Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Major 21 Lecture
Major 21 Lecture
Why is the study of literature important? What skills do students learn through reading
literature? What is gained from reading literature and evaluating it?
When we study literature, our horizons are broadened, because we can learn about and
come to understand people who are different from us. Conversely, we might discover
characters or poems that we really identify with—it can be really exciting and validating
to discover that your exact thoughts and feelings have also been experienced by
someone else. Because of these effects, literature encourages us to be sensitive to the
whole spectrum of human experience and to consider this when making decisions in our
day-to-day lives. Academically, studying literature also helps us to refine our own
writing skills and expand our vocabularies.
Literary and Cultural Studies gives you access to historical and emergent traditions of
literature, culture and thought. Through critical interpretation and dialogue, we can see
how language mediated through texts arranges and allows different ways of knowing
and living. In the process you will read some of the greatest wordsmiths and thinkers in
the English language.
What are the three importance of literature we can see in the 21st century?
1. Get to know past lives
2. Awakens empathy and understanding
3. Opportunities and escapism
Mystery Nonfiction
Fiction dealing with the solution of a crime or Informational text dealing with an actual,
the unraveling of secrets. real-life subject.
Speech
Public address or discourse.
5. Dramatic Irony. Remember the first time you read or watched Romeo and
Juliet? The tragic ending of this iconic story exemplifies dramatic irony: The
audience knows that the lovers are each alive, but neither of the lovers knows
that the other is still alive. Each drinks their poison without knowing what the
audience knows. Dramatic irony is used to great effect in literature, film, and
television.
8. Humor. Humor brings people together and has the power to transform how we
think about the world. Of course, not everyone is adept at being funny—
particularly in their writing. Making people laugh takes some skill and finesse,
and, because so much relies on instinct, is harder to teach than other techniques.
However, all writers can benefit from learning more about how humor functions in
writing.
11. Metaphor, Simile, and Analogy. Metaphors, similes, and analogies are three
techniques used in speech and writing to make comparisons. Each is used in a
different way, and differentiating between the three can get a little tricky: For
example, a simile is actually a subcategory of metaphor, which means all similes
are metaphors, but not all metaphors are similes. Knowing the similarities and
differences between metaphor, simile, and analogy can help you identify which is
best to use in any scenario and help make your writing stronger.
12. Motif. A motif is a repeated element that has symbolic significance to a story.
Sometimes a motif is a recurring image. Sometimes it’s a repeated word or
phrase or topic. A motif can be a recurrent situation or action. It can be a sound
or a smell or a temperature or a color. The defining aspect is that a motif repeats,
and through this repetition, a motif helps to illuminate the central ideas, themes,
and deeper meaning of the story in which it appears.
13. Motif vs. Symbol. Both motifs and symbols are used across artistic mediums:
Painters, sculptors, playwrights, and musicians all use motifs and symbols in
their respective art forms. And while they are similar literary terms, “motif” and
“symbol” are not synonyms.
17. Satire. Satire is so prevalent in pop culture that most of us are already very
familiar with it, even if we don’t always realize it. Satire is an often-humorous way
of poking fun at the powers that be. Sometimes, it is created with the goal to
drive social change. Satire can be part of any work of culture, art, or
entertainment—it has a long history, and it is as relevant today as it was in
ancient Rome.
18. Situational Irony. Irony: it’s clear as mud. Theorists quibble about the margins
of what constitutes irony, but situational irony is all around us—from humorous
news headlines to the shock twists in a book or TV show. This type of irony is all
about the gap between our expectations and reality, and it can make a
memorable and powerful impression when we encounter it.
19. Suspense. No matter what type of story you’re telling, suspense is a valuable
tool for keeping a reader’s attention and interest. Building suspense involves
withholding information and raising key questions that pique readers’ curiosity.
Character development plays a big role in generating suspense; for example, if a
character’s desire is not fulfilled by the end of the book, the story will not feel
complete for the reader.
20. Symbolism. An object, concept, or word does not have to be limited to a single
meaning. When you see red roses growing in a garden, what comes to mind?
Perhaps you think literally about the rose—about its petals, stem, and thorns, or
even about its stamen and pistil as a botanist might. But perhaps your mind goes
elsewhere and starts thinking about topics like romance, courtship, and
Valentine’s Day. Why would you do this? The reason, of course, is that over the
course of many generations, a rose’s symbolic meaning has evolved to include
amorous concepts.
Literary Criticism
Literary criticism is the comparison, analysis, interpretation, and/or evaluation of works
of literature. Literary criticism is essentially an opinion, supported by evidence, relating
to theme, style, setting or historical or political context. It usually includes discussion of
the work’s content and integrates your ideas with other insights gained from research.
Literary criticism may have a positive or a negative bias and may be a study of an
individual piece of literature or an author’s body of work.
Although criticism may include some of the following elements in order to support an
idea, literary criticism is NOT a plot summary, a biography of the author, or simply
finding fault with the literature.
Researching, reading, and writing works of literary criticism will help you to make better
sense of the work, form judgments about literature, study ideas from different points of
view, and determine on an individual level whether a literary work is worth reading.
Examples of some types of literary criticism are:
Biographical
Comparative
Ethical
Expressive
Feminist
Historical
Mimetic
Pragmatic
Psychological
Social
Textual
Theoretical
Literary Criticism – The analysis of a literary text though various lenses that
highlight authorial stance, purpose, and perspective
Part of the fun of reading good literature is looking for all its meanings and
messages. Since people have written literature, critics have been interpreting it ….
going all the way back to ancient Greece and Rome. For many centuries, literary
criticism has been limited to some basic approaches involving historical, moral and
biographical perspectives. But during the 20th century, critical approaches have
become much more varied due to the huge increase of educated people and their
widely diverse reactions to literature. As the meaning of what literature is and can
be or should be has changed, so has the critics’ responses to it.
Below are outlined for you six of the dozen-or-so “schools” of literary criticism
currently deemed valid by the academic world. A critical viewpoint is simply a lens
through which we look at a piece of literature, allowing this lens to shape our
reaction to the work. These different schools are not exclusive – in fact, most critical
essays use ideas from several types of criticism. But depending upon what work
you are reading, and what your own ideas about what good literature should do, or
your own ideas about life and the world, some critical methods will work better than
others or be more helpful for your understanding of a work. The goal of literary
criticism is always to help us understand and appreciate a work more fully, no
matter what approach(es) we use.
2. Moral-Philosophical. This approach takes the position that the larger function of
literature is to teach morality and probe philosophical issues, such as ethics,
religion, or the nature of humanity. Literature is interpreted within the context of
the philosophical thought of a period or group, such as Christianity,
Existentialism, Buddhism, etc. Often critics will see in the work allusions to other
works, people, or events from this perspective, or see the work as allegorical.
3. Formalistic Criticism. Using this type of criticism, a reader would see the work
as an independent and self-sufficient artistic object. This approach is also
sometimes referred to as the “New Criticism,” since it came back in vogue in the
1960s-70s, but it was originally an outgrowth of the “Art for Art’s Sake” movement
of the late 1800s. Formalistic critics assume that everything necessary for
analyzing the work is present in the work itself and disregard any connection to
possible outside influences such as the author’s own life or historical times. This
criticism considers what a work says and how it says it as inseparable issues. It
focuses on close reading, with sensitivity to the words and their various
meanings. It searches for structures, patterns, imagery and motifs, and figurative
language along with the juxtaposition of scenes, tone, and other literary
techniques in order to come to conclusions about the meaning of the work.
The term literary criticism refers directly to the ‘reasoned consideration’ of literary works
and their relatable issues. It encompasses all arguments about literature – whether or
not specific literary works are analyzed. The earliest form of literary criticism can be
seen in Plato’s warnings against the potentially detrimental effects of poetic inspiration
in his work, Republic.
More specifically, literary criticism includes what has been referred to as ‘practical
criticism’, or the interpretation of intended meanings and the overall judgement of
quality. Criticism at this level can be seen not only from an artistic vantage point, but
also from other viewpoints that might be relevant to students and others who study
literature in more depth than the traditional reader.
For example, bibliographical questions, historical knowledge, influential sources, and
even problems of method. For this reason, criticism is often considered to be in a
different category than conventional scholarship. That is where the separation ends,
however. At the root of all criticism is informed outside knowledge.
The literary critic sometimes finds that they must wear multiple hats, acting as a
pseudo-detective, uncovering, verifying and editing unknown manuscripts. Occasionally,
literary critics have the unique opportunity to introduce the public to literary works that
have either been forgotten or may not have generated a strong interest in previous
years.
The depth of the functions involved in a proper literary critique will determine the range
of publications the critique appears in. For example, literary criticisms that are published
in the daily press will seldom include detailed analysis and often have little more
information than a summary of the publishers claim for book interest.
Weekly or biweekly magazines will contain slightly more information, however, they are
often bias in their judgement and some magazines (such as the New York Review of
Books) prefer to publish reviews of more popular works. It is also possible to find
sustained criticism in monthly and quarterly publications, scholarly journals and books.
Given the role that critics play in demonstrating which written work should garner the
most respect from the public and in deciding what the work is ‘really’ about, literary
critics are often the target of resentment. Critics who are misinformed or malicious have
the capability to steamroll or discourage writers who have been struggling to enter new
realms of writing. Plodding critics can hinder new literature by diverting deserved
attention away from pivotal points in the work and reflecting on inessential maters.
Literary critics might even antagonize writers despite optimal performance of their work.
Those writers who possess minimal regard for literary critics aren’t less pleased when
they are told that their finished work might possess unintended meanings or when it is
viewed as incomplete.
What authors who believe that there is no need for literary criticism fail to recognize is
that their work, after publication, is ‘theirs’ only in the legal sense. The genuine ‘owners’
of the work, in the broad sense, is the public who will now be in a position to form their
own opinions regardless of what critics say or believe.
The responsibility of the critic is not to stroke the ego of the writer, but rather to compel
the public to become involved in the conversation and to develop their own standard of
judgement. A critic can be useful to the public because they focus on what the public
wants in literature or popular culture and what they stand to receive from literature and
popular culture.
Interestingly, despite the fact that literary critics are often the basis of the personal
opinions of the critics themselves, it is these reviews that help to create a thirst for art in
the public. It is the role of the critic to identify authentic talent in authors and to make
sure that the public has the opportunity to explore those talents.
That said, there are critics who feel strongly that literature must be discussed separately
from other matters, however many feel that social and political debates will augment
these conversations. Literature is known to be partisan, meaning that it will always, in
one way or another, bare connection to local circumstance and can call upon values
and affirmations – It is not surprising to hear that the best critics pay little attention to the
boundaries between criticism and other social conventions.
This is particularly true in modern European nations where literary criticism has held a
formative place in ongoing debates about political and cultural issues. What is Literature
(1947) by Sarte is a prime example of how literary ideals can relate to the development
of society and various freedoms.
Sociological Criticism: Similar to historical criticism, this type of critique explores the
written work in the cultural, economic, and political context in which it was originally
written. This might include things like the analysis of the social content of the written
work or the cultural, economic and / or political values expressed.
Gender Criticism: Here, critics explore how gender identity can influence the
development and understanding of a literary work. Gender studies were first seen
during the feminist movement, when literary critics began to explore the role of gender
in writing. Feminist critics look at how the gender of a writer might – knowingly or
unknowingly – influence their writing. These critics also explore how images of males
and females in literature relate to the social norms of gender in society.
Mythological Criticism: As the name suggests, this type of literary critique explores
universal patterns and draws upon insights from history, anthropology, psychology, and
religion to determine how an author might use myths and symbolism in the development
of their work. A central concept of this type of criticism is the archtype – a character,
situation or image that evokes a profound universal response.
Biographical Criticism: These types of critics will explore how details of the author’s
life might assist readers in developing a more thorough understanding of their writing.
This is not to say that biographical critics concern themselves only with describing the
life and times of the author, but rather with interpreting the written work using keen
insights and examples extrapolated from their understanding of the author’s life.
Formalist Criticism: Formalist’s examine the written work as closely as possible, they
analyze each of the various elements as a way of interpretation.
Plato morality found poetry as a statement untrustworthy and believed that poetry could
never been seen as more than transcendent ideas. It was with this statement that we
was, in essence, saying that literature could only serve to move truth seekers away from
the truth. Plato credited the poet with inspiration, but insisted that this was a cause for
worry; ‘A man possess by such madness would subvert rational’ Because of this, poets
were to be banished from the hypothetical republic.
In Poetics, Aristotle countered Plato’s argument by stressing his views of what was
normal and helpful in literature. It was his argument that the poet was not inspired by
the divine, but was instead motivated by basic human desire to imitate the universe
around him. Imitation is perceived to have value for those who are empathetic to it.
Both Aristotle and Plato are seen as antagonists, but their inability to agree with each
other’s viewpoint is noteworthy. Both agree that poetry is imitative, both agree that it
evokes emotions in readers, and both feel that poetry gains justification from its service
to the public. Poets, in history, had power over others. Modern critics feel that poetry is
much more than a past-time , where Aristotle believes that it was not the social marvel
that it was made out to be.