CIVPRO II CASES

RULE 41

Appeal From The Regional Trial Courts

Cases:

 Basco vs. CA, 337 SCRA 472

 Corpus vs. Alikpala, 22 SCRA 104
 Yasuda vs. CA, 330 SCRA 385
 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila vs. CA, 258 SCRA186
 Fajardo vs. CA, 354 SCRA 736
 Constantino-David vs. Pangandaman-Gania, 409 SCRA 80
 Bisaya Land Transp. Co., Inc. vs. Geronimo, 29 SCRA 130

RULE 42

Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the Court of Appeals

Cases:

 Yao vs CA, 344 SCRA 202

 Ditching vs. CA, 263 SCRA 343
 Jaro vs. CA, 377 SCRA 282
 Atillo vs. Bombay, 351 SCRA 361


RULE 44

Ordinary Appealed Cases

Cases:

 De Liano vs. CA, 370 SCRA 349

 Torres vs. Orden, 330 SCRA 1
 Aguam vs. CA, 332 SCRA 784

RULE 45

Appeal by Certiorari to the Supreme Court

Cases:

 People vs. Velez, 397 SCRA 721

 Lim Tong Lim vs. Phil. Fishing Gear Industries , Inc., 317 SSCRA 728
 Villarico vs. CA, 309 SCRA 193
 Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. vs.Tonda, 338 SCRA 254
 Manila Bay Club Corp. vs. CA, 245 SCRA 715
 Alomora vs. CA, 309 SCRA 586
 Consing vs. CA, 425 SCRA 192Caoili vs. CA, 314 SCRA 345
 RULE 46

Original Cases

Case:

 Paras vs. Baldado, 354 SCRA 141

RULE 47

Annulment of Judgments of Final Orders and Resolutions

Cases:

 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 352 SCRA235

 Manipor vs. Ricafort, 407 SCRA 298
 Ancheta vs. Ancheta 424 SCRA 725
 Republic vs. Heirs of Sancho Magdato, 340 SCRA 115
 Capacete vs. Baroro, 405 SCRA 457
 Malolos vs. Dy, 325 SCRA 827
 PEA vs, Uy, 372 SCRA 180
 Islamic Dawah Council of the Phils. Vs. CA, 178 SCRA 178

RULE 51

Judgment

Case:

 Peope vs. Teehankee, Jr., 249 SCRA 54

RULE 52

Motion for Reconsideration

Case:

 Ortigas & Co. Ltd. Partnership vs. Velasco, 254 SCRA 234

RULE 57

Preliminary Attachment

Cases:

 Quasha et.al, vs. Juan, 118 SCRA 505

 Master Tours & Travel Corp. vs. CA, 219 SCRA 321
 Mangila vs. CA, 387 SCRA 162
 FCY CONST. Group, Inc. vs. CA, 324 SCRA 270
 Roque vs. CA, 93 SCRA 540
 CBTC vs. CA, 197 SCRA 663
 RULE 58

Preliminary Injunction

Cases:

 Buayan Cattle Co. Inc. vs. Quintillan, 128 SCRA 276

 Viray vs. CA, 191 SCRA 308
 Agro River Gold Dredging Co. Inc., vs. DE Leon, 61 Phil. 190
 Pelejo vs. CA, 117 SCRA 665
 Olalia vs. Hizon, 196 SCRA 665
 Golangco vs. CA, 283 SCRA 493
 Urbanes. Jr. vs. CA, 355 SCRA 537
 Tambaoan vs. CA, 365 SCRA 359
 Lasala vs. Fernandez, 5 SCRA 79

RULE 59

Receivership

Cases:

 Arranza vs.B.F. Homes, Inc., 333 SCRA 799

 Pacific Merchandising Corp.vs. Consolacion Insurance & Surety Co. Inc., 73
SCRA 564

 Commodities Storage & Ice Plant Corp. vs. CA, 274 SCRA 439

RULE 60

Replevin

Cases:

 Filinvest Credit Corp. vs.CA, 248 SCRA 549

 Pongos vs. Hidalgo Enterprises, Inc. 84 Phil. 499
 Vda. De Danao vs. Ginete, 395 SCRA 542
 Castillo vs. Buencillo, 354 SCRA 641
 Citibank, N.A. vs. CA, 304 SCRA 679
 Sebastian vs. Valino, 224 SCRA 256
 Yang vs. Valdez, 177 SCRA 141

RULE 61

Support Pendente Lite

Cases:

 Ramos vs. CA, 45 SCRA 604

 Saavedra vs. Estrada, 56 Phil. 33
 Lopez vs. CA, 434 SCRA 597
 RULE 62

Interpleader

Cases:

 Makati Dev. Corp. vs. Tanjuatco, 27 SCRA 401

 UCPB vs. IAC, 183 SCRA 368
 Ramos vs. Ramos, 399 SCRA 43

RULE 63

Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies

Cases:

 Macasiano vs.MHA, 224 SCRA 236

 Office of the Ombudsman vs. Ibay, 364 SCRA 281
 Velarde vs. Social Justice Society, 424 SCRA 283
 Manila Electric Company vs. PCFI, 374 SCRA 262
 Natalia Realty, Inc. vs. CA, 391 SCRA 370

 King vs. Hernaez, 4 SCRA 792

 Int. Hardwood & Veneer Co. of the Phils. Vs. UP, 200 SCRA 554
 Ollada vs. Central Bank of the Phils., 5 SCRA 297
 Matalin Coconut Co. Inc. vs. Mun. Council of Malabang, Lanao del Sur, 143
SCRA 404

RULE 65

Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus

Cases:

 Cochingyan, Jr. vs. Cloribel, 76 SCRA 361

 Chan vs. RTC of Zamboanga del Norte, 427 SCRA 796
 Lapid vs. Laurea, 391 SCRA 277
 Yao vs. Perello, 414 SCRA 474
 Enriquez, Jr. vs. Bidin, 47 SCRA 183
 Calderon vs. Sol. General, 215 SCRA 876
 Taroma vs. Sayo, 67 SCRA 508
 Sadio vs. RTC of Antique, 201 SCRA 744
 Diaz vs. Diaz, 331 SCRA 302
 PEA vs. Uy, 372 SCRA 180
 RULE 66

Quo Warrant0

Cases:

 Castro vs. Del Rosario, 19 SCRA 196

 Tecson vs. Comelec, 424 SCRA 277
 Mendoza vs. Allas, 302 SCRA 623
 Villegas vs. Dela Cruz, 15 SCRA 720
 Fernandez vs. Sto. Tomas, 242 SCRA 192
 Torayno, Sr. vs. Comelec, 337 SCRA 574Gaerlan vs, Catubig, 17 SCRA 376
 Garcia vs. Perez, 99 SCRA 628

RULE 67

Expropriation

Cases:

 NPC vs. Manubay Agro-Industrial Dev. Corp., 437 SCRA 60

 Mun. of Binan vs. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576
 Napocor vs. Jocson, 206 SCRA 520
 Barangay San Roque vs. Heirs of Francisco Pastor, 334 SCRA 127
 NHA vs. Heirs of Isidro Guivelongo, 404 SCRA 389
 Estate of Salud Jimenez vs. Phil. Export Processing Zone, 349 SCRA 240
 Manosca vs. CA, 252 SCRA 412
 Reyes vs. NHA, 395 SCRA 494
 BH, Berkenkotter & Co. vs. CA, 216 SCRA 584
 Coscolluela vs, CA, 164 SCRA 393
 Asso. Of Small Landowners in the Phils. Inc. vs. Sec. of Agrarian Reform,
175 SCRA 343

RULE 68

Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage

 Distinction between right of redemption and equity of redemption

 Cases:

 PBC vs. DE Vera, 6 SCRA 1026

 Medida vs. CA, 208 SCRA 887
 RULE 69

Partition

Cases:

 Valmonte vs. CA, 252 SCRA 92

 Maglucot Aw vs. Maglucot, 329 SCRA 78
 Gulang vs. CA, 300 SCRA 246
 Mun. of Binan vs. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576
 Vda. De Daffon vs. CA, 387 SCRA 427
 Roque vs. IAC, 165 SCRA 118

RULE 70

Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

Cases:

 Firmeza vs. David, 92 Phil. 733

 Emili vs. Bado, 23 SCRA 183
 Lopez vs. David, Jr., 426 SCRA 535
 Javier vs. Veridiano 11, 237 SCRA 565
 Heirs of Demetrio Melchor vs. Melchor, 415 SCRA 726
 Go, Jr. vs. CA, 362 SCRA 755
 Barba vs. CA, 376 SCRA 210
 People vs. Alfeche, Jr., 211 SCRA 770
 Ong vs. Parel, 355 SCRA 691
 Lanuza vs. Munoz, 429 SCRA 562
 Commander Realty, Inc. vs. CA, 161 SCRA 264
 Odsigue vs. CA, 233 SCRA 626
 Raboca vs. Pantanosas, Jr., 245 SCRA 293
 Cruz vs. Pascual, 425 SCRA 403
 Heirs of Lourdes Saez Sabanpan vs. Comorposa, 408 SCRA 692

RULE 71

Contempt

Cases:

 Ang vs. Castro, 136 SCRA 453

 People vs. Godoy, 243 SCRA 64
 Converse Rubber Corp. vs. Jacinto Rubber & Plastics Co. Inc., 97 SCRA 158
 Yasay, jr. vs. Recto, 313 SCRA 739San Luis vs. CA, 365 SCRA 279
 Eballa vs. Paas, 362 SCRA 389
 Soriano vs. CA, 363 SCRA725
 Oclavit vs. Paderanga, 350 SCRA 260
 Canas vs. Castigador, 348 SCRA 425
 Concepcion, jr. vs. Gonzales IV, 4 SCRA 1124
 Torcende vs. Sardido 396 SCRA 11
 Nazareno vs. Barnes, 136 SCRA 57
 Defalobos vs. Aquilizan, 150 SCRA 55
 Fuentes vs. Leviste, 117 SCRA 958
 Rom vs. Cobadora, 28 SCRA 758
 Flores vs. Ruiz, 90 SCRA 428
 Barrete vs. Amila, 230 SCRA 219

Land Bank of the Phils. Vs. Listana, Sr., 408 SCRA 328