Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Consumer Behavior Case Study: DAIKIN INDIA
Consumer Behavior Case Study: DAIKIN INDIA
who came to know about this situation and that has helped you to
plan the precautionary measures henceforth this sort of problem
would not arise anymore. Now, give your marketing solutions
regarding how to integrate all the different component of the
marketing team and service domains to provide the best consumer
service to retain and upgrade the positive sentiment about the brand.
This case illustrates about Daikin India's service experience of a former customer
encountered by Sarbani and her family. The customer gains a product knowledge about AC,
with her family's approval Sarbani, i.e., the customer, finally decides to buy a new AC with
the following features:
(i) Cost-Effective
(ii) Technologically featured (USP of the Product)
(iii)Eco-Friendly Benefits (Use of R-32 Gas as Societal Utility)
Thus, we come to find Daikin, a technology-oriented brand as their USP and the 4th best-
selling and service providing brand in India, while the specific product meets all the
customer's needs. But lately, it took a dramatic turn for which the customer regrets having
this Daikin Split Inverter AC (Cognitive Dissonance) and shares all her experience. As the
Brand Manager of Daikin India, we'll first try to identify all the issues occurred and then
discuss the holistic solutions to integrate a positive perspective on the same.
Page 1 of 3
Issues identified:
• Poorly trained Technicians: All the Technicians who visited Sarbani’s house could
not diagnose the issue. They all visually inspected the ODU and IDU but the problem
actually laid with the copper pipe; it was only discovered when the technical engineer
arrived. In this observation, we know that the technicians were not well trained in
technicality, which also becomes the biggest drawback for this issue.
• Unavailability of prior Resources: The R-32 gas was not in stock with the service
provider as it was one of the essential resources while servicing. The ODU was sent
for an inspection in the second instance because the IDU was also not currently
available with them.
• Unprofessionalism and Commitment Failure: There are several observations to
accept the lack of professionalism among the service provider. Promises were broken,
assurances were never kept, expectations were never met. Most of the technicians
delayed the service response time; few even never showed up, which is also the most
significant reason for disappointment.
• Non-Exclusivity of the Service: During the appointment, the customer was handed
another company’s receipt claiming that the service provider is partnered with more
than one brand. During the official tenure of the warranty, the service provider should
produce with a Daikin Exclusive receipt rather than another brand’s trademark.
Page 2 of 3
Holistic approaches to integrate positive Solutions:
Page 3 of 3