UniKL MIMET/ACAD/

Doc. No:
DTL/F-05
UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Revision
03
No:
Technology (MIMET)
Effective
26/09/2016
Date:
ASSESSMENT BRIEF AND
VERIFICATION COVER SHEET Page No: 1 of 2

COURSE DETAILS

SECTION M.E.E. T YEAR/ SEMESTER 2/3

COURSE NAME WORKSHOP TECHNOLOGY 2 COURSE CODE LMD 25102

COURSE LEADER MR. BAKHTIAR ARIFF LECTURER MR.FAIRUZKHAN

ASSESSMENT DETAILS

TITLE/ NAME/ TYPE ACTIVITY WEEK 1 WEIGHTAGE 10/10

COURSE CLO: 1, 2, 3,4

DATE/ DEADLINE 16/08/2022
OUTCOME(S)

INSTRUCTIONS DELIVERABLES
On completion of this course the students will be able to::
1. Answer all question.
1. Identify all safety procedures and practices and the operating principles of
Manual Metal Arc Welding process, Gas Metal Arc Welding process, Plasma Arc
Cutting, Oxygen Fuel Gas Cutting and mechanical cutting,.
2. Identify the methods of forming and bending processes including operating
principle of bending machine and bending allowances.
3. Demonstrate welding inspection such as checklist for visual inspection, Non-
Destructive Test (NDT) and destructive Test (DT).
4. Demonstrates task of cutting, welding and bending.

DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this assessment complies with the approved syllabus and latest guideline set forth by UniKL’s
Centre for Instructional Technology and Curriculum Development (CITC).

Prepared by: Verified by:

Course Lecturer Head of Section/ Programme Coordinator

Date: 08.08.2022 Date: 08.08.2022

STUDENT DETAILS

NAME DANIAL IRFAN BIN NORSHAMSUL KAMAL

ARIFFIN L01/L02/L03/L04/L05
I/D NO. 56103121124 GROUP

GENERAL INSTRUCTION TO CANDIDATES TOTAL MARKS

Write ALL answers in English unless instructed otherwise.
Answers should be written in black or blue ink except for sketches, graphics
and illustrations.
 Universiti Kuala Lumpur DANIAL IRFAN BIN NORSHAMSUL KAMAL ARIFFIN
NAME: TOTAL MARKS:
Malaysia Institute of Marine Engineering Technology
(MIMET) ID. NO:
56103121124
/ 100
GROUP NO: L02
COURSE : WORKSHOP TECHNOLOGY 1 – LMD 12402
RUBRIC – ASSESSING TECHNICAL REPORT (100%)

No (4) (3) (2) (1)

Criteria Score Weightage Total
. Excellent Good Good Fair Poor
1. Content of Content contains all major aspects Content covers most of the Content misses one or more Several major aspects of the
Technical of carrying out the practical task’s major aspects of the procedures major aspects of carrying out procedures of the practical task
Report procedures and the technical of the practical task and the the practical task’s procedures and the technical question are 7
question, well-written and technical question. Some minor and the technical question. missing; the student displays a
presented neatly and in an orderly details are missing / not included lack of understanding of how to
manner or not calculated produce an excellent report
2. Images and Clear, accurate images are Images/sketches are included Images/sketches are included Needed Images/sketches are
sketches included and make them easier to and are labelled neatly and and labelled. missing OR are missing important
5
understand. Images/sketches are accurately. labels.
labelled neatly and accurately.
3. Procedures Procedures are listed in clear Procedures are listed logically, Procedures are listed but are Procedures do not accurately list
steps. Each step is numbered and but steps are not numbered and not in a logical order or are the steps of the experiment. 6
is a complete sentence. are not complete sentences. difficult to follow.
4. Report Information is very organized in a Information is slightly organized Information is organized, but The information appears to be
Organization well-constructed paragraph or in a well-constructed paragraph or paragraph(s) are not well- disorganized. 4
paragraphs paragraphs constructed.
5. Spelling, One or fewer errors in spelling, Two or three errors in spelling, Four errors in spelling, More than four errors in spelling,
punctuation, punctuation, and grammar in the punctuation, and grammar in punctuation, and grammar in punctuation, and grammar in the 3
and grammar report. the report. the report. report.

TOTAL: /100

COMMENTS:

SIGNATURE: NAME OF EVALUATOR: FAIRUZKHAN HASSAN DATE: