Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Analysis Paper
Critical Analysis Paper
Critical Analysis Paper
Nancy Mun
EDUC 2108.01
Professor Albert
Thornton (1995) describes the critical role social factors play on children’s problem-
solving skills. She explains how “Children learn a lot from watching other people, from
listening, and even from simply solving problems in a social setting” (Thornton, p. 94).
Additionally, she supports her explanations by referencing studies from Martin Glachan, Paul
Light, and Robert Hartley. In my paper, I plan to explore Thornton’s beliefs about problem-
solving in social contexts, the role confidence plays on children, how her ideas relate to my
experiences throughout my academic career, and how they will impact my role as a future
educator. From my K-12 education to my time so far at Boston College, I have worked in many
group settings. I found Thornton’s assumptions to be very eye-opening, as I saw how my past
Thornton describes how children are very social and they love doing things with others
and watch what others are doing. Through this, they are able to build experiences and improve
their problem-solving skills. However, she argues how a child’s own resources are not always
enough. Working with adults or other children is key to discovering knowledge and strategies
that a child, individually, may not have been able to learn on their own. Thornton references
“two wrongs can make a right” from a study by Martin Glachan and Paul Light, who studied
collaborative learning among students. When children work together, conflicts of strategies may
arise, and their views will be challenged. From here, they would either work together to form a
better strategy, or their differing ideas may cause too much conflict to the point where they
cannot agree on a strategy. In the case where two children with different strategies are not able to
come up with a shared strategy, Thornton describes as there sometimes being a dominant and
passive dynamic between the children. In the case of the passive child having a stronger strategy,
3
the dominant child leaves with the same strategy from before, not gaining new knowledge.
Although children may not always agree, Thornton explains how when they collaborate, new
feedback is insightful and helps open the door for new possibilities and discoveries.
In elementary school, I struggled with adding fractions, as I kept forgetting to find the
common denominator before adding. However, my class did a lot of table-partner work, and I
remember feeling so relieved that my partner remembered the steps to adding fractions. Growing
up, I was very shy and did not have the confidence to speak up for myself. I was definitely the
“passive” student of the “two wrongs can make a right” passive and dominant student dynamic.
As a result, I often felt too shy to share my strategies. In this case, I believe I was able to gain
problem-solving abilities, since my partner was more “dominant” and had the better strategy
between us. I believe it is important for teachers to acknowledge this dynamic when students
collaborate. Although it would be ideal for all students to work together and share strategies,
confidence if a factor that affects students who are interested in the subject as well.
Thornton believes that children are very aware of how they are perceived by others and
this affects their problem-solving skills. She references a study by Robert Hartley to support her
views, as he studied how much or lack of confidence affects children’s abilities to solve
problems. He found that children who perceived themselves to be disadvantaged were less likely
to use certain skills and act impulsively when solving problems. However, when he asked the
children to pretend to be the brightest student in the class, they were more likely to use helpful
skills and be less impulsive. Thornton also explains the phenomenon “learned helplessness” and
the power it has. She uses an anagram example to describe how children who find success in an
easy anagram are more likely to be successful than others who were not successful. She suggests
that parents and adults can help by continuously boosting confidence and self-esteem. However,
4
it is easier said than done, as children need to believe and have the self-confidence that they are
I can see how Thornton’s view on confidence and control applies to my academic
achievement in math in elementary school compared to high school. In elementary school, math
came super easy to me and I was very confident in my abilities. Although concepts such as
adding fractions may not have come instantly to me, I was still quickly able to learn. However, I
remember the feeling of getting my grade back from my first trigonometry test my sophomore
year of high school. I was devastated seeing the red marks all over my sheet. I did not realize it at
the time, but I believe this affected how I perceived math in high school. After seeing I was not
good at solving trigonometry problems, it was no longer my favorite subject, and I struggled in
the class the rest of the year. As a future educator, I hope to boost self-confidence by giving
positive feedback and praise whenever possible. By doing so from an early age, I hope to help
As social beings, humans learn many problem-solving skills through social settings,
according to Thornton. Her views on how “two wrongs make a right” and one’s perception on
themselves highlights the importance of self-confidence. Additionally, I have been able to reflect
that shyness is not something that can be “cured;” therefore, it will not be easy to get rid of a
passive and dominant relationship when collaborating. Additionally, as much as a teacher may
praise a student for their good work, a child may not internalize it. Therefore, I believe teachers
should really get to know their students and praise whenever praise should be given. Through
this, according to Thornton, children will really get to learn more through their social context.
5
Reference
Thornton, S. (1995). Children solving problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.