Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isrm Case Study
Isrm Case Study
C: 12%
D: 4%
A: 24% C: 28% A: 28%
A: 36%
B: 60%
B: 44%
B: 64%
D: 4%
D: 4% D: 8%
C: 4% A: 16%
A: 28% C: 12% A: 28% C: 12%
B: 64%
B: 56% B: 64%
Figure 1. The results of how much the students agree with statements (a) to (f)
Table 5. T-test results of students’ ranking of their knowledge/skills on incident response planning
Obj. 1 Obj. 2 Obj. 3 Obj. 4 Obj. 5 Obj. 6
pre-survey mean 2.94 2.69 2.56 2.69 2.63 2.63
pre-survey variance 0.73 0.76 1.46 1.03 0.92 1.45
(f)
post-survey mean 3.94 3.81 3.94 3.88 4.06 3.81
post-survey variance 0.46 0.30 0.60 0.52 1.00 0.96
degree of freedom 15 15 15 15 15 15
observations 16 16 16 16 16 16
two-tail p-value 0.0004 0.0003 7.84E-05 0.0002 2.59E-05 0.0004
(d)
(e)
E: 6% D: 6%
D: 6% A: 17% A: 17% A: 17%
D: 11% C: 17%
C: 28%
C: 17%
(a)
(b) (c)
E: 6%
D: 6% E: 6%
C: 6% A: 17%
A: 28% C: 6% C: 11%
A: 44%
B: 39%
B: 60%
B: 71%
Figure 2. The results of how much the students agree with statements (a) to (f)
5. REFERENCES