See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/304778589

Chemical Physical Properties of Bio-coal - Defining the Thermal

Regime Known as Torrefaction

Presentation · June 2012

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1228.4406

CITATIONS READS

0 877

2 authors:

David A. Agar Margareta Wihersaari

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (Umeå) Åbo Akademi University
58 PUBLICATIONS   460 CITATIONS    39 PUBLICATIONS   744 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

The feasibility of torrefaction for the co-firing of wood in pulverised-fuel boilers View project

MOBILE FLIP View project

All content following this page was uploaded by David A. Agar on 04 July 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Nordic Environmental Chemistry Conference, Kakskerta,Turku, 4-7 June, 2012

Chemical Physical Properties

of Bio-coal
Defining the thermal regime known as torrefaction
David Agar1
Margareta Wihersaari2

1 Department of Chemistry
2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science

University of Jyväskylä
Presentation Outline
 Introduction
 What is Bio-coal?
 Why Bio-coal?
 Torrefaction
 Process overview
 The torrefaction regime
 Solid fuel properties of torrefied wood
 Torrefaction versus carbonisation
 Bio-coal production
 Active players in Europe
 Three key properties of bio-coal from experiment data
 Conclusions
What is Bio-coal?
 Solid fuel made from biomass (renewable)
 Fossil coal substitute
 High heating value (MJ/kg, compared to untreated biomass)
 High bulk energy density (MJ/m3)
 Handling properties like fossil coal (easy to grind)
 Fuel for coal-fired power plants (large-scale production)

Bio-coal as briquette Bio-coal as pellets

 What Bio-coal is NOT
 Not (grilling) charcoal
 Not bio-char (soil additive)
 Not bio-carbon (high-end technical carbon product)
 Note: Especially confusing in Finnish

Bio-coal
Bio-char Biohiili
Bio-carbon

The Finnish language may have many different words for snow but this is not the case for high-carbon products 
Why Bio-coal?
 EU Climate & Energy Package
 Reduce GHG emissions by 2020
 Secure inland energy sources (inland biomass)

 Untreated biomass not feasible (i.e. wood pellets)

 Enabling technology: co-combustion using bio-coal would be

a fast method of cutting CO2 emissions significantly
because…
Coal-fire power plants (black dots)

Helsingin Sanomat 28.10.2010

Torrefaction (roasting or incomplete pyrolysis)
at the heart of bio-coal production
Energy 0.1
Mass 0.3
Torrefaction gases

Torrefaction
Raw T = 220-300 C Torrefied
Biomass (inert Biomass

Energy 1.0 atmosphere) Energy 0.9

Mass 1.0 Mass 0.7
Heating value increase = 0.9/0.7 = 1.29
29% increase
 The Composition of Woody Biomass
Component Chemical Formula Hardwood Softwood
mass (%) mass (%)
Cellulose (C6H10O5)n 43 43
Hemicellulose (C5H8O4)n 34 28
Lignin [(C9H10O3)(CH3O)0.9-1.7]n 23 29
 Rate of thermal degradation of the
three components of woody biomass
cellulose

Torrefaction
Regime
220-300 C

Yang H et al., Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis, Fuel 2007
 Volatile matter and fixed carbon
content of fuels
100 35
Volatile matter (%)
90
Fixed carbon (%)
80 30
70

higher heating value (MJ/kg)

Ash content (%)
composition (%)

60 25
Higher heating value
50 (MJ/kg)
40 20
30
20 15
10
0 10
wood sod peat torrefied wood coal wood charcoal

Pine wood (T = 285 C, t = ?) Typical Polish coal

Bourgeois & Doat (1984) used in Finland
 Elemental compositional changes

Composition of beech wood and torrefeed beech wood (T= 220-280C) in van Kravelen diagram
Prins et al. More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction (2006)
 Torrefaction versus carbonisation
Heating value, as
received
= 10 MJ
Mass balance – 1 kg of wood
1000

900

800 Limit of pelletisation

Pelletointiraja (ligniini ei riittää)
tuhka
700
(lignin decomposition)
600 N

g 500 O
9 MJ
400 H

300 C
6 MJ
200 H20

100

Wood hake
chips torrefioitu
Torrefied puu
wood Woodpuuhiili
charcoal

Extent of pyrolysis
Bio-coal production is an optimisation
problem

Minimise Maximise

Reaction time Raw material particle size

Reactor size Ability to pelletise/briquette
Process complexity Heat transfer
Investment expenses Use of torrefaction gas
Grindability of product
Bio-coal versus conventional wood pellets

Wood pellets

∆E = 10%

Bio-coal
Torrefaction technology developers in
Europe

Kiel J,Torrefaction for upgrading biomass into

commodity fuel, 2011.
 Are the expectations of bio-coal
realistic = based on scientific findings?
Key Property Popular Claim Experimental Data*

Mass/Energy Balance 70/90% 61-82/73-92%

29% heating value increase 7-21% (woody)
7-15% (agro)
Grindability Same as fossil coal Improved, grinding energy
7-36 kWh/t reduced 68-89% (reactivity?)
52-150 kWh/t
Equilibrium Moisture Hydrophobic or 3-6% max. 2.2% (RH 11.3%)
Content (ECM) 8.7% (RH 83.6%)
Measured at 30 degrees C

*Experimental data from peer-reviewed scientific journal publications.

Agar D, Wihersaari M. Bio-coal, torrefied lignocellulosic resources – key properties for its use in co-firing
with fossil coal – their status, Biomass & Bioenergy (2012).
 Conclusions
 Bio-coal is a fossil coal substitute for coal-fired power plants
 Potential to cut CO2 emissions significantly from energy sector
 Torrefaction is a distinct thermal regime in which mostly
hemicellulose undergoes degradation (220-300 C)
 Bio-coal production is an optimisation problem and is not trivial
 Three key properties of bio-coal are available from recent peer-
reviewed literature for modelling of economics and GHG-
emission balance.
 Nordic Environmental Chemistry Conference, Kakskerta,Turku, 4-7 June, 2012

Thank You
For your attention

David Agar1
Margareta Wihersaari2

1 Department of Chemistry
2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science

University of Jyväskylä

View publication stats