TABLE 1:

A. HYPOTHESES
HO: There is no significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic
White Mice (Mus musculus) between Pre and Post Treatment of 75 ml of
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts.

H1: There is a significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic

White Mice (Mus musculus) between Pre and Post Treatment of 75 ml of
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts.
.
B. Variables
Dependent: Sugar Level (Pre – Post) of White Mice
Independent: 75 ml of Treatment
C. STATISTICAL TEST TO BE USED : T-Test between two Independent Groups
D. SPSS Output:
 Statistical Analysis and Treatment

Group Statistics
75 ml
Treatment N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Blood Sugar Level Pre 3 2.7867 13.31666 7.68838
Post 3 1.3367 24.58319 14.19311

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Blood Equal variances 145.0000 189.8166

1.769 .254 8.983 4 .001 16.14173 100.18336
Sugar assumed 0 4
Level
Equal variances 145.0000 195.6173
8.983 3.081 .003 16.14173 94.38267
not assumed 0 3

E.CONCLUSION

There is a significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic White Mice

(Mus musculus) between Pre (2.7867 and Post (1.3367 Treatment of 75 ml of
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts, T(4) = 8.983 , p = .001.
TABLE 2:
A. HYPOTHESES
HO: There is no significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic
White Mice (Mus musculus) using the different amount of treatments of
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts: Treatment A1, Treatment A2, and Treatment A3.

H1: There is a significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic

White Mice (Mus musculus) using the different amount of treatments of
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts: Treatment A1, Treatment A2, and Treatment A3
B. Variables
Dependent: Sugar Level of White Mice
Independent: Treatments A1, A2, and A3
C. STATISTICAL TEST TO BE USED : One Way ANOVA
D. SPSS Outpu
 Descriptives
Sugar
Level
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum
Treatment -
2 2.0900 93.33810 66.00000 1047.6095 143.00 275.00
A1 629.6095
Treatment -
2 2.0700 97.58074 69.00000 1083.7281 138.00 276.00
A2 669.7281
treatment -
2 2.0650 102.53048 72.50000 1127.6998 134.00 279.00
A3 714.6998
Total 6 2.0750 75.83337 30.95884 127.9178 287.0822 134.00 279.00

ANOVA
Sugar Level
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 7.000 2 3.500 .000 1.000
Within Groups 28746.500 3 9582.167
Total 28753.500 5

Robust Tests of Equality of Means

Sugar Level
Statistica df1 df2 Sig.
Welch .000 2 1.997 1.000
a. Asymptotically F distributed.
E.CONCLUSION
There is no significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic
White Mice (Mus musculus) using the different amount of treatments
of Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba
(Lagerstroemia speciosa) Leaf Extracts:
Treatment A1 (2.0900 , Treatment A2 (2.070 , and Treatment A3
(2.0650 102.53048,F(2,3)= 0.000, p=1.000

TABLE 3:
A. HYPOTHESES
HO: There is no significant difference in the sugar level of
Hyperglycemic White Mice (Mus musculus) using the Treatment
A3 of Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba
(Lagerstroemia speciosa) Leaf Extracts, Commercial, and
Controlled.

H1: There is a significant difference in the sugar level of

Hyperglycemic White Mice (Mus musculus) using the Treatment
A3 of Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba
(Lagerstroemia speciosa) Leaf Extracts, Commercial, and
Controlled.
B. Variables
Dependent: Sugar Level of White Mice
Independent: Treatments A3 of Spinach, Commercial, and
Controlled.
C. STATISTICAL TEST TO BE USED : One Way ANOVA
 D. SPSS Output:
Descriptives
Sugar Level
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum
TReatment -
A3 2 2.0650 102.53048 72.50000 714.699 1127.6998 134.00 279.00
8
Commercial -
2 2.1900 79.19596 56.00000 492.547 930.5475 163.00 275.00
5
Controlled 295.146
2 3.0150 .70711 .50000 307.8531 301.00 302.00
9
Total 164.585
6 2.4233 74.08554 30.24529 320.0813 134.00 302.00
3

ANOVA
Sugar Level
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 10658.333 2 5329.167 .952 .478
Within Groups 16785.000 3 5595.000
Total 27443.333 5

Robust Tests of Equality of Means

Sugar Level
Statistica df1 df2 Sig.
Welch 1.296 2 1.334 .487
a. Asymptotically F distributed.

E.CONCLUSION
There is no significant difference in the sugar level of Hyperglycemic
White Mice (Mus musculus) using the Treatment A3 (2.0650 of Water
spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Leaf extracts and Banaba (Lagerstroemia
speciosa) Leaf Extracts, Commercial (2.1900 , and Controlled (3.0150
,F(2,3)= .952 , p = .478 .