MOOTCOURTASSI

GNMENT
FORENSI
CSCI
ENCE

NAME-
SNEHASI
NGH
SRI
SHTIKHARKWAL
SUBODHNISHARMA
BATCH-
BBALLB
ROLLNO.
-2014314
2014315
2014316
1

MOOTCOURT

BEFORETHEHON’
BLESUPREMECOURTOFI
NDI
A

I
NTHEMATTEROF

RAJA………….
APPELLANT

VS

STATEOFDELHI
……….
RESPONDENT

WRI
TTENSUBMI
SSIONTOTHEHON’
BLESUPREME
COURTOFI
NDIA

MEMORI
ALONBEHALFOFTHERESPONDANT
2

I
NDEX

S.
NO CONTENTS PAGE.
NO.

1 Li
stofabbr
evi
ati
on 3

2 Casesr
efer
red

3 St
atut
es 4-
5

4 Websi
teandbooks
ref
err
ed
5 St
atementofj
uri
sdi
cti
on 6

6 Fact
soft
hecase 7-
8

7 St
atementofi
ssues 9

8 Summar
yofar
gument
s 10

9 Adv
ancedar
gument
s 11-
18

10 pr
ayer 19
3

LI
STOFABBRI
VIATI
ONS

AI
R Al
lIndi
arepor
ter

Anr
. Anot
her

HON’
BLE HONOURABLE

i
.e. THATI
s

Or
s Ot
her
s

SCC Supr
emecour
tcases

u/
s Undersect
ion

V. Ver
sus

www. Wor
ldwi
deweb
4

CASELAWSREFFERED

 BachanSi
nghv
sSt
ateOfPunj
abon9May
,1980(
1982)3
SCC24,
19831SCR145a

 KeharSi
nghAndAnr
.Et
cvsUni
onOfI
ndi
aAndAnron16
December
,19881989AI
R653,
1988SCRSupl
.(3)
1102

 Machhi
SinghAndOt
her
svsSt
ateOfPunj
abon20Jul
y,
19831983AI
R957,
1983SCR(
3)413

 Sr
iMahendr
aNat
hDasSr
iGobi
nda.
..v
sSt
ateOfAssam on
14May
,1999

 Dhananj
ayChat
ter
jeeAl
i
asDhanav
sSt
ateOfW.
B.on11
Januar
y,1994,
1994(
1)ALTCr
i388,
1994(
2)BLJR1231,
(
1994)1CALLT28SC,
JT1994(
1)SC33,
1994(
1)SCALE
48,
(1994)2SCC220,
19941SCR37,
1994(
2)UJ106SC

 SmtKamt
idev
ivs.Poshi
ram 11thmay2001
5

St
atuesr
efer
red
 THECODEOFCI
VILPROCEDURE,
1908

 THEI
NDI
ANPENALCODE,
1860

 THECONSTI
TUTI
ONOFI
NDI
A

 THEI
NDI
ANEVI
DENCEACT,
1872

Websi
tes

1.
www.
supr
emecour
tcases.
com

2.
www.
indi
ankanoon.
com

3.
www.
manupat
ra.
com

4.
www.
scconl
i
ne.
com

5.
www.
air
.com

6.
www.
adv
ocat
ekhoj
.com

booksr
eff
ered
1.TheI
ndi
anpenal
code,
S.N.Mi
shr
a
6

2.Thecodeofcr
imi
nal
procedur
e,S.
N.Mi
shr
a

3.TheConst
it
uti
onofI
ndi
a,V.
N.Shukl
a

St
atementofj
uri
sdi
cti
on

Ther
espondenthumbl
ysubmi
tsi
ntheHon’
bleSupr
emeCour
tOf
I
ndi
aunderAr
ti
cle136oft
heConst
it
uti
onofI
ndi
aSpeci
all
eav
e
t
oappeal
byt
heSupr
emeCour
t:

(
1)Not
wit
hst
andi
ngany
thi
ngi
nthi
sChapt
er,t
heSupr
emeCour
t
may
,ini
tsdi
scr
eti
on,gr
antspeci
all
eav
etoappealf
rom any
j
udgment
,decr
ee,det
ermi
nat
ion,sent
enceoror
deri
nanycause
ormat
terpassedormadebyanycour
tort
ri
bunali
nthet
err
it
ory
ofI
ndi
a.

(
2) Not
hing i
n cl
ause (
1) shal
l appl
yto any j
udgment
,
det
ermi
nat
ion,sent
enceoror
derpassedormadebyanycour
tor
t
ri
bunalconst
it
utedbyorunderanyl
aw r
elat
ingt
otheAr
med
For
ce
7

FACTSOFTHECASE

1)TheaccusedRaj
aobj
ect
edt
ohi
swi
feNai
naf
ri
endshi
pwi
th

Mat
loobwher
eMat
loobandNai
nawer
ecl
assmat
esand

f
ell
owcongr
esswor
ker
s.Raj
asuspect
edNai
naofhav
ingan

ext
ramar
it
alr
elat
ionshi
pwi
thMat
loob.

2)Ont ghtof2ndj
heni uly1995,
whenRaj
acamehomehef
ound

hi
swi
feNai
nahav
ingaconv
ersat
it
ionont
hephonewi
th

someone and consumi

ng al
cohol
.Nai
naon seei
ng Raj
a

i
mmedi
atel
yhungupt
hephone.

3)
Raj
awhoal
way
ssuspect
edhi
swi
fer
edai
l
edt
henumberf
rom
8

herphoneandf
oundt
hati
twasMat
loob.Bei
nghi
ghl
yshocked,

Raj
atookouthi
srev
olv
erandf
atal
l
yshotNai
nat
wot
imesNai
na

haddi
edonspot
.

4)
Aft
ert
hemur
derwascommi
tedt
heaccusedRaj
acar
ri
edt
he

bodyt
oar
est
aur
antcal
l
edbagi
ya.Thebodywaschoppedi
nto

pi
ecesandt
heaccusedwi
tht
hehel
pofco-
accusedkeshav
kumar
,

t
hemanager
,r
est
aur
antdi
sposedoft
hebodyAnddumpedi
tint
o

at
andoor
.

5)
Thebodyoft
hedeceasedbei
ngbur
nti
nthet
andoorgav
eout

t
he huge amount of f
ir
e and smoke f
rom t
he.The pol

r
est
aur
ant
pol
i
ce ar
ri
ved on t
he scene ofcr
ime and ar
rest
ed

KeshavKumarbutRaj
amanagedt
ofl
ee.Hesur
render
edonj
uly

101995.
9

STATEMNETSOFI
SSUES
I
ssuest
hatar
epr
esent
edv
iat
heappealbef
oret
heHonb’
l
eApex
cour
tfordi
scussi
onandadj
udi
cat
ionar
easf
oll
ows:

1)I
SSUE1:
WHETHERAPPEALBROUGHTBEFORETHI
SCOURTI
S

MAI
NTAI
NABLEORNOT.

2)I
SSUE2:
WHETHERTHEI
NTENSI
TYOFPUNI
SHMENTWASRI
GHT

FORTHEPERSONORNOT.

3)I
SSUE3:
WHETHERTHEPUNI
SHMENTWASGI
VENONTHEBASI
S

OFCI
RCUMSTANTI
ALEVI
DENCE ANDSECONDAUTOPSY.
10
11

SUMMARYOFARGUMENTS

I
SSUE1-WHETHERTHEINTENSI
TYOFPUNI
SHMENTWASRI
GHTFOR
THEPERSONORNOT-;

Thei
ntensi
tyofpuni
shmentwasr
ightundert
hesect
ion302of
i
ndi
anpenalcode1860. . Sect
ion302oft
heI
PCt
alksabout
puni
shi
ngt
heper
sonwhocommi
tsmur
derwi
tht
hedeat
hpenal
ty.
TheI
PC doesnotexemptany
onef
rom t
heof
fenceofmur
der
.
Sect
ion302cl
ear
lyst
ates,“
Whoev
ercommi
tsmur
der
.”Fur
ther
,
t
he of
fence of mur
der i
s non-
bai
l
abl
e and non-
compoundabl
e.Deat
hsent
enceundert
heI
PCi
sgi
venaccor
ding
t
othepr
inci
pleof‘
rar
estofr
arecases.
’

I
ssue 2:whet
hert
he puni
shmentwasgi
ven on t
he basi
sof
ci
rcumst
ant
ial
evi
denceandsecondaut
opsy
.

I
nthe sai
d case t
he ci
rcumst
ant
ialev
idences cl
ear
lypr
oves
accusedRaj
agui
l
tyofbr
utal
l
ymur
der
ingherwi
fe.Fi
rst
lyi
twasa
homi
cidaldeat
h as t
he body was bur
ned i
n unf
avor
abl
e
condi
ti
ons.Al
so t
her
ewer
eno r
easonswi
thst
andi
ng t
hatt
he
bul
l
etwasi
nser
tedast
hecondi
ti
onoft
hebodydoesnotal
l
ow
t
hebul
l
ett
obeseenwi
tht
henakedey
e.
12

ARGUMENTSI
NADVANCE
I
SSUE1
WHETHERTHEINTENSI
TYOFPUNI
SHMENTWASRI
GHTFOR
THEPERSONORNOT.

Undersect
ion 300 mur
der,excepti
nthe casesher
einaf
teraccept
ed

cul
pabl
ehomi
cidei
smur
der
,ift
heactbywhi
cht
hedeat
hiscausedi
sdone

wi
tht
hei
ntent
ionofcausi
ngdeat
hDeat
hsent
enceundert
heI
PCi
sgi
ven

accor
dingt
othepr
inci
pleof‘
rar
estofr
arecases.
’Thi
spr
inci
plewasf
ir
st

i
ntr
oducedi
nthecaseof
 BachanSi
nghv
.St
ateofPunj
ab 
(1980)
, 
inwhi
ch

t
he accused was gui
l
ty ofmur
der
ing t
hree peopl
e. 
Sect
ion 354(
3) 
of

t
he 
CodeofCr
imi
nalPr
ocedur
e1973 
stat
est
hati
fanof
fencei
stobe

puni
shedwi
thdeat
h,t
hent
hecour
tmustgi
vespeci
alr
easonsf
ort
hesame.

Hence t
he cour
tbya maj
ori
tyobser
ved t
hatt
he deat
h penal
tyi
san

except
iont
othepuni
shment
sment
ionedundert
heI
ndi
anPenalCode,
and

shoul
dbegi
venonl
yinr
arestofr
arecases.Howev
er,whi
chof
fenceshal
l

comeundert
hispr
inci
plehasnoty
etbeencl
ari
fi
ed.I
nthecaseof
 Bachan

Si
nghv
.St
ateofPunj
ab(
1980)
, 
apar
tfr
om i
ntr
oduci
ngt
hedoct
ri
neof
13

r
arestofr
arecases,
theconst
it
uti
onalv
ali
dit
yofSect
ion302I
PCwasal
so

t
est
ed.TheBachanSi
ngh

 BachanSi
nghv
sSt
ateOfPunj
abon9May
,1980(
1982)3SCC24,
19831SCR145a

v
erdi
ctst
il
lhol
dst
het
rut
handt
hedeat
hpenal
tyi
sgi
veni
nther
arestof

r
arecases.

I
nthe case of
 KeharSi
ngh v
.Uni
on ofI
ndi
a (
1988)
, 
the const
it
uti
onal

v
ali
dit
yofi
mposi
ngt
hedeat
hsent
encewast
est
ed.TheCour
trel
i
edupon

t
he Bacchan Si
ngh case and obser
ved t
hat t
his pr
ovi
si
on was

const
it
uti
onal
l
yval
i
d.

Af
tert
heBachanSi
nghl
andmar
kver
dict
,thedeat
hpenal
tyunderSect
ion

302i
sst
ri
ctl
yawar
dedaccor
dingt
othedoct
ri
neofr
arestofr
arecases.

I
nthecaseof
 MacchiSi
nghv
.St
ateofPunj
ab 
(1983)
, 
thecour
twental
i
ttl
e

deepert
odet
ermi
net
her
arestoft
her
arecases.I
tlai
ddowncer
tai
n

gui
del
i
nesr
elat
ing t
o how t
hemur
derwascommi
tt
ed,t
hemot
ivef
or

mur
der
,thei
ntensi
tyoft
hecr
ime,
andt
heant
i-
soci
alnat
ureoft
hecr
ime.I
n

ar
ecent
 j
udgment
 i Channul
n2018( alvSt
ateofChat
ti
sgar
h),t
heCour
t
14

obser
vedt
hatast
hepuni
shmentoft
hedeat
hpenal
tywasuphel
dint
he

BachanSi
nghcasei
n1980,
ther
eisnoneedt
ore-
visi
torr
e-exami
nei
t.I
tis

necessar
ytouset
hedeat
hsent
enceasaf
orm ofpuni
shment
.

Thepr
osect
ionwoul
dnowl
i
ket
ohi
ghl
i
ghtt
otheHon’
bl
ecour
tthat 
ther
e

cannotbeabet
tercasef
orawar
dingdeat
hpenal
tyt
hant
hepr
esentone.

 MachhiSi
nghAndOthersvsSt
ateOfPunjabon20Jul
y,19831983AIR957,1983SCR(3)
413
 KeharSi
nghAndAnr
.EtcvsUni
onOfIndi
aAndAnron16December,1988AI
R653,1988

The appel
l
antdef
ini
tel
yki
l
led a hel
pless woman wi
th whom he was

enj
oyi
ngl
i
febyl
i
vingwi
thherasherhusbandbutbydoubt
ingt
hechar
act
er

ofhi
swi
fenai
naandt
hesuddeni
nci
denthef
aced,het
houghtwashav
ing

af
fai
rswi
thot
herbi
gandmi
ght
ypeopl
eal
so,washi
swi
fehedeci
dedt
o

f
ini
shherof
f.Theappel
l
antadmi
tt
edl
ywaspur
sui
ngpol
i
ticalcar
eerand

hemustbehav
ingbi
gambi
ti
onst
oachi
evei
nhi
spol
i
ticall
i
feandatt
he

samet
imehemustbeappr
ehensi
veal
sot
hathemi
ghtl
oset
hesuppor
tof

hi
sfol
l
ower
sandt
hesy
mpat
hyoft
hepubl
i
cingener
ali
ncasei
tbecame

knownt
oev
ery
onet
hatherwi
fewashav
inganext
ramar
it
alaf
fai
rwi
tha

f
ell
owpar
tymember
.Wehav
eal
readyf
oundt
hathehadt
husav
eryst
rong

mot
ivet
ogetr
idof
fNai
na.So,t
heappel
l
antmusthav
ebeenwai
ti
ngf
or

somegoodoppor
tuni
tyt
ogetr
idoft
hedeceased.
15

Thecounci
lwoul
dher
eli
ket
obr
ingt
othenot
icet
hatTheappel
l
anthadnot

onl
ypumpedbul
l
etsi
ntheheadoft
hedeceasedbuthadal
sochoppedof
f

herl
i
mbsandt
henher
oical
l
ytookt
hebodyt
ohi
srest
aur
antandpl
acedi
t

ont
het
andoorandbur
nti
t.Thatr
efl
ect
snotonl
ytheext
remedepr
avi
tyof

t
heappel
l
ant
smi
ndbutal
sohi
spr
epar
ednessf
ort
hatbr
utalact
.The

appel
l
antknewwhathehaddoneandhowhehadt
odealwi
tht
hebodyof

Nai
na.

I
nthecaseofMahendr
aNat
hDassv
.St
ateofAssam 
theSupr
emeCour
t

hadwhi
l
econf
ir
mingt
hedeat
hsent
enceoft
heconv
ict
.Int
hatcaset
he

conv
icthadki
l
ledt
hedeceasedwi
thaswor
dandamput
atedt
hehandand

sev
eredt
heheadandt
henhadt
akent
hebodymaj
est
ical
l
ytot
hepol
i
ce

st
ati
on.That
,accor
dingt
otheSupr
emeCour
t,showedext
remedepr
avi
ty

oft
heconv
ict
.Si
mil
arl
yinanot
hercaseofdeat
hsent
encedeci
dedbyt
he

Hon'
bl
eSupr
emeCour
t,apl
eawasr
aisedt
hatsi
ncet
heaccusedwas

y
oungboyheshoul
dnotbegi
vent
heext
remepenal
tyofdeat
hbutt
hat

pl
eawasnotaccept
edandi
twasobser
vedbyt
heHon'
bl
eSupr
emeCour
t

t
hatt
hiscompassi
onat
egr
oundoft
heaccusedbei
ngy
oungcoul
dnotbe

consi
der
edasr
elev
antconsi
der
ingt
hef
actt
hathehadcommi
tt
edt
he
16

mur
deri
nacol
d-bl
oodedandbr
utalmanner
.Wemayal
somakeausef
ul

r
efer
encet
othef
oll
owi
ngv
iewsexpr
essedbyt
heHon'
l
eSupr
emeCour
tin

Dhananj
oyChat
ter
jee al
i
as 
Dhana v
.St
ate ofWestBengal
 
whi
ch al
so

di
ssuadeusf
rom accept
ingt
hepl
eaofl
eni
encyandmer
cyr
aisedonbehal
f

oft
heappel
l
ant
.

Sr
iMahendr
aNat
hDasSr
iGobi
nda.
..v
sSt
ateOfAssam on14May
,1999

Dhananj
ayChat
ter
jeeAli
asDhanavsStat
eOfW.
B.on11Januar
y,19941994(1)ALTCri388,
1994(2)BLJR1231,(
1994)1CALLT28SC,JT1994(
1)SC33,1994( 1)SCALE48,(
1994)2
SCC220,19941SCR37,1994(2)UJ106SC

I
SSUE2
WHETHERTHEPUNISHMENTWASGIVENONTHEBASISOF
CI
RCUMSTANTI
ALEVIDENCEANDSECONDAUTOPSY

I
tishumbl
ysubmi
tt
edbef
oret
hehon’
blecour
tthatci
rcumst
ancespr
essed

i
ntoser
vicebyt
hepr
osecut
ioni
sthatt
hedeat
hoft
hef
emal
ewhosebody

wasbei
ngbur
ntont
het
andoorbyt
heappel
l
antandt
heot
herconv
ict

KeshavKumarwashomi
cidal
.Inourv
iew t
heci
rcumst
ancet
hatbodyof

t
hel
adywasbei
ngbur
ntonat
andoorof
,whi
chi
sact
ual
l
ymeantf
or

r
oast
ingchi
cken,mut
toneet
c.f
orhumanconsumpt
ion,i
tsel
fissuf
fi
ci
ent
17

t
oshow t
hatt
hel
adyhaddi
edahomi
cidaldeat
h.Bagi
yar
est
aur
antwas

notacr
emat
iongr
ound.Ther
ewasnor
easonf
orbur
ningt
hebodyof

someoneatt
het
andoori
fitwasnotahomi
ci
daldeat
h.Thatbur
ningwas

done af
tert
urni
ng outev
ery
one f
rom t
he r
est
aur
ant
.These t
ell
-t
ale

ci
rcumst
ancesbyt
hemsel
vesar
esuf
fi
ci
entf
orust
ohol
dthatt
hisi
sa

caseofhomi
cidal
deat
h.

Asf
arast
hesubmi
ssi
onoft
hel
ear
nedCounself
ort
heappel
l
antt
hatl
ead

bul
l
etswer
eimpl
ant
edi
nthedeadbodyatt
het
imeofsecondpost
-mor
tem

i
sconcer
nedt
hesamehasnol
egst
ost
andonandi
swi
thoutsubst
ance.

Foraccept
ingt
hissubmi
ssi
oni
twi
l
lhav
etobehel
dthatt
hepol
i
cemen,
the

i
nvest
igat
ingof
fi
cer
,lowerst
affoft
hemor
tuar
yandal
so t
heaut
opsy

sur
geonshadal
ljoi
nedhandst
odot
hat
.We,howev
er,donotf
indany

ci
rcumst
anceemer
gingi
ntheev
idenceofanyoft
hewi
tnesseswhohad

beenhandl
i
ngt
hedeadbodyf
rom whi
chi
tcoul
dbei
nfer
redt
hatbul
l
ets

wer
eimpl
ant
edi
nthecor
ps.Andwhyshoul
danyoft
hem haddonet
hat

t
hey hav
e no r
eason t
o do t
hatand i
mpl
i
cat
e a power
fulpol
i
tical

per
sonal
i
ty.Ther
enomot
ivewascont
ri
but
edbyanyoft
hem.

Thecounci
lwoul
dli
ket
obr
ingt
othenot
iceoft
heHon’
bl
ecour
tthatdur
ing

t
hesecondpost
-mor
tem whent
heygotX-
rayexami
nat
iondonet
henonl
y

t
hepr
esenceoft
womet
all
i
cpi
ecesi
ntheskul
landneckoft
hecor
psewas
18

not
icedandonext
ract
iont
hesamewer
efoundt
obel
eadbul
l
ets.I
tis,
thus,

cl
eart
hatt
hel
eadbul
l
etscoul
dbenot
icedonl
yonX-
rayexami
nat
ionand

wer
enotnot
iceabl
ewi
thnakedey
esi
tcannotbesai
dthatatt
het
imewhen

t
hedoct
orconduct
edt
hepost
-mor
tem exami
nat
iont
her
ewer
enol
ead

bul
l
etsi
nthedeadbodyandl
ateront
hesamewer
eimpl
ant
ed.

Thepr
osecut
ioni
sal
sor
ely
ingupont
her
esul
tofDNAt
estf
orest
abl
i
shi
ng

t
hati
twast
hebodyofNai
nawhi
chwasbur
nt.I
mpor
tanceandut
il
it
yof

DNAt
esti
snowt
oowel
lknowni
ncr
imi
nalmat
ter
s.I
tisnotdi
sput
edt
hat

DNAt
esti
sver
yusef
ulf
orest
abl
i
shi
ngt
hei
dent
it
yofadeadper
sonwhose

bodyi
srecov
eredwhi
chi
snoti
nani
dent
if
iabl
econdi
ti
onbecauseof

decomposi
ti
onet
c.

I
twasobser
vedi
n Smt
.Kamt
iDev
iv.PoshiRam 
that'
Ther
esul
tofgenui
ne

DNAt
esti
ssai
dtobesci
ent
if
ical
l
yaccur
ate.
'

Weagr
eet
hatt
heconf
essi
onofKeshavKumarcannotbeusedagai
nstr
aja.

Sect
ion30 
oft
heEv
idenceActi
sat
tr
act
edwhenaconf
essi
onofoneoft
he

accusedf
aci
ngt
ri
alwi
thot
her
sis'
prov
ed'byt
hepr
osecut
ion.Conf
essi
on
19

canbepr
ovedonl
ydur
ingev
idence.Thatwoul
dmeant
hatconf
essi
on

soughtt
ober
eli
eduponagai
nstanaccusedot
hert
hani
tsmakershoul
d

hav
ebeenmadebef
oret
het
ri
albeganandt
hendur
ingev
idencei
thast
o

bepr
ovedandonl
ythent
hesamemaybeut
il
izedbyt
heCour
tagai
nstt
he

co-
accusedsi
ncei
nthatsi
tuat
iononl
ytheco-
accusedagai
nstwhom t
hat

conf
essi
on i
s bei
ng soughtt
o be used woul
d getan oppor
tuni
tyt
o

chal
l
enget
heev
idenceoft
hewi
tnesseswhoar
eexami
nedt
opr
ovet
hat

conf
essi
on.Ot
her
wiset
heaccusedagai
nstwhom conf
essi
onofhi
sco-

accusedi
sbei
ngr
eli
eduponwoul
dgetadv
ersel
yaf
fect
edwi
thoutget
ti
ng

anyoppor
tuni
tyt
odemol
i
sht
heev
idenceaboutt
heconf
essi
on.So,
wear
e

oft
hev
iewt
hati
nthi
scasesi
ncet
heconf
essi
onofKeshavKumarwasnot

i
ntr
oducedandpr
oveddur
ingt
hepr
osecut
ionev
idencei
tcannotused

agai
nstRaj
a.

Smt
.Kamt
idev
ivs.poshi
ram 11thmay2001

Andi
nthi
svi
ewoft
hemat
ter
,weneednotgoi
ntot
heot
herpoi
ntr
aisedby

t
hecounself
ort
heappel
l
antt
hatt
het
ri
alCour
twasboundt
oactont
he

conf
essi
oni
mmedi
atel
ywheni
twasmadeandcoul
dnothav
ekepti
ts
20

deci
sionpendi
ngandsi
ncenodeci
sionwast
akenatt
het
imewhent
he

conf
essi
onalappl
i
cat
ionwasmov
edbyKeshavKumari
tcoul
dnothav
e

beenusedagai
nstRaj
alat
eron.

PRAYER

Wher
efor
eint
hel
i
ghtoft
hei
ssuedr
aised,ar
gument
sadv
anced
21

andaut
hor
it
iesci
ted,
iti
shumbl
yrequest
edt
hatt
hishon'
bl
ecour
t
maybepl
easedt
o:

Thatt
her
espondentRaj
aisl
i
abl
eundersect
ion300,302,201of
I
PC1860.

AND/
OR

•Yourl
ordshi
pbepl
easedt
ogr
antappr
opr
iat
ejudgementi
nthe
l
i
ghtoft
hegr
oundandcont
ent
ionsr
aisedi
nthepr
esentappeal
.

•Yourl
ordshi
psbepl
easedt
ogr
antsuchot
herandf
urt
herr
eli
efs
as

maybedeemedf
iti
nthei
nter
estofj
ust
ice.