Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Law3 Summative Lyka 1
Law3 Summative Lyka 1
● True
● False
●
● True
● False
When induced to sign a note for the price of a worthless stock which was fraudulently
represented by the payee as to its value, this is an example of fraud in inducement
Choices:
Code of Commerce
● True
● False
Where the instrument is wanting in any material particular , the person in possession
thereof has a prima facie authority to complete it by filling up the blanks therein.
● True
● False
When a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose signature it
purports to be, it is wholly inoperative , and no right to retain the instrument, or to give a
discharge therefor, or to enforce payment thereof against any party thereto
In e-commerce law, the guiding principle is the functional equivalent approach which
means that the functions of say, a document or a signature is analyzed, and if an
equivalent exist in electronic form, then it will be adopted.
● True
● False
●
● True
● False
● True
● False
● True
● False
● no answer
● upon the fulfillment of a condition
● at a determinable future time
● at an indefinite time hence non negotiable
● on demand
● True
● False
● True
● False
A warehouse receipt is a bilateral contract which imports that goods are in the hands
of a warehouseman and is a symbolical representation of the property itself.
The maker of a negotiable instrument, by making it, engages that he will pay it
according to its tenor, and admits the existence of the payee and his then capacity to
indorse.
Where the holder has a lien on the instrument arising either from contract or by
implication of law, he is deemed a holder for value to the extent of his lien.
Assuming all the other requisites of negotiability are present, which of the foregoing
instruments are negotiable?
● An indorsement that vests title in the indorsee in trust for some other person.
● no answer
● An indorsement that constitutes the indorsee an agent of the indorser.
● An indorsement that constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title of the
instrument.
● An indorsement that prohibits the further negotiation of the instrument.
● True
● False
● True
● False
● True
● False
No person is liable on the instrument whose signature does not appear thereon,
except as herein otherwise expressly provided.
● negotation
● first indorsement
● issuance
● acceptance
● last indorsement
● True
● False
The holder may at any time strike out any indorsement which is not necessary to his
title.
● True
● False
● True
● False
● Howard may not enforce of the check against Robert, whether Howard is a
holder in due course or not.
● Howard may enforce payment of the check against Andrew, Brian and Charlie ,
whether Howard is a holder in due course or not.
● all are incorrect.
● Howard may enforce payment of the check against Shiela, whether Howard is a
holder in due course or not.
● Howard may enforce payment of the check against Robert if Howard is a holder
in due course.
● True
● False
Question 47 of 692 Points
Every contract on a negotiable instrument is incomplete and revocable until delivery of the
instrument for the purpose of giving effect thereto.
● True
● False
Best evidence rule means, when a document is the subject of inquiry, no evidence shall be
admissible other than the original document itself.
A warehouseman is a person lawfully engaged in the business of storing goods for profit.
● True
● False
● no answer
● The maker, if an indorser's signature is forged.
● The acceptor, if the drawer's signature is forged.
● A person negotiating by mere delivery if a prior party's signature is forged.
● An indorser, if the maker's signature is forged.
● True
● False
● Andrea, indorser.
● Menard, maker.
● Forgery is not available as a defense to any party to the instrument.
● Phoemela, payee.
● True
● False
● True
● False
For his protection, the warehouseman must bring a complaint in interpleader and
require the different claimants to litigate among themselves.
● True
● False
● True
● False
● Mark cannot be compelled to pay even if the condition is fulfilled because the
conditional indorsement renders the instrument non-negotiable.
● no answer
● Mark may pay Albert even if the condition has not been fulfilled. The fulfillment of
the condition becomes immaterial and Albert becomes the absolute owner of the
proceeds of the note.
● Mark must wait for the condition to be fulfilled before he can pay Albert.
● Mark may pay Albert even if the condition has not been fulfilled but Albert has to
hold the proceeds subject to the rights of Pia.
A qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the
instrument.
● True
● False
● True
● False
Question 67 of 694 Points
● True
● False
●
● True
● False
Submissions
Here are your latest answers:
Question 1
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 2
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 3
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 4
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 5
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 6
Score: 8 out of 8
Yes
Question 7
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 8
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 9
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 10
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 11
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 12
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 13
Score: 0 out of 2
No
Question 14
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 15
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 16
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 17
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 18
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 19
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 20
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 21
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 22
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 23
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 24
Score: 0 out of 2
No
Question 25
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 26
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 27
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 28
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 29
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 30
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 31
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 32
Score: 0 out of 2
No
Question 33
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 34
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 35
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 36
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 37
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 38
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 39
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 40
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 41
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 42
Score: 0 out of 2
No
Question 43
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 44
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 45
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 46
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 47
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 48
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 49
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 50
Score: 0 out of 2
No
Question 51
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 52
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 53
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 54
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 55
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 56
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 57
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 58
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 59
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 60
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 61
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 62
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 63
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 64
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 65
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 66
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 67
Score: 4 out of 4
Yes
Question 68
Score: 2 out of 2
Yes
Question 69
Score: 2 out of 2
Score
Your latest submission is used
3.50
Category Progress
Grade 93.15068493150685
None 6.849315068493155
136/146 (93%)