Compare and Contrast The Philosophers

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Both have the same idea that

there is no self.
Roddick Rory Batiforra 1331027
BIT-CT I-B2 9-24-22
Assignment 1.1: Compare and Contrast
the Philosophers
PHILOSOPHER SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES

They both believe that the self is made up of the Paul Churchland believes that self is the brain, whereas St.
1.Paul Churchland vs. St.
mind and the body, and that the two are Augustine believes that self is an immortal soul that exists over
Augustine
separate. time.
They differ from Maurice Merleau-concept Ponty’s in that he
2.Socrates vs. Maurice Merleau- They both believe that the self is made up of believes there’s also a mind. The body, soul, and mind are all
Ponty both body and soul. merged into one, unlike Socrates’ assertion that the body and soul
are separate entities.
They disagree regarding the concept of self because for Descartes,
Both had the idea of “I doubt therefore I am,”
it should be the mind, not the body or the soul, and for David
3.Rene Descartes vs. David because Hume agreed with Descartes’ idea that
Hume, the body is nothing more than a machine that is associated
Hume they should evaluate not just their own
with the mind it’s a unified amalgamation of everything a person’s
perception but also that of others.
experience
They disagree on David’s concept. Hume idea of self is that there
is no such thing as a self; it is a collection of different perceptions
They each have a concept that knowledge is
from you and other people; he considers not only other people’s
4.David Hume vs. John Locke acquired by the senses, and self-perception is
perceptions but also his own; whereas John Locke’s idea is that it
the result of other people’s perceptions.
is only other people’s perceptions; if what other people say about
him is all that matters.
5. David Hume vs. Gilbert Ryle Both have the same idea that there is no self. They differ in their reasons for why there is there is no self: David
Hume believes there’s no self because self is just a label, a
convenient name for us to refer to one’s behavior while Gilbert
Ryle believes there’s no self because self is just a label, a
convenient name for us to refer to one’s behavior. It’s just the way
people act.
They differ in their understanding of the soul, because for
They both believe that the self is made up of Socrates, the soul is simply a soul, whereas for Plato, the soul
6.Socrates vs. Plato body and soul. The self is more than simply a consists of three elements: appetitive, rational, and spirited. And
physical body; it is also the psyche. justice only works if all three components are in sync with one
another. Plato also believes that the soul is superior to the body.
Both believed that human beings’ ability to
They differ in Descartes’ idea because, unlike Plato, Descartes
reason is what makes us human. Since
aimed to understand the nature of our reasoning process and its
7.Descartes vs. Plato Descartes agreed to Plato as a great thinker, we
relationship to the human ego, rather than merely employing
have an extraordinary instrument to achieve
reason to try to answer problems
truth and knowledge
Both believe that the self is an immortal soul
They vary in St. Augustine’s belief that the body and soul are
that exists over time. And they both felt that the
8.Plato vs. St. Augustine separated or bifurcated, whereas Plato believes that the self is
physical body was both superior to and distinct
made up of two parts: body, and soul, which should be duplicated.
from its resident, the immortal soul.
Both believe that the body is the source of the They vary in St. Augustine’s belief that the body and soul are
9.St. Agustine vs. Socrates problem, and both believe that the self is an separated or bifurcated, because Socrates believes that the self is
immortal soul that exists over time. made up of two bodies and souls, and that it is duplicated.
They disagree on Kant’s concept. Locke, on the other hand,
10. Immanuel Kant vs. John Both believed in empiricism and felt that
believed in empiricism with reason and believed in both
Locke freedom was necessary for human rationality.
rationalism and empiricism.

You might also like