Test 0502

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CONTENTS

Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv

PART 1: THE BIG PICTURE

1 The New World of Digital Commons by Paul Stacey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3


The Commons, the Market, and the State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
The Four Aspects of a Resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
A Short History of the Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
The Digital Revolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
The Birth of Creative Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
The Changing Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Benefits of the Digital Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Our Case Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2 How to Be Made with Creative Commons by Sarah Hinchliff Pearson . . . . . . . . . . . . 19


Problem Zero: Getting Discovered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Making Money . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Making Human Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

3 The Creative Commons Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

PART 2: THE CASE STUDIES

Arduino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Ártica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Blender Institute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Cards Against Humanity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
The Conversation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Cory Doctorow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Figshare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Figure.nz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Knowledge Unlatched . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Lumen Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Jonathan Mann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

Made With Creative Commons vii


Noun Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Open Data Institute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Opendesk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
OpenStax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Amanda Palmer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
PLOS (Public Library of Science) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Rijksmuseum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Shareable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Siyavula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
SparkFun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
TeachAIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
Tribe of Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Wikimedia Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

viii Made With Creative Commons


FOREWORD
Three years ago, just after I was hired as CEO of in their case study: “We don’t make jokes and
Creative Commons, I met with Cory Doctorow games to make money—we make money so
in the hotel bar of Toronto’s Gladstone Hotel. we can make more jokes and games.”
As one of CC’s most well-known proponents— Creative Commons’ focus is on building a
one who has also had a successful career as vibrant, usable commons, powered by collab-
a writer who shares his work using CC—I told oration and gratitude. Enabling communities
him I thought CC had a role in defining and ad- of collaboration is at the heart of our strategy.
vancing open business models. He kindly dis- With that in mind, Creative Commons began
agreed, and called the pursuit of viable busi- this book project. Led by Paul and Sarah, the
ness models through CC “a red herring.” project set out to define and advance the best
He was, in a way, completely correct—those open business models. Paul and Sarah were
who make things with Creative Commons have the ideal authors to write Made with Creative
ulterior motives, as Paul Stacey explains in this Commons.
book: “Regardless of legal status, they all have Paul dreams of a future where new mod-
a social mission. Their primary reason for be- els of creativity and innovation overpower the
ing is to make the world a better place, not to inequality and scarcity that today define the
profit. Money is a means to a social end, not worst parts of capitalism. He is driven by the
the end itself.” power of human connections between com-
In the case study about Cory Doctorow, Sar- munities of creators. He takes a longer view
ah Hinchliff Pearson cites Cory’s words from than most, and it’s made him a better educa-
his book Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free: tor, an insightful researcher, and also a skilled
“Entering the arts because you want to get rich gardener. He has a calm, cool voice that con-
is like buying lottery tickets because you want veys a passion that inspires his colleagues and
to get rich. It might work, but it almost certain- community.
ly won’t. Though, of course, someone always Sarah is the best kind of lawyer—a true
wins the lottery.” advocate who believes in the good of people,
Today, copyright is like a lottery ticket— and the power of collective acts to change
everyone has one, and almost nobody wins. the world. Over the past year I’ve seen Sarah
What they don’t tell you is that if you choose struggle with the heartbreak that comes from
to share your work, the returns can be signif- investing so much into a political campaign
icant and long-lasting. This book is filled with that didn’t end as she’d hoped. Today, she’s
stories of those who take much greater risks more determined than ever to live with her
than the two dollars we pay for a lottery ticket, values right out on her sleeve. I can always
and instead reap the rewards that come from count on Sarah to push Creative Commons to
pursuing their passions and living their values. focus on our impact—to make the main thing
So it’s not about the money. Also: it is. Find- the main thing. She’s practical, detail-oriented,
ing the means to continue to create and share and clever. There’s no one on my team that I
often requires some amount of income. Max enjoy debating more.
Temkin of Cards Against Humanity says it best

Made With Creative Commons xi


As coauthors, Paul and Sarah complement Jonathan Mann, who is profiled in this book,
each other perfectly. They researched, ana- writes a song a day. When I reached out to ask
lyzed, argued, and worked as a team, some- him to write a song for our Kickstarter (and to
times together and sometimes independently. offer himself up as a Kickstarter benefit), he
They dove into the research and writing with agreed immediately. Why would he agree to
passion and curiosity, and a deep respect for do that? Because the commons has collabora-
what goes into building the commons and tion at its core, and community as a key value,
sharing with the world. They remained open and because the CC licenses have helped so
to new ideas, including the possibility that many to share in the ways that they choose
their initial theories would need refinement with a global audience.
or might be completely wrong. That’s coura- Sarah writes, “Endeavors that are Made
geous, and it has made for a better book that with Creative Commons thrive when com-
is insightful, honest, and useful. munity is built around what they do. This may
From the beginning, CC wanted to develop mean a community collaborating together to
this project with the principles and values of create something new, or it may simply be a
open collaboration. The book was funded, de- collection of like-minded people who get to
veloped, researched, and written in the open. know each other and rally around common in-
It is being shared openly under a CC BY-SA li- terests or beliefs. To a certain extent, simply
cense for anyone to use, remix, or adapt with being Made with Creative Commons auto-
attribution. It is, in itself, an example of an matically brings with it some element of com-
open business model. munity, by helping connect you to like-minded
For 31 days in August of 2015, Sarah took others who recognize and are drawn to the val-
point to organize and execute a Kickstarter ues symbolized by using CC.” Amanda Palmer,
campaign to generate the core funding for the the other musician profiled in the book, would
book. The remainder was provided by CC’s surely add this from her case study: “There is
generous donors and supporters. In the end, no more satisfying end goal than having some-
it became one of the most successful book one tell you that what you do is genuinely of
projects on Kickstarter, smashing through value to them.”
two stretch goals and engaging over 1,600 do-
nors—the majority of them new supporters of
Creative Commons.
Paul and Sarah worked openly throughout This is not a typical business book. For those
the project, publishing the plans, drafts, case looking for a recipe or a roadmap, you might
studies, and analysis, early and often, and be disappointed. But for those looking to pur-
they engaged communities all over the world sue a social end, to build something great
to help write this book. As their opinions di- through collaboration, or to join a powerful
verged and their interests came into focus, and growing global community, they’re sure
they divided their voices and decided to keep to be satisfied. Made with Creative Commons of-
them separate in the final product. Working in fers a world-changing set of clearly articulated
this way requires both humility and self-confi- values and principles, some essential tools for
dence, and without question it has made Made exploring your own business opportunities,
with Creative Commons a better project. and two dozen doses of pure inspiration.
Those who work and share in the com- In a 1996 Stanford Law Review article “The
mons are not typical creators. They are part of Zones of Cyberspace”, CC founder Lawrence Les-
something greater than themselves, and what sig wrote, “Cyberspace is a place. People live
they offer us all is a profound gift. What they there. They experience all the sorts of things
receive in return is gratitude and a community. that they experience in real space, there. For

xii Made With Creative Commons

You might also like