Final Amit Jain Vs State of UP - 23.05.2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. OF 2022
[UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA]
(WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF)
[Against the Impugned final judgment and order dated
25.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022]
IN THE MATTER OF:
Amit Kumar Jain …Petitioner
VERSUS
State of U.P. and Ors. …Respondents
With
CRLMP No. _________/2022
Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the
Impugned order
With
CRLMP No. _________/2022
Application for exemption from filing Official Translation.
PAPER BOOK
(For index kindly see inside)
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER: ABHINAY SHARMA

Dy. No. ............../2022
DECLARATION
All defects have been duly cured. Whatever has been added
/ deleted / modified in the petition is the result of curing of
defects and nothing else. Except curing the defects, nothing
has been done. Paper books are complete in all respects.
Signature: ---------------------------------
ABHINAY SHARMA
Advocate for the Petitioner
AOR Code: 3080
Contact No.: 9899272882
Email:sharmabhinay.aor@gmail.com
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SR. NO. RECORD OFPROCEEDINGS PAGE NO.
1. Court’s Order dated
10 Court’s Order dated

No. F.5/Judl(I)/2018, dated: 29/10/2018
w.e.f. 29th October, 2018 A1
ANNEXURE_X
PROFORMA FOR FIRST LISTING

SECTION_ _ _ __
The case pertains to (Please tick/check the correct box}:
• Central Act: (Title) Indian Penal Code
• Section: NA
• Central Rule: (Title) NA
• Rule No(s} NA
• State Act: (Title) NA
• Section: NA
• State Rule: (Title) NA
• Rule No(s) NA
• Impugned Interim Order: (Date) NA
• Impugned Final Order/Decree: (Date) 25.04.2022
• High Court: (Name) Highb Court of Judicature at Allahabad
• Names of Judges: Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.

Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J
• Tribunal/Authority: (Name} NA
1. Nature of matter: • Civil •

Yes Criminal
2. (a) Petitioner/ appellant No. l : Amit Kumar Jain

(b) e-mail ID:
(c) Mobile phone number:
A2
3. (a) Respondent No. l :_ State

_ _of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
UP
(b) e-mail ID:_ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __.____ _
(c) Mobile phone number: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4. (a) Main category classification: _14

__ _ _ __
(b) Sub classification:- 1408
----------
5. Not to be listed before :- -NA- -- - - - - - - -
6. (a) Similar disposed of matter with citation, if any, & case

No similar matter
details:- - - - - - - -- -
(b) Similar pending matter with case details: _No_similar
___ matter
__
7. Criminal Matters:
(a) Whether accu sed/convict has su1rendered: D

Yes D
No.
(b) FIR No._ 101/2022
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ __
14.03.2022
Muzzafar
(c) Police Station: _ __ _Nagar
__ _ _ _ __
(d) Sentence Awarded: _ NA_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
(e) Period of sentence undergone including period of
NA_ _ _ _ __
detention/ custody undergone: _ _
8. Land Acquisition Matters:
(a) Date of Section 4 notification: _ _NA

__ _ _
(b) Date of S ection 6 notification: _ _NA
_ _ __
NA
(c) Da te of Section 17 notification:_ _ _ __
9. Tax Matters: State the tax effect:- -NA
----
10. Specia l Category (first petitioner/ appellant only):
D Senior Citizen>65 years D SC/ST O woman/child D Disabled
D Legal a id case D In cu stody
11. Vehicle Number (in case of Motor Accident Claim m atters):
Date: 23.05.2022 AOR for petitioner(s)/appellant(s)

(Name)_ Abhinay
_ ·_ _ _ _ __ _
Sharma
Registration No._ 3080
_ _ _ _ __
INDEX
Sl. Particulars of Page No. of part to Remarks

No. Document which it belongs
Part I Part II
(Contents (Contents
of Paper of file
Book) alone)
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v)
1. Court Fees Nil Nil
2. O/R on Limitation A A
3. Listing Performa A-1-A-2 A-1-A-2
4. Cover Page of Paper A-3
Book
5. Index of Record of A-4
Proceedings
6. Limitation Report A-5
prepared by the Registry
7. Defect List A-6
8. Note Sheet NS1
9. List of Dates. B- CC
10. Impugned final judgment
and order dated
25.04.2022 passed by
the Hon’ble High Court 1-3
of Judicature at
Allahabad in Criminal
Misc. Writ Petition No.
3894 of 2022
11. Special Leave Petition 4- 28

with Affidavit.
12. ANNEXURE P-1:

29-32
A true translated copy of
the transcript of the call
recording between the
Petitioner and the
Respondent No. 4 dated
11.03.2022 at 9.37 PM
13. ANNEXURE P-2:

33-75
the transcript of the
recorded conversations
between the Petitioner
and the Ld. Judge dated
11.03.2022
14. ANNEXURE P-3:

76-108
Petitioner and the
12.03.2022
15. ANNEXURE P-4:

109-121
Petitioner and the
13.03.2022 at 12:57 PM
16. ANNEXURE P-5:

122-157
Petitioner and the
13.03.2022 at 2:23 PM
17. ANNEXURE P-6:
A true translated copy of 158-160

Petitioner and the Ld.
Judge dated 14.03.2022
at 2:22 PM
18. ANNEXURE P-7:
A true translated copy of 161-179

the FIR filed by the
Respondent No. 4, being
FIR No. 101 of 2022
under Section 452, 387,
353, 506 and 507 of IPC,
before Police Station
Civil Lines, Muzzafar
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh,
against the Petitioner
19. ANNEXURE P-8:

180-188
the
Application/representati
on dated 15.03.2022
made by the Petitioner to
the S.S.P, Muzaffar
Nagar
20. ANNEXURE P-9:

189-202
the letter dated
15.03.2022 written by
the Petitioner to Hon’ble
Chief Justice of High
Court of Allahabad
21. ANNEXURE P-10:

203-212
the letter dated
15.03.2022 written by
the Petitioner to Hon’ble
Chief Justice of India
22. ANNEXURE P-11:

213-225
the representation made
by the Petitioner to the
Hon’ble Home Secretary
of Respondent No.1 state
23. ANNEXURE P-12:

226-238
the representations
made by the Petitioner to
the Home Minister of
India
24. ANNEXURE P-13 239-255

A true copy of the
Criminal Misc. Writ
Petition No. 3894 of
2022 filed by the
Petitioner before the
Hon’ble High Court of
Allahabad
25. CRLMP No. ______/2022

Application for 256-258
exemption from filing
certified copy of the
Impugned Order
26. CRLMP No.

_______/2022
Application for 259-261
exemption from filing
Official Translation
27. FIR Format 262

28. F/M 263
29. V/A 264
A5

IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
OFFICE REPORT OF LIMITATION
1. The Petition is /are within time.
2. The petition is barred by time and there is delay of __NIL___
days in filing the SLP against Impugned final judgment and
order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.
3894 of 2022 for Condonation of __NIL__ Days delay has
been filed.
3. There is a delay of __NIL__ day in refilling the Petition and
Petition for the Condonation of delay in refilling has been
filed.
PLACE: NEW DELHI BRANCH OFFICER
Filed on: 23.05.2022

B
SYNOPSIS
By the instant Special Leave Petition, the Petitioner is
assailing the legality and validity of impugned final order and
judgment dated 25.04.2022 (hereinafter referred as
“Impugned Order”) passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.
3894 of 2022 (hereinafter referred as “Writ Petition”). The
petitioner submits that the Hon’ble High Court has
erroneously dismissed the said Writ Petition filed by the
Petitioner on or about 01.04.2022 and directed the
investigation to be conducted by the police under the
supervision of the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffar
Nagar, ignoring the material fact that the allegations raised by
the Petitioner in its writ petition would show that there were
inter alia serious allegations showing the involvement of wife
of the sitting Addl. District Judge of District Muzaffar Nagar,
Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred as “Ld. Judge”) and the
Ld. Judge himself.
The present petition also raises inter alia questions of law
for the kind consideration of this Hon’ble Court:

C
I. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
procedure as contemplated by this Hon’ble Court, for
matters wherein allegations have been made against the
sitting judicial officer, in Rajendra Singh v Lieutenant
Governor (NCT of Delhi) and Ors., as reported in (2011)
10 SCC 1 and Kamini Jaiswal v. Union of India, (2018) 1
SCC 156?
II. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, erred in directing the Respondent No. 2
to investigate into the allegations raised by the Petitioner
against the Respondent No. 4 and her husband who is a
sitting judge in District Court of Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar
Pradesh?
III. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, without appreciating the circumstances
due to which the Petitioner had to pay the bribe to the
Ld. Judge, erred in holding that the Petitioner had
intentionally and for his gain offered bribe to Ld. Judge
which disentitles the Petitioner to grant of any relief
under Article 226 of Constitution of India?

D
IV. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that directing the local police authority to investigate
into the allegations against the sitting Ld. Judge of the
same district may have some influence over the
investigation and due process of law?
V. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to exercise its
vested control over District Judiciary as enumerated
upon the Hon’ble High Court under Article 235 of the
Constitution of India, by not taking action against the
judicial officer based on specific allegation against such
judicial officer which are also corroborated with
substantial proof?
The aforesaid question of laws need to be decided in light
of facts mentioned hereinafter.
It is most respectfully submitted that the said Ld. Judge
was conducting the trials being Trial No. 592 of 2004 and
Trial No. 932 of 2004, pending before District Court Muzaffar
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred as “Trial”) both
proceedings being trials for abduction and murder of the

E
younger brother of Petitioner viz. Sachin Jain, which were
pending before the court of the said Ld. Judge.
On 18.02.2022, the Ld. Judge asked the Petitioner to
come and meet him at his residence in the evening.
Accordingly, the Petitioner went to the residence of the Ld.
Judge in the evening. Further, the Ld. Judge thereafter
demanded a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- for convicting the Accused
persons in on-going Trials for abduction and murder of the
brother of the Petitioner. Thereafter, the Ld. Judge,
Respondent No. 4 and the Petitioner had several telephonic
conversations discussing the modalities and
procedure/status of the Trial for conviction of the Accused
persons. The transcript of recorded telephonic conversations
between the Petitioner, Respondent No. 4 and Ld. Judge,
where the Ld. Judge and the Respondent No. 4 can clearly be
heard admitting taking some amount of monies for convicting
the said Accused persons, were placed on record by the
Petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court, however, the Hon’ble
High Court erroneously without appreciating the transcript of
the said recorded conversations passed the Impugned Order

F
dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner seeking
independent enquiry into the allegations raised by the
Petitioner against the Respondent No. 4 and Ld. Judge.
The transcripts placed on record by the Petitioner inter
alia record the following conversations between the Petitioner,
Respondent No. 4 and Ld. Judge:
“Amit Jain Advocate - Sir, with folded hands, I request you to

give them life Imprisonment . Tell me if you want me to give
something else. I will give no problem.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – No, it is not about giving me
something else.
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta - I had said yes to you without
even reading the evidence. We had only read the papers.
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – Judgment will be pronounced
on 15th. They will be put behind the bars.
…
Judge Sandeep Gupta –Let me read more, whatever is there is
factual. I want to convict all of them.
Amit Jain Advocate- You convict them all sir, you pass the
order accordingly. I will give whatever you demand.
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – That is why we have called you
here today. 15th is almost here.
…
Amit Jain Advocate – So, you just let me know whatever
you want, I will give whatever you demand. I request you
with folded hands, because if you acquit one then whole case
G
will be shattered like pearls. If one of them is innocent then

you’ll have to acquit all of them because from the beginning all
of them were tried together. Already evidence are not that
strong and if you acquit one of them then the case will become
weak against rest of them that one of them have been acquitted
so how the trial can continue against rest. So, please do not
acquit anyone.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - How will I leave anyone like
this? I will write the entire judgment. I’ll not spare
anyone, I’ll hang them, all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no! you hang them sir. Tell me if you
want something more from me. I will do whatever you ask
without any problem.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - I will let you know.
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - Now I have started reading the
files. Let me read. If anything happens, we will discuss with
each other. Will see, will hang all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate – You do it sir, I will be indebt to you, you
just let me know whatever you want and I will do it.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - Look, if you had approached
me sooner, I would have hanged all of them by now.
…
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Okay, let us study the matter and we
will call you day after tomorrow.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta –
The date of the verdict is day after tomorrow only
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – I will try, you do not worry.
Dharmpal and Rohit both are ready to pay me 6-7 Lakh,
they also approached me, I just don’t meet anyone.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – Whatever, we have made up in our mind,
we will do it accordingly.
H
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - We have already said yes to

you.
…
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta – Do not tell this to anyone. I
will try to hang all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate -I'm not going to tell anyone, but the
sentence given by Sumit Panwar in that case, has the same
lawyer as Dharampal…
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – Dharampal and Rohit are also
offering 6-7 lakhs and other two accused are also trying
to meet me.
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir, I am saying that suppose some
person says that I will give one crore rupees, acquit everyone.
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta - We never meet anyone like this. I
am just reading the facts of the case. We have already said
yes to you that mean it will always remain yes.”
…
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes he is asking if you can come at
10:30?
Amit Jain Advocate – Who is this speaking?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - from the house of Gupta ji
…
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Come at 10.30 PM.
Amit jain Advocate - Ok ok should I come now or morning?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Now, if you can come now then it is
fine otherwise, let's see tomorrow”
[Emphasis Supplied]
I
In view of the enormity of the issues raised by the
Petitioner staking his life and career at risk, the Hon’ble High
Court ought to have exercised its writ jurisdiction under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Further, while
refusing to grant any relief under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the Hon’ble High Court failed to
appreciate the circumstances under which the Petitioner was
constrained to pay the bribe to the Ld. Judge which was
admittedly accepted by the Ld. Judge.
It will not be out of place to mention that the Petitioner
has filed his representation before several authorities,
however, no action was taken on any of such representations,
constrained by which, the Petitioner approached the Hon’ble
High Court by filing the Writ Petition. The Hon’ble High Court
even after recording the seriousness of the matter instead of
taking the cognizance of matter in accordance with the settled
law as laid down by this Hon’ble Court in Rajendra Singh v
Lieutenant Governor (NCT of Delhi) and Ors., as reported in
(2011) 10 SCC 1 and Kamini Jaiswal v. Union of India, [(2018)
1 SCC 156] or to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation

J
(CBI) to do the investigation, directed the Respondent No. 2 to
ensure that no influence is allowed to be exercised by anyone.
Hence the present SLP.

K
LIST OF DATES
DATES EVENTS
2004 The brother of the Petitioner viz. Sachin Jain was
abducted and murdered in the year 2004.
Thereafter, FIR bearing No. 24 of 2004 was
registered by the father of the Petitioner in Nai
Mandi Police Station, Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar
Pradesh.
It is relevant to mention that the above case was
thoroughly investigated and charge sheet in the
above-mentioned FIR was filed. In the final charge
sheet, four persons were named as accused viz.
Dharampal, Katar Singh, Kapil and Rohit
(hereinafter referred as “Accused Persons”), all the
accused are facing trial as Trial No. 592 of 2004
(hereinafter referred as “Trial”). The Petitioner is
one of the witnesses in the above-mentioned trial.
2008 The Petitioner started practicing as an Advocate in
Civil Court Muzaffar Nagar in the year 2008 and is

L
a resident of District Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar
Pradesh. It is important to mention that the
Petitioner has devoted more than 14 years of his
life to this noble profession.
13.08.2021 When the Trial was pending before Ld. Judge the
Petitioner herein filed a petition before this Hon’ble
Court inter alia seeking relief for transfer of the
Trial to CBI, which is pending since the year 2004.
Further, while disposing the said writ petition, this
Hon’ble Court directed the trial court to dispose the
Trial within 6 months. However, even after the
direction of this Hon’ble Court to dispose the Trial
within 6 months, the Ld. Trial Court did not
dispose the Trial.
February, In the month of February, 2021, the
2022 aforementioned Trial was transferred from POSCO
Court to the Court of Addl. District Judge,
Muzzafar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred
as “Ld. Judge”)
18.02.2022 The Ld. Judge asked the Petitioner to come and

M
meet him at his residence in the evening.
Accordingly, the Petitioner went to the residence of
the Ld. Judge in the evening. Further, the Ld.
Judge thereafter demanded a sum of Rs.
5,00,000/- for convicting the Accused persons in
on-going Trials for abduction and murder of the
brother of the Petitioner. However, the Petitioner
refused to pay any amount to the Ld. Judge and
stated that we have strong case in our favour and
he will not give any amount to the Ld. Judge but to
utter shock of the Petitioner, Respondent No. 4
stated that Accused persons are also approaching
them with 6-7 Lakh and it is upon the Ld. Judge to
pass the judgment and he will pass the judgment
as he wish. Since even after running from pillar to
post for expeditious Trial of the Accused persons
who had abducted and murdered the younger
brother of the Petitioner and getting no relief, the
Petitioner, who was already under the pressure,
had no option but to obey the illegal demands of

N
the Ld. Judge for seeking complete justice in Trial
of abduction and murder of younger brother of the
Petitioner. Thereafter, the Ld. Judge, Respondent
No. 4 and the Petitioner had several telephonic
conversations discussing the modalities and
procedure/status of the Trial for conviction of the
Accused persons.
11.03.2022 The Respondent No. 4 had a telephonic
at 9:37 PM conversation with the Petitioner and requested the
Petitioner to come and meet the Ld. Judge and
Respondent No. 4 at their residence at 10:30 PM,
however, the Petitioner initially could not even
recognize the voice or phone number of the
Respondent No. 4 which is evident from the
transcript of the recorded telephonic conversation.
Thereafter, after the Respondent No. 4 stated that
she is calling on behalf of the Ld. Judge, she
handed over the phone to Ld. Judge.
The Ld. Judge also asked the Petitioner either to
meet them at his residence at 10:30 PM or they can

O
fix some time on next day. The Petitioner unaware
about the intentions of the Respondent No. 4
agreed to meet the Ld. Judge and Respondent No. 4
at their residence at 10:30 PM. The Petitioner
reached at the residence of Ld. Judge and
Respondent No. 4 and once again called them to
ask if he could come inside their residence, the
Respondent No. 4 on instructions of Ld. Judge
requested the Petitioner to come inside their
residence.
The relevant extract from the said transcript is
reproduced herein for ready reference of this
Hon’ble Court:
A true translated copy of the transcript of the call
recording between the Petitioner and the
Respondent No. 4 dated 11.03.2022 at 9.37 PM is
annexed herewith and marked as Annexure P-1
29
(Pg No. ____to 32
____).
11.03.2022 After accepting bribery from the Petitioner, the Ld.
Judge and his wife i.e. Respondent No. 4 herein

P
met the Petitioner on 11.03.2022 and inter alia
while admitting on several occasions that the Ld.
Judge has received the bribe, stated that the Ld.
Judge would convict the Accused Persons and he
would sentence them at least for life imprisonment.
Further, the Ld. Judge also in order to influence
the Petitioner, indicated that the Ld. Judge have
several contacts in higher judiciary and that the
counsel for the Accused Persons have also offered
him bribe for Rs. 6-7 Lakh. Pertinently, the Ld.
Judge also stated that he will pronounce the
judgment in the Trial on or before 15.03.2022.
The relevant part of transcript of recorded
conversation between the Petitioner, Ld. Judge and
Respondent No. 4 is reproduced herein for ease of
reference of this Hon’ble Court:
“Amit Jain Advocate - Sir, with folded hands, I

request you to give them life Imprisonment . Tell
me if you want me to give something else. I
will give no problem.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – No, it is not about
giving me something else.
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta - I had said yes to
you without even reading the evidence. We
Q
had only read the papers.

…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – Judgment will be
pronounced on 15th. They will be put behind
the bars.
…
Judge Sandeep Gupta –Let me read more,
whatever is there is factual. I want to convict
all of them.
Amit Jain Advocate- You convict them all sir, you
pass the order accordingly. I will give whatever
you demand.
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – That is why we
have called you here today. 15th is almost
here.
…
Amit Jain Advocate – So, you just let me know
whatever you want, I will give whatever you
demand. I request you with folded hands,
because if you acquit one then whole case will be
shattered like pearls. If one of them is innocent
then you’ll have to acquit all of them because
from the beginning all of them were tried
together. Already evidence are not that strong
and if you acquit one of them then the case will
become weak against rest of them that one of
them have been acquitted so how the trial can
continue against rest. So, please do not acquit
anyone.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - How will I leave
anyone like this? I will write the entire
judgment. I’ll not spare anyone, I’ll hang
them, all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no! you hang them sir.
Tell me if you want something more from
me. I will do whatever you ask without any
problem.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - I will let you know.
R
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - Now I have started
reading the files. Let me read. If anything
happens, we will discuss with each other.
Will see, will hang all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate – You do it sir, I will be
indebt to you, you just let me know whatever you
want and I will do it.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - Look, if you had
approached me sooner, I would have hanged
all of them by now.
…
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Okay, let us study the
matter and we will call you day after tomorrow.
The date of the verdict is day after tomorrow only
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – I will try, you do
not worry. Dharmpal and Rohit both are
ready to pay me 6-7 Lakh, they also
approached me, I just don’t meet anyone.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – Whatever, we have made
up in our mind, we will do it accordingly.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - We have already
said yes to you.
…
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta – Do not tell this to
anyone. I will try to hang all four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate -I'm not going to tell anyone,
but the sentence given by Sumit Panwar in that
case, has the same lawyer as Dharampal…
…
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – Dharampal and
Rohit are also offering 6-7 lakhs and other
two accused are also trying to meet me.
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir, I am saying that
suppose some person says that I will give one
S
crore rupees, acquit everyone.

Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta - We never meet anyone
like this. I am just reading the facts of the case. We
have already said yes to you that mean it will
always remain yes.”
[Emphasis Supplied]
A true translated copy of the transcript of the
recorded conversations between the Petitioner and
the Ld. Judge dated 11.03.2022 is annexed
herewith and marked as Annexure P-2 (Pg No.
33
____to 75
____).
12.03.2022 The Petitioner had a telephonic conversation with
Respondent No. 4 wherein she inter alia told the
Petitioner that she had discussed it with the Ld.
Judge and that the conviction of the Accused
persons is assured, however, the Ld. Judge might
acquit one of the Accused i.e. Kapil since there is
no evidence against him. Further, after much
discussion, the Respondent No. 4 stated that she
would try to convince the Ld. Judge to convict Kapil
also with maximum imprisonment.
The relevant part of transcript of recorded

T
conversation between the Petitioner and
Respondent No. 4 is reproduced herein for ready
Respondent No. 4 dated 12.03.2022 is annexed
76
____to 108
____)
13.03.2022 The Respondent No. 4 once again had a telephonic
at 12:57 PM conversation with the Petitioner and inter alia told
him that Accused persons in the Trial have been
roaming around their residence since yesterday
and they rang the doorbell several times, however,
she was not aware about the name of those
persons. Further, the Petitioner with bone fide
intention offered that the Respondent No. 4 could
call the Petitioner anytime if any Accused tries to
approach the Respondent No. 4.
Thereafter, the Respondent No. 4 stated that they

U
might be roaming around their house with
intention to contact the Ld. Judge.
The relevant part of the transcript of recorded
conversation between the Petitioner and
Respondent No. 4 is reproduced herein for ready
Respondent No. 4 dated 13.03.2022 at 12:57 PM is
(Pg No. 109 121

____to ____).
13.03.2022 The Petitioner called the Respondent No. 4 to check
at 2:23 PM if the Ld. Judge will be able to deliver the judgment
on 15.03.2022, as promised by the Ld. Judge and
the Respondent No. 4. However, the Respondent
No. 4 stated that due to some personal difficulties,
the Ld. Judge might not be able to deliver the
judgment on 15.03.2022 but the Respondent No. 4
assured the Petitioner that she would try her best
that the judgement gets delivered on 15.03.2022.

V
Further, the Respondent No. 4 once again stated
that the prosecutor is also trying to pressurize the
Ld. Judge and Respondent No. 4 to not convict the
Accused persons, however, the Respondent No. 4
did not entertain the offers made by the prosecutor
or counsel for the Accused persons.
Respondent No. 4 dated 13.03.2022 at 2:23 PM is
(Pg No. 122 157

____to ____).
14.03.2022 Thereafter, suddenly on 14.03.2022 the Ld. Judge
at 2:22 PM called the Petitioner and started abusing the
Petitioner and alleged that the Petitioner is
harassing his wife i.e. Respondent No. 4. However,
when the Petitioner told the Ld. Judge that the
Petitioner has all the call recording of all the
conversations between the Petitioner, Ld. Judge
and Respondent, the Ld. Judge disconnected the
call and threatened the Petitioner with dire

W
consequences.
The relevant part of the transcript of recorded
conversation between the Petitioner and the ld.
Judge is reproduced herein for ease of this Hon’ble
Court:
recording between the Petitioner and the Ld. Judge
dated 14.03.2022 at 2:22 PM is annexed herewith
and marked as Annexure P-6 (Pg No. 158

____to 160
____).
14.03.2022 After calling and abusing the Petitioner, the wife of
at 11:35 PM Ld. Judge i.e. Respondent No. 4 lodged a FIR being
FIR No. 101 of 2022 under Section 452, 387, 353,
506 and 507 of IPC, before Police Station Civil
Lines, Muzzafar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, against the
Petitioner herein raising several baseless
allegations including that the Petitioner on several
occasions had sent messages and called the
Respondent No. 4 and threatened the Respondent
that if the Ld. Judge does not convict the Accused
persons then the Petitioner would kidnap and

X
murder the whole family of Respondent No. 4.
Further, the Respondent No. 4 in her FIR has also
alleged that on 14.03.2022 the Petitioner
trespassed the residence of the Ld. Judge and
assaulted the Ld. Judge and Respondent No. 4 and
threatened to kill them if they do not convict the
Accused Persons in on-going trial before the Ld.
Judge.
A true translated copy of the FIR filed by the
Respondent No. 4, being FIR No. 101 of 2022 under
Section 452, 387, 353, 506 and 507 of IPC, before
Police Station Civil Lines, Muzzafar Nagar, Uttar
Pradesh, against the Petitioner is annexed herewith
and marked as Annexure P-7 (Pg No. 161 179

____to ____).
(NOTE: Pertinently, the FIR was lodged by the
Respondent No. 4 at 11:35 PM with allegations that
the Petitioner had forcefully entered the residence
of the Respondent No. 4 and Ld. Judge, at 1 PM, to
threaten them to pass favourable judgment,

Y
however, it is a matter of record that the Ld. Judge
called the Petitioner at 2:22 PM inter alia abusing
the Petitioner for the reasons best known to him.)
15.03.2022 Aggrieved by the FIR dated 14.03.2022 the
Petitioner filed his representation before the Police
Station Civil Lines, Muzzafar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.
The Petitioner while enclosing all the call recordings
between the Ld. Judge, Respondent No. 4 and the
Petitioner clearly showing that the Ld. Judge has
taken bribery from the Petitioner, stated that the
Ld. Judge on 14.03.2022 called the Petitioner on
his mobile phone and inter alia started abusing the
Petitioner. Further, the Petitioner in his
representation request the police authority to check
the CCTV camera installed near the residence of
Ld. Judge to check if the Petitioner was near their
residence.
The Petitioner in his representation also stated that
the alleged time of incident is around 1 PM and the
FIR was lodged by the Respondent No.4 at 11:35

Z
PM which itself shows that the FIR is clearly an
afterthought by the Ld. Judge to use Respondent
No. 4 as a pawn to frame the Petitioner in false case
under Section 452, 387, 353, 506 and 507 of IPC.
It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the
representation made by the Petitioner, the police
authority has still not impounded the CCTV footage
of the residence of the Respondent No. 4 on
contrary the police authority is harassing the
Petitioner to provide several documents/recording
in original form for “forensic investigation”.
A true translated copy of the
Application/representation dated 15.03.2022 made
by the Petitioner to the S.S. P, Muzaffar Nagar is
(Pg No. 180 188

____to ____).
15.03.2022 The Petitioner on 15.03.2022 also wrote an e-mail
to District Judge, Muzzafar Nagar marking the
same mail to registrar of Hon’ble High Court of
Allahabad and this Hon’ble Court.

AA
In the said e-mail, the Petitioner has raised the
clear allegations against the Ld. Judge for taking
bribe from the Petitioner and further stated that the
Petitioner is under life threat from the family of Ld.
Judge and Respondent No. 4. Further, the
Petitioner also wrote a letter to Hon’ble Chief
Justice of High Court of Allahabad as well as
Hon’ble Chief Justice of India revealing the corrupt
practices of Ld. Judge.
A true translated copy of the letter dated
15.03.2022 written by the Petitioner to Hon’ble
Chief Justice of High Court of Allahabad is annexed
189 202
____to ____).
A true translated copy of the letter dated
15.03.2022 written by the Petitioner to Hon’ble
Chief Justice of India is annexed herewith and
203 212
marked as Annexure P-10 (Pg No. ____to ____).
17.03.2022 The Petitioner also sent a representation to the
Hon’ble Home Secretary of Respondent No.1 state

BB
and Home Minister of India for an independent and
impartial investigation into the allegations raised by
the Petitioner against the Ld. Judge, however, till
date no response has been received by the
Petitioner to his representation.
A true translated copy of the representation made
by the Petitioner to the Hon’ble Home Secretary of
Respondent No.1 state is annexed herewith and
213 225
marked as Annexure P-11 (Pg No. ____to ____).
A true translated copy of the representations made
by the Petitioner to the Home Minister of India is
(Pg No. 226

____to 238
____).
01.04.2022 Aggrieved by no action being taken against the
representations filed by the Petitioner before several
authorities, the Petitioner filed the Writ Petition
being Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022
before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad seeking
independent enquiry into the allegations raised by
the Petitioner against the Ld. Judge and further

CC
seeking protection from the malicious proceedings
being conducted against the Petitioner on behest of
the Ld. Judge.
A true copy of the Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.
3894 of 2022 filed by the Petitioner before the
Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad is annexed
239 255
____to ____).
25.04.2022 The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad after hearing
the submissions made by the counsel for Petitioner
passed the Impugned Order erroneously dismissing
the writ petition filed by the Petitioner by directing
coercive steps against the Petitioner and taking no
action against the Respondent No. 4 or the Ld.
Judge even after considering the admission by the
Ld. Judge and Respondent No. 4 for taking the
bribe for convicting the Accused persons in the on-
going Trial of abduction and murder of the younger
brother of the Petitioner in the year 2004.
23
__.05.2022 Hence the present Petition
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 44 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3894 of
2022
Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Jain

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.

Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
This writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondent authority to transfer the investigation of Case Crime No.101 of
2022, under Sections 452, 387, 353, 506, 507 IPC, Police Station Civil
Lines, District Muzaffar Nagar to Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to
investigate the above noted case.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the
respondent no.1 to decide the representation dated 17.03.2022 within
stipulated time.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing

the respondents to make fair investigation in Case Crime No.101 of 2022,
under Sections 452, 387, 353, 506, 507 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines,
District Muzaffar Nagar."
The facts of the case are disturbing. We direct the description of

parties to be anonymized. Names of the parties to the present
petition henceforth shall be referred to as X vs. State.
The First Information Report under challenge is contained in

Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The informant happens to be
the wife of a Judicial Officer and claims to be receiving threats
from the named accused whose matter is pending in the court of
her husband. Various instances of such threats have been
referred to in the report. Prayer has thus been made to
investigate the crime and to provide appropriate protection to
the family members of the judicial officer concerned.
The FIR is challenged on the ground that there exists complicity

of the Judicial Officer and his wife in the matter and various
call recordings of telephonic conversations between them have
been brought on record of the writ petition and its annexures. In
para 9 & 20 of the writ petition it is also alleged that certain
considerations have been passed on to the officer concerned.
The petitioner virtually accepts having paid bribe for favourable
decision in the matter. Transcripts of communication between
the Presiding Officer; his wife; and the parties have been
annexed in order to demonstrate that Presiding Officer is
2
himself guilty in the matter and that the information given by
his wife to the police is not reliable and the FIR is liable to be
quashed.
Judicial system of this country is governed by the rule of law

and its credibility rests upon trust of the people in the system
itself. Instances of this kind, if the allegations are correct, have
the ability to question the confidence of a common man in the
system itself. It is, therefore, imminently necessary that the
allegations and counter allegations are thoroughly investigated
in an independent and fair manner. The issue cannot be taken
lightly.
So far as the implication of petitioner in the FIR is concerned

we find that allegations are specific which clearly make out a
prima facie case of cognizable offence in the matter. Whether
these allegations are correct or not is an aspect to be examined
during the course of investigation. We would not be inclined to
interfere with the ongoing investigation in the matter or to
direct the investigation to be transferred to any other agency on
the asking of petitioner merely on the strength of vague
allegations that the investigating officer is not acting
independently. The allegations are neither specific nor are
substantiated. We, therefore, do not find any good ground to
doubt the impartiality of the Investigating Officer in the matter
so as to transfer the investigation to any other agency.
The petitioner admittedly is an advocate and he is thus an

officer of the Court. Narration of facts in the writ petition which
is supported by petitioner's own affidavit clearly suggest that
petitioner had intentionally and for his gain offered bribe to a
Judicial Officer which clearly disentitles him to grant of any
relief by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India. We direct the Registry to send copy of this order
alongwith the writ petition to the Chairman, Bar Council of
Uttar Pradesh for appropriate action in the matter in accordance
with law.
Counsel for the petitioner has referred to and relied upon

judgment of this Court in Sri Gopal Gupta and another vs. State
of U.P. and others being Writ Petition No.10987 of 2014,
decided on 12.09.2014. In that case facts were distinct. The
investigation had already progressed and the Court had reasons
to form an opinion that the investigation was not progressing in
the desired manner where the allegation was against a judicial
officer of having committed offence under section 376 IPC. It
was in that unusual circumstances that the Court made
observations and directed investigation to be entrusted to the3
CBI. We do not find any such material available on record, as of
now, which persuades us to follow similar course.
So far as the judgement of the Apex Court in Param Vir Singh

vs. State of Maharashtra and others being Criminal Appeal
No.473 of 2022, decided on 24.03.2022, relied upon by
petitioner's counsel is concerned, it was passed in the facts of
the particular case where there was serious cloud on the conduct
of impartial investigation itself necessitating the transfer of
investigation to CBI.
Considering the seriousness of the allegations levelled we call

upon the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffar Nagar to
personally monitor the investigation and ensure that no
influence is allowed to be exercised by anyone only because of
the status held by the persons involved in the matter. We also
direct that copy of this order alongwith writ petition be placed
before Registrar General of this Court for appropriate
examination.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022

Ashok Kr.
4
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
IN THE MATTER OF:
Between Position of Parties

In the Hon’ble In this
High Court of Hon’ble
Judicature at Court
Allahabad
1. Amit Kumar Jain Petitioner Petitioner
R/o 41, Gherkhatti, Nai
Mandi, District Muzaffar
Nagar
Versus
1. State of U.P. through its Respondent Contesting

Secretary Ministry of No. 1 Respondent
Home, U.P. at Lucknow No. 1
2. Senior Superintendent of Respondent Respondent

5
Police Muzaffar Nagar, No. 2 No. 2
District Muzaffar Nagar
3. Station House Officer, Respondent Respondent

Police Station Civil Lines, No. 3 No. 3
District Muzaffar Nagar
4. Smt. Neeru Agarwal, Respondent Respondent

R/o House No. HCH-I No. 4 No. 4
Type IV ground, Ground
Floor Court Complex,
Officers Colony, Near
Masjid, Muzaffar Nagar
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the present Special Leave Petition is being filed under
Article 136 of the Constitution of India for grant of Special
Leave to Appeal against final judgment and order dated
25.04.2022 (hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”)
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022
(hereinafter referred to as “Writ Petition”), whereby the
Hon’ble Court dismissed the said writ petition and directed
the investigation to be conducted by the Respondent No. 2,
ignoring the material fact that the allegations raised by the

6
Petitioner are against the sitting Addl. District Judge of
District Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred
as “Ld. Judge”).
2. QUESTION OF LAW
That the Petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Hon’ble
Court to the following question of law:
I. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to exercise its
vested control over District Judiciary as enumerated
upon the Hon’ble High Court under Article 235 of the
Constitution of India, by not taking action against the
judicial officer based on specific allegations against
such judicial officer which are also corroborated with
substantial proof?
II. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate
the procedure laid down by this Hon’ble Court, for
conducting an enquiry against judicial officer, in
Rajendra Singh v Lieutenant Governor (NCT of Delhi)
and Ors., as reported in (2011) 10 SCC 1 and Kamini
Jaiswal v. Union of India, (2018) 1 SCC 156?

7
III. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, erred in directing the Respondent No.
2 to investigate into the allegations raised by the
Petitioner against the Respondent No. 4 and her
husband who is a sitting judge in District Court of
Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh?
IV. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, without appreciating the
circumstances due to which the Petitioner had to pay
the bribe to the Ld. Judge, erred in holding that the
Petitioner had intentionally and for his gain offered
bribe to Ld. Judge which disentitles the Petitioner to
grant of any relief under Article 226 of Constitution of
India?
V. Whether the Hon’ble High Court erred in holding that
the Petitioner had intentionally and for his gain offered
bribe to a Ld. Judge, when it is evident from the
transcripts on record that in the facts and
circumstances of the case, the Petitioner was forced to

8
pay bribe to the Ld. Judge for expeditious disposal of
Trial which is pending since the year 2004 related to
abduction and murder of younger brother of the
Petitioner?
VI. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, failed to appreciate the fact that the
Petitioner is the brother of the victim, who was
abducted and murdered in Case Crime No. 24 of 2004
which was pending adjudication before the Ld. Judge?
VII. Whether the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, erred in holding that the
investigation is not liable to be transferred to an
Independent Agency even after observing that the
allegations and counter allegations are serious in
nature concerning the trust of general public in
judicial system that ought to be investigated in a fair
and independent manner?
VIII. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate
the fact that directing the local police authority to

9
investigate into the allegations against the sitting Ld.
Judge of the same district may influence the
investigation and due process of law?
IX. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to take suo moto
cognizance against the actions of the sitting Ld. Judge
even after observing in the Impugned Order that in
order to preserve the trust and faith of the common
man in the judicial system, the allegations and counter
allegations are ought to be investigated in fair manner?
X. Whether the Hon’ble High Court erred in holding that
action must be taken by the Bar Council of Uttar
Pradesh against the Petitioner for offering bribe to Ld.
Judge and no action was directed against the sitting
Ld. Judge who also admittedly accepted the bribe?
XI. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate
the fact that the call recordings and CCTV footage,
which are crucial material evidences in the facts and
circumstances of this case, were not collected and

10
preserved by the Respondent No. 2 and Respondent
No. 3 Police?
XII. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate
the fact that the Application moved by the Petitioner
before Home Secretary U.P at Lucknow and Home
Secretary Govt. of India New Delhi for transferring the
investigation is still pending adjudication before the
concerned Authority?
XIII. Whether the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate
the fact that there has been continuous pressure and
threat by the Respondent police on the Petitioner
during investigation?
XIV. Whether the Hon’ble High Court erred in holding that
fact of the present matter does not require any
independent investigation which is not controlled by
the state machinery?
3. DECLARATION IN TERMS OF RULE 2(2):

11
The Petitioner state that no other petition seeking leave to
appeal has been filed by her with respect to final judgment
and order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ
Petition No. 3894 of 2022.
4. DECLARATION IN TERMS OF RULE 4:
The Annexure P- 1 to P- 13 are produced along with the
Special Leave Petition are true copies of the pleadings /
documents which formed part of the records of the case in
the court below against whose order the leave to appeal is
sought for in this petition.
5. GROUNDS
The petitioner craves leave to appeal, inter-alia on the
following grounds amongst others which are without
prejudice to each other:-
A. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, erred in directing the Respondent No. 2
to investigate into the allegations raised by the Petitioner
against the Respondent No. 4 and her husband who is a

12
sitting judge in District Court of Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar
Pradesh. The Petitioner most respectfully submits that
the investigation into the allegations raised against the
sitting Ld. Judge of a district by the local police may have
influence over the investigation against such Ld. Judge.
Further, the local police who also report to such Ld.
Judge, no matter what the investigation concludes, will
not build the confidence in general public for general
public which was the real intention of the Hon’ble High
Court while passing the Impugned Order.
B. Because the Hon’ble High Court erred in holding that the
relief sought by the Petitioner includes the relief quashing
of the said FIR. It is submitted that the relief (i) to (v)
stated in the Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of
2022 nowhere mentions that the said FIR should be
quashed and the reliefs were prayed only limited to the
extent of transferring the investigation to an independent
agency for fair investigation. In fact, the impugned
judgment has been delivered as if the writs were filed for
seeking quashing of the FIRs against the Petitioner.

13
C. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the said
impugned order, erred in holding that the investigation is
not liable to be transferred to an Independent Agency
even after observing that the allegations and counter
allegations are serious in nature and therefore ought to
be investigated in a fair and independent manner. It is
submitted that after taking the transcripts of the call
recording between the Respondent No. 4 and the
Petitioner and also between the sitting Ld. Judge and the
Petitioner placed on record by the Petitioner into
consideration, it is recorded by the Hon’ble High Court
that the said transcripts demonstrates that the Ld. Judge
is guilty in the matter.
D. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, without appreciating the circumstances
due to which the Petitioner had to resort to offer bribe to
the Ld. Judge, erred in holding that the Petitioner had
intentionally and for his gain offered bribe to Ld. Judge
which disentitles the Petitioner to grant of any relief
under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

14
E. Because the Hon’ble High Court erred in holding that the
Petitioner had intentionally and for his gain offered bribe
to a Ld. Judge, when it is evident from the transcripts on
record that in the facts and circumstances of the case,
the Petitioner was forced to pay bribe to the Ld. Judge. It
is submitted that the Hon’ble High Court referred to
paragraph 8 and 9 of the said writ petition in the
impugned order and erroneously held that the Petitioner
for his gain offered bribe to the Ld. Judge. The facts and
circumstances leading to the only option the petitioner
was left with and had to resort to i.e., offering a bribe are:
i. It is submitted that the FIR bearing Case Crime No.
24 of 2004 was registered by the father of the
Petitioner in Nai Mandi Police Station, Muzaffar
Nagar in the case of abduction and murder of the
brother of the Petitioner which was pending has
been pending in that matter for last 18 years.
ii. Thereafter, the Petitioner, on 18.02.2022, was asked
the Ld. Judge to come and meet at his residence.

15
iii. It is pertinent to mention that the first call was from
the Respondent No. 4 to the Petitioner and not vice
versa.
iv. The Petitioner, after seeing there was no hope for
justice, gave in to the illegal demands of the Ld.
Judge and paid the amount asked by the Ld. Judge.
F. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
impugned order, failed to appreciate the fact that the
Petitioner is the brother of the victim, who was abducted
and murdered, in Case Crime No. 24 of 2004 which was
pending adjudication before the said Ld. Judge.
G. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to take suo moto
cognizance against the actions of the sitting Ld. Judge
even after observing in the impugned order that in order
to preserve the trust and faith of the common man in the
judicial system, the allegations and counter allegations
are ought to be investigated in fair manner. It is
submitted that the Hon’ble High Court directed actions
against the Petitioner for alleged offering bribe to the Ld.

16
Judge by directing the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to
take appropriate steps against the Petitioner, however,
failed to take any steps against the sitting Ld. Judge for
firstly asking bribe to do this official duty and secondly to
accept the bribe.
H. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that the call recordings and CCTV footage, which are
crucial material evidences in the facts and circumstances
of this case, were not collected and preserved by the
Respondent No. 1 Police.
I. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
Impugned Order, failed to appreciate that it is
Respondent No. 4 who had initiated the conversations
and called the Petitioner to their residence which is
evident from the transcript as well as Call Detail Records
between the Petitioner and Respondent. It is most
respectfully submitted that the Respondent No. 2 may be
directed to file Call Detail Records of the Respondent No.
4 and Petitioner which will make it clear that the FIR

17
against the Petitioner is just to thwart the allegations
raised by the Petitioner against Ld. Judge and
Respondent No. 4.
J. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that the Application moved by the Petitioner before
Home Secretary U.P at Lucknow and Home Secretary
Govt. of India New Delhi for transferring the investigation
to Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) is still pending
adjudication before the concerned Authority. It is
submitted that the Petitioner also gave representations to
the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Chief Justice
of Allahabad High Court, Administrative Judge Muzaffar
Nagar and High Court Allahabad and Registrar General
High Court of Allahabad, however there was response.
K. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that there has been continuous pressure and threat
by the Respondent No. 1 police on the Petitioner during
investigation.
18
L. Because the Hon’ble High Court while directing the
Respondent No. 2 to monitor the investigation on the
allegations and counter allegations made against the ld.
Judge, failed to appreciate the law laid down by this
Hon’ble Court in Kamini Jaiswal v. Union of India,
(2018) 1 SCC 156. The relevant extract of the said
judgment is reproduced herein for ready reference of this
Hon’ble Court:
“23. … There is an averment made in the writ petition

that it is against the highest judicial functionaries;
that FIR has been recorded. We do not find reflection
of any name of the Judge of this Court in the FIR.
There is no question of registering any FIR against
any sitting Judge of the High Court or of this Court as
it is not permissible as per the law laid down by a
Constitution Bench of 5 Hon'ble Judges of this Court
in K. Veeraswami v. Union of India [K. Veeraswami v.
Union of India, (1991) 3 SCC 655 : 1991 SCC (Cri)
734] wherein this Court observed that in order to
ensure the independence of the judiciary the
apprehension that the executive being the largest
litigant, it is likely to misuse the power to prosecute
the Judges. Any complaint against a Judge and
investigation by CBI if given publicity, will have a far-
reaching effect on the Judge and the litigant public.
The need, therefore, is of judicious use of action
taken under the Act. There cannot be registration of
any FIR against a High Court Judge or Chief Justice
of the High Court or the Supreme Court Judge without
the consultation of the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India
and, in case there is an allegation against the Hon'ble
Chief Justice of India, the decision has to be taken by
19
the Hon'ble President, in accordance with the
procedure prescribed in the said decision. Thus, the
instant petitions, as filed, are a misconceived venture
inasmuch as the petition wrongly presupposes that
investigation involves higher judiciary i.e. this Court's
functionaries are under the scanner in the aforesaid
case; that independence of judiciary cannot be left at
the mercy of CBI or that of the police is a red herring.
There cannot be any FIR even against the Civil
Judge/Munsif without permission of the Chief Justice
of the court concerned; and rightly, FIR has not been
registered against any sitting Judge. Otherwise, on
unfounded allegations, any honest Judge to the core,
can be defamed, and reputation can be jeopardised.
No Judge can be held responsible for what may, or
has happened in the corridors, or for “who purports to
sell whom”….”
[Emphasis supplied]
M. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
law laid down by this Hon’ble Court in Civil Appeal No.
3613 of 2022 titled as Muzaffar Husain vs State of
Uttar Pradesh and Anr that the undue favour to a party
under the guise of passing judicial orders is the worst
kind of judicial dishonesty and misconduct. The relevant
portion of the above-mentioned judgment is reproduced
below for ready reference:
“In our opinion, showing undue favour to a party

under the guise of passing judicial orders is the
worst kind of judicial dishonesty and misconduct.
20
The extraneous consideration for showing favour
need not always be a monetary consideration. It is
often said that “the public servants are like fish in
the water, none can say when and how a fish
drank the water”. A judge must decide the case on
the basis of the facts on record and the law
applicable to the case. If he decides a case for
extraneous reasons, then he is not performing his
duties in accordance with law. As often quoted, a
judge, like Caesar’s wife, must be above
suspicion.”
[Emphasis supplied]
N. Because the Hon’ble High Court erred in ignoring the law
laid down in Rajendra Singh Verma v. Lt. Governor
(NCT of Delhi), (2011) 10 SCC 1 by this Hon’ble Court
that by virtue of Article 235 of the Constitution of India,
High Court enjoys complete control over the District
Courts and subordinate Courts’ judges. The relevant
portion of the above-mentioned judgment is reproduced
below for ready reference:
“80. The mandate of Article 235 of the Constitution

is that the High Court has to maintain constant
vigil on its subordinate judiciary as laid down by
this Court in High Court of Judicature of Bombay
v. Shirishkumar Rangrao Patil [(1997) 6 SCC 339.
In the said case, this Court has explained that the
lymph nodes (cancerous cells) of corruption
constantly keep creeping into the vital veins of the
judiciary and need to stem it out by judicial
surgery lies on the judiciary itself by its self-
21
imposed or corrective measures or disciplinary
action under the doctrine of control enshrined in
Articles 235 and 124(6) of the Constitution, and
therefore, it would be necessary that there should
be constant vigil by the High Court concerned on
its subordinate judiciary and self-introspection.
81. Judicial service is not a service in the sense of
an employment as is commonly understood.
Judges are discharging their functions while
exercising the sovereign judicial power of the
State. Their honesty and integrity is expected to be
beyond doubt. It should be reflected in their overall
reputation. There is no manner of doubt that the
nature of judicial service is such that it cannot
afford to suffer continuance in service of persons of
doubtful integrity or who have lost their utility.”
[Emphasis supplied]
O. Because the Hon’ble High Court erred in ignoring the law
laid down by the Hon’ble High Court Allahabad that the
investigation has to be from all possible angles and not
one sided due to the involvement of Ld. Judge in Sri
Gopal Gupta And Anr. vs State of U.P. And 2 Others
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10987 of 2014
“The investigation has to be fair judicious,

transparent and expeditious to ensure with basic
compliance of law i.e. to find out as to where the
truth lies. Same obligates the Investigating Officer
to view the case in hand being investigated from
all possible angles i.e. from the perspective of
complainant and from the perspective of accused
persons also, as ultimate object of investigation is
to bring guilty to law as no body stands above law
22
dehors his position and influence in the society.
The investigation has to be conducted in manner,
that would reflect that every possible measure has
been taken to find out the whole truth and to
decipher the truth from the web of falsehoods.”
[Emphasis supplied]
6. GROUNDS FOR INTERIM RELIEF:
It is humbly submitted that the Petitioners are entitled to
the interim relief prayed for, inter-alia for the following
reasons:
A. Because the impugned judgment has passed in utter
disregard of various judgments passed by this Hon’ble
Court.
B. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that the Application moved by the Petitioner before
Home Secretary U.P at Lucknow and Home Secretary
Govt. of India New Delhi for transferring the investigation
is still pending adjudication before the concerned
Authority.
C. Because the Petitioner has a good prima facie case on
merits. Further the balance of convenience is in favour of

23
the Petition. It is submitted that no irreparable loss shall
be caused to the Respondent is the prayers for interim
relief are granted. However, if the interim reliefs as prayer
for are not granted, grave and irreparable harm and loss
shall be suffered by the Petitioner.
D. Because the Hon’ble High Court failed to appreciate the
fact that the call recordings and CCTV footage, which are
crucial material evidences in the facts and circumstances
of this case, were not collected and preserved by the
Respondent No. 1 Police.
E. Because the Hon’ble High Court while passing the
impugned order, failed to appreciate the fact that the
Petitioner is the brother of the victim, who was abducted
and murdered, in Case Crime No. 24 of 2004 which was
pending adjudication before the said Ld. Judge
7. PRAYER:
In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the
interest of justice, it is most respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

24
i. Grant Special Leave to Appeal against the final
judgment and order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the
Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022;
ii. May pass such other and further order(s) as this
Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the premises
of this case.
8. PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF:
It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court,
during the pendency of the hearing and disposal of the
present petition, may be pleased to:
i. Pass an appropriate order and stay the operation and
implementation of the Impugned Judgment and Order
dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition
No. 3894 of 2022;
ii. Pass an appropriate order and stay the further
proceedings arising out of FIR No. 101 of 2022 under
Section 452, 387, 353, 506 and 507 of IPC, before
Police Station Civil Lines, Muzzafar Nagar, Uttar

25
Pradesh, filed by the Respondent No. 4, against the
Petitioner;
iii. Pass an appropriate order or direction for no coercive
steps against the Petitioner till pendency of the present
Petition;
iv. Stay the proceedings initiated by the Bar Council of
Uttar Pradesh on the direction of the Hon’ble High
Court against the Petitioner
v. Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER

AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY
Filed By:
ABHINAY SHARMA
AOR Code: 3080
Contact No.: 9899272882
Email: sharmabhinay.aor@gmail.com
Drawn on:17.05.2022
Date: 23.05.2022 (Filed on)
Place: New Delhi

26
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
CERTIFICATE
Certified that the Special Leave Petition is confined only to the
pleading before the Court whose order is challenged and the
other documents relied upon in those proceedings. No Additional
facts documents or grounds have been taken therein or relied
upon in the Special Leave Petition. It is further certified that the
copies of the documents/ annexure attached to the Special Leave
Petition are necessary to answer the questions of law raised in
the petition or to make out grounds urged in the Special Leave
Petition for consideration of this Hon’ble Court. The certificate is
given on the basis of the instructions given by the person
authorized by the Petitioner whose affidavit is filed in support of
the Special Leave Petition.
PLACE: NEW DELHI (Abhinay Sharma)
Date:23-0 5-2022 ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER

27
COURT OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME
(CRIMINAL) NO. OF 2022

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION
UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA]
IN THE MATTER OF:

.Petitioner
Amit Kumar Jain
VERSUS
State of U.P. and Ors. .Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
R/o
1, Sh. Amit Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Pradeep Kumar Jain, aged12,
Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar
H. No. 41, Gherkhatti, Nai Mandi, Distt.
Pradesh- 251 306, presently at New Delhi, do hereby solemnly
affirm and declare that:
such well conversant with the facts

1. I am the Petitioner and as
and circumstances of the present case.
2. That the facts stated in the accompanying synopsis and list of

A 28),
dates ( Pages B to CC
4Special Leave Petition (Pages 4 to
ANDANA true to the best of my

(Paras 1 to 8) andCRLMPs are
Knowledge. R
DANA
13 ann¢xed to the Special Leave
That the Annexure P/1 to P/_
TAR
RANetition are
K. BANDANNA true copy of their respective original.
Delhi/ *
Regd. No9718
ate of Expiry
26.02.2025
OF
IND
28
4. That the facts stated herein above are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
1, the above named deponent do hereby verify that the facts
stated in the above affidavit are true to my knowledge. No part of
the same is false and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
2022
Verified at oh this Day of , 2022.
IDENTIFIED
O Regd.
OTAA
TAR
K. BANDAKA
Na
De. lhy1718
26.02.2025
Date6f Exp\y
18MAY 2022
pEPQNENT
26.02.2025
OF MDI
ATTESTED
NOTARYFUBLIC,
GOVT. OF INDIADELHI
ANNEXURE P-1 29
CALL RECORDING BETWEEN

MR. AMIT JAIN ADVOCATE
AND Mrs. NEERU AGGARWAL
W/O ADJ MR. SANDEEP
GUPTA
(FROM 8968231511 TO
9411033400)
DATE -11.03.2022
TIMING-21.37PM
CALL DURATION- 1.15

MINUTES
Amit Jain Advocate -- Hello.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal ---

Hello.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Yes,

he is asking if you can come
at 10:30 PM?
Amit Jain Advocate – Who is

this speaking?
30
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – I am

speaking from the house of
Gupta ji.
Amit Jain Advocate – who?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – I am

speaking from the house of
Gupta ji.
Amit Jain Advocate – No,

What number did you dial?
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal-

Advocate Amit Jain
speaking?
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes

yes.
Mrs. Neil Aggarwal - Yes,

from Sandeep Gupta's
house.
Amit Jain Advocate – okay ,

okay hello madam.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes

Hello.
31
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes, I

will come at 10.30 pm.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Come

at 10.30 pm.
Amit jain Advocate - Ok ok

should I come now or in the
morning?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Now,

if you can come now then it
is fine otherwise, let's see
tomorrow
Amit Jain Advocate – as you

say, I can come now at
10:30 PM.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- One

minute, you talk to him
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta -

Hello!
Amit Jain Advocate - Hello

Sir!

Yes, hello.
32
Amit Jain Advocate -yes ,

Sir.

Where are you now?
Amit Jain Advocate - I am

here at shiv chowk sir
Judge Sandeep Gupta ---

Well if you can come at
10.30 PM, come, otherwise
we will keep it for tomorrow
Amit Jain Advocate - No, I

can come at 10.30 PM.

All right.
Amit Jain Advocate - Alright

Sir I am coming now!
ANNEXURE P-2 33
VOICE RECORDING
BETWEEN MR. AMIT JAIN
ADVOCATE AND ADJ MR.
SANDEEP GUPTA & MRS.
NEERU AGGARWAL
DATE - 11-03-2022
DURATION- 54.37 Sec

It will be covered by this
that the weapon that he has
recovered is this one only.
Amit Jain Advocate – yes it

is sir. My point is that if he
claimed in section 27 that I
can recover the body and
find out where it is
concealed, or can show the
Location of the body. It is
also admissible.

Yes It is. Katar Singh
snatched the keys from
Sachin and slid him into the
back seat. This will be
Surely on record.
34
Amit Jain Advocate -Yes,

you Should write this. But
you can, also Write
Mamchand's entire
statement which is relevant.
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta -

Here it is for Dharmapal. I
have read it. Katar Singh
stated that he could show
the location as well as the
body.
Amit Jain Advocate – this is

it sir. these 4 lines are
admissible under section 27
What all should be written.

One is this.
Amit Jain Advocate – This is

the one thing It's quiet
significant. Can show the
dead body, can trace the
location of dead Body, it is
very strong thing even
supreme Court cannot deny
this Judgement
35

Yes, this is his one
statement
Amit jain Advocate - Sir,

take a look at his 156/3; I
have a typed copy with me.

She says in the beginning
that no person had come to
my house between 8.00 pm –
9:30 pm on 24.01.2004. In
the meantime, I cannot say
that anyone has spoken to
Raju because Raju was
missing. She says Raju was
missing from there
Amit Jain Advocate - She is

lying.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta --

There she says something
else.
Amit Jain Advocate - We are

establishing that someone or
a witness is lying in court.
36

Date - On 24.01.2004 she
said Kapil is my son Kapil
was at home. However, on
September 17, 2021, she
stated that she does not
know where the Kapil is at
this time because he has
been missing.
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir she

is telling lies.

The incident is of 2004 and
she is saying this in 2021.
Till now she did not find
him?
Amit Jain Advocate - He is

absconding sir. There is
order for kurki against him .
To avoid this they had filed
a case . There are 25 cases
registered against him .
they were suggested to
make him vanish . File a
bogus case against him . If
37
anyone is facing a criminal

charge. Then can anyone
make a complaint against
him? We have, sir.

Where?
Amit Jain Advocate - Here in

Muzaffarnagar, We have
spent money on him. She
came to us crying and said
that I am telling the truth
that my son Raju, who is in
your case for abduction of
Sachin and Dharampal and
Rohit had taken him home
and at home they shot him.

Whose?
Amit Jain Advocate -

Sachin's. And the whole
roof.

What he said to you
Amit Jain Advocate-

38
He stated that Dharampal,

Rohit, Kapil, and Katar
Singh has had taken Sachin
from the alcohol store to
Dharampal's house.

It is in the statement.
Amit Jain Advocate - Not in

the statement. He came and
told us.

Okay.
Amit Jain Advocate
- He then spoke with

Dharampal's relatives and
handed the recorded tapes.

Okay.
Amit Jain Advocate - Kapil

then gave an interview to a
television station from his
residence. That they have
taken him from here. Like,
'Sir, suppose I am sitting
39
here and the mosque is in

front, then how will I signal
that I was abducted from
here. Yes or no So he told
that he had been taken from
here. Dharampal, Rohit,
Katar Singh, and Raju were
all there to take him home
and taken him home. Rohit
shot a gun on his forehead.
And his skull hit to the
ceiling. And there was blood
all over the ceiling .Later,
what was remained was
removed and thrown into the
canal. Mother was admitted
to the hospital for eight
days after hearing this.

yes sir that it is .
Amit Jain Advocate - When

the skull flew off, it hit the
ceiling. We know how sir we
did we had goosebumbs
Alright sir. We trusted his
40
words and decided to file a

complaint against him.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta ---

hm
Amit Jain Advocate - We got

the case filed sir, got the
charge sheet filed against
him in it sir. He later
helped them get him
acquitted.

To whom?

Dharampal, and Rohit. We
said it.

They are killers for sure
Amit Jain Advocate - So he

saved his son Raju. They are
absconding. Found it at
home and then saying after
a month he met my girl in
Mansoorpur.
41

In which? statement?
Amit Jain Advocate –
This is what she says in her

statement. So, Sir, this one
has gone off on its own. One
was saved in such a way
that he was made, and the
other is having a good time.
Why would Kapil talk to the
killers when Rohit's brother,
Kapil's brother, has been
murdered? Tell me, sir, that
he hangs out with them,
that he comes and goes with
them. Sir, here it is..

Where?
Amit Jain Advocate – he has

been taken from home, after
some time had passed, he
met with your daughter in
Masnsoorpur. He claimed to
be with Dharampal Tau.
42

So they are saying that
Dharampal has taken him .
Amit Jain Advocate - She is

lying; the 156/3 application,
a copy of the FIR, and a
certified copy of the
statement are all separate
documents. We have filed a
certified copy of her
statement in court. We
asked Chhotelal ji to put it
that we had to put the
question, but he wouldn't
let us. If this is done,
another proof will appear.
It's never mind . Files are
also filed under Sections 74
and 59 of the Evidence Act.

okay , FIR of Kuldip.

Kuldeep describes an
incident in which there is no
encounter. There was no
43
ongoing investigation. The

paper in which his
encounter occurred has been
filed.by us Sir, what did he
say twistedly while it was
late at night? There were no
public witnesses found by
the police. What are you
testifying about when they
have written it themselves?
Right?

Yes.
Amit Jain Advocate --- —-

Sir, we have filed a
Dharampal’s FIR and a bail
application. The Dharampal,
Rohit, and Kapil judgments
have all been filed. All three
are involved in the same
way. All three bails were
rejected in a single order.
Sir, which is the judgement
order. That will also be
read.
44

Yes,
Amit Jain Advocate - —And

Sir, the paper that we filed
was later changed to 313 in
addition, and in 313
Dharampal himself stated
that if these papers are
correct, then you are
claiming that Sachin
abducted Kuldep from his
home and took him away
before handing him over to
the police. This is what you
wanted in his statement:
that I called him from home
and gave him to the cops,
and that the cops staged a
false encounter so that a
302 complaint could be filed
against them. You wanted
this submission, but they
have not said whether or not
they have witnessed the
encounter. that he was
taken from his home and
45
handed over to police in

order to launch a false
murder charge against them.
He wish to file false murder
case instead of self defense
encounter, he said no
because he didn’t brought so
why should he give this
statement . we did not do
anything. He wanted to file a
bogus murder case instead
of a self-defense encounter,
but he refused because he
hadn't brought anything
with him, so why should he
offer this statement?
Nothing was done by us.

Well, that was the motive for
him that his nephew was
dead. What was the motive
of these two?
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir

these Raju, Kapil,
Dharampal, Rohit.
46

What was the motive of
Katar Singh?
Amit Jain Advocate - There

is only one witness, belong
to the same village, and
among themselves.

No, I am talking about
motive.
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir I'm

referring about Raju, Kapil,
and Kuldeep, who used to
live together. And there were
times when Raju and
Kuldeep would get into
mischief. Raju is currently
facing 18 charges. In
addition, Kuldeep was facing
25 charges. So, whenever
they wanted to do something
mischievous like loot, they
used to get on a bike
together, and Kapil used to
assist him with the heist by
47
supplying information. They

can't go together since it
can present an issue, so
Kapil takes care of this and
the same work they
performed in this. They
informed Raju that
Dharmpal had vanished. We
assumed she was correct
and decided to assist her.
She will, as you have stated.
it now she will be alone and
helpless . even we felt a soft
corner for her. and we
decided to help her out
Judge Sandeep Gupta-
If somebody asks, we have

to see everything. We have
to look out for ourselves
also
Amit Jain Advocate – No No .

No one will inquire, sir. This
case will move to the
Supreme Court because it
48
was broadcast on all

television channels at the
time and will continue to be
broadcast even now, so
there will be no problem.
There is nothing wrong with
taking responsibility. that
anyone is wrong or not
wrong however we accepted
that because of raju rajveeri
we have accepted that he is
missing .Sir he is not
missing ,when you are
saying that he called him
from home and then after
two months he met with
your daughter in
mansurpoor then you got
him acquitted through
collusion . When I am ready
to spend money and you are
not letting me. and kapil
hugs rohit and dharamal
while going from the court
.how it is possible that he is
missing when your hanging
out with your brothers killer
49
Mr. Sandeep Gupta -

Yes……….
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir,

with folded hands, I request
you to give them life
Imprisonment. Tell me if
you want me to give
something else. I will give
no problem.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – No, it

is not about giving me
something else.
Amit Jain Advocate - My

request to you, Sir, is the
same. That day, I was also
telling you that there is
anxiety in my head about my
case.

I had said yes to you
without even reading the
evidence. We had only read
the papers.
50
Amit Jain Advocate - The day

I came, I told you that in my
case there one tension in my
mind

We had already read. You
already knew us, so we
thought let's do it .
Amit Jain Advocate - With

folded hands, Sir, I make a
plea to you. the mother who
found out her son had been
shot and the skull had hit
the ceiling and there was
blood all over the place. Sir
mother was admitted to the
hospital and stayed for eight
days. We know sir, and she
is currently seeing Dr. Vinod
Arora, a neuro surgeon in
Meerut.

They have not imposed
anything for TA yet I hope
51
they do not file anything for

T.A
Amit Jain Advocate - No. sir

it is okay I will handle it for
my self

Judgment will be
pronounced on 15th. They
will be put behind the bars.
Amit Jain Advocate – It

makes no difference whether
TA occurs or not; they are
the culprit, and I am the
plaintiff as well as the
advocate. And if my TA isn't
authorised, they're the ones
to blame, sir. Sir, the
accused's TA does not work.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – under

which district judge did you
filed your TA.
Amit Jain Advocate---under

him
52
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – under

him??
Amit Jain Advocate – I have

filed before only when
Rajeev sharma was there.
His retirement time was
arrived . so he filled and put
the notices out. And then
his retirement came and his
was on a leave for a while
so I didn’t get a chance to
speak to him and there was
no posting and then
arguments has been done
before him. He read the file
and rejected the T.A . or he
doesn’t any ground for the
rejection of T.A.
Judge Sandeep Gupta –Let

me read more, whatever is
there is factual. I want to
convict all of them.
Amit Jain Advocate- You

convict them all sir, you
53
pass the order accordingly. I

will give whatever you
demand.

That is why we have called
you here today. 15th is
almost here.
Amit Jain Advocate.- Sir it

is like that ,for now it will
be done further will see
And sir the matter is that
for raju’s mother no one will
be there .

No, even the evidence will be
seen,
Amit Jain Advocate – Sir if

anyone is sentenced to
death. Sir, whatever the
evidence is, they are equally
against everyone, if we leave
even one, then our link will
be broken.
54

I'll see and read the rest of
the things.
Amit Jain Advocate – So,

you just let me know
whatever you want, I will
give whatever you demand. I
request you with folded
hands, because if you acquit
one then whole case will be
shattered like pearls. If one
of them is innocent then
you’ll have to acquit all of
them because from the
beginning all of them were
tried together. Already
evidence are not that strong
and if you acquit one of
them then the case will
become weak against rest of
them that one of them have
been acquitted so how the
trial can continue against
rest. So, please do not
acquit anyone.
55

How will I leave anyone like
this? I will write the entire
judgment. I’ll not spare
anyone, I’ll hang them, all
four of them.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no!

you hang them sir. Tell me if
you want something more
from me. I will do whatever
you ask without any
problem.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta - I

will let you know.
Amit Jain Advocate - It's

just that this is my personal
matter sir because sir if it
is any of my client then I
would have explained. That
sir saying like this sir, you
accept it.

will read the rest .
Amit Jain Advocate - No sir

they have created the
56
Contradiction not us .
Motive is present sir .
Motive is present against
everyone. its not like that
one has a motive and other
does not
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - How

many pages does it have?
Let me see a little bit at
night.
Amit jain Advocate ... I don't

go out anyplace because
everytime mother remembers
something, her head spins
at 110 mph. If I go and tell
this to mother, she will have
to call the doctor at night
itself . She was laying on
the bed, holding his head.

am not refusing it . Let me
read it . Two are sure.
Dharampal and rohit is sure
there is weak evidence
against kapil .
57
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – tell

us one thing the one who
has Weak evidence how can
we give him a life
imprisonment
The evidence is equally

against everyone, madam.
He was kidnapped on April
24, and the evidence and the
accused have remained the
same to this day. Because of
the Kuldip event, they hold
grudges towards him. You
can view Katar's call log
from the day of the incident,
where he called Sachin. He
had also called him before
the incident. The call date
was discovered through the
letter, and the ssp accepted
the call data as true in the
supreme court.
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta –

Did Kapil say something?
58
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes Sir

Kapil's statement is also
there in the case diary.
Has he said something in

the file? He had said in BW
file.
Amit Jain Advocate - The

SHO had told the
investigator that there
should be no copy of the
case diary in it. You are
saying this over and over
again. He said this, he said
that is in the case diary.

Now I have started reading
the files. Let me read. If
anything happens, we will
discuss with each other.
Will see, will hang all four
of them.
Amit Jain Advocate – You do

it sir, I will be in debt to
you, you just let me know
59
whatever you want and I will

do it.

Look, if you had approached
me sooner, I would have
hanged all of them by now.
Amit Jain Advocate - Do a

favor sir, you will be in
favor. You will be grateful
for life, don’t worry about
the money.

we can’t say anything about
them what if they imposed
T.A
Amit Jain Advocate - These

are the rules for TA, if there
is no stay then the
proceedings of the court
cannot and will not stop.
Do the case as it is, you tell
me. What more service I
have to do . I will do it sir
let me know
60
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Okay,

let us study the matter and
we will call you day after
tomorrow.
The date of the verdict is

day after tomorrow only
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Day

after Tomorrow is Sunday.

please tell me. Get it written
down. Please type Katar
Singh's talk, which is in
section 27, in four lines.
Katar Singh had called
repeatedly, and he was still
chatting in the police
station. In the Supreme
Court, the SSP stated that
he had discussed this
number with Katar Singh.
Assume he was a witness, as
his counsel claimed, and
that he should be called as
a government witness. He
61
was neither made a

government witness nor did
he provided anything.

You are telling so many
things.
Amit Jain Advocate - That is

what he was saying , that he
was out. I am saying that
Katar Singh was the
witness. His lawyer said
that he was a witness. Are
you saying somewhere that
he was a witness? You are
just saying in the argument
that he was a witness and if
someone wants to become a
government witness, then
the lawyer can’t make him
.He should Give Affidavit .
Neither the court will refuse
nor the police will refuse!
Till today I have never said
that I want to become a
government witness. Where
has never been made and
62
the police are saying that

they are absconding and
themselves talking on the
phone to the SHO. SHO was
summoned to the Supreme
Court. The SHO has said in
the Supreme Court that I
was told that this number
belongs to Katar Singh. Talk
to him I spoke to Katar
Singh's number for the
statement.

Come on. Shoot it. Now you
tell me that . How to write
Kapil?
Amit Jain Advocate – the

motive of kapil is the motive
of everyone If a man is
committing a crime.

How it is the same? One had
a nephew.
Amit Jain Advocate – Whose

sir ?
63

in the Kuldeep encounter.
Motives is a different thing.
These are the
Circumstances. I will read
all the things . I.O Has also
proved it . these three are
done . I will see for him also
Amit Jain Advocate - Don't

look it in sir just do it

Will write that the dead
body is recovered
Amit Jain Advocate - yes sir

he stated that he can
recover the dead body he
can also show the place this
is a big thing sir even raju
had the motive

Raju is not there now .

Because Dharampal, Rohit
Kapil and Raju are residents
of Fahimpur village.
64
It makes no difference if
they are from the same
place.
Amit Jain Advocate - They

are from Fahimpur, Sir.
Kuldeep, too, was from
Fahimpur. They call each
other tau-uncle. These four
people are village relatives.
Four Kapil, Dharampal, and
Rohit Raju These four are
related to one another.
Rajveeri has now stated that
she does not know Rohit. He
is from Dharampal's village,
and Rajveeri was the one
who has filed the
case against Dharampal
Rohit and now she claims
she doesn't know them.

will try to hang all four of
them . Let me read it
Amit Jain Advocate

65
:- Read or don't read, sir. If

you do my work, you will get
favour. I'll see what happens
in the High Court. in the
high court only bail
can be granted in four or
five months.
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta-
It’s not necessary that they

will get the bail . I will make
a strong case .
Amit Jain Advocate . –
get the bail Anyway, they

are outside since 2004.
You do it sir I have no
problem. I will do whatever
you say.

Okay but will read first.
Amit Jain Advocate - fine

sir , you read it .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Life

imprisonment of four people
is a big thing.
66
Judge Mr. Sandeep Gupta – I

will try, you do not worry.
Dharmpal and Rohit both
are ready to pay me 6-7
Lakh, they also approached
me, I just don’t meet
anyone.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal –

Whatever, we have made up
in our mind, we will do it
accordingly.

We have already said yes to
you.
Amit Jain Advocate - Look,

sir, if one person gives this
amount and another person
gives another amount, if we
see this, no work can be
done.

No it is not like that, I do
not meet anyone like this .
67
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - You

are the first person visit
to our house like this
Amit Jain Advocate – sir, I

don't need to ask any
questions, the criminal is
committing the crime
, making money in
unethical methods, and
money obtained in unethical
ways is never profitable. I
told you should impose
a fine 5 lakh rupees on
them . I don't even require
five rupees out of that. You
keep it, sir. I don't require
anything.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – they

also said to call them after
you come back from walking.
I said we will see on
Saturday-Sunday.

Do not tell this to anyone. I
68
will try to hang all four of

them.
Amit Jain Advocate -I'm not

going to tell anyone, but the
sentence given by Sumit
Panwar in that case, has the
same lawyer as Dharampal.
The lawyer was Rajeev Garg.
He was also the accused's
lawyer at the time, and they
provided 12 witnesses, two
of whom have been in prison
for the past eight years and
no one has been released.
The defendants paid the
lawyer to get them
acquitted, but when the
punishment was handed
down, they abused the
lawyer. Even the money has
not been returned by the
lawyer. So, sir, do my work
as you promised earlier
.
69
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - See,

Conviction is bound to
happen.
Amit Jain Advocate – no one

is innocent in this madam
He is also the highest

Conviction Judge of
Muzaffarnagar in the High
Court.
Amit Jain Advocate - This is

a good thing sir. After the
TA was rejected. the letter
has been sent to you

Well, I am telling you this
from day one.
The letter stated that the TA

had been rejected on that
date, but that we still
needed it to transfer under
you.
70

You transferred because you
know that in my court, an
85 percent conviction is
guaranteed.
Amit Jain Advocate – Sir I

never asked anyone to say
anything, and even I never
said anything.
Mrs. Neeru Agwal --- how is

he the relative to you ? He
was the district judge of
Agra before
Amit Jain Advocate – Yes he

was the District Judge in
Agra before now he is the
district judge of
Saharanpur.

he was the District Judge of
Meerut also for some time
Amit Jain Advocate - No, not

Meerut. For Muzaffarnagar
he was
71
Judge Shri Sandeep Gupta --

No, No, he has been a
Meerut District Judge.
Amit Jain Advocate – he was

the District Judge of
Meerut for a while . After
that he went to Gonda and
after then to Agra. he will
now retire in 2022. What
exactly was that , his
brother Bharatesh Jain was
an Income Tax lawyer, but
he had passed away
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes, I

know. It's a matter of 2019.
When you came and after
some time he was promoted,
to a high court judge but he
didn’t want it , so he was
made a district judge
Amit Jain Advocate - When I

went to the High Court, sir
couldn’t meet me.

72
Chief justice is also our

relative, he is the relative of
one of our known person. we
even talk sometimes
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes, he

is your neighbor. That is
good. Sir, just get my work
done.

Dharampal and Rohit are
also offering 7-8 lakhs and
other two accused are also
trying to meet me.
Amit Jain Advocate - Sir, I

am saying that suppose
some person says that I will
give one crore rupees, acquit
everyone.

We never meet anyone like
this. I am just reading the
facts of the case. We have
already said yes to you that
mean it will always remain
yes.
73
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Look

this case came from a high
court and we know how
tough this case is .

The case in which I have
given life Imprisonment .
There was no plaintiff in
it.
Amit Jain Advocate - So sir

you do it.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - So you

want all four of them in LI.
Amit Jain Advocate - Madam

This was the initial
conversation between sir
and me .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - That

we know
Amit Jain Advocate - Nobody

is wrong here. Even one of
us has been made a fool of.
that he was the one who did
it or saved him. Kapil hangs
74
around with them as well.

Even I said this to kapil .
Sir you do this work for me.
I will remain in favor of you
for the rest of my life.

we are already doing the
work

please. Consider neither how
it will occur nor how it will
not occur. Alright sir.

It's been a long time.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes. So

you do it sir, tell me. Sir
you are like my elder
brother. The money of a good
man blesses the house, but
the money of a wicked man
does not. The doctor will
say, "Either submit 15 lakhs
or the individual will die,,
You do my work. Whatever
you say and I will give it.
75
ANNEXURE P-3 76

W/O ADJ MR. SANDEEP
GUPTA
(FROM 7017273644 TO
8968231511)
DATE -12.03.2022
TIMING-12.07PM
CALL DURATION- 16.53

MINUTES
Amit Jain Advocate - Hello.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Hello.

Yes, Yes.

Madam!
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes,

hello.
Amit Jain Advocate – sir is

at home or in the court?
77
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No, I

am at home. but sir, is at
the court, today is Lok
Adalat.
Amit Jain Advocate – okay
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - may i

come for a while ?
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - What

work do you have at home?

Nothing just to talk about
my case. What happened last
night, he must have checked
it at night.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – peon

has come to a house.
Amit Jain Advocate – okay,

he will be gone in a while.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – when

he will go , I will call you.

78
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – many

people are standing outside
even the ladies are present
in the compound.

okay

I'll tell you later, okay.
Amit Jain Advocate – have

you discussed anything last
night ?
Amit jain Advocate – Have

you discussed about
anything at night?

we had
Amit jain Advocate- please

do the work madam , this is
my personal work anyway .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -yes

yes , it is personal, but we
are seeing as much as we
79
can, Anyway, Conviction will

be done
Amit Jain Advocate --- Yes,

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal –

He's saying that how can
he give someone more
punishment than they
deserve.
Amit Jain Advocate – no, he

is saying this about kapil,.
That he doesn’t deserve this
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Yes.
Amit Jain Advocate – if you

see, the motive of all 4
accused was same as Kapil.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal- there

should be some evidence not
only motive. Motive alone
cannot work. I am a common
man if somebody says to me
that another have a motive
to kill me, that person will
80
not kill me without any

motive.
Amit Jain Advocate --- No, it

is not like that, we have
equal evidence against all.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Don’t

talk about this on a call.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes,

yes, don’t worry about this.
We are a family now
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – hm .
Amit Jain Advocate – My

only request from you is you
should ask him to do it.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – See,

he is doing as much as
possible, he has already
given Life Imprisonment to 2
of them in fact after you
asked him, he agreed for
kartar singh, for 10 years,
he is saying minimum 10
years can be given to kartar
81
singh . I will give 10 years

to kartar singh.
Amit Jain Advocate - hm.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Then

after your request he agreed
for him as well
Amit Jain Advocate – For

whom?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -

Kartar Singh's.

he agreed for Life
Imprisonment of Kartar
Singh also.
Amit Jain Advocate – hm.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - When

it comes to Kapil, he
believes that punishing an
innocent person is
committing a sin against
oneself.
82
Amit jain Advocate -No

madam he is not an innocent
person, if you want I can
make you meet my mother
and then you will get to
know that he is not innocent
. we never made a complaint
against the innocents. It has
been 20 years now .
Okay, I'll make a phone call

to him. He is currently in
the office..

you do it, there is no
problem, but please do it . it
is about my family
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Look,

we know it is the family
matter that is why we are
doing it, otherwise you know
anything can happen in a
judgement
Amit Jain Advocate - No no.

83
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Is it

not ?

like that, madam.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - see

we are accepting your every
request but even our
conscience does not allow to
give punishment to an
innocent person.
Amit jain Advocate - No no

its not like that . he even
accepted in the video that
they have killed him .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Where

are the videos?
Amit Jain Advocate.-
Videos are there in the

pendrive In the court ,
chotelal has not opened it
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal l..
You should provide the

evidence tomorrow because
84
day after tomorrow is a

judgement date .
Amit Jain Advocate - No, no.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – if you

show the video then kapil
can be convicted
Amit jain Advocate – we have

submitted the video in the
pendrive file .
Amit Jain Advocate - Then

we have gave an application
that video has been
submitted in the pendrive
file and court has sealed it .
Amit Jain Advocate - Open it

and run it.

but now Chhote Lal has
rejected our application.
85
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - okay!
Amit Jain Advocate – that

pendrive contains the video
of the accused
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Where

is the pen drive ?.
Amit Jain Advocate – in

court only.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Now

in our court.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes, it

came from there to your
Court, but it has not been
opened , it can only be
opened through the
Application but the
Application got rejected
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - okay.
Amit Jain Advocate - On

that pen drive, he has also
cross-examined his sign,
what is the name, with us.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal…okay .

86
Amit Jain Advocate - after

cross-examination and only
on the orders of the court, it
was sealed.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - And

then when the argument was
taking place. why didn’t
you said that put the
pendrive and see .
Amit Jain Advocate – no,

when file came in the court
of sir’s office.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- Yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - we

already had given an
application to chotelal
asking to play the pendrive.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Okay.
Amit Jain Advocate - So they

rejected that.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Then

you could have put the
application here.
87
Amit Jain Advocate – if the

application is rejected once
it is then not maintainable
Amit Jain Advocate – Yes,

since if it were permitted, it
would have been wrong .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal .... Yes

Yes Yes
Amit Jain Advocate – yes , it

has the whole thing , I will
narrate this to kapil too.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – okay.
Amit Jain Advocate – yes,

there is no problem and I am
standing to fight with this
all. sir will not be blamed in
any way . I will be
responsible for everything
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -okay!

let me talk to him.

point is this if anyone of
88
them Is acquitted then it

will make our case weak
because the evidence is
same against all.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No,

the case will not become
weak, he was actually
thinking that how will he
pass the judgment in a way
that sentence of those three
will not be reduced.
Amit Jain Advocate... Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – he

said that he will give a
judgment in such a way that
bail won’t be allowed.

Actually, the point is kapil
is present in the last scene
as well as in our FIR, Kapil
is there (Statement of P-W-1
Papa)
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - okay.

89

is there in that too.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – hm .

is also there in my
statement.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- OK.

even in I.O statement kapil
is there.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – okay

is also inside the case diary.
Kapil is everywhere; he
plays such enormous
politics that he made my
brother abducted through
Dharmpal and
Rohit. Thinking that
90
now my brother has passed

away, I shall be with them.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Yes

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate -- Is it

not?

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate --- We

have also registered FIR
against him .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – okay.
Amit Jain Advocate - got the

charge sheet filed against. If
we Oppose that he is an
absconding accused in our
case.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – hm.
Amit Jain is Advocate -- and

the main accused.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- hm.

91
Amit Jain Advocate - So his

FIR should have been
registered. If there is a case
of kidnapping against
someone, there is a case of
murder, he started saying
that if he disappeared, then
no one would have filed a
report in it.
Amit Jain Advocate - We

lodged that after trusting.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - hm.
Amit Jain Advocate --

Chargesheet was filed.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - hm.
Amit Jain Advocate ---

(Illegible)

What do you want me to do,
should I put a little
pressure on him?
92
Amit jain Advocate... Yes,

you please do. You will do
us a favour. This is our
personal conversation.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – yes

that is fine
Amit Jain advocate ...

because. You have the main
role, if you say it sir, then
he will understand

you are right.
Amit Jain Advocate - After

the judgement, I will fight
for everything, the writ has
been filed in the Supreme
Court. Nothing will come on
sir, when I first came I had
already told everything to
sir about the admissions
chargesheet you sir said no
issues , punishment can be
given on case diary as well.
He has given the
punishment in the case
93
diary as well . every witness

was hostile , he has given
the life imprisonment just
on the basis of case diary .
sir has given the four life
imprisonments this will be
five of yours
Amit Jain Advocate – fine

sir
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – hm
Amit Jain Advocate - I did

not refuse a single thing you
asked for, and agreed to
everything you said
Amit Jain Advocate - I am

ready to give now as well.
Just asking to do my work
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No ,

it’s not a favour , he has
left the file with me, let me
go through it once more
94
Amit Jain Advocate - That's

why I am saying you can call
me and I will come and
explain it to you once
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I am

not sure, everybody is
present in the compound at
the day time
Amit Jain Advocate - It is

so.

workers of Chhote Lal ji ,
Madam's as well as Babu
Ram ji's is going on here

Baburam ji and Chhote Lal
ji will be in court.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -yes he

is in court , but his wife is
standing outside.
Amit Jain Advocate- okay .

95
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – she

looks everybody who comes
and goes
Amit Jain Advocate - Look

whole family is there , there
will always be somebody

everybody knows , no one
comes here .
Amit Jain Advocate – what if

there is any relative?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -In this

compound, our house is the
only one where no one
comes.
Amit Jain Advocate - hm!
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – all

our relative is from
Chandigarh and no one
comes from Chandigarh to
meet us

96
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Not a

single person.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – No

one come to our home, he
has created his image like
that, we live in private. No
on has come to our home
since last one year.
Amit Jain Advocate - what It

is madam.
If this case belonged to any

client, I would have
explained him but it’s my
personal matter madam .

its your personal matter
that why he met you and
had a talk with you

97
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - He

couldn't possibly have let
you in.
Amit Jain Advocate - Hello,

hello.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - I will

try my best. And I will talk
to you in the evening about
this.
Amit Jain Advocate - Okay!

ok ok ok
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - If it

is Convenient, then you can
also come

Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - I will

tell you.
Amit Jain Advocate - All

right!
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal -

Because.
98
Amit Jain Advocate -- Hello.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – as

you are not known ,things
will spread quickly even in
chotelal house , Mishra is
coming or raja is coming
every now and then
Amit Jain Advocate – no

issues I will meet you
outside

don't go outside from the
compound.
Amit Jain Advocate – you go

to markets ?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No I

don't go, I always go with
him
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – since

we have come here neither I
nor him have gone alone .he
99
just go to a club house

alone for a walk
Amit Jain Advocate - hm, hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – we go

together everywhere.
Amit Jain Advocate... No no

it is a good thing.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – If

there is a function or party,
we attend together only.

is such a bastard he does a
work for him as a contractor
Mrs. Neeru Amwal - Of what.
Amit Jain Advocate - So

these water tanks are made,
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Oh

yes!
Amit Jain Advocate - Water

tanks are made.

yes, yes.
100
Amit Jain Advocate - Big

tanks

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - He

does this work.
Amit Jain Advocate - nagar

nigam adhikaris gives the
contract

hm.
Amit Jain Advocate – made

a video while taking money
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - hm,

hm.
Amit Jain Advocate - Then

he blackmailed!
Amit Jain Advocate – from

there one person approached
me and asked that my case
101
is going against him then he

request me to pull out some
paper, I said no, it is your
matter you pull out papers
yourself.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – okay
Mr.Amit Jain Advocate – I

asked if is that your matter?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Tell

Kuldeep Bhaiya to collect all
the utensils and put them in
the kitchen. Tell him to do
this soon

Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - All
right.
Amit Jain Advocate - So you

do it.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – okay

I will talk to him, he is in
the office
102
Amit Jain Advocate – don’t

talk about our personal
conversation with the sir.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – Yes.
Amit jain Advocate - Will

you tell him that I called
you?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - If I

tell him this, then he will be
annoyed

that is what I am saying.

will also get annoyed by you
for pressuring him.
Abhit Jain Advocate - No, it

is not like that. This is our
conversation that’s why I am
saying like that.

will ask whether the
judgment has been typed
103

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – I will

ask this

Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – I will

ask him generally about
what is he doing

Alright, now it is in their
hands to tell or not to tell.
Amit Jain Advocate – hm hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -- I can

only talk to him.
Amit Jain Advocate – hm .

Because he was discussing
with me in the morning also.
Now I will read the file once
104
again, see I will be honest

with you

Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – He

was not agreed for Kartar
Singh, he wanted him to go
for 10 years but after you
asked that night, he agreed
for full conviction of kartar
Singh.
Amit Jain Advocate - No for

Kartar Singh, I have told
him already.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – we

had made our mind for three
convictions but for kapil we
will discuss today
Amit jain Advocate -- Yes,

Yes.

don’t have this much time
for a case
105

Sir.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - As

soon as he comes he goes to
a club then for walk .then
the dinner etc..

Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – He is

still very tired , but he has
a habit of brushing and
cleansing his teeth before
going to bed.
Amit Jain Advocate - No, it

is a good thing.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Goes

to sleep every night at 1
o'clock.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no

it is a good thing even I
don’t sleep without brushing
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – and

then again In the morning
106
they start getting ready at

7:30, 8:30, 8:00.
Amit Jain Advocate – hm

hmm.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - We

don't get enough sleep, and
we're exhausted. Today is
Lok Adalat, and I'm hoping
he arrives early so we can
talk.
Amit Jain Advocate - yes
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - In the

evening, we will sit together
and discus
Amit Jain Advocate – no you

can say that it is a personal
matter even the evidences
are there

are doing this much because
it your personal matter .
Amit jain Advocate - No, not

at all.
107
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – look

we are doing more then we
could do .

Yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – He is

not influenced by anyone,
not even his parents.
Amit Jain Advocate - No, it

is just a little I am only
asking about the kapil .
those three are done . we
have all the evidences
against the kapil , his name
is mentioned in the FIR,
papa has also given a
statement against him

Rather he told me at night
that we picked up the book
and read it
Amit Jain Advocate - hm hm.

108

will see it again if you say
so
Amit Jain Advocate - ok

ma'am
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – let’s

see if the video opens. He is
also calling.

okay, Madam.
ANNEXURE P-4 109

WO ADI MR. SANDEEP
GUPTA
(FROM 8968231511 TO
7017273644)
DATE -13.03.2022
TIMING-12.57PM
CALL DURATION-5.28
MINUTES
Amit Jain Advocate -- Hello

madam.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- Yes,

hello. You sent someone
home.

have sent it. Let me know if
I can come
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I have

told you that he won’t be
110
there as we have children

examination. I did not go.
Amit Jain Advocate, --- Well,

good, good.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal- You

see, how much pressure I
am in. they have come to my
house. I have to lock the
door from outside
Amit Jain Advocate - Who,

who reached your home?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - There

are two people from the side
of the accused, those people
have come to my house and
rang the bell again and
again.
Amit Jain Advocate – okay .

have got a lock from outside
the house.
Amit Jain Advocate - Who

had come?
111
I don’t know who came
Amit Jain Advocate - No,

when did they come
yesterday
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – they

came yesterday as well as
today in the morning
Amit Jain Advocate – okay.

have got the lock installed
outside the house, as sir is
not there, please don’t
disturb me
Amit Jain Advocate – No, I

am not disturbing you .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - I am

afraid. I have even told the
guards that he should not
allow anyone to come here.
Amit Jain Advocate - Okay,

112
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I am

seriously scared.

there is nothing to be afraid
of.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No

look my children are small, I
am very scared, at this time
they are roaming around
here and there
Amit Jain Advocate – who all

were there
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – gents

.
Amit Jain Advocate – ok
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - they

Were gents.
Amit Jain Advocate --- okay

.

have got a lock installed
outside my house.
113
Amit Jain Advocate - No how

can the gents(accused side )
come like this .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I

don't know, I put the lock
outside my house.
Amit Jain Advocate - Okay,

good.
Srinti Neeru Aggarwal - Yes,

please don't disturb me from
today. Until he comes.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no,

I am not disturbing that’s
why I didn’t come, and I
have send somebody else

told the guard specially to
lock the door from outside
Amit Jain Advocate - Good.

that no one should come
here.
114
Amit Jain Advocate - No, no

no no, if you have any
problem then you can call
me.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal -he

rang the bell and told me
that he want to meet the sir
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - You

know that he is going

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - if he

is going at night how will he
be there in the morning .
this is a genuine thing
Amit Jain Advocate - No no,

I thought that the program
of going to Ami has been
canceled.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No

the program is not cancelled
he is there only . papa is
115
not well .he will come in

the morning
Amit Jain Advocate – don’t

worry if sir is not there,
there is no problem, if you
have any problem, give me a
call. I can be present even
at midnight.

there is no problem.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - And

please don't send anyone
from your side to ring the
bell
Because I had to see that

who rang the bell, I even
scolded the guard
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - it is

locked outside.
Amit Jain Advocate – Hmm.

116

already told him in the
morning that no one should
come to my house
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes ,No

No No problem. You have the
number, if you have any
problem, give me a call. I
will be there
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Okay

yes, yes it is fine.
Amit Jain Advocate --- yes ,

if you need anything let me
know, will be there
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- All

right.
Amit Jain Advocate – how

can anybody reach like this
at judge residence. Even we
are also fighting a case
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I feel

that no one comes to my
house due to these things.
117
Amit Jain Advocate – I don’t

understand how can
somebody come like this.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – ask

them whose life can be
taken by hanging .
Amit Jain Advocate - Oh no

ma'am, Sumit Gawor
sentenced seven people to
death and sentenced them to
life imprisonment.
may be they wanted to

approach him

Everyday, someone is
punished they don’t get to a
judge residence like this
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – may

be they wanted to approach
him , how do I know who
are the lawyers or who are
the criminals
118
Amit Jain Advocate --- Yes.

Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – how
will I know ?
Amit Jain Advocate – yes yes

, did they said that they
came in relation to a
dharampal’s case
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- No,

they didn't say anything like
that, they just said that
they want to meet Gupta ji,
now I know you, but I don't
recognize anyone else.

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - So I

said that he is out of
station.
Amit Jain Advocate - Well,

okay okay . No, there is no
problem, you tell me, give
me a call. Don't be worried.
Sir, whenever he comes,
tomorrow night, if you need
119
any goods, then I will send

it in the hands of any boy.
There is no problem in that
.

no, no, there is no need for
any stuff . I just don't want
any disturbance at home, I
won't let anyone open the
gate until he comes.
Amit Jain Advocate - No, no.

There is no need to open the
lock, no one should come.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Even

when I was living in the
Judicial Compound, I have
kept my house locked.

nobody can come. If you
don’t get afraid

right.

is no problem, there is no
120
problem, no one can come

like this

right.
Amit Jain Advocate - I think

the program got cancelled.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Her

father's heart rate was
abnormally low, and he grew
cold.
Amit Jain Advocate --- okay

.

he went immediately.

good, good. Must have
reached in the night at 2-3
o'clock.

left from here at 9 o'clock.
He reached there at 1
o'clock.
Amit Jain Advocate -- Hmm.

121
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes it

is fine, brother.

right.
ANNEXURE P-5 122

W/O ADJ MR. SANDEEP
GUPTA
(FROM 7217273644 TO
8968231511)
DATE -13.03.20022 TIMING-

14.23 PM
CALL DURATION- 17.58

MINUTES
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Hello.

Hello Madam

hello.
Amit Jain Advocate – have I

disturbed you?

was asking whether you had
a talk with sahib last night
123
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No, it

was only around 5.30 pm, he
had come from the office, he
had a cup of tea, then the
call came from his home, so
. No matter what happened,
at this time I would not like
to ask such a thing from
him.

you are right.

haven’t talked to him about
this, but we had a
conversation over a call
where he told me that he
was working on this

good, good. Means you will
do it in on 15th , will you
not?

I can say 100% from my side
124

yes.

Because whether they leave
tonight or tomorrow, they
will reach early morning at
5 o'clock, they have to come
tomorrow.

Yes..the new road has been
constructed, it will only
take him half an hour to
reach

yes. We will also reach in 3
hours.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes it

is a very nice road , it has
become very good.

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - Rather

I went to Dehradun one day.
Reached Dehradun in one
125
and a half hours from

Muzaffarnagar.

sir.
Amit Jain Advocate - Great

road.

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - Means

look at how far Agra is !

we are like this, they go
from Dehradun-Roorkee
Highway.

very nice road.

all are total highways, it
takes us half an hour to
reach reach home from
Panchkula

that is why Modi government
126
has made such a good

highway.

journey of the car has
become like the journey of a
train.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – Yes

before also we come early
morning, if everything goes
well , he will come at night
Amit Jain Advocate – if we

come at night we can sleep
comfortably

there is nothing like this,
this is our work, we have to
see it further!
Amit Jain Advocate --

Actually no.

Yours ahead.
127

Actually if you drive early
morning, you will feel sleepy
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - No.

They have a habit, they are
used to.
Amit jain advocate..- so he

drives himself sir.

he drives himself.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes , it

feels sleepy sometimes
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - No ,

he is used to it
Amit Jain Advocate – Bye

the way, he can take a
driver
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - If the

weather is good , if the
weather is not cloudy or
there is no rain, then we go
out early morning only. ,
Amit Jain Advocate - okay

128
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - We

leave at five in the morning,
reach by nine o'clock in any
condition, then get ready
and go to our office at ten,
one and a quarter of ten.
Amit Jain Advocate --- hm
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – he will

come tomorrow, your work
will be done.

Actually No.

you don't need to worry, he
is more worried than you ,
that he has to decide on the
15th any way!

don't need to take tension, I
will call him, he is in the
Chandigarh and will ask
him.
129
Amit jain Advocate – this

incident happened in 2004
but we still remember this
incident.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – yes
Amit Jain Advocate - Now

you see this, my father came
from Delhi at 2.30 in the
night and left again at 5 in
the morning.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Yes!
Amit Jain Advocate - we

have suffered like this

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - It is

God's grace that this case
came under sir
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Come

on don't you worry, your
case will be decided
130
Amit Jain Advocate - So the

confirmation of Kapil is
there or not

I can’t tell you something
right now, he had got it
done in court only probably
he typed it himself, I am not
sure how he is getting it
done, he did not let anyone
know about it in fact
Rajeshwari was telling him
that this matter was with
sir.
Amit Jain Advocate --- Yes,

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- So

he made them write it so
that no body knows what’s
going on a case
Amit Jain Advocate – If it is

not written then it will not
be with Rajeshwari.
131

yes.

Rajeshwari will type
everything

said nobody will get to know
. whatever the main part
will be he will get it typed
on the spot only
Amit Jain Advocate - Well

then he must have got the
facts written.

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes, all

the facts were typed, they
were the same, I have given
all the statements.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Don't

you worry. everything will be
alright. Rest I will call them
in Chandigarh after 4 o
clock and will ask him at
132
what time will he be leaving

.
Amit Jain Advocate - Means

according to you three are
confirmed but the 4th one Is
not sure .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Yes it

is, we had a talk a day
before yesterday , I know
this much, , I could not talk
to him yesterday because in
the day he was at the
court, just as soon as he
came we got busy .
Amit Jain Advocate- Good.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I will

call him after 4 o'clock
today. And will ask him at
what time they will leave
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - This

is it.
133

are three people in that
Kartar Singh.

Because it is like that even
if he leaves at 9 o'clock in
the night, then he will reach
by 12:3o in the morning

will come easily!

will see, and ask him after
some time
Amit Jain Advocate - Google

show time, it is showing
three and a half hours.

yes.

speed of the car is 100/120
kmp, then in two and a half
hours.
134
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- our

doesn't work, on 120/140.

with that speed assumed
that he will reach
comfortably in two and a
half hours.

has actually gone alone too,
so I told them to go easy.
Amit Jain Advocate - 'If you

would have told me, I
would have gone, I would
have driven the car, it would
have been no problem

he don't like to take the
driver .
Amit Jain Advocate --- No,

no, just tell me if you want
to go somewhere in the
future , I will have no
problem
135
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Come

on.
Amit Jain Advocate – you

are like a family

yes yes
Amit jain Advocate ---- I am

not here for my work only

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate – I am

standing with you in all the
ways
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - No

problem
Amit Jain Advocate - our

younger brother is standing
like elder brother.

yes.

how I am standing.
136

yes.
Amit Jain Advocate - You

can call me even at 2 o'clock
in the night, no matter
where am I , I will reach as
soon as possible.

right!
Amit Jain Advocate--- He is

not, then!

tomorrow is the only day left
your case is on his first
preference.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – other

party is also trying to put
the pressure but we are not
entertaining them at all .
Amit Jain Advocate - hm,

now madam, should I tell
137
the address of the other

party.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I

don’t need it because we
are not interested
Amit Jain Advocate – your

court has the Government
lawyer Amit Tyagi .
Amit Jain is Advocate -- and

Professional.
Amit Jain Advocate - And

your orderly.

three sit together and eat
food.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --. Yes

yes.
138

Something is cooking
between all of them
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - what

about all three?

three are same.

we know this too.

suppose if any case comes
Mrs. Neil Aggarwal - Yes.

these three say that I will
get it done, I will get it
done!
Amit Jain Advocate - I had

told sir also.

yes.
139
Amit jain Advocate – I had

already informed sir about
these three even earlier
when I met him before the
case.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - hm.
Amit Jain Advocate - I have

already told sir that he has
been defamed
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - see I

will tell you honestly that
we don’t have the interest in
any case
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- You

are also watching him for
the past six months, he
takes full interest in the
case, then only they give the
verdict.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – They

don’t give it in favor of
140
someone, they do what they

think is right.

Absolutely.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - If we

give a one sided decisions it
will be bad for us only .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – See,

he is not PCS anymore. So,
he always need to disclose
everything because all the
allegations against him will
be made before High Court.

Yes, Yes.

We also have to take care of
our image. Even earlier
there was a complaint
against him due to fault of
Peshkar.
Amit Jain Advocate – okay .

141
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I did

not know what was going on
in that.
Amit Jain Advocate - hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - It was

because of the mistake of
Peshkar, he even scolded the
Peshkar by calling himself
Amit Jain Advocate -hm, he

must have leaked the
judgment.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - We

know how much tension has
been in our house for these
six months.
Amit Jain Advocate - No, he

must have leaked the
judgment.

Which one ?
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – No,

he didn’t leaked the
142
judgment , he was holding a

cash
Amit Jain Advocate – Oh!,
Mrs. Neel Aggarwal –

Peshkar was there . he has
given the bail

dhas peshwar has told
something.
Mrs. Neil Aggarwal – he

thought that if we will say
to , sir will do something
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - he

was holding the money.
Amit Jain Advocate – very

bad
Mrs. Neil Agarwal – hm
Amit Jain Advocate - I know

how bad he is
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal –hm

143
Mr.Amit Jain Advocate -

crossed all the limits.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Now

let me tell you about this
case!
Amit Jain Advocate --- yes .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - on

behalf of their Accused’s
lawyer and our public
prosecutor.
Amit Jain Advocate- Ji.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal –

Personally, I myself was
under so much pressure,
they (Public prosecutor)
called me today also and
even last night around 8’o
clock.
Amit Jain Advocate --- hm

hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- 'I

told my guard to lock my
144
premises. I am so much
worried.

Actually madam what you
do is don’t talk to them on
call

no, the thing is Public
Prosecutor always have our
phone number.
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes, do

not tell them anything on
the phone.

Actually, now and then we
talk to each other, in fact,
the public prosecutor on one
occasion even took my
daughter to get the
medicines.

yes, yes.

yes, now when there is some
145
urgent matter at home, the

orderly has to be called
because I sometimes I talk
with public prosecutor also.
Amit Jain Advocate - Ji.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - When

they started creating
pressure, then we alerted
everyone, that there is no
need to put pressure on me
at all.
Amit Jain Advocate --- Yes

Yes.

Because I am a family
member.

Absolutely.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- I

will go directly to the
District Judge and make a
complaint.
146

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - That

everyone is putting pressure
on me.

yes.

Yesterday, I told Kuldeep
that he should not let
anyone come outside means
inside the premises

Children's studies are also
disturbed, they come and sit
for two- two hours.
Amit Jain Advocate hm hm .
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – Pubic

prosecutor had also put his
all efforts, he called in the
morning also
147
Amit Jain Advocate - I know

about him.

everyone thinks of their own
benefit.

Absolutely, absolutely.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - It is

okay, how do we know how
much money they are giving
him

hm.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - He

was sitting in his chamber
yesterday.

yes.

he said that you should go.
That today my own work is
going on, you are not
required here.
148

yes.

Yesterday there was Lok
Adalat.

don't have any work, you go
out and sit.
Amit Jain Advocate -hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – hm ,

we could have listened
everybody if we wanted to
entertain everyone.
Amit Jain Advocate - No no I

know about him . just now
he has became.

don't worry, you don't
worry. Your judgment will be
done on 15th .

149

Because they too have a lot
of tension on their mind
about the fact that if T.A
Complaint is done by
somebody unnecessarily
then it wont be of any use .

you worry. T.A.'s
responsibility and
complaints responsibility is
mine . I won’t roam around
like this
Amit jain Advocate – Isn’t I

can try to get the case
transferred after T.A. is
rejected.

hm
Amit Jain Advocate - So this

is how the transfer will
happen in the air.
150

yes.
Amit jain Advocate --- It is

not like this.

hm

judge is in the High Court,
in the Supreme Court as
well, it is not a small thing

you don't worry. Look, he
had assured you on the very
first day itself.
Amit Jain Advocate - Look ,

I can give my life, no
problem, but someone
cheats with me. I do not
tolerate that.
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Who

is cheating.
Amit Jain Advocate - No.

151

Cheating. Who's cheating
Amit Jain Advocate – I am

not saying this for you . I
am saying it in general
Amit Jain Advocate – hmm .
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Don't

you worry, I will talk to him
in the evening and then call
you and will tell you
whether he will come or not
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes!

right.
Amit jain Advocate - Till I

don't talk to sir.
Amit jain Advocate - . I

don’t feel like eating
anything or don’t feel like
152
talking to anyone my mind

remains agitated .

no, there is nothing like
this, you don't need to take
so much tension ,
Amit Jain Advocate – even If

I receives a call from any
client I just ask them to call
me after 15th
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – that

day the boy came and asked
me about the sir, you must
have told him to take anil
Yadav name at the gate
Amit Jain Advocate - No, he

didn’t said anything on the
gate
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal --- he

has said that I have to go to
Anil Yadav's house at the
gate.

153
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal -. And

came and rang the bell of
my house and asked about
the Sir.
Amit Jain Advocate - I am,

am.

I scolded Shamshad, that
when I have asked you that
no one should ring the bell
of my premises why it is
happening then
Amit Jain Advocate ---hm

how did someone came?
Amit jain Advocate – hm
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - I told

him in the morning that no
one should ring the bell
Amit Jain Advocate - Yes Yes

Yes!
154
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal – I even

told my milkman . not to
bring the milk today .
Amit Jain Advocate - No no

look madam, I am telling
you that I am absolutely like
a member of your family,
wherever you need anything
in school or medical, don't
you tell anyone, you tell me.

haven’t let the milk person
to come today at, I have told
all of them that we are not
at home today

take tension at all.
Whenever there is a need for
anything , you can call me,
Mrs. Neeru Aggarwal - Well,

Amit ji will ask himself.
Whether he is at home or
not
Amit Jain Advocate - Who

155
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Amit

Tyagi!

yes.
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal .... Yes.

So today I even told them
not to come because we are
not at home

yes.

you don’t need to worry.
Amit Jain Advocate - I had

sent this so that whenever
Chhotelal ji is standing
outside or someone is
standing, then that would be
the problem. Madam, once
you have seen or not.
Amit Jain Advocate – I had

already explained him that
if madam comes take my
156
name, but If somebody else

comes , tell then you came
from G.d Goenka and just
came to meet the sir
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal - Yes

you don't need to worry at
all.
Amit Jain Advocate - If you

want to go somewhere, I will
take the car myself, I will
send the car, I have a car, I
don't have any problem.

now don’t worry I will let
you know after talking to
him in the evening
Amit Jain Advocate - So now

Madam Three is imprisoned
for life, and we still don’t
know about the kapil .
157
Mrs. Neeru Agarwal – okay .

it.
Mrs. Neeru Agwal - It's okay

it's fine, I'll ask.
Amit Jain Advocate - Has

anyone come?
158
ANNEXURE P-6

AND ADJ MR. SANDEEP
GUPTA (FROM 8968231511
TO 9411033400)
DATE -14.03.2022
TIMING-14.22PM
CALL DURATION- (0.34

MINUTES)
Amit Jain Advocate - Hello.

Hello.

Sir

Why are you troubling my
wife by calling at home
again and again?
Amit Jain Advocate - Now it

has become trouble sir?
159

No, you think you are a big
goon?
Amit Jain Advocate – Look

sir, you please don’t give me
threats.

Don't talk nonsense,
bastered
Amit Jain Advocate - Listen

to me.

Why are you troubling my
wife?
Amit Jain Advocate - First

listen to me.

am not deciding your case at
all, I am sending this case
back.
Amit Jain Advocate - Look, I

have all the recordings of
160
you, your wife too. I will

send it to you right now.

Get lost, you bhenchod.

will complain about you,
don't you worry.
ANNEXURE P-7 161
F I R S T I N F O R M A T I O N
R E P O R T
( U n d e r S e c t i o n 1 5 4 C r . P . C . )
1 . D i s t r i c t : M u z a f f a r N a g a r
P . S . ( P o l i c e S t a t i o n ) : C i v i l
L i n e s
Y e a r : 2 0 2 2 F I R N o . : 0 1 0 1
D a t e a n d T i m e : 0 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2
2 3 : 3 5
2 .
S . A c t s S e c t i o n s
N o .
1 . I P C 1 8 6 0 4 5 2
2 . I P C 1 8 6 0 3 8 7
3 . I P C 1 8 6 0 3 5 3
162
4 . I P C 1 8 6 0 5 0 6
5 . I P C 1 8 6 0 5 0 7
3 . O c c u r r e n c e o f O f f e n c e
( O c c u r r e n c e o f O f f e n c e ) :
( a ) D a y ( d a y ) : M o n d a y D a t e
F r o m : 1 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2 D a t e T o :
1 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2
T i m e P e r i o d : 5 : 0 0 H r s .
T i m e F r o m : 1 3 : 0 0 P M T i m e
T o : 1 3 : 0 0 P M
( b ) I n f o r m a t i o n r e c e i v e d a t
P . S . : D a t e : 1 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2
T i m e ( t i m e ) : 2 3 : 3 0 H r s .
163
( c ) D a t e o f f i l i n g o f F I R : -
D a t e : 1 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2 T i m e :
2 3 : 3 0 H r s .
( c ) G e n e r a l D i a r y
R e f e r e n c e :
E n t r y N o . : 0 5 8 T i m e :
1 4 / 0 3 / 2 0 2 2 2 3 : 3 0 H r s .
4 . T y p e o f I n f o r m a t i o n :
W r i t t e n
5 . P l a c e o f O c c u r r e n c e :
( a ) D i r e c t i o n a n d D i s t a n c e
f r o m P . S : S o u t h 0 1 K M S
B e a t N o . : … … … … . .
( b ) A d d r e s s : H O U S E N O
H C H 1 s t , T Y P E - I V , G r o u n d
164
F l o o r , C o u r t C o m p l e x ,
O f f i c e r s C o l o n y n e a r M a s j i d
M u z
( c ) I n c a s e , O u t s i d e t h e
l i m i t o f t h e P o l i c e S t a t i o n
( i f p o l i c e s t a t i o n i s o u t s i d e
t h e l i m i t ) :
N a m e o f P . S ( n a m e o f p o l i c e
s t a t i o n ) : D i s t r i c t :
6 . C o m p l a i n a n t / I n f o r m a n t
( c o m p l a i n a n t / i n f o r m a n t ) :
a . N a m e : S m t . N e e r u
A g g a r w a l ,
b . F a t h e r ’ s N a m e : S h .
S a n d e e p G u p t a
c . D a t e / Y e a r o f B i r t h
( y e a r o f b i r t h ) : 1 9 8 7
165
d . N a t i o n a l i t y
( n a t i o n a l i t y ) : I n d i a n
e . U I D N o . :
f . P a s s p o r t N o . :
D a t e o f I s s u e :
P l a c e o f I s s u e :
g . I d D e t a i l s ( R a t i o n
C a r d , V o t e r I D C a r d ,
P a s s p o r t , U I D N O . ,
D r i v i n g L i c e n s e , P A N )
S . N o . I D T y p e I D
N u m b e r
1 .
h . A d d r e s s :
S . N o . A d d r e s s A d d r e s s
T y p e
C u r r e n t H O U S E N O
1 .
A d d r e s s H C H 1 s t ,
166
T Y P E - I V ,
G r o u n d
F l o o r ,
C o u r t
C o m p l e x ,
O f f i c e r s
C o l o n y n e a r
M a s j i d ,
c i v i l L i n e s ,
M u z a f f a r p u r
N a g a r ,
U t t a r
P r a d e s h ,
I n d i a
P e r m a n e n t H O U S E N O
2 .
A d d r e s s H C H 1 s t ,
T Y P E - I V ,
G r o u n d
F l o o r ,
167
C o u r t
C o m p l e x ,
O f f i c e r s
C o l o n y n e a r
M a s j i d ,
c i v i l L i n e s ,
M u z a f f a r p u r
N a g a r ,
U t t a r
P r a d e s h ,
I n d i a
i . O c c u p a t i o n :
j . P h o n e N u m b e r :
M o b i l e :
168
7 . D e t a i l s o f K n o w n /
S u s p e c t / U n k n o w n a c c u s e d
w i t h f u l l p a r t i c u l a r s ( a t t a c h
s e p a r a t e s h e e t i f
n e c e s s a r y ) :
S . N a m e A l i a s R e l a t i v e ’ s P r e s e n t
N o . N a m e A d d r e s s
1 . A m i t F a t h e r ’ s 4 1 , G h e r
K u m a r n a m e : - K h e t i ,
J a i n P r a d e e p N a i
K u m a r M a n d i ,
J a i n M u z a f f a r
p u r
N a g a r ,
U t t a r
P r a d e s h ,
I n d i a
169
8 . R e a s o n f o r d e l a y i n
r e p o r t i n g b y t h e
c o m p l a i n a n t / i n f o r m a n t :
9 . P a r t i c u l a r s o f t h e
p r o p e r t i e s s t o l e n / i n v o l v e d
( a t t a c h s e p a r a t e s h e e t i f
n e c e s s a r y ) :
P r o p e r t P r o p e r t D e s c r i p t i
S . y y T y p e o n
N o C a t e g o
. r y
1 0 . T o t a l v a l u e o f p r o p e r t y
s t o l e n
1 1 . I n q u e s t R e p o r t / U . D .
C a s e N o . , i f a n y
S . N o . U I D B
N u m b e r
170
1 2 . F . I . R . C o n t e n t s ( a t t a c h
s e p a r a t e s h e e t , i f r e q u i r e d )
( C o p y i n g T a h r i r )
S i r , T o S e n i o r
S u p e r i n t e n d e n t o f P o l i c e ,
D i s t r i c t M u z a f f a r n a g a r S i r ,
i t i s r e q u e s t e d t h a t
C o m p l a i n a n t i s c u r r e n t l y
r e s i d i n g i n J u d g e ' s
r e s i d e n c e a t J u d g e
C o m p o u n d H o u s e N o . H . C H
I s t , T y p e - 1 G r o u n d F l o o r
C o u r t C o m p l e x O f f i c e r s
C o l o n y n e a r M a s j i d
M u z a f f a r n a g a r . I n t h e
f a m i l y o f t h e C o m p l a i n a n t ,
h e r h u s b a n d i s p r e s e n t l y
a p p o i n t e d a s t h e A d d i t i o n a l
171
D i s t r i c t J u d g e a n d S e s s i o n s
J u d g e C o u r t N o . 1 4 D i s t r i c t
M u z a f f a r n a g a r a n d t h e r e a r e
t w o y o u n g e r d a u g h t e r s o f
t h e C o m p l a i n a n t . I n t h e
c o u r t o f t h e C o m p l a i n a n t ' s
h u s b a n d , S e s s i o n s T r i a l n o .
5 9 2 / 2 0 0 4 S a r k a r V s .
D h a r a m p a l A d i S e s s i o n
T r i a l N o . 2 3 2 / 2 0 0 4
G o v e r n m e n t V s . K a t a r S i n g h
u n d e r S e c t i o n 3 6 4
I . D . N o . 2 4 / 2 0 0 4 P o l i c e
S t a t i o n N e w M a n d i D i s t r i c t
M u z a f f a r n a g a r i s r e s e r v e d
f o r d e c i s i o n . M r . A m i t J a i n
w h o i s t h e s o n o f t h e
C o m p l a i n a n t M r . P r a d e e p
J a i n i n t h e a b o v e m e n t i o n e d
c a s e h a s b e e n c o n t i n u o u s l y
172
c a l l i n g t h e C o m p l a i n a n t o n
m o b i l e n u m b e r 8 9 6 5 8 2 3 1 5 1 1
f r o m h i s p h o n e n u m b e r
9 4 1 1 0 3 5 4 0 0 a n d a n o t h e r
b l o c k n u m b e r 7 0 1 7 2 7 3 6 4 4 .
H e i s c o n t i n u o u s l y
t h r e a t e n i n g t h e C o m p l a i n a n t
b y s e n d i n g m e s s a g e s , v o i c e
m e s s a g e s a n d s a y i n g t h a t i f
y o u r h u s b a n d d o e s n o t
p u n i s h t h e a c c u s e d p e r s o n s
o f t h e a b o v e c a s e o r e v e n i f
a s i n g l e a c c u s e d i s l e f t o u t ,
t h e n I w i l l k i l l a l l t h e f o u r
m e m b e r s o f y o u r f a m i l y b y
k i d n a p p i n g . . . w i t h t h e h e l p
o f m y c o m p a n i o n s a n d
t r a u m a t i z e y o u r c h i l d r e n b y
k i d n a p p i n g t h e m f r o m
s c h o o l . I w i l l n o t l e a v e y o u
173
g u y s ! I n t h i s w a y , A m i t
K u m a r J a i n i s t h r e a t e n i n g
t h e C o m p l a i n a n t a n d t h e
f a m i l y o f t h e C o m p l a i n a n t
w i t h a b u s i v e l a n g u a g e a n d
b y c o n s t a n t l y f e a r i n g d e a t h
a n d h u r t b y m e n t a l t o u c h e r .
A m i t K u m a r J a i n t h r e a t e n e d
m e t h i s m o r n i n g o n
1 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 a t a r o u n d 1 . 0 0
P M . I n c i d e n t s a r e h a p p e n i n g
c o n t i n u o u s l y . M r . A m i t J a i n
i s p u t t i n g u n d u e p r e s s u r e o n
t h e C o m p l a i n a n t , a n d
o b s t r u c t i n g t h e o f f i c i a l
w o r k o f t h e h u s b a n d o f t h e
c o m p l a i n a n t . T h e r e a f t e r o n
t h e s a m e d a y w h e n t h e
C o m p l a i n a n t p a n i c k e d a n d
c a l l e d h e r h u s b a n d f r o m
174
c o u r t , A m i t K u m a r J a i n
e n t e r e d i n s i d e t h e h o u s e a n d
s t a r t e d p u s h i n g a n d
t h r e a t e n i n g m e t h a t i f a l l
t h e f o u r a c c u s e d w e r e n o t
p u n i s h e d t o l i f e
i m p r i s o n m e n t , h e w i l l s h o o t
m y f a m i l y a n d w i l l t r o u b l e
m e . H e a l s o s t a t e d t h a t A l l
i n f o r m a t i o n i s r e q u i r e d t o
b e g i v e n t o h i m b e f o r e a
d e c i s i o n i s m a d e . T h e
d e c i s i o n s h o u l d b e i n o u r
f a v o r i n a n y c a s e , k e e p i n g
i n v i e w t h e a b o v e i n c i d e n t ,
i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o p r o v i d e
p o l i c e p r o t e c t i o n t o t h e
f a m i l y o f t h e c o m p l a i n a n t .
L e g a l a c t i o n s h o u l d b e
t a k e n b y r e g i s t e r i n g f i r s t
175
i n f o r m a t i o n r e p o r t o f t h e
s a i d i n c i d e n t a g a i n s t
a c c u s e d A m i t J a i n .
T h e r e f o r e , i t i s r e q u e s t e d t o
O f f i c e r i n c h a r g e , P o l i c e
S t a t i o n C i v i l L i n e s h o u l d b e
d i r e c t e d t h a t A m i t K u m a r
J a i n S / o P r a d e e p K u m a r J a i n
r e s i d e n t 4 1 G h e r K h a t t i
P o l i c e S t a t i o n N a i m a n d i
D i s t r i c t M u z a f f a r n a g a r , a n d
a l s o r e q u e s t h i m t o r e g i s t e r
f i r s t i n f o r m a t i o n r e p o r t
a g a i n s t h i s o t h e r a s s o c i a t e s
a n d t a k e a p p r o p r i a t e l e g a l
a c t i o n . D a t e d 1 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2
S i g n a t u r e E n g l i s h U n r e a d
a p p l i c a n t o r ( N e e r u
A g g a r w a l ) w i f e S h r i
S a n d e e p G u p t a , A d d i t i o n a l
176
D i s t r i c t a n d S t a t e J u d g e ,
C o u r t N o . 1 4 M u z a f f a r n a g a r
H o u s e N o . H . C . H . 1 s t , T y p e
I V , G r o u n d F l o o r C o u r t
C o m p l e x , O f f i c e r s C o l o n y
n e a r M a s j i d M u z a f f a r n a g a r
M O B I L E : - 8 9 6 8 2 3 1 5 1 1
N o t e : - I , C o n s t a b l e S a n d e e p
K u m a r N o . 5 7 8 , c e r t i f y t h a t
t h e c a s e h a s b e e n r e g i s t e r e d
i n t h e a b o v e m a n n e r b y m e .
N o t e - T h e c o p y o f t h e
T a h r i r w a s c o m p u t e r i z e d
l i t e r a l l y o n t h e c o m p u t e r .
1 3 . A c t i o n T a k e n S i n c e t h e
a b o v e i n f o r m a t i o n r e v e a l s
c o m m i s s i o n o f o f f e n c e ( s )
u / s a s m e n t i o n e d a t i t e m
N o . 2 :
177
( 1 ) R e g i s t e r e d t h e c a s e a n d
t o o k u p t h e I n v e s t i g a t i o n :
( 2 ) D i r e c t e d ( N a m e o f t h e
I . O . ) : P a w a n D e e p S h a r m a
R a n k : S I ( S u b - I n s p e c t o r )
N o : 0 1 2 2 7 0 0 5 3 t o t a k e u p
t h e I n v e s t i g a t i o n
O R
( 3 ) R e f u s e d I n v e s t i g a t i o n
d u e t o ) :
O R
( 4 ) T r a n s f e r r e d t o
P . S ( n a m e ) : D i s t r i c t : o n
p o i n t o f j u r i s d i c t i o n C y b e r
P o l i c e S t a t i o n , P u n e
F . I . R r e a d o v e r t o t h e
c o m p l a i n a n t / i n f o r m a n t ,
178
a d m i t t e d t o b e c o r r e c t l y
r e c o r d e d a n d a c o p y g i v e n
t o t h e c o m p l a i n a n t /
i n f o r m a n t , f r e e o f c o s t .
R . O . A . C . :
S i g n a t u r e o f O f f i c e r
1 4 . S i g n a t u r e / T h u m b
I m p r e s s i o n o f t h e
C o m p l a i n a n t / I n f o r m a n t :
S i g n a t u r e o f O f f i c e r i n
c h a r g e
N a m e : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
R a n k : ( I n s p e c t o r )
N o . :
179
1 5 . D a t e a n d T i m e o f
d i s p a t c h t o t h e c o u r t :
S i g n a t u r e o f O f f i c e r
i n c h a r g e P o l i c e S t a t i o n
N a m e : P o l i c e S t a t i o n C i v i l
L i n e s
R a n k : I ( I n s p e c t o r )
N o . 9 4 5 4 4 0 4 0 6 4
T h i s i s t y p e d o n t h e
c o m p u t e r a n d e x p l a i n e d t o
m e i n H i n d i . I t i s a s t r u e
a n d r i g h t a s I s a y .
I n f r o n t o f
N a m e o f I . O . :
D e s i g n a t i o n :
ANNEXURE P-8 180
To,
Respected S.S.P, Muzzafar Nagar
Subject- Cr. No.-101, 2022
Section-452387,353,506,507 In
relation to the investigation of
police station civil line
Muzaffarnagar from the Central
Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.).
Sir,
It is submitted that in the court
of court ADJ-14, Muzaffarnagar,
Sessions Trial No. 592 of 2004,
Sarkar Vs. Dharampal etc.
Section 364 IPC and Sessions
Trial No. 932 of 2004, Sarkar Vs
Katar Singh is under
consideration. Sachin Jain, who
is kidnapped in the above case,
is my younger brother. The said

181
case was transferred from
Hon'ble Court of Posco, Court
no.-2 to the Hon'ble Court of
ADJ-14.
In which the presiding officer
Sandeep Gupta told me in the
court on 18.02.2022 that if I
come to his house in the
evening, he will punish the
accused in the above said case.
On his call, I went to his house
and the judge told me that the
case is weak, if you give me 5
lakh rupees, then I will punish
the accused. On his demand, Rs
5 lakh was given to him by me in
4 installments at his residence.
He took money from me and gave
it to his wife in front of me.
Judge Sandeep Gupta and his
wife talked to me at his house

182
regarding the case, whose voice
recording is also safe with me.
(Which is attached with this
application by copying in CD.)
After taking full 5 lakh rupees
from me, on 11.03.2022,
Sandeep Gupta Judge Sahab
called from his wife's mobile
number 8958231511 on my
mobile number 9411033400 at
09:30 PM and called me to his
house. Firstly, I spoke to the
wife of the judge and then to the
Judge himself who called me to
meet him at his residence at
10:30 in the night, whose call
recording is attached with it.
After this, on 11.03.2022, we
had a conversation when there
was call from number
8963231511 on my another Jio

183
number 7017273644, When I
went to his house, Judge Sahab
Sandeep Gupta and his wife said
that we will punish 2 out of 4
accused and not the other 2.
Then said let's punish 3 but we
will not be able to punish Kapil.
Thereafter, I told him that you
should have told me this thing
in advance, then the judge said
that the accused Dharampal and
Rohit are giving me 6 to 7 lakhs.
I said that if you want some
more money then tell me and I’ll
make arrangements. After that,
on 12.03.2022, the wife of the
judge called me on my mobile
number 7017273644 at 12:44 pm
and 08:41 pm and on 13.03.2022
at 01:03 pm, in which they
discussed about the judgement

184
of the whole case and said that
our court's public prosecutor
Amit Tyagi and the accused's
lawyers and accused are
pressurizing us, by coming home
again and again. The call
recording of the conversation
and other evidence is safe with
me, which is attached herewith.
After taking the bribe, the
accused made an agreement with
the judge and to put pressure on
me, the judge Sahab Sandeep
Gupta called me on my mobile
number 9411033400 from the
above number on 14.03.2022 at
2:23 pm and abused and
threatened me and in order to
save himself and to implicate
me, he filed a complaint against
me through his wife and wants

185
to send me to jail by using his
position in false case. While
there is no truth in the said
complaint. The recording of
CCTV footage near the lock-up in
the court premises and
collectorate premises should be
collected and taken into
consideration in the said case.
On 14.03.2022 I did not go to
the house of the judge. If I had
gone to his house as he alleged
in the complaint, he could have
made a video of me and made
noise and called the police at
the same time. But this was not
done by him and to save himself
under a conspiracy, a false case
was instituted against me
through his wife. I am giving all
the audio in CD, voice recording

186
which is recorded by me from my
mobile (Samsung A-12) which is
absolutely correct, if the judge
and his wife deny the recording
available in CD or contends that
it is false, forensic examination
should be done and samples of
voice of Judge and his wife
should also be sent for forensic
examination so that truth come
out. In this regard, I have sent a
complaint letter and mail to the
District Judge Sir
Muzaffarnagar, Chief Justice of
Supreme Court New Delhi, Chief
Justice of High Court Allahabad
and Administrative Justice
Muzaffarnagar High Court
Allahabad and Registrar General
High Court Allahabad. Judge
Saheb Sandeep Gupta and his

187
wife is guilty in this whole case,
against whom it is necessary to
get a case registered after
investigation under the
Corruption Act etc. or I should
be given permission to file a
case and my 5 lakh rupees
should also be returned from the
judge and I should get justice in
the case filed against me by the
wife of the Judge. There is a
danger to life from Sandeep
Gupta and his wife and from the
accused in the above case and
from other unknown people. Any
untoward incident can happen to
me and my family at any time. It
is my humble request that the
pendrive should be taken into
consideration in the said case

188
and help me get justice in the
false case instituted against me.
Date: 15.03.2022
Amit Kumar Jain (Advocate)
Son Shri Pradeep Kumar
Resident- Gherkhatti,
Naimandi, Muzaffarnagar.
MOBILE:---9411233400,
7017273644
ANNEXURE P-9 189
INDIA NON JUDICIAL
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Certificate No. : IN-
UP43632642721482U
Certificate Issued Date: 15-
Mar-2022:02:48 PM
Account Reference :
NEWIMPACC
(SV)/up14535304/MUZAFFA
RNAGAR SADAR/UP-MJF
Unique Doc. Reference:
SUBIN-UPUP
1456580478195358827604U
Purchased by: AMIT KUMAR
JAIN S/O PK JAIN R/O NEW
MANDI MZNA
190
Description of Document:
Article 4 Affidavit
Property Description: Not
Applicable
Consideration Price (Rs.):
First Party : AMIT KUMAR
JAIN S/O PK JAIN R/O NEW
MANDI MZN
Second Party : Not
Applicabie
Stamp Duty Paid By : AMIT
KUMAR JAIN S/O PK JAIN
R/O NEW MANDI MZN.
Stamp Duty Amount(Rs.): 10
(Ten only)
……Please write or type below this
line………
191
Before
Honorable Chief Justice Sir
High Court Allahabad.
Complaint application with
evidence regarding the
involvement of the Presiding
Officer of Additional and
District Sessions Judge No-
14, Mr. Sandeep Gupta
posted in the concerned
district Muzaffarnagar.
Affidavit of Amit Kumar Jain
(Advocate)
1. That I solemnly declare
that my name is Amit Kumar
Jain (Advocate) son of Shri
Pradeep Kumar resident of
41, Gherkhatti, Naimandi,

192
Muzaffarnagar MOBILE:--
9411033400, 7017273644.
2. That the case is under
consideration in the court of
A.D.J.-14, Muzaffarnagar,
Sessions Trial No. 592 of
2004, Sarkar Vs. Dharampal
etc. Section 364 IPC and
2004, Sarkar Vs Katar
Singh. Sachin Jain, who is
kidnapped in the above
case, is my younger brother.
3. That the said case was
transferred from the Court
of POCSO Court No.-2 to the
Court of A.D.J.-14.
4. That the presiding officer
of the court A.D.J.-14,

193
Sandeep Gupta told me in
the court on 18.02.2022
that we will punish the
accused in the above-
mentioned cases, if the
deponent come to his house
in the evening. On his call, I
went to his house and the
judge told me that the case
is weak, if you give 5 lakh
rupees, then he will punish
the accused in the above-
mentioned cases.
5. That on his demand, Rs 5
lakh was given to him in 4
installments at his
residence. He took the
money from me and gave it
to his wife in front of me.
Judge Sandeep Gupta and

194
his wife talked to me at his
house regarding the case,
whose voice recording is
also safe with me. (Which is
attached with this affidavit
by copying it in pen drive.)
6. That after taking full 5
lakh rupees from me, on
11.03.2022, Sandeep Gupta
judge called me from his
wife's mobile number
8968231511 on my mobile
number 9411033400 at
09:30 pm and called me to
his house. The judge asked
me to come to his residence
at 10:30 pm, whose call
recording is attached
herewith.
195
7. That after this, on
11.03.2022, I had a word
with him via my second Jio
number 7017273644. When I
went to his house, Judge
Sahab Sandeep Gupta and
his wife said that we will
punish 2 out of 4 accused
and not punish the other 2.
Then he said let's punish 3
accused but Kapil cannot be
punished.
8. That I told him if you
want more money, I’ll
arrange and then he said
that the accused Dharampal
and Rohit are giving 6 to 7
lakhs. I said that if you
want some more money, then

196
tell me, I will give it after
making arrangements.
9. That after that on
12.03.2022, I got a call from
the wife of the judge on my
mobile number 7017273644
at 12:44 am and also at
08:41 pm in the evening. On
13.03.2022 at 01:03 pm, he
talked about the judgment of
the whole case and said that
our court's public
prosecutor Amit Tyagi and
the accused's lawyer and
accused are pressurizing
us., by coming to their
residence again and again.
10. That the call recording
of the conversation and

197
other evidence is safe with
me, which is attached with
the affidavit.
11. That after taking the
bribe from me, the accused
made arrangement with the
judge and then with the
intention to put pressure on
me, the judge sahab
Sandeep Gupta called on my
from the above number on
14.03.2022 at 02:23 pm. He
abused me and to save
himself and to implicate me,
he filed a complaint against
me through his wife. He
wants to send me to jail by
using his position and
implicating me in a false
198
and frivolous case, whereas
case.
12. That the recording of
CCTV footage near the lock-
up in the court premises
and collectorate premises
should have been collected
and taken into
consideration. On
14.03.2022, I did not go to
the judge's residence. If I
had gone to his house as he
alleged in the complaint, he
could have made a video of
me or could have made noise
and called the police at the
same time. But this was not
done by him and under a
conspiracy to save himself,

199
as an afterthought
instituted a false case
against me through his wife.
13. That all audio, video and
voice recording is being
given by me in pendrive
which is recorded by me
from my mobile (Samsung A-
12) which is absolutely
correct.
14. That if the judge and his
wife denies the recordings
and videos available in the
pendrive or contends that
the same is false, then
forensic examination should
be done and the voice
sample of the judge and his
wife should also be sent for

200
forensic examination so that
the truth can be out in
open.
15. That in this regard, I
have sent a complaint via
mail to District Judge,
Muzaffarnagar, Chief Justice
of Supreme Court New Delhi,
Chief Justice High Court
Allahabad and
Administrative Justice
Allahabad and Registrar
General High Court
Allahabad along with
recordings.
16. That the judge Sandeep
Gupta and his wife are
guilty in this whole case,

201
against whom it is necessary
to investigate and get a case
registered under the
Corruption Act etc. or allow
me to get the case registered
and my 5 lakh rupees should
also be returned to me from
the judge. That I should get
justice from the false
complaint registered against
me by the wife of the judge.
I and my family are facing
threat of life from Judge
Sahab Sandeep Gupta and
his wife and from the
accused in the above case
and from other unknown
persons. Any untoward
incident can happen to me
and my family at any time.

202
17. That the judicial inquiry
of the said case should be
conducted by the judicial
committee and it is
necessary in the interest of
justice to take legal action
and departmental action
against the above presiding
officer and his wife and
justice should be given to
the applicant.
18. That I solemnly declare
that Sections 1 to 17 of the
Affidavit are true and
correct to the best of my
knowledge. Help me God.
MUZAFFAR NAGAR
Deponent
Place:- Muzaffarnagar
Date:15.03.2022
ANNEXURE P-10 203
On stamp Paper
Before
Honorable Chief Justice,
Supreme Court, New Delhi
Complaint application with
evidence regarding the
involvement of the Presiding
Officer of Additional and District
Sessions Judge No-14, Mr.
Sandeep Gupta posted in the
concerned district
Muzaffarnagar.
Affidavit of Amit Kumar Jain
(Advocate)
1. That I solemnly declare that
my name is Amit Kumar Jain
(Advocate) son of Shri Pradeep
Kumar resident of 41,
Gherkhatti, Naimandi,
204
Muzaffarnagar MOBILE:--
9411033400, 7017273644.
2. That the case is under
consideration in the court of
A.D.J.-14, Muzaffarnagar,
Sessions Trial No. 592 of 2004,
Section 364 IPC and Sessions
Trial No. 932 of 2004, Sarkar Vs
Katar Singh. Sachin Jain, who is
kidnapped in the above case, is
my younger brother.
3. That the said case was
transferred from the Court of
POCSO Court No.-2 to the Court
of A.D.J.-14.
4. That the presiding officer of
the court A.D.J.-14, Sandeep
Gupta told me in the court on
18.02.2022 that we will punish

205
the accused in the above-
mentioned cases, if the deponent
come to his house in the
evening. On his call, I went to
his house and the judge told me
that the case is weak, if you give
5 lakh rupees, then he will
punish the accused in the above-
mentioned cases.
5. That on his demand, Rs 5
lakh was given to him in 4
installments at his residence. He
took the money from me and
gave it to his wife in front of me.
Judge Sandeep Gupta and his
wife talked to me at his house
regarding the case, whose voice
recording is also safe with me.
(Which is attached with this
affidavit by copying it in pen
drive.)
206
6. That after taking full 5 lakh
rupees from me, on 11.03.2022,
Sandeep Gupta judge called me
from his wife's mobile number
8968231511 on my mobile
number 9411033400 at 09:30 pm
and called me to his house. The
judge asked me to come to his
residence at 10:30 pm, whose
call recording is attached
herewith.
7. That after this, on
11.03.2022, I had a word with
him via my second Jio number
7017273644. When I went to his
house, Judge Sahab Sandeep
Gupta and his wife said that we
will punish 2 out of 4 accused
and not punish the other 2.
Then he said let's punish 3

207
accused but Kapil cannot be
punished.
8. That I told him if you want
more money, I’ll arrange and
then he said that the accused
Dharampal and Rohit are giving
6 to 7 lakhs. I said that if you
want some more money, then tell
me, I will give it after making
arrangements.
9. That after that on
12.03.2022, I got a call from the
wife of the judge on my mobile
number 7017273644 at 12:44 am
and also at 08:41 pm in the
evening. On 13.03.2022 at 01:03
pm, he talked about the
judgment of the whole case and
said that our court's public
prosecutor Amit Tyagi and the
accused's lawyer and accused

208
are pressurizing us., by coming
to their residence again and
again.
10. That the call recording of
the conversation and other
evidence is safe with me, which
is attached with the affidavit.
11. That after taking the bribe
from me, the accused made
arrangement with the judge and
then with the intention to put
pressure on me, the judge sahab
Sandeep Gupta called on my
mobile number 9411033400 from
the above number on 14.03.2022
at 02:23 pm. He abused me and
to save himself and to implicate
me, he filed a complaint against
me through his wife. He wants to
send me to jail by using his
position and implicating me in a

209
false and frivolous case, whereas
case.
12. That the recording of CCTV
footage near the lock-up in the
court premises and collectorate
premises should have been
collected and taken into
consideration. On 14.03.2022, I
did not go to the judge's
residence. If I had gone to his
house as he alleged in the
complaint, he could have made a
video of me or could have made
noise and called the police at
the same time. But this was not
done by him and under a
conspiracy to save himself, as
an afterthought instituted a
false case against me through
his wife.
210
13. That all audio, video and
voice recording is being given by
me in pendrive which is recorded
by me from my mobile (Samsung
A-12) which is absolutely
correct.
14. That if the judge and his
wife denies the recordings and
videos available in the pendrive
or contends that the same is
false, then forensic examination
should be done and the voice
sample of the judge and his wife
should also be sent for forensic
examination so that the truth
can be out in open.
15. That in this regard, I have
sent a complaint via mail to
District Judge, Muzaffarnagar,
Chief Justice of Supreme Court
New Delhi, Chief Justice High

211
Court Allahabad and
Allahabad and Registrar General
High Court Allahabad along with
recordings.
16. That the judge Sandeep
Gupta and his wife are guilty in
this whole case, against whom it
is necessary to investigate and
get a case registered under the
Corruption Act etc. or allow me
to get the case registered and my
5 lakh rupees should also be
returned to me from the judge.
That I should get justice from
the false complaint registered
against me by the wife of the
judge. I and my family are facing
threat of life from Judge Sahab
Sandeep Gupta and his wife and

212
from the accused in the above
case and from other unknown
persons. Any untoward incident
can happen to me and my family
at any time.
17. That the judicial inquiry of
the said case should be
conducted by the judicial
committee and it is necessary in
the interest of justice to take
legal action and departmental
action against the above
presiding officer and his wife
and justice should be given to
the applicant.
18. That I solemnly declare that

Sections 1 to 17 of the Affidavit
are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge. Help me God.
MUZAFFAR NAGAR
Deponent
Place:- Muzaffarnagar
Date:15.03.2022
213
ANNEXURE P-11
To,
Mr Avnish Kumar Awasthi
Additional Chief Home
Secretary, Lucknow.
Section-452387,353,506,507
In relation to the
investigation of police
station civil line
Muzaffarnagar from the
Central Bureau of
Investigation (C.B.I.).
Sir,
It is submitted that in the
court of court ADJ-14,
Muzaffarnagar, Sessions
Trial No. 592 of 2004,

214
Section 364 IPC and
2004, Sarkar Vs Katar Singh
is under consideration.
Sachin Jain, who is
The said case was
transferred from Hon'ble
Court of Posco, Court no.-2
to the Hon'ble Court of ADJ-
14.
In which the presiding
officer Sandeep Gupta told
me in the court on
18.02.2022 that if I come to
his house in the evening, he
will punish the accused in
the above said case. On his
call, I went to his house and

215
the judge told me that the
case is weak, if you give me
5 lakh rupees, then I will
punish the accused. On his
demand, Rs 5 lakh was given
to him by me in 4
installments at his
residence. He took money
from me and gave it to his
wife in front of me. Judge
Sandeep Gupta and his wife
talked to me at his house
regarding the case, whose
voice recording is also safe
with me. (Which is attached
with this application by
copying in CD.) After taking
full 5 lakh rupees from me,
on 11.03.2022, Sandeep
Gupta Judge Sahab called

216
from his wife's mobile
at 09:30 PM and called me
to his house. Firstly, I
spoke to the wife of the
judge and then to the Judge
himself who called me to
10:30 in the night, whose
with it. After this, on
11.03.2022, we had a
conversation when there was
call from number
8963231511 on my another
Jio number 7017273644,
When I went to his house,
Judge Sahab Sandeep Gupta
and his wife said that we

217
will punish 2 out of 4
Then said let's punish 3 but
we will not be able to punish
Kapil. Thereafter, I told him
that you should have told
me this thing in advance,
then the judge said that the
accused Dharampal and
Rohit are giving me 6 to 7
want some more money then
tell me and I’ll make
arrangements. After that, on
12.03.2022, the wife of the
judge called me on my
at 12:44 pm and 08:41 pm
and on 13.03.2022 at 01:03
pm, in which they discussed

218
about the judgement of the
whole case and said that our
court's public prosecutor
Amit Tyagi and the
accused's lawyers and
accused are pressurizing us,
by coming home again and
again. The call recording of
evidence is safe with me,
which is attached herewith.
accused made an agreement
with the judge and to put
pressure on me, the judge
Sahab Sandeep Gupta called
me on my mobile number
9411033400 from the above
number on 14.03.2022 at

219
threatened me and in order
to save himself and to
implicate me, he filed a
complaint against me
through his wife and wants
to send me to jail by using
his position in false case.
While there is no truth in
the said complaint. The
recording of CCTV footage
near the lock-up in the
court premises and
collectorate premises should
be collected and taken into
consideration in the said
case. On 14.03.2022 I did
not go to the house of the
judge. If I had gone to his
complaint, he could have

220
made a video of me and
made noise and called the
police at the same time. But
this was not done by him
and to save himself under a
conspiracy, a false case was
instituted against me
through his wife. I am giving
all the audio in CD, voice
recording which is recorded
by me from my mobile
(Samsung A-12) which is
absolutely correct, if the
judge and his wife deny the
recording available in CD or
contends that it is false,
be done and samples of
should also be sent for

221
truth come out. In this
regard, I have sent a
complaint letter and mail to
the District Judge Sir
Chief Justice of High Court
Allahabad and
General High Court
Allahabad. Judge Saheb
is guilty in this whole case,
to get a case registered after
Corruption Act etc. or I

222
should be given permission
to file a case and my 5 lakh
rupees should also be
returned from the judge and
I should get justice in the
case filed against me by the
Gupta and his wife and from
the accused in the above
case and from other
unknown people. Any
untoward incident can
happen to me and my family
at any time. Local Civil
Police is under Judicial
Muzaffarnagar and under
judicial pressure, the local
police officers can
physically, mentally,
223
financially abuse the
applicant in the above false
case and send me to jail.
After sending to jail, the
applicant will not even be
allowed to get bail and will
end the future and career of
the applicant. The family of
the appellant is in extreme
panic due to the above false
case. And the applicant is
being forced to commit
suicide. Therefore, the
appellant is not expected to
get justice as he is under
the case is under the
judicial influence of the
local police. It is necessary
in the interest of justice to
get the above case

224
transferred from the local
police to the Central Bureau
of Investigation (C.B.I.) so
that a fair investigation can
be conducted and the
applicant can get justice.
Therefore, it is most
respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Authority may be
pleased to pass an order to
hand over the case to
(C.B.I.) for investigation by
removing the local police
case.
Applicant
Date-- 17/03/2022
225
MOBILE:---9411233400,
701727364
ANNEXURE P-12 226
To,
Hon’ble Home Minister,
Ministry of Home Affairs,
New Delhi
Section-452387,353,506,507
In relation to the
investigation of police
station civil line
Central Bureau of
Investigation (C.B.I.).
Sir,
It is submitted that in the
court of court ADJ-14,
Muzaffarnagar, Sessions
Trial No. 592 of 2004,

227
Section 364 IPC and
2004, Sarkar Vs Katar Singh
is under consideration.
Sachin Jain, who is
The said case was
transferred from Hon'ble
Court of Posco, Court no.-2
to the Hon'ble Court of ADJ-
14.
In which the presiding
officer Sandeep Gupta told
me in the court on
18.02.2022 that if I come to
his house in the evening, he
will punish the accused in
the above said case. On his
call, I went to his house and

228
the judge told me that the
case is weak, if you give me
5 lakh rupees, then I will
punish the accused. On his
demand, Rs 5 lakh was given
to him by me in 4
installments at his
residence. He took money
from me and gave it to his
wife in front of me. Judge
talked to me at his house
regarding the case, whose
voice recording is also safe
with me. (Which is attached
with this application by
copying in CD.) After taking
full 5 lakh rupees from me,
on 11.03.2022, Sandeep
Gupta Judge Sahab called

229
from his wife's mobile
at 09:30 PM and called me
to his house. Firstly, I
spoke to the wife of the
judge and then to the Judge
himself who called me to
10:30 in the night, whose
with it. After this, on
11.03.2022, we had a
conversation when there was
call from number
8963231511 on my another
Jio number 7017273644,
When I went to his house,
Judge Sahab Sandeep Gupta
and his wife said that we

230
will punish 2 out of 4
Then said let's punish 3 but
we will not be able to punish
Kapil. Thereafter, I told him
that you should have told
me this thing in advance,
then the judge said that the
accused Dharampal and
Rohit are giving me 6 to 7
want some more money then
tell me and I’ll make
arrangements. After that, on
12.03.2022, the wife of the
judge called me on my
at 12:44 pm and 08:41 pm
and on 13.03.2022 at 01:03
pm, in which they discussed

231
about the judgement of the
whole case and said that our
court's public prosecutor
Amit Tyagi and the
accused's lawyers and
accused are pressurizing us,
by coming home again and
again. The call recording of
evidence is safe with me,
which is attached herewith.
accused made an agreement
with the judge and to put
pressure on me, the judge
Sahab Sandeep Gupta called
me on my mobile number
9411033400 from the above
number on 14.03.2022 at

232
threatened me and in order
to save himself and to
implicate me, he filed a
complaint against me
through his wife and wants
to send me to jail by using
his position in false case.
While there is no truth in
the said complaint. The
recording of CCTV footage
near the lock-up in the
court premises and
collectorate premises should
be collected and taken into
consideration in the said
case. On 14.03.2022 I did
not go to the house of the
judge. If I had gone to his
complaint, he could have

233
made a video of me and
made noise and called the
police at the same time. But
this was not done by him
and to save himself under a
conspiracy, a false case was
instituted against me
through his wife. I am giving
all the audio in CD, voice
recording which is recorded
by me from my mobile
(Samsung A-12) which is
absolutely correct, if the
judge and his wife deny the
recording available in CD or
contends that it is false,
be done and samples of
should also be sent for

234
truth come out. In this
regard, I have sent a
complaint letter and mail to
the District Judge Sir
Chief Justice of High Court
Allahabad and
General High Court
Allahabad. Judge Saheb
is guilty in this whole case,
to get a case registered after
Corruption Act etc. or I

235
should be given permission
to file a case and my 5 lakh
rupees should also be
returned from the judge and
I should get justice in the
case filed against me by the
Gupta and his wife and from
the accused in the above
case and from other
unknown people. Any
untoward incident can
happen to me and my family
at any time. Local Civil
Police is under Judicial
Muzaffarnagar and under
judicial pressure, the local
police officers can
physically, mentally,
236
financially abuse the
applicant in the above false
case and send me to jail.
After sending to jail, the
applicant will not even be
allowed to get bail and will
end the future and career of
the applicant. The family of
the appellant is in extreme
panic due to the above false
case. And the applicant is
being forced to commit
suicide. Therefore, the
appellant is not expected to
get justice as he is under
the case is under the
judicial influence of the
local police. It is necessary
in the interest of justice to
get the above case

237
transferred from the local
police to the Central Bureau
of Investigation (C.B.I.) so
that a fair investigation can
be conducted and the
applicant can get justice.
Therefore, it is most
respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Authority may be
pleased to pass an order to
hand over the case to
(C.B.I.) for investigation by
removing the local police
case.
Applicant
Date-- 17/03/2022

238
MOBILE:---9411233400,
7017273644
ANNEXURE P-13 239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
CRLMP NO. OF 2022
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILLING
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER
TO,
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND
HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON'BLE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
The humble petition of the
Petitioner above-named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

257
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022 (hereinafter
referred to as “Writ Petition”), whereby the Hon’ble Court
dismissed the said writ petition and directed the investigation
to be conducted by the Respondent No. 2, ignoring the
material fact that the allegations raised by the Petitioner are
against the sitting Addl. District Judge of District Muzaffar
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred as “Ld. Judge”).
2. That for the sake of brevity the contents of the accompanying
SLP are not being repeated herein, but the contents of the
accompanying SLP may be read as part and parcel of this
Application and the Petitioner crave leave of this Hon’ble
Court to refer and rely on the same as and when this
Application is taken up for hearing.
3. That the Petitioner has filed the true Photocopy of the
impugned order and undertakes to file certified copy of the
same as and when the same be directed by this Hon’ble
Court.
258
4. That this application is made bonafide and in the interest of
justice.
P R A Y E R
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may graciously be pleased to:-
a. Exempt the petitioner from filing Certified Copy of the
Impugned order; and
b. Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER

AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
Filed by:
Place:- New Delhi Abhinay

Filed on: 23.05.2022 Advocate for the Petitioner
AOR Code: 3080
Mob: 989927882
259
CRLMP NO. OF 2022
IN
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILLING

OFFICIAL TRANSLATION
TO,
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND
HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON'BLE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
The humble petition of the
Petitioner above-named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

260
in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022 (hereinafter
referred to as “Writ Petition”), whereby the Hon’ble Court
dismissed the said writ petition and directed the investigation
to be conducted by the Respondent No. 2, ignoring the
material fact that the allegations raised by the Petitioner are
against the sitting Addl. District Judge of District Muzaffar
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred as “Ld. Judge”).
2. That for the sake of brevity the contents of the accompanying
SLP are not being repeated herein, but the contents of the
accompanying SLP may be read as part and parcel of this
Application and the Petitioner crave leave of this Hon’ble
Court to refer and rely on the same as and when this
Application is taken up for hearing.
3. That the Annexure No. P-1 to P-12 annexed with the
accompanying SLP were in Hindi vernacular language and
due to urgency the same could not be translated by the
Official Translator. However, the same have been translated
by a person well conversant with both the languages, hence
this application.
4. That the present application is made in the interest of justice.

261
P R A Y E R
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble

Court may graciously be pleased to:-
(a) exempt the petitioner from filing official translation
of Annexure P-1 to P-12 and accept the
translation filed herein; and
(b) Pass any other order or orders may also be passed
which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the
circumstances of the case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONERS AS IN

DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
Filed by:
Place:- New Delhi Abhinay

Filed on: 23.05.2022 Advocate for the Petitioner
AOR Code: 3080
Mob: 989927882
262 262
430
Abhinay Sharma
Advocate for the
Petitioner
23.05.2022
Filed On: 21.12.2021
Place: New Delhi
263
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
INDEX OF FILING
S.NO. PARTICULARS COPIES COURT
FEES
1. SLP 1 -
Total -
Filed on: 23.05.2022

Abhinay
AOR Code: 3080
Mob: 989927882
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA264
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amit Kumar Jain .. Petitioner

VERSUS
State of U.P. and ODrs.
..Respondents
VAKALATNAMA
I, Sh. Amit Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Pradeep Kumar Jain Petitioner in the above
Petition do hereby appoint and retain Mr.
Abhinay
Sharma, Advocate Supreme
Court of India to act and appear for me in the above Petition and on my behalf to
conduct and prosecute (or defend) or withdraw the same and all proceedings that
may be taken in respect of any application connected with the same or any decree
or order passed therein, including proceedings in taxation and application for
Review, to file and obtain return of documents and to deposit and receive money
on my behalf in the said Petition and in application for Review and to represent me
and to take all necessary steps on my behalf in the above matter.
agree to ratify
all acts done by the aforesaid Advocate in
pursuance of this Authority.
Dated this 18th
* * * * . . . day of May
***''**''********** 2022
ACCEPTED
Mr. Abhinay Sharma.

|Advocatee
PETITIONER
MEMO OF APPEARANCE
h To
The Registrar,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Please enter my appearance on behalf of the Petitioner in the matter above
mentioned Dated this . . 18th May
d a y of .... s 2022.
Yours faithfully,
h
DATED: 18.05.2022 (Mr. Abhinay Sharma)
The address for service of the said Advocate is

H-29, First Floor, Jangpura Extension
New Delhi-14
abhinay@taslaw.in; sharmabhinay.aor@gmail.com
72 2 2
NCT OF DELHI COURT FEE NGT OF DELHI COURT FEE NCT OF OELHI COURT FEE
05MAY.20
AY-2022 DLCTO527401E22530 DLCTO5274 10E22530
05-MAY-2022 05-MAY-2022

Final Amit Jain Vs State of UP - 23.05.2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Amit Jain Vs State of UP - 23.05.2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER: ABHINAY SHARMA

/ deleted / modified in the petition is the result of curing of

defects and nothing else. Except curing the defects, nothing

has been done. Paper books are complete in all respects.

Advocate for the Petitioner

AOR Code: 3080

Contact No.: 9899272882

SR. NO. RECORD OFPROCEEDINGS PAGE NO.

1. Court’s Order dated

2. Court’s Order dated

3. Court’s Order dated

4. Court’s Order dated

5. Court’s Order dated

6. Court’s Order dated

7. Court’s Order dated

8. Court’s Order dated

9. Court’s Order dated

10 Court’s Order dated

PROFORMA FOR FIRST LISTING

• Central Act: (Title) Indian Penal Code

• Central Rule: (Title) NA

• State Act: (Title) NA

• State Rule: (Title) NA

• Impugned Interim Order: (Date) NA

• Impugned Final Order/Decree: (Date) 25.04.2022

• High Court: (Name) Highb Court of Judicature at Allahabad

• Names of Judges: Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.

1. Nature of matter: • Civil •

2. (a) Petitioner/ appellant No. l : Amit Kumar Jain

3. (a) Respondent No. l :_ State

4. (a) Main category classification: _14

6. (a) Similar disposed of matter with citation, if any, & case

(a) Whether accu sed/convict has su1rendered: D

(a) Date of Section 4 notification: _ _NA

Date: 23.05.2022 AOR for petitioner(s)/appellant(s)

Sl. Particulars of Page No. of part to Remarks

11. Special Leave Petition 4- 28

12. ANNEXURE P-1:

13. ANNEXURE P-2:

14. ANNEXURE P-3:

15. ANNEXURE P-4:

16. ANNEXURE P-5:

A true translated copy of 158-160

18. ANNEXURE P-7:

A true translated copy of 161-179

19. ANNEXURE P-8:

20. ANNEXURE P-9:

21. ANNEXURE P-10:

22. ANNEXURE P-11:

23. ANNEXURE P-12:

24. ANNEXURE P-13 239-255

25. CRLMP No. ______/2022

26. CRLMP No.

27. FIR Format 262

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

2. The petition is barred by time and there is delay of __NIL___

days in filing the SLP against Impugned final judgment and

order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of

Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.

3894 of 2022 for Condonation of __NIL__ Days delay has

3. There is a delay of __NIL__ day in refilling the Petition and

2. The petition is barred by time and there is delay of NIL_

3894 of 2022 for Condonation of NIL Days delay has

3. There is a delay of NIL day in refilling the Petition and