Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lit Review Table Student
Lit Review Table Student
Lit Review Table Student
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research, Fifth Edition
Nola A. Schmidt and Janet M. Brown
Related Documents
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research, Fifth Edition
Nola A. Schmidt and Janet M. Brown
Related Documents
Gomez, M. J. (2018)
Handwashing adherence -
Is that really our goal?
Nephrology Nursing
Journal, 45(4), 393–394
Gould, D. J., McKnight, J.,
Leaver, M., Keene, C.,
Gaze, S., & Purssell, E.
(2020). Qualitative
interview study exploring
front line managers’
contributions to hand
hygiene standards and
audit: Local knowledge can
inform practice. American
Journal of Infection
Control, 48, 480–484.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aji
c.2020.02.005
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research, Fifth Edition
Nola A. Schmidt and Janet M. Brown
Related Documents
Karaoglu, M. K., & Akin, Evaluate effect of A convenience sample of IV: 20 handwashing training Knowledge scores: One group pre-
S. (2018). Effectiveness of HH training on Turkish nurses (N = 63) session with 5–7 nurses per Pretest: 14.70 test/posttest
hygienic hand washing the knowledge working on a session, content taught was Posttest: 25.79 quasi-
training on hand washing and practices of hematology/oncology, not indicated p < 0.001 experimental
practices and knowledge: A nurses. transplant, and surgical III
nonrandomized quasi- ICU HH rate:
experimental design. The DVs: Pretest: 0–2.3%
Journal of Continuing - Knowledge: Nurse Posttest: 0–50%
Education in Nursing, knowledge form to test p < 0.001
49(8), 360–371. https:// knowledge of nurses
doi:10.3928/00220124- - HH rate: Hand washing Although training improved HH rates,
20180718-07 observation tool: Using a there is opportunity for improvement.
checklist, researcher covertly
watched RNs 5 days a week
Løyland, B., Wilmont, S., Explore HCPs’ Purposive sample of 31 Individual interviews using an Four major themes were identified: Qualitative
Hessels, A., & Larson, E. knowledge about HCPs working in 3 interview guide study
(2016). Staff knowledge, preventing different pediatric health 1. HH products: various opinions VI
awareness, perceptions, infection and HH, care facilities in New efficacy; lack of product availability;
and beliefs about infection attitudes about York poor quality of product
prevention in pediatric HH, and advice 2. Knowledge awareness, perceptions,
long-term care facilities. for improving and beliefs: motivation is internal and
Nursing Research, 65(2), compliance with external; “us and them”; disconnect
132–141. https:// DOI: HH. between policy and practice
10.1097/NNR.0000000000 3. Barriers to infection: patient
000136 characteristics, access, workflow, low
priority
4. Suggested improvements: firm
organizational direction, make HH fun,
direct feedback, lifting up things that
are going “fine”
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research, Fifth Edition
Nola A. Schmidt and Janet M. Brown
Related Documents
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research, Fifth Edition
Nola A. Schmidt and Janet M. Brown
Related Documents
Copyright © 2022 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company