Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Timber Is An Innocent Casualty of Ungrounded Fears Over Fire Safety
Structural Timber Is An Innocent Casualty of Ungrounded Fears Over Fire Safety
NEWS BUILDINGS COMPETITIONS OPINION AJ100 MAGAZINES EVENTS LIBRARY JOBS TRIAL ACCOUNT
OPINION
7 COMMENTS
MOST POPULAR MOST COMMENTED
Mass timber can help us tackle the climate emergency safely and we cannot afford to Foster + Partners asks staff to take
a 20% pay cut
ignore it, says Maribel Mantecon
Following the Grenfell Tower Dre tragedy in 2017 structural timber, along with all combustible materials, has RIBA investigating president over
been banned in the external walls of residential buildings above 18m. Public safety is paramount and there possible misuse of funds
was clearly a need to provide reassurance. Yet structural timber has become an innocent casualty.
to do all we can to secure a future for our children. What we need are carefully considered strategies and
regulations.
ARB looks to test architects’
competence throughout their careers
Since the Great Fire of London in 1666, timber has been generally perceived in the UK as unsafe, especially
compared to the two most common structural frame materials, concrete and steel. However, concrete and
steel represent a staggering 11 per cent of global carbon emissions and we really need to look elsewhere Coronavirus: RIBA furloughs third of
moving forward. To put it into context, concrete’s carbon emissions are 550 kgCO2/m³, steel’s 12,000 workforce as profession stands staff
down
kgCO2/m³ while, in comparison, cross-laminated timber has a negative emission of -600 kgCO2/m³.
Clearly not all timber products have the same level of Dre-resistance. Mass or engineered timber can match or Search and apply online for your dream job.
exceed the performance of concrete and steel. In the UK, structural elements over 18m require two hours of Find out more
Dre protection. Under test conditions, 180mm cross-laminated timber lasts over three hours. Performance-
based Dre engineering needs to be taken into consideration to meet building regulations.
Prefabricated engineered timber and modular CLT also have the sustainable beneDts of reduced waste and
energy during manufacturing.
Laminated glass balustrades, also included in the combustible ban, are being considered for exception. Yet,
although the RIBA had called for structural timber to be exempt, this has not been taken up by the
government. How can it be that there is the time and appetite to reconsider glass balconies, but not to review
structural timber, which could make a signiDcant shift towards zero-carbon buildings?
Of course, making buildings safe is a given, but there is a misunderstanding here that needs to be put right.
And it needs to be done quickly.
By using off-site manufactured structural timber with non-combustible insulation and cladding, we can design
buildings that are safe, better for the environment and for our wellbeing.
In Copenhagen, a beautiful all-timber district is being planned. In the USA, where it meets building regulations
for Dre safety via testing, mass timber is being embraced with large glulam columns and beams often
appearing instead of concrete and steel in large buildings.
The world’s tallest timber building, the 18-storey Mjøstårnet Tower in Norway, has been designed to withstand
a Dre that is left to develop freely without active extinguishing and now Sweden has unveiled its own tall
timber building, the Kajstaden scheme by CF Møller Architects.
If these countries can put safety procedures in place to allow them to build with timber so can we. We must
insist that the government reviews this, puts in place Dre test compliance that permits the use of structural
timber members and encourages further research and development in this Deld. Without this, not only will we
fall behind other countries but we risk missing our legally-binding 2050 Net Zero target.
Current regulations here result in strange contradictions. Google’s new headquarters in King’s Cross by BIG
and Heatherwick Studio will boast the largest wooden façade in the world (pictured) and this is considered
acceptable as it is an odce building. But in the residential sector, all over the country even small four-storey
housing developments are seeing modular CLT being designed out.
Mass timber can help us tackle the climate emergency safely and we cannot afford to ignore it.
Populist politics has surely crept into the factors ineuencing government attitudes in Britain - looking at the
images of CF Moller's Kajstaden tower the timber clad balconies are surely something that in the UK would
now be out of favour following a few alarming Dres caused by barbecues.
I once tried to persuade a boatyard owner that a large span portal framed shed would be more secure against
collapse in a Dre if it were a timber rather than steel structure, but he was having none of it - and unfortunately
public opinion (at present, anyway) is likely to be more heavily ineuenced by the horrors of the likes of the Dres
at Lakanal House and Grenfell Tower than by the unfolding horrors of the sheer human ineptitude that enabled
these disasters.
I'm no fan of CLT (Dartington Primary School) but there is little doubt that, it , and heavy timbers, perform well
in a Dre.
Again - sorry to bang on about it - ditch The Building Regulations - Go IBC.
I thought that Dartington Primary was the victim of criminally deDcient speciDcation of the external skin, but if
non-disclosure agreements were part of the liability settlement we might never get to know.
This in itself could surely be termed criminal - and unless the construction detailing strayed from what
received local authority building approval it should be a matter of public record.
Robert,
Had the same thing happened in the USA then indeed it would have been criminal; and had a decent lawyer
been on the case it would have been deemed so here.
I had quite an education in the apathy of bureaucracy during a fairly extensive correspondence with Devon
County Council which Dnally ended when the DCC, Jan Shadbolt, informed me, after I had suggested
incompetence was evident on all sides, that she would no longer respond to my concerns.
There are several millions the taxpayers of Devon are still out of pocket.
It was only after FOI requests was I able to learn of the settlement amount.
I've been in the construction industry as a designer and contractor for most of my life and can conDdently
state the Dasco was way beyond anything I could have imagined.
As to your point Re: the failing fabric. It is surely deDnitive proof of the unsuitability of CLT if a structure built of
it has to be demolished in the event of moisture intrusion.
Some bold Dgures quoted there. Could you provide a source of the -600kg CO2/m³ for CLT?
Hi Colin, yes, these Dgures should really make us sit up and pay attention-my source for them was FCS's
Carbon Counts research and current exhibition
No mention of the tallest timber building going up in Milwaukee Wisconsin. It is my home town so I am a bit
biased. It is going to be 23 stories and all residential.
https://archinect.com/news/article/150161330/milwaukee-s-wooden-skyscraper-just-got-a-little-bit-taller
SUBMIT COMMENT
IN OPINION PAUL FINCH EMILY BOOTH WEEKEND ROUNDUP ELLIS WOODMAN CATHERINE SLESSOR HATTIE HARTMAN WILL HURST THE REGS THE COACH
The AJ supports the architecture industry on a daily basis with in-depth news analysis,
insight into issues that are affecting the industry, comprehensive building studies with
technical details and drawings, client proDles, competition updates as well as letting you
know who’s won what and why.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
FIND US ON
SITE MAP A-Z SUBJECTS A-Z CONTRIBUTORS PUBLICATION INDEX COPYRIGHT © 2002-2020 EMAP PUBLISHING LIMITED