Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intro To Fourier Optics
Intro To Fourier Optics
Overview:
The response of a linear system can be expressed by its response to a (basis) set of
elementary functions. In particular, since
g1 x1 , y1 g1 , x , y dd
This defines the impulse response (or point spread function) of the linear system:
An important subset of linear systems are invariant systems, in which the impulse
response is only dependent on the difference in coordinates:
hx2 , y2 , , hx2 , y2
In this case the system response is simply a convolution between the input and the
transfer function:
g 2 g1 h
This implies that in Frequency domain, the output of an invariant linear system is
merely a multiplication of the input by the transfer function H
G2 G1 H
Where
H hx, y exp 2i f
x
x f y y dx dy
To further discuss this let us remember some of the properties of the Fourier
transform:
Definition of the 2D Fourier transform
F g g x, y exp 2i f
x
x f y y dx dy
F 1 G G f x
, f y exp 2i f x x f y y df x df y
The conditions for this being definite are that the function is "regular", which applies
for all physical realizations in the optical realm.
Are:
Linearity:
Similarity:
1 fx fy
F g ax, by G ,
ab a b
F g x a, y b exp 2i f x a f y b F g x, y
g x, y dxdy G f x , f y df x df y
2 2
Convolution theorem:
F g , hx , y dd G f x , f y H f x , f y
F g hx d g hx de 2if x x dx
g e 2if x dhx e 2if x x d x
G f x H f x
Autocorrelation theorem:
F g , g * x, y dd G f x , f y
2
F g g * x d g g * x de 2if x x dx
g e 2if x dg * x e 2if x x dx
G f x G * f x G f x
2
F F 1 g F 1 F g g
If
g x, y g x x g y y
then
F g x, y Fx g x x Fy g y y
f2
F exp a 2 x 2 1
exp x2
a a
f
F rect ax
1
sin c x
a a
F ax
1
a
a
F exp iax f x
2
1 D
xH 0 D 0
c t
1 B
xE 0 B 0
c t
E E 2 E
We get:
1 B 1 B 1 E n2 2 E
E 2
c t c t c t c t c t 2
E
E E E E ln 2 E ln n
n2 2 E
2 E 2E ln n 0
c 2 t 2
n2 2 E
2 E 0
c 2 t 2
And the scalar Maxwell equation holds, we get for U P APexp i P the
Helmholtz equation:
2
k 2 U 0
with k 2n .
c
This equation can be solved by means of the use of Green's theorem, relating the
values of a function inside the volume to a surface integral.
Briefly, this states that for any two "reasonable" functions U,G:
G U
dvU G G U dsU n G n
2 2
I will not go through the details, but a long description can be found in Goodman.
Intuitively, the Green's function chosen for the Helmholtz equation is a spherical
wave:
e ikR
G
R
For which:
2
k 2 G R
Performing the integration on the left hand side we are left with the value of U at the
origin (since the laplacian operator elsewhere is just k2 – from Helmholtz equation).
Thus, the integration is done over a surface comprising a plane and a hemisphere
stretching to infinity. Under some conditions, the value of the latter vanishes, leaving
only the integration over the plane.
e ikr01
U P0
1
1 r01 cos ds
U
i aperture
P
Where the cosaccounts for the exact choice of the Green's function, and in any case
vanishes for small angles.
Relating this to what we said previously, this can be interpreted as the impulse
response of propagation from the aperture, where:
1 e ikr01
hP0 , P1 cos
i r01
Now let us consider the small angle approximations for this. We get the integral:
e ik z0 x1 x0 y1 y0
2 2 2 1/ 2
U P0 U x1 , y1 z 2 x x 2 y y 2
1
cos dx1 dy1
i aperture
0 1 0 1 0 1/ 2
The dependence on the integration coordinates appears both in the numerator (phase
term) and in the denominator (amplitude term). For large z, obviously the amplitude
contribution is small. The cosine term is also an amplitude term which has a small
effect for large z. Phase terms can have, of course, a much higher effect, so we will
keep them. We thus get:
ik z02 x1 x0 2 y1 y0 2
U P0
1 1/ 2
1 1
U
iz aperture
x , y e dx1dy1
Fresnel diffraction:
Let us now consider two more restrictive solutions to the problem of diffraction from
an aperture. The first is effectively a small angle solution, retaining only the first order
(in x,y) terms of:
1 x 2 2 2
y 1 x y
2 2
r01 z x y z 1
2 2
2
2
z z
8
z z
2
2 z x y
2 2
1
8 z z
or:
z 3
4
x y
2 2
2
4
4
R
Where R is a typical dimension of observation in both planes.
z 3 10 4 cm 3 z 20cm
e ikz x 2 y 2
ik
U x, y U , e 2z
dd
iz aperture
Fraunhoffer diffraction:
This is a more restrictive approximation. Let us first expand the Fresnel formula. We
get:
e ikz 2 2 x x 2 2 2 y y 2
ik
U x, y U , e 2z
dd
iz aperture
If z is so large that:
2
z
2
Than the quadratic phase terms on and can be neglected and we are left with:
ik
x y2
2
ik
ikz 2z x y
U x, y U , e
e e z
dd
iz aperture
Which is just a (scaled) Fourier transform of the aperture field
z 10 4 cm z 100m
Simple Fraunhoffer diffraction patterns:
t a , rect rect
2w
2 wx y
This being a separable function, the Fourier transform is just a multiplication of the
two individual Fourier transforms, giving:
Ae ikz e ik x y2 2w y y
2
2w x
U x, y sin c x sin c
iz z z
A2 2w x 2w y y
I x, y sin c 2 x sin c 2
z z z
2 2
z
The width of the central lobe in each direction is: d
w
q
t a q circ
w
U r 2
iz kwr z
A 2 J kwr z
2
I r 4 2 2 1
z kwr z 2
z
This is called an Airy pattern. The width of the central lobe in this case is d 1.22
w
Amplitude grating
In the y direction this leads to the "standard" sinc dependence. In the x direction, we
can apply the convolution theorem to get the response, using the Fourier transform of
the grating:
1 m 1
F cos2f 0 f x f x f 0 f x f 0
m m
2 2 2 4 4
To get:
Ae ikz e ik x y2 2w y y 2w x f 0 z m 2 w x f 0 z
2
2w x m
U x, y sin c sin c x sin c x sin c x
2iz z z 2 z 2 z
If wx f 0 1, corresponding to many grating lines in the aperture, the peaks are well
separated, and the intensity distribution is approximately the sum of the squared
amplitudes:
2 2 w x x f 0 z 2 w x f 0 z
A2 2w y y 2 2w x x m2 m2
I x, y sin c 2
sin c sin c sin c 2 x
4 z z z 4 z 4 z
2 2
Thus, the forward transmission is 1/4, and each of the sidelobes (termed +1 and -1
orders) have a maximal efficiency of m2/16, or a maximum of ~6%.
2
k 2 U 0
Then:
Physically we can interpret this as a sum of plane waves, since a plane wave of the
form:
px, y, z, t e i k r t
with:
2
k xˆ yˆ zˆ
has an intensity pattern which is periodic in the plane, with the period which increases
as 1 2 2 becomes smaller.
Thus, using:
f x ; f y ; 1 f x 2 f y 2
Since:
2i x y
U x, y, z d d A , , z e
2
d d A , , z e
2
2i x y
U x, y , z
2
2 2
d2 2i x y
d d
dz 2
A , , z e
2
d d A , , z e
2
2i x y
1
2 2
d 2 2i x y
d dz 2 A , , z e
d 0
Since this integral equation is fulfilled for any distribution over the integration
variables, the equation must also hold for the integrand, not just the integral, leaving:
d 2 2
2
A , , z 2 2
1 A , , z 0
dz
2
2i
1 2 2 z
A , , z A , ,0 e
Physically this means that free space propagation just introduces a relative phase shift
between interferences of various plane wave components.
f x 2 f y 2
1 f x f y 1
2 2
2 2
or to lowest order small angle diffraction.
Evanescent waves
Clearly, something is wrong with this picture when the spatial frequency is greater
than 2/. In this case 2 2 1 , which means that is imaginary. The solution in
that case is not of a propagating wave, but rather of an exponentially decaying wave:
2i
z 2 2 1
A , , z A , ,0 e
These waves do not propagate, and decay over a length scale of the inverse spatial
frequency. All the information on these, which represents the fine detail of the
aperture, is lost in the far field.
In fact, free space propagation in the far-field can be considered as a circular filter in
spatial frequency space.
2i
1 2 2
A , , z A , ,0 circ 2 2 e
2i x y
T , t a x, y e dxdy
For an incoming plane wave, the outgoing angular spectrum is just the Fourier
transform of the aperture. Thus, the smaller the aperture, the broader the angular
distribution (wider angle diffraction).
Let us consider again an amplitude grating, but now only in the Fresnel
approximation, and using the ASPW approach. For simplicity lets consider an infinite
grating in 1D.
We start with
1 m
t a cos2f 0
2 2
The transfer function for any given component of the ASPW is:
2i
1 2 2
H , circ e
2 2
iz
1
H ,0 e L2
L
1 m 1
F cos2f 0 f x f x f 0 f x f 0
m m
2 2 2 4 4
z z
j 2 j 2
F U x, y, z f x f x f 0 e L f x f 0 e L
1 m m
2 4 4
z
2x j L2
U x, y, z
1 m
cos e
2 2 L
Now there are three special cases, where this expression get further simplified.
z
For 2n :
L2
2
1 2x
I x, y, z 1 m cos
4 L
z
For 2n :
L2
2
1 2x
I x, y, z 1 m cos
4 L
z
For n 2 :
L2
2
1 m2 m2 4x
I x, y, z 1 cos
4 2 2 L
This phenomenon is related to any revival in a periodic system. For the case of a
general periodic system it holds only in the Fresnel approximation, since then the
various frequency components propagate in integer multiples of the same phase
factor.