easy to understand voice are loud and clear. not loud. voice are not loud.
     Loud and Clear
    MELODY: 5% Accurate Rhythm and One/Two Minor Error Many Errors
     Catchy extremely catchy
    EFFECTIVENESS OF Start to End was very Start was creative but not No creativity at all. Not
    PRESENTATION: 15% creative. It is very well up to the end. Most parts very thought out
     Clearly prepared thought out appeared to have been
     Creative thought out

    You might also like