Criteria Fail Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Proficient Excellent

（0） （1-3） （4-5） （6-8） （9-10）

Content （20%） No attempt Poor identification leadership issues in Acceptable identification leadership Effective identification leadership Very good identification leadership
case study issues in case study issues in case study issues in case study

Analysis （30%） No attempt Demonstrate poor ability to critically Demonstrate acceptable ability to Demonstrate effective ability to Demonstrate excellent ability to
evaluate important issues, to display an critically evaluate important issues, critically evaluate important issues, to critically evaluate important issues,
awareness of their contextual relevance. to display an awareness of their display an awareness of their to display an awareness of their
contextual relevance. contextual relevance. contextual relevance.

Analysis （30%） No attempt Demonstrate poor ability to utilise and Demonstrate acceptable ability to Demonstrate effective ability to Demonstrate excellent ability to
apply relevant theories and paradigms utilise and apply relevant theories utilise and apply relevant theories utilise and apply relevant theories
to reveal a high-level understanding of and paradigms to reveal a high-level and paradigms to reveal a high-level and paradigms to reveal a high-level
the case. understanding of the case. understanding of the case. understanding of the case.

Presentation （20%） No attempt Very poor presentation with Acceptable presentation with some Above average presentation with Excellent presentation with no
grammatical errors, poor formatting and grammatical errors, inconsistent minimal grammatical errors, good grammatical errors, good formatting
referencing errors formatting and some mistakes in formatting and minimal referencing and perfect referencing errors.
referencing. errors.