STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT

Ridjil P. Perez LPT MAT Student

Parametric Analysis-assumes that the distribution of data is normal.
1. Is there a significant difference in English Proficiency according to sex? (t-test for
independent samples)

Group Statistics

sex N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

english proficiency 1 15 30.20 11.416 2.947

2 15 31.33 9.990 2.580

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of t-test for Equality of Means
Variances

95% Confidence Interval

the Difference

Mean
Sig. (2- Std. Error
F Sig. t df Differen Lower Upper
tailed) Difference
ce

Equal
variances .485 .492 -.289 28 .774 -1.133 3.917 -9.157 6.890
assumed
English proficiency
Equal
variances not -.289 27.516 .774 -1.133 3.917 -9.163 6.896
assumed
 2. Is there a significant difference between mathematical ability and English
proficiency? (t-test for dependent samples/paired t-test)

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 mathematical ability 30.03 30 11.445 2.090

English proficiency 30.77 30 10.556 1.927

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 mathematical ability & 30 .365 .047

English proficiency

3. Is there a significant difference in English Proficiency according to grade levels?

(Analysis of Variance-ANOVA)

ANOVA

English proficiency

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 73.421 3 24.474 .201 .894

Within Groups 3157.945 26 121.459

Multiple Comparisons
Total 3231.367 29
english proficiency
Scheffe

95% Confidence Interval

(I) grade (J) grade Mean Difference
level level (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

grade 7 grade 8 2.136 6.435 .990 -17.09 21.36

grade 9 3.100 6.520 .973 -16.38 22.58

grade 10 5.500 7.393 .906 -16.59 27.59

grade 8 grade 7 -2.136 6.435 .990 -21.36 17.09

grade 9 .964 4.815 .998 -13.42 15.35

grade 10 3.364 5.944 .955 -14.40 21.12

grade 9 grade 7 -3.100 6.520 .973 -22.58 16.38

grade 8 -.964 4.815 .998 -15.35 13.42

grade 10 2.400 6.036 .984 -15.63 20.43

grade 10 grade 7 -5.500 7.393 .906 -27.59 16.59

grade 8 -3.364 5.944 .955 -21.12 14.40

grade 9 -2.400 6.036 .984 -20.43 15.63

Homogeneous Subsets

English proficiency

Subset for alpha

= 0.05

grade level N 1

Scheffea,,b grade 10 5 28.00

grade 9 10 30.40

grade 8 11 31.36

grade 7 4 33.50

Sig. .854

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.241.

b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of

the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not
guaranteed.

4. Is there a significant relationship between mathematical ability and English

proficiency? (Pearson r)

Correlations

mathematical english
ability proficiency

mathematical ability Pearson Correlation 1 .365*

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 30 30

English proficiency Pearson Correlation .365* 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 30 30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).