Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FYP-REPORT-F2017132078-08 Feb-2022-6
FYP-REPORT-F2017132078-08 Feb-2022-6
Authors
Supervisor
Assistant Professor
LAHORE
February 2022
1
DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDING
Authors
Project Supervisor
Assistant Professor
LAHORE
2
Abstract
Project Supervisor:
Assistant Professor
UMT, LAHORE
Currently in the ever-progressing field of structural engineering. Use of software for analysis,
design & detailing has certainly proven itself to be revolutionary. Crown Mall & Residency is a
residential and commercial project, & is the structure under consideration for this study. This study
aims to analyze & design this residential and commercial Plaza using the ETABS software, by
The structure was surveyed & was modelled using Computer-Aided Design ETABS software.
Different analyses approaches were studied & loading was applied on the structure to observe its
behavior under different load patterns & load combinations. All frames passed the stress checks.
To rectify this issue, we increased the cross-sectional area of these beams, after which structure
3
UNDERTAKING
I certify that research work titled “Design of a Multi-Story Building” is our own work. The work
has not been presented elsewhere for assessment. Where material has been used from other sources
F2017132078
Muhammad Salman
F2017132084
Shazim Ali
F2017132095
Muneeb Hassan
F2017132076
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All Praise to Allah SWT for all blessings bestowed on us in every step of the way to carry out work
on our final year project (FYP). Hence, we were able to finish this thesis entitled Design of Multi-
Story Building.
We would like to express our highest gratitude to our FYP supervisor for his great assistance,
patience and support during our working on project and writing of report.
Authors
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 .............................................................................................................................. 12
1.1.2 Significance............................................................................................................. 12
CHAPTER 2 .............................................................................................................................. 15
CHAPTER 3 .............................................................................................................................. 24
6
CHAPTER 4 .............................................................................................................................. 28
CHAPTER 5 .............................................................................................................................. 41
CHAPTER 6 .............................................................................................................................. 61
REFERNCES ............................................................................................................................. 67
8
List of Figure
9
Figure 4.11: Reinforcement detail of slab......................................................................................39
Figure 5.3:Approximate analysis Bending moment and shear force diagram ...............................41
Figure 5.4: Etabs bending moments and Shear force diagram ......................................................42
Figure 5.10: Reinforcemnet diagram of Corner Edge and interior column ...................................41
10
List of Tables
Table 5.6: Procedure for solving the column using equivalent ecentricity method......................41
11
CHAPTER 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 General
With the intention to achieve efficiency, in the modern world of construction one requires a new
set of knowledge and skills that is of the modem tools and software. These tools can assist engineer
in solving many complex problems that otherwise might have taken hours upon hours. But can be
solved within a split second by these modern software packages. Nevertheless, these engineering
analysis and design programs are not the answer to all problems.
1.1.2 Significance
This project is focused on designing a reinforced concrete having 10 storey super-structure and 3
This project is undertaken to design a reinforced concrete structure comprising total of 6 storey on
ETABS. Focus of this research is on designing the slab, beams and columns of the structure and
to determine the reinforcing steel (Area of steel for slab, beams and columns).
Design of R.C.C Multistory Building (Crown Mall and Residency) using ETABS
software.
12
Design important structural members (slab, beams and columns) manually and
The Crown Mall and Residency is located near Main GT Road opposite DHA Phase II, Islamabad,
Pakistan.
1.5 ETABS®
analysis, design, and reporting software. It is one of the products of Computers and Structures.
Dead loads are set of load due to the permanent elements in structure that do not move or change
their location, joined into the structure including, dividers, floors, rooftops, roofs, flights of stairs.
Live toads are a set of toads that are not permanent & might move for instance the load of building
occupants is a type of live load but load-bearing wall or permanent cupboard is a part of dead load.
13
1.6.3 Dimensions and storey details of the structure:
Number of Stories = 10 (including two Basements, GF, GL, M, 1st -7th floor)
14
CHAPTER 2
Maximum bending moment values for each member may be acquired from the analysis results,
which can be supplied in both graphical and tabular form. These numbers are used to design
concrete dimension and reinforcing quantities. For load combinations of 1.2DL+1.6LL and 1.4DL,
the displacement diagram, column responses, shear force, and bending Moments diagrams are
shown.
15
Fig 2.2: Floor Plan Basement 1 and 2
16
Fig 2.3: Lower Ground floor plan
17
Fig 2.4: Floor Plan of story 1-6
18
Fig 2.5: Section View A-A
19
Fig 2.6: Plan view of story 6
20
Fig 2.8: Plan view of story 6
21
Fig 2.10: BMD for elevation view of story 6
22
Fig 2.12: SFD for elevation view of story 6
23
CHAPTER 3
In this chapter different calculations have been made and different results have been observed, will
compare the software results with the approximate results manually calculated. It is usually
practiced to use approximate solutions as the basis for structural analysis. Manually made
These are the points at which the shape of the deflection curve of the beam changes the sign.
3.2 Procedure
To verify the results approximate analysis has been adopted along with the point of inflection
method in which calculations were made and moment were calculated for every span. After finding
moment at edges and in the middle of the span and by adding the edges moment the value observed
will be equal to the moments at middle of the span, it is applied in order to verify that either the
calculated Moment are correct or not. In this procedure the point has been taken at 0.2 of the span.
24
Fig 3.2: Loading by approximate analysis method
Mid Span:
∑ 𝐹𝑥 =2.69x20
=53.8 kip
1. Span AB
Moments at A:
Moments at B:
= -75.66 Kip-ft.
Moments at Mid-Span:
𝑤𝑙2
= (2.69 (20)²)/8 = 134.5 Kip-ft.
8
2. Span BC:
Moments at B:
= 4.66 + 37.31
= 47.97 Kip-ft.
25
Moments at C:
= -47.97 Kip-ft.
𝑤𝑙2
= (2.22 (16.4)²)/8 = 74.64 Kip-ft.
8
3. Span CD:
Moment at C:
= 5.29 + 42.37
= 47.66 Kip-ft.
Moments at D:
= -47.66 Kip-ft.
𝑤𝑙2
= (2.31 (17.14)²)/8 = 84.83 Kip-ft.
8
4. Span at DE:
Moments at D:
= 4.66 + 37.92
= 42.58 Kip-ft.
Moments at E:
= -42.58 Kip-ft
𝑤𝑙2
= (2.22 (16.36)²)/8 = 74.27 Kip-ft.
8
Similarly,
26
We will proceed with the same procedure for the other spans.
Member Moments Left (kip.ft) Moments Mid (kip.ft) Moments Right (kip.ft)
AB 75.66 134.5 -75.66
BC 41.97 74.64 -41.97
CD 47.66 84.83 -47.66
DE 42.58 74.27 -42.58
EF 35.79 74.64 -35.79
FG 34.45 61.18 -34.45
GH 1.99 3.56 -1.99
CALCULATION
27
CHAPTER 4
A concrete slab is a flat, horizontal surface constructed of cast concrete that is used as a structural
element in modern constructions. Floors and ceilings are typically constructed using steel-
reinforced slabs.
This method has been adopted to define plate strips at the critical locations across the slab. It is
usual to locate strips along lines of support (column strips) and along lines in-between the supports
28
4.2.1 Thickness of slab:
The thickness of a concrete slab is determined by the loads and the slab's size. For residential and
commercial buildings, a slab thickness of 6 inches is often used, with reinforcement details as
needed. The methods for determining slab thickness varied depending on the type of slab.
𝑙𝑛 21.67
β= = = 1.15
𝑙𝑠 24
Here
Now to compute thickness of slab, reference has been taken from ACI that is (Eq 9-13
ACI)
𝑓𝑦
𝑙𝑛 (0.8+ )
200000
hmin = 36+9𝛽
Here
4.2.2 Self-Weight:
The weight of the concrete in the slab and the steel used in its construction make up the slabs self-
7.5
q(self) = ( 12 )× 150 = 93.75 psf
29
4.2.3 Factored Load:
In order to make our structure safe it has been underestimate the actual strength/capacity of
material and overestimate the actual load coming on the structure. This overestimated load or
The slab's load is spread over the beams on their sides, including self-weight, living load, and
enforced dead load. The loads on slabs are measured in pounds per square foot, but the weights on
𝑙𝑠 21.67
= = 5.41
4 4
30
4.2.5 Edge strip:
In each case, slabs are separated into two sorts of strips. One middle strip has a width of three-
quarters of the breadth of the respective. Span length in either direction, or two edge strips, each
𝑤𝑙2 (120.25)(5.41)2
Cantilever Moment = = = 1759.74 lb-ft
2 2
1
Positive Moments = 3 (1759.74) = 595.29 lb-ft
BMD
31
In Y-direction
𝑤𝑙2 (120.25)(5.41)2
Cantilever Moment = = = 1759.74 lb-ft
2 2
2
Negative Moments = 3 (1759.74) = 9411.3 lb-ft
1
Positive Moments = 3 (1759.74) = 4705.33 lb-ft
BMD
32
Middle Strip
In each case, slabs are separated into two sorts of strips. One middle strip has a width of three-
quarters of the breadth of the respective. Span length in either direction, or two edge strips, each
X-direction
𝑤𝑙2 (240.5)(5.41)2
Cantilever Moment = = = 3571.73 lb-ft
2 2
2
Negative Moments = 3 (3571.73) = 2381.15 lb-ft
1
Positive Moments = 3 (3571.73 ) = 1190.58 lb-ft
BMD
33
Y-direction
𝑤𝑙2 (240.5)(25)2
Fixed End Moment = = = 12526.04 lb-ft
12 12
2
Negative Moments = 3 (12526.04) = 1191.57 lb-ft
1
Positive Moments = 3 (12526.04 ) = 595.29.7 lb-ft
BMD
34
4.2.6 Calculation for As using Moment from ETABS
The values from ETABS were used to determine the required steel along with computing the no
Now calculation will be done against every Moments in order to determine the steel at every strip
ØMn = Mu
𝑎
Mu = ØAsfy (d - 2 )
By re-arranging the above equation we will determine the area of steel that is
𝑀𝑢
As = 𝑎
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − )
2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓
𝑐
3
c = 8 (6.37) = 2.38
As we know
a=βc
Putting values of a in the following equation we will get the value for As
𝑎
Mu = ØAsfy (d - 2 )
0.2418
As = 2.03 = 0.48 in2/ft
0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2
35
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.48(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000) = 2.01 ˝
𝑐
As (min) will remain same in every strip because the values required to compute it are same for every
strip.
Now we will revise the same procedure for the other strip at left edge
𝑀𝑢 0.1227
As = 𝑎 = 2.01 = 0.667 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.667(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(6)= 1.98 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.1227
As = 𝑎 = 1.98 = 0.659 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
In this way we find the a for the following as the value of a will reduce in the next iteration.
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.541(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.96 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.2436
As = 𝑎 = 1.96 = 0.537 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(60000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.378(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.91˝
𝑐
36
𝑀𝑢 0.1182
As = 𝑎 = 1.91 = 0.365 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(60000) (6.37 − )
2 2
Similarly,
𝑀𝑢 0.0959
As = 𝑎 = 1.91 = 0.446 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(60000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.446(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.87 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.0959
As = 𝑎 = 1.87 = 0.439 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(60000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝑀𝑢 0.1227
As = 𝑎 = 1.87 = 0.667 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.667(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.85 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.1227
As = 𝑎 = 1.85 = 0.652 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝑀𝑢 0.122
As = 𝑎 = 1.87 = 0.41 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.41(4000)
a= = = 1.81 ˝
0.85 𝑏 𝑓𝑐 0.85(3000)(60000)
𝑀𝑢 0.122
As = 𝑎 = 1.81 = 0.397 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝑀𝑢 0.0797
As = 𝑎 = 1.81 = 0.541 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.41(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.793 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.0797
As = 𝑎 = 1.793 = 0.541 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝑀𝑢 0.0812
As = 𝑎 = 1.793 = 0.55 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.41(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.771 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.0812
As = 𝑎 = 1.771 = 0.543 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
37
𝑀𝑢 0.0959
As = 𝑎 = 1.793 = 0.611 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 0.41(4000)
a = 0.85 𝑏 𝑓 =0.85(3000)(60000)= 1.74 ˝
𝑐
𝑀𝑢 0.0959
As = 𝑎 = 1.74 = 0.602 in2/ft
Ø𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 0.9(4000) (6.37 − )
2 2
Now we will compile all the areas calculated in a table in order to compare them with As (min).
X-axis
Moment As
Kip-ft./ft. in2/ft.
0.2418 0.48
0.193 0.667
Edge strip
0.2436 0.343
0.178 0.481
0.0797 0.541
Middle strip
0.0959 0.611
Y-axis
Moment As
Kip-ft./ft. in2/ft.
0.1227 0.512
0.1322 0.41
Edge strip
0.0812 0.55
0.0876 0.387
0.1182 0.481
Middle strip
0.110 0.651
38
Figure 4.11: Moments in X and Y Strip
4.2.7 Sketch:
39
Hence from the above table it has been observed that As ˃ As (min)
40
CHAPTER 5
Beam:
A beam is a structural element that resists loads that are applied laterally to the axis of the beam
(an element designed to carry primarily axial load would be a strut or column). Its primary mode
of deflection is bending. Reaction forces are generated at the beam's support points as a result of
the loads applied to it. The combined impact of all forces operating on the beam is to produce shear
forces and bending moments within the beams, which cause internal stresses, strains, and
deflections. Beams are distinguished by their support method, profile (cross-section form),
41
5.2.1 Area of slab
The tributary area of the slab is defined as the area of floor or roof (in plan) that causes loading
The tributary area of slab was calculated by adding the area of two, trapezium and triangle.
Area (slab) = (0.5(3.33 + 25) (10.83)) + ((0.5) (1 + 25) (12)) = 153.41 + 156 = 309.41ft2
Self-weight of slab is equal to weight of concrete in slab and weight of steel which is used in
construction of slab.
Self-weight of slab is equal to weight of concrete in slab and weight of steel which is used in
construction of slab.
42
5.2.3 Factored Load:
We will find factored load by using 1.2DL (dead load) and 1.6LL (live load).
43
5.2.4 Calculation of Span Moment:
Moments Right
Member Moments Left (kip.ft) Moments Mid (kip.ft)
(kip.ft)
44
5.2.5 Comparison between approximate analysis and ETABS analysis
Manual calculations were made for first three spans so the comparison between the approximate
Member Moments at left support(- Moments at right support(- Moments at mid span(-
ve) ve) ve)
Approximate ETABS Approximate ETABS Approximate ETABS
analysis analysis analysis analysis analysis analysis
Kips-ft
AB -91.58 -153.81 -219.78 -89.98 156.96 112.60
kips
AB -43.87 -37.64 50.46 32.06
45
Fig 5.3: Bending Moments and shear force diagram from approximate analysis
Assume that the beam's full depth is between 1/18 and 1/12 of the largest span length for beam A–
𝑙 𝑙
h ≈ 12 to 18
47
2. Selection of 𝝆 value and corresponding R-factor.
Use material properties of f’c ≤ 4000 psi, 𝛽 = 0.85. To select an initial value for 𝜌 use this
equation
𝑓𝑦 60 𝑘𝑠𝑖
𝜔= 𝜌 = 0.014 = 0.21
𝑓𝑐 4 𝑘𝑠𝑖
It's necessary for a designer to make conclusions on what the R-factor should be selection of
∅𝑀𝑛 ≥ 𝑀𝑢
∅𝑅(𝑏𝑑 2 ) ≥ 𝑀𝑢
Now select a value between b and d, which have been defined as𝛼. The 𝛼 can be set equal to a
𝑀 3967 𝑖𝑛3
d ≥ (𝛼∅𝑅)0.333 = ( )0.333 = 17.78 in
0.7
Now d = 18.5 in. and h d + 2.5 in. = 21 in. are the results of rounding up to the next half-inch value.
3967 𝑖𝑛3
b ≥ (18.5 𝑖𝑛)2 = 11.59 in.
h = 21 in b = 15 in
48
Design tension reinforcement for one positive and one negative bending section of the continuous
floor beam A-B-C-D. The beam's cross-sectional dimensions are h = 21" and b = 15 inches.
Assume concrete has a compressive strength of 4000 psi and steel has a yield strength of 60,000
psi.
Using structural analysis software, the factored design Moments at this segment were determined
to be 157 k-ft and 112 k-ft, respectively, using the ACI Moments coefficients. The bigger number
will be utilized in this computation. Assuming only one layer of reinforcement, d = 21.5 in. Apply
Eq. As (explained below) to produce an initial estimate for the desired tension steel area, assuming
Because this is a small value, we should check As, min for the given concrete strength, so use this
equation:
Accordingly, the insignificant region won't make a difference, and one cycle will be expected to
work on the worth of As. Decide the successful width of the pressure zone to decide the profundity
49
Using this value of ‘a’
Select three No. 8 bars for this needed area, resulting in an area of 2.37 in2. Although it is feasible
to choose a mix of bar sizes to get closer to the needed tension steel area
4. Detailing check
The shortest distance from the reinforcing surface to the tension face is cc, bar. The term fs refers
to the stress in the flexural reinforcement, which can be set to 40,000 psi for Grade-60 steel.
40,000 40,000
s ≤ 15 ( )-2.5cc =15 (40,000)-2.5(2) = 10 in.
𝑓𝑠
40,000 40,000
s ≤ 12 ( ) = 12 (40,000) = 12 in.
𝑓𝑠
Assuming the distance from the sides of the beam to the center of each #8 bar is 2.5 in., the center-
15−2(2.5 𝑖𝑛.)
s= = 5 in. < 10 in.
2
As a result, the distance between the bars complies with the Code. If the spacing was too great,
four (smaller) bars would be designed to bring the center-to-center spacing between the bars down
to the minimum.
The needed minimum steel area has already been established, and it is less than the steel area
selected. Because this is a tension-controlled area, use = 0.9. Calculate c and compare it to 3/8 of
50
The factor 1 is 0.85 for a concrete compressive strength of 4000 psi. As a result, the distance from
𝑎 0.523
∅Mn = ∅Asfy (𝑑 − 2) = 0.9 × 2.37 in2 × 60 ksi (18.5 − )
2
The pattern on both sides of support B is identical to the one shown here. Using structural analysis
software, the factored design Moments at this segment were determined to be -219 k-ft and -89 k-
ft, respectively, using the ACI Moments coefficients. Use the higher value in this computation.
The first tension steel area estimate is based on the premise that this is a tension-controlled
segment.
𝑀𝑢 𝑀
𝑢 219 k−ft ×12 in./ft
As ≥ 𝑎 ≈ ∅𝑓𝑦 (𝑗𝑑) = 0.90 ×60 ksi × 0.95 × 18.5 in = 2.76 in2
∅𝑓𝑦(𝑑− )
2
Before As, do one iteration to improve the value of As. For this case, the width of the compression
Now
As = 3.2 in2
51
For 4 #6 bars, the minimum web width is 9.0 in. Because a slab can have a thinner cover, the No.
4 bars in the flange will usually be higher in the T-beam portion than the bars above the web.
However, it is possible to attain sufficient precision in strength calculations by assuming that all
tension reinforcement is approximately 2.5 in. from the top of the section. This method is
To determine if this is a tension-controlled section, compare the depth to the neutral axis, c, to 3/8
of d, the neutral axis depth limit for tension-controlled sections. The factor 1 is 0.85 for a concrete
compressive strength of 4000 psi. As a result, the distance from the neutral axis is
𝑎 4.35
∅Mn = ∅Asfy (𝑑 − ) = 0.9 × 3.2 in2 × 60 ksi (18.5 − )
2 2
52
5.3.1 Reinforcement diagrams
53
Fig 5.9: Section design at the face of column
54
5.4 DESIGN OF COLUMN
In architecture and structural engineering, a column or pillar is a structural member that conveys
the weight of the structure above to other structural components below by compression. A column,
An interaction Diagram for axial load and bending along either primary axis may be drawn for a
given cross section and reinforcing scheme. A double iteration is required to calculate each point
on such a surface.
55
Pu = positive in compression factored axial load.
in the cross section, ex = eccentricity of applied force measured parallel to the x-axis, positive to
right
ey = eccentricity of applied load measured parallel to the y-axis on cross section, positive upward
Mux = factoral Moments about the x-axis, equivalent to Pu ey, positive when causing fibre
5.5.2 Procedure
The comparison between the ETABS value and approximate analysis is tabulated below. The
software values varies from the approximate analysis values at supports so the approximate
analysis values have been used in order to attain the accuracy in calculations.
Mux Muy
Approximate Approximate
ETABS ETABS
analysis analysis
Kip-ft.
Corner column 11.26 14.98 21.77 36.45
Edge column 27.33 34.42 39.88 59.42
Interior column 29.42 33.67 41.96 55.96
Before starting the procedure some values to be used are Pu = 18.4 kips, Mux = 14.98 Kip-ft.,
Compute γ
(18−(2𝑥2.5))
γ= = 0.72
18
56
Compute ex, ey from the definition of the Moments and eccentricities.
𝑀𝑢𝑥 36.45 𝑥 12
ey = = = 23.77 in
𝑝𝑢 18.4
𝑀𝑢𝑦 14.98 𝑥 12
e x= = = 9.76 in
𝑝𝑢 18.4
Check
𝑒𝑥 𝑒𝑦 23.77 9.76
≥ = ≥ = 1.32 ≥ 0.54 hence satisfied
𝑙𝑥 𝑙𝑦 18 18
Compute α
α 𝑒𝑦 𝑙𝑥 18
eox = e x + = 23.77 + 0.51(9.76)( 18 ) = 28.74
𝑙𝑦
Also
𝑀𝑢 528.816
= 324 𝑥 18 = 0.09 ksi
𝐴𝑔 ℎ
For bottom story corner column, the value obtained from interaction curve will be
𝑝𝑢 184
= = 0.56 ksi
𝐴𝑔 324
𝑀𝑢 2993.6
= 324 𝑥 18 = 0.51 ksi
𝐴𝑔 ℎ
57
Similarly, by using the previous procedure we will solve some other columns which are as
follow;
58
Table 5.6: Procedure for solving the column using equivalent eccentricity method
𝒆𝒙 𝒆𝒚
Pu γ Muy Mux ex ey ≥ α eox Moy
𝒍𝒙 𝒍𝒚
kips Kip-ft. in in kip-in
Top
56.48 0.72 17.76 7.78 7.31 5.07 0.4 >0.28 0.51 9.89 181.97
Story
Edge
Ground
column 67.89 0.72 16.54 6.71 7.26 5.01 0.403 >0.27 0.51 16.27 432.87
floor
𝒆𝒙 𝒆𝒚
Pu γ Muy Mux ex ey ≥ α eox Moy
𝒍𝒙 𝒍𝒚
kips Kip-ft. in in kip-in
Top
47.84 0.72 5.22 6.96 11.8 4.53 0.65 >0.25 0.51 14.11 259.62
Story
Interior
column Ground
67.89 0.72 16.54 6.71 7.26 5.01 0.4 >0.27 0.51 16.27 323.54
floor
59
Reinforcement diagram
60
CHAPTER 6
6.1 Drawings
We have been using this software for the drawings of the building such as:
Floor plans
Front elevations
61
Fig 6.1: 1st to 6th Floor Plan
62
Fig 6.2: Load Distribution on Slab
63
Fig 6.4: Load pattern on beam
64
Fig 6.6: Section design at midspan of span AB
65
Fig 6.8: Reinforcement diagram of Corner, Edge, Interior Column
66
REFERNCES
1. Wight, James K. Reinforced concrete: mechanics and design. Prentice Hall, 2015.
2. MacGregor JG, Wight JK, Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design. Upper Saddle River,
67