Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JFG Pat Notes
JFG Pat Notes
Title X: PARTNERSHIP
Partnerships contemplated herein are those formed for private interest or purpose.
4. Onerous
- Because each of the parties aspires
Partnership Defined to procure himself a benefit through
the giving of something.
ART 1767. BY THE CONTRACT OF 5. Commutative
PARTNERSHIP TWO OR MORE PERSONS BIND - Because the undertaking of each of
partners is considered as the
THEMSELVES TO CONTRIBUTE MONEY,
equivalent of that of the others.
PROPERTY, OR INDUSTRY TO A COMMON
6. Principal
FUND, WITH THE INTENTION OF DIVING THE
- Because it does not depend for its
PROFIT AMONG THEMSELVES. existence or validity upon some
TWO OR MORE PERSONS MAY ALSO FORM - other contracts (as opposed to
A PARTNERSHIP FOR THE EXERCISE OF A accessory contract)
PROFESSION 7. Preparatory
- Because it is entered into as a means
NOTES:
to an end (i.e. to engage in business
A partnership contract, in its essence, is a
or specific venture for the realization
contract of agency. (see Art. 1818)
of profits with the view of dividing
them among the contracting parties.
Elements of Partnership:
Essential Features of Partnership:
1. An agreement to contribute money,
(1) There must be a valid contract; (2) The
property, or industry to a common fund;
parties (two or more persons) must have
and
legal capacity to enter into the contract;
2. Intent to divide the profits among
(3) There must be a mutual contribution
themselves.
of money, property, or industry to a
common fund;
Requisites of Partnership:
(4) The object must be lawful; and (5) The
1. Intention to create a partnership;
primary purpose must be to obtain profits
2. Common fund obtained from
and to divide the same among the parties
contributions; and
3. Joint interest in diving the profits.
1. There must be a valid contract
partnership relation is fundamentally
Characteristics of Partnership:
contractual.
1. Consensual
- Note: there is no such thing as
- because it is perfected by mere
partnership created by law or by
consent, that is, upon the express or
operation or implication of law alone
implied agreement of two or more
(precisely because partnership is
persons;
created by trust)
2. Nominate
- Note: The partnership relation s not
- Because it has a special name or
the contract itself, but the result of
designation in our law
the contract.
- Example: Partnership for Growth
a. Form:
Program (Its primary objective is to
May be oral or written,
address the binding constraints to
express or implied from
economic growth and development
the acts and declarations
in the Philippines; Ph and US)
of the parties subject to
3. Bilateral
the provisions of Art 1771
- Because it is entered into by two or
to 1773 and to the stature
more persons and the rights and
of frauds.
obligations arising therefrom are
always reciprocal.
- Example: Philippine-Japan Economic
Partnership
2 JF GALLENTES NOTES ; SSC-R; AY 22-23
- Note: A stipulation which excludes Art 1772 (3k; public Arts 1773 & 1775
one or more partners form any instrument; Securities and (immovable property
participation in the profits (or losses) Exchange Commission) and secret association/
is Void (art 1799). societies)
Failure to comply still creates In 1773, it does not
a juridical personality create a juridical
Q: How are profits distributed? (But any of the partners is personality since the
A: a. the partners share in the profits granted the right by the law contract itself is void
according to their agreement. (see Arts. 1357, 1358.) to (having no inventory of
b. In the absence of such: compel each other to execute the immovable
the contract in a public property.
i. Capitalist partner – in
instrument. Of course, this In 1175, no juridical
proportion to his right cannot be availed of if personality as well.
contribution. the partnership is void under
ii. Industrial partner – what is Article 1773
just and equitable under the
circumstances. Rules in determining existence of a partnership
7. Sharing of losses
- Partners share the losses. The
obligation is implied from the ART 1769. IN DETERMINING WHETHER
partnership relation. But, if only the PARTNERSHIP EXIST, THESE RULES SHALL
share of each partner in the profits APPLY:
has been agreed upon, the share of 1. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY
each in the losses shall be in the ARTICLE 1825, PERSONS WHO
same proportion (art. 1797) ARE NOT PARTNERS AS TO EACH
OTHER ARE NOT PARTNERS AS
Q: How are losses distributed? TO THIRD PERSONS;
A: a. the partners share in the losses 2. CO-OWNERSHIP OR CO-
according to their agreement. POSSESSION DOES NOT OF
b. In the absence of such: ITSLEF CREATE PARTNERSHIP,
i. according to their WHETHER SUCH SO-OWNER OR
agreement as to profits; CO-POSSESOR DO OR DO NOT
ii. in the absence of profit SHARE ANY PROFITS MADE BY
agreement, in proportion to THE USE OF THE PROPERTY;
his capital contribution. 3. THE SHARING OF GROSS
RETURNS DOES NOT OF ITSELF
Juridical Personality ESTABLISH PARTNERSHIP,
WHETHER OR NOT THE PERSONS
SHARING THEM HAVE A JOINT
ART 1768. THE PARTNERSHIP HAS A OR COMMON INTEREST IN ANY
JURIDICAL PERSONALITY SEPARATE AND PROPERTY OF WHICH THE
DISTINCT FROM THAT OF EACH OF THE RETURNS ARE DERIVED;
PARTNERS EVEN IN CASE OF FAILURE TO 4. THE RECEIPT BY A PERSON OF A
COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SHARE OF THE PROFITS OF A
ARTICLE 1772, FIRST PARAGRAPH. BUSINESS IS PRIMA FACIE
EVIDENCE THAT HE IS A
PARTNER IN THE BUSINESS, BUT
NOTES: NO SUCH INFERENCE SHALL BE
A partnership is an entity separate from its DRAWN IF SUCH PROFITS WERE
aggregate individual partners. RECEIVED IN PAYMENT:
As an independent juridical person, it may a. AS A DEBT BY
enter into contracts, acquire and possess INSTALLMENT OR
property of all kinds in its name, as well as incur OTHERWISE;
obligations and bring civil or criminal actions in b. AS WASGES OF
conformity with the laws and regulations of its AN EMPLOYEE
organization (art 46). OR RENT TO A
Effects to the juridical personality of a LANDLORD;
partnership upon failure to comply with Art
1772 vs failure to comply with Arts 1773 and
1775:
5 JF GALLENTES NOTES ; SSC-R; AY 22-23
If A and B are not partners as to each other, Heirs, after partition of common properties, sold the
neither will they be partners with respect to C, a same with the intent of making profit and dividing the
third person. But if A, with the consent of B, same proportional to their respective share of the
represents to C that they are partners, then A inheritance.
and B will be considered partners as to C even if
they are not really partners Facts: A and B are co-owners of inherited properties.
They agreed to use the said common properties and the
income derived therefrom as a common fund with the
2. Co-ownership and co-possession intention to produce pro-fits for them in proportion to
- There is co-ownership (or co- their respective shares in the inheritance as determined
possession) whenever the ownership
in a project of partition.
(or co-possession) of an undivided
thing or right belongs to different Issue: What is the effect of such agreement on the
persons. existing co-ownership?
- PARTNERSHIP VS CO-OWNERSHIP/
CO-POSSESSION Held: The co-ownership is automatically converted into
a partnership. From the moment of partition, A and B, as
heirs, are entitled already to their respective definite
6 JF GALLENTES NOTES ; SSC-R; AY 22-23
shares of the estate and the income thereof, for each of between a co-ownership and a partnership. C, etc. were
them to manage and dispose of as exclusively his own not engaged in any joint venture by reason of that
without the intervention of the other heirs, and, isolated transaction.
accordingly, he becomes liable individually for all taxes in
connection therewith. If, after such partition, an heir The original purpose was to divide the lots for
allows his shares to be held in common with his co-heirs residential purposes. If later on they found it not feasible
under a single management to be used with the intent of to do so because of the high cost of construction, then
making profit thereby in proportion to his share, there they had no choice but to resell the same to dissolve the
can be no doubt that, even if no document doubt that, co-ownership. The division of the profits was merely
even if no document or instrument were executed for the incidental to the dissolution of the co-ownership which
purpose, for tax purposes, at least, an unregistered17 was, in the nature of things, a temporary state. It has to
partnership is formed. (Ona vs. Commissioner of Internal be terminated sooner or later.
Revenue, 45 SCRA 74 [1972].) (3) There must be an unmistakable intention to form a
Two persons contributed money to buy a sweepstakes partnership. — Article 1769(3) provides that “the
ticket with the intention to divide the prize which they sharing of gross returns does not of itself establish a
may win. partnership whether or not the persons sharing them
have a joint or common right or interest in any property
Facts: A, B, etc. put up money to buy a sweepstakes from which the returns are derived.” There must be an
ticket for the sole purpose of dividing equally the prize unmistakable intention to form a partnership or joint
which they may win as they did in fact the amount of venture.
P50,000.00. If a partnership had been formed by A, B,
etc. then it was liable for income tax pursuant to law then 3. Sharing of Gross Returns
-
in force; if merely a community of property, then such co-
- The sharing of gross returns alone does not
ownership was not liable, not having a legal personality
indicate that a partnership exists (gross
of its own. means before anything else is deducted i.e.
Issue: Did A, B, etc. form a partnership or merely a labilities) because the partners will only share
the profits only after they have satisfied all
community of property?
the liabilities of the partnership.
Held: A, B, etc. formed a partnership. The partnership
was not only formed, but upon the organization thereof 4. Receipt of share in the profits
- The sharing of profits and losses is a prima facie
and the winning of the prize, it appeared that B
evidence of an intention to form a partnership
personally appeared in the office of the Philippine Charity
but not a conclusive evidence, it may be
Sweepstakes, in his capacity as co-partner, and as such rebutted and outweighed by other
collected the prize. All these circumstances repel the idea circumstances.
that A, B, etc. organized and formed a community of - Receipt of share in the profit is not considered
property only. (Gatchalian vs. Collector of Internal a prima facie evidence of partnership when it is
Revenue, 67 Phil. 666 [1939].) received as:
o Payment of debt;
Children sold lots given by their father and divided the o Wage to an employee or rent to a
proceeds. landlord;
o Annuity to a widow or representative
Facts: O, after completing payment to S on two lots, of a deceased partner;
transferred his rights to his four children, C, etc. to enable o Interest on a loan; or
them to build their residences. S sold the two lots for o Consideration for the sale of property
P178,708.12 to C, etc. who resold them more than a year
later to T ART 1770. A partnership must have a lawful
object or purpose, and must be established
for P313,050, treating the profit of P134,341.88 as for the common benefit or interest of the
capital gains and paying an income tax on one-half of partners.
their respective shares (or P33,584) of the profit. When an unlawful partnership is dissolves by a
judicial decree, the profits shall be confiscated
Issue: Did C, etc. form a partnership under Article 1767?
in favor of the state, without prejudice to the
Held: No. (1) Division of profits was merely incidental. provisions of the Penal Code governing the
— They were co-owners pure and simple. To consider confiscation of the instruments and effects of
them as partners would obliterate the distinction a crime.
7 JF GALLENTES NOTES ; SSC-R; AY 22-23
partners, but to the public as 17. Retiring partner – one withdrawn from the
well. partnership; a withdrawing partner.
3. General – one whose liability to 3rd persons ART. 1778. A partnership of all present
extend to his personal or separate property. property is that in which the partners
4. Limited – one whose liability to third persons is contribute all the property which actually
limited to his capital contribution. belongs to them to a common fund, with the
intention of dividing the same among
5. Managing – manages affairs or business of the themselves, as well as all the profits which
partnership; he may be appointed either in the they may acquire therewith.
articles of partnership or after the constitution
of the partnership; also known as general or ART. 1179. In a universal partnership of all
real partner. present property, the property which
6. Liquidating – takes charge of the winding up of
belonged to each of the partners at the time
partnership affairs upon dissolution.
of the constitution of the partnership,
becomes the common property of all the
7. Partner by estoppel – is not really a partner but
is liable as a partner for the protection of
partners, as well as all the profits which they
innocent 3rd persons; the term “quasi-partner” may acquire therewith.
is sometimes used. A stipulation for the common enjoyment of
any other profits may also be made, but the
8. Continuing partner – continues the business of property which the partners may acquire
a partnership after it has been dissolved by subsequently by inheritance, legacy or
reason of the admission of a new partner, donation cannot be included in such
retirement, death, or expulsion of one of the stipulation except the fruits thereof.
partners.
9. Surviving partner – remains after a partnership
Notes:
has been dissolved by death of a partner.
Universal partnership of all present property –
10. Sub-partner – is not a member of the
in this kind of partnership, the partners
partnership; contracts with a partner with
contribute all of the property which actually
reference to the latter’s share in the
belonged to them into a common fund, with
partnership.
the intention of dividing the same among
11. Ostensible – takes active part and known to the
themselves, as well as the profits which they
public as partner in the business.
may acquire through the properties
12. Secret – takes active part in the business but is
contributed.
not known to be a partner by outside parties.
13. Silent – does not take any active part in the The following become a common property of
business although he may be known to be a all partners:
partner. 1. Property which actually belonged to them
14. Dormant – does not take active part in the at the time of the constitution of the
business and is not known or held out as a partnership; and
partner. 2. Profits which they may acquire for the
15. Original partner – one who is a member of the property contributed.
partnership from the time of its organization; GR: future properties cannot be contributed/
16. Incoming partner – a person lately, or about ot Rationale: Contribution must be
be, taken into an existing partnership as a determinate things since the position of a
member. partner is like of that a donor, and
10 JF GALLENTES NOTES ; SSC-R; AY 22-23
Particular Partnership
Note:
Particular Partnership is a partnership that is
limited and well-defined, being confined to an
undertaking of a single, temporary, or ad hoc
nature.